<h3><SPAN name="chap17"></SPAN>[ 17 ]</h3>
<p>What parallel courses did Bloom and Stephen follow returning?</p>
<p>Starting united both at normal walking pace from Beresford place they followed
in the order named Lower and Middle Gardiner streets and Mountjoy square, west:
then, at reduced pace, each bearing left, Gardiner’s place by an inadvertence
as far as the farther corner of Temple street: then, at reduced pace with
interruptions of halt, bearing right, Temple street, north, as far as Hardwicke
place. Approaching, disparate, at relaxed walking pace they crossed both the
circus before George’s church diametrically, the chord in any circle being less
than the arc which it subtends.</p>
<p>Of what did the duumvirate deliberate during their itinerary?</p>
<p>Music, literature, Ireland, Dublin, Paris, friendship, woman, prostitution,
diet, the influence of gaslight or the light of arc and glowlamps on the growth
of adjoining paraheliotropic trees, exposed corporation emergency dustbuckets,
the Roman catholic church, ecclesiastical celibacy, the Irish nation, jesuit
education, careers, the study of medicine, the past day, the maleficent
influence of the presabbath, Stephen’s collapse.</p>
<p>Did Bloom discover common factors of similarity between their respective like
and unlike reactions to experience?</p>
<p>Both were sensitive to artistic impressions, musical in preference to plastic
or pictorial. Both preferred a continental to an insular manner of life, a
cisatlantic to a transatlantic place of residence. Both indurated by early
domestic training and an inherited tenacity of heterodox resistance professed
their disbelief in many orthodox religious, national, social and ethical
doctrines. Both admitted the alternately stimulating and obtunding influence of
heterosexual magnetism.</p>
<p>Were their views on some points divergent?</p>
<p>Stephen dissented openly from Bloom’s views on the importance of dietary and
civic selfhelp while Bloom dissented tacitly from Stephen’s views on the
eternal affirmation of the spirit of man in literature. Bloom assented covertly
to Stephen’s rectification of the anachronism involved in assigning the date of
the conversion of the Irish nation to christianity from druidism by Patrick son
of Calpornus, son of Potitus, son of Odyssus, sent by pope Celestine I in the
year 432 in the reign of Leary to the year 260 or thereabouts in the reign of
Cormac MacArt († 266 A.D.), suffocated by imperfect deglutition of aliment at
Sletty and interred at Rossnaree. The collapse which Bloom ascribed to gastric
inanition and certain chemical compounds of varying degrees of adulteration and
alcoholic strength, accelerated by mental exertion and the velocity of rapid
circular motion in a relaxing atmosphere, Stephen attributed to the
reapparition of a matutinal cloud (perceived by both from two different points
of observation Sandycove and Dublin) at first no bigger than a woman’s hand.</p>
<p>Was there one point on which their views were equal and negative?</p>
<p>The influence of gaslight or electric light on the growth of adjoining
paraheliotropic trees.</p>
<p>Had Bloom discussed similar subjects during nocturnal perambulations in the
past?</p>
<p>In 1884 with Owen Goldberg and Cecil Turnbull at night on public thoroughfares
between Longwood avenue and Leonard’s corner and Leonard’s corner and Synge
street and Synge street and Bloomfield avenue. In 1885 with Percy Apjohn in the
evenings, reclined against the wall between Gibraltar villa and Bloomfield
house in Crumlin, barony of Uppercross. In 1886 occasionally with casual
acquaintances and prospective purchasers on doorsteps, in front parlours, in
third class railway carriages of suburban lines. In 1888 frequently with major
Brian Tweedy and his daughter Miss Marion Tweedy, together and separately on
the lounge in Matthew Dillon’s house in Roundtown. Once in 1892 and once in
1893 with Julius (Juda) Mastiansky, on both occasions in the parlour of his
(Bloom’s) house in Lombard street, west.</p>
<p>What reflection concerning the irregular sequence of dates 1884, 1885, 1886,
1888, 1892, 1893, 1904 did Bloom make before their arrival at their
destination?</p>
<p>He reflected that the progressive extension of the field of individual
development and experience was regressively accompanied by a restriction of the
converse domain of interindividual relations.</p>
<p>As in what ways?</p>
<p>From inexistence to existence he came to many and was as one received:
existence with existence he was with any as any with any: from existence to
nonexistence gone he would be by all as none perceived.</p>
<p>What act did Bloom make on their arrival at their destination?</p>
<p>At the housesteps of the 4th of the equidifferent uneven numbers, number 7
Eccles street, he inserted his hand mechanically into the back pocket of his
trousers to obtain his latchkey.</p>
<p>Was it there?</p>
<p>It was in the corresponding pocket of the trousers which he had worn on the day
but one preceding.</p>
<p>Why was he doubly irritated?</p>
<p>Because he had forgotten and because he remembered that he had reminded himself
twice not to forget.</p>
<p>What were then the alternatives before the, premeditatedly (respectively) and
inadvertently, keyless couple?</p>
<p>To enter or not to enter. To knock or not to knock.</p>
<p>Bloom’s decision?</p>
<p>A stratagem. Resting his feet on the dwarf wall, he climbed over the area
railings, compressed his hat on his head, grasped two points at the lower union
of rails and stiles, lowered his body gradually by its length of five feet nine
inches and a half to within two feet ten inches of the area pavement and
allowed his body to move freely in space by separating himself from the
railings and crouching in preparation for the impact of the fall.</p>
<p>Did he fall?</p>
<p>By his body’s known weight of eleven stone and four pounds in avoirdupois
measure, as certified by the graduated machine for periodical selfweighing in
the premises of Francis Froedman, pharmaceutical chemist of 19 Frederick
street, north, on the last feast of the Ascension, to wit, the twelfth day of
May of the bissextile year one thousand nine hundred and four of the christian
era (jewish era five thousand six hundred and sixtyfour, mohammadan era one
thousand three hundred and twentytwo), golden number 5, epact 13, solar cycle
9, dominical letters C B, Roman indiction 2, Julian period 6617, MCMIV.</p>
<p>Did he rise uninjured by concussion?</p>
<p>Regaining new stable equilibrium he rose uninjured though concussed by the
impact, raised the latch of the area door by the exertion of force at its
freely moving flange and by leverage of the first kind applied at its fulcrum,
gained retarded access to the kitchen through the subadjacent scullery, ignited
a lucifer match by friction, set free inflammable coal gas by turning on the
ventcock, lit a high flame which, by regulating, he reduced to quiescent
candescence and lit finally a portable candle.</p>
<p>What discrete succession of images did Stephen meanwhile perceive?</p>
<p>Reclined against the area railings he perceived through the transparent kitchen
panes a man regulating a gasflame of 14 CP, a man lighting a candle of 1 CP, a
man removing in turn each of his two boots, a man leaving the kitchen holding a
candle.</p>
<p>Did the man reappear elsewhere?</p>
<p>After a lapse of four minutes the glimmer of his candle was discernible through
the semitransparent semicircular glass fanlight over the halldoor. The halldoor
turned gradually on its hinges. In the open space of the doorway the man
reappeared without his hat, with his candle.</p>
<p>Did Stephen obey his sign?</p>
<p>Yes, entering softly, he helped to close and chain the door and followed softly
along the hallway the man’s back and listed feet and lighted candle past a
lighted crevice of doorway on the left and carefully down a turning staircase
of more than five steps into the kitchen of Bloom’s house.</p>
<p>What did Bloom do?</p>
<p>He extinguished the candle by a sharp expiration of breath upon its flame, drew
two spoonseat deal chairs to the hearthstone, one for Stephen with its back to
the area window, the other for himself when necessary, knelt on one knee,
composed in the grate a pyre of crosslaid resintipped sticks and various
coloured papers and irregular polygons of best Abram coal at twentyone
shillings a ton from the yard of Messrs Flower and M’Donald of 14 D’Olier
street, kindled it at three projecting points of paper with one ignited lucifer
match, thereby releasing the potential energy contained in the fuel by allowing
its carbon and hydrogen elements to enter into free union with the oxygen of
the air.</p>
<p>Of what similar apparitions did Stephen think?</p>
<p>Of others elsewhere in other times who, kneeling on one knee or on two, had
kindled fires for him, of Brother Michael in the infirmary of the college of
the Society of Jesus at Clongowes Wood, Sallins, in the county of Kildare: of
his father, Simon Dedalus, in an unfurnished room of his first residence in
Dublin, number thirteen Fitzgibbon street: of his godmother Miss Kate Morkan in
the house of her dying sister Miss Julia Morkan at 15 Usher’s Island: of his
aunt Sara, wife of Richie (Richard) Goulding, in the kitchen of their lodgings
at 62 Clanbrassil street: of his mother Mary, wife of Simon Dedalus, in the
kitchen of number twelve North Richmond street on the morning of the feast of
Saint Francis Xavier 1898: of the dean of studies, Father Butt, in the physics’
theatre of university College, 16 Stephen’s Green, north: of his sister Dilly
(Delia) in his father’s house in Cabra.</p>
<p>What did Stephen see on raising his gaze to the height of a yard from the fire
towards the opposite wall?</p>
<p>Under a row of five coiled spring housebells a curvilinear rope, stretched
between two holdfasts athwart across the recess beside the chimney pier, from
which hung four smallsized square handkerchiefs folded unattached consecutively
in adjacent rectangles and one pair of ladies’ grey hose with Lisle suspender
tops and feet in their habitual position clamped by three erect wooden pegs two
at their outer extremities and the third at their point of junction.</p>
<p>What did Bloom see on the range?</p>
<p>On the right (smaller) hob a blue enamelled saucepan: on the left (larger) hob
a black iron kettle.</p>
<p>What did Bloom do at the range?</p>
<p>He removed the saucepan to the left hob, rose and carried the iron kettle to
the sink in order to tap the current by turning the faucet to let it flow.</p>
<p>Did it flow?</p>
<p>Yes. From Roundwood reservoir in county Wicklow of a cubic capacity of 2400
million gallons, percolating through a subterranean aqueduct of filter mains of
single and double pipeage constructed at an initial plant cost of £ 5 per
linear yard by way of the Dargle, Rathdown, Glen of the Downs and Callowhill to
the 26 acre reservoir at Stillorgan, a distance of 22 statute miles, and
thence, through a system of relieving tanks, by a gradient of 250 feet to the
city boundary at Eustace bridge, upper Leeson street, though from prolonged
summer drouth and daily supply of 12 1/2 million gallons the water had fallen
below the sill of the overflow weir for which reason the borough surveyor and
waterworks engineer, Mr Spencer Harty, C. E., on the instructions of the
waterworks committee had prohibited the use of municipal water for purposes
other than those of consumption (envisaging the possibility of recourse being
had to the impotable water of the Grand and Royal canals as in 1893)
particularly as the South Dublin Guardians, notwithstanding their ration of 15
gallons per day per pauper supplied through a 6 inch meter, had been convicted
of a wastage of 20,000 gallons per night by a reading of their meter on the
affirmation of the law agent of the corporation, Mr Ignatius Rice, solicitor,
thereby acting to the detriment of another section of the public,
selfsupporting taxpayers, solvent, sound.</p>
<p>What in water did Bloom, waterlover, drawer of water, watercarrier, returning
to the range, admire?</p>
<p>Its universality: its democratic equality and constancy to its nature in
seeking its own level: its vastness in the ocean of Mercator’s projection: its
unplumbed profundity in the Sundam trench of the Pacific exceeding 8000
fathoms: the restlessness of its waves and surface particles visiting in turn
all points of its seaboard: the independence of its units: the variability of
states of sea: its hydrostatic quiescence in calm: its hydrokinetic turgidity
in neap and spring tides: its subsidence after devastation: its sterility in
the circumpolar icecaps, arctic and antarctic: its climatic and commercial
significance: its preponderance of 3 to 1 over the dry land of the globe: its
indisputable hegemony extending in square leagues over all the region below the
subequatorial tropic of Capricorn: the multisecular stability of its primeval
basin: its luteofulvous bed: its capacity to dissolve and hold in solution all
soluble substances including millions of tons of the most precious metals: its
slow erosions of peninsulas and islands, its persistent formation of homothetic
islands, peninsulas and downwardtending promontories: its alluvial deposits:
its weight and volume and density: its imperturbability in lagoons and highland
tarns: its gradation of colours in the torrid and temperate and frigid zones:
its vehicular ramifications in continental lakecontained streams and confluent
oceanflowing rivers with their tributaries and transoceanic currents,
gulfstream, north and south equatorial courses: its violence in seaquakes,
waterspouts, Artesian wells, eruptions, torrents, eddies, freshets, spates,
groundswells, watersheds, waterpartings, geysers, cataracts, whirlpools,
maelstroms, inundations, deluges, cloudbursts: its vast circumterrestrial
ahorizontal curve: its secrecy in springs and latent humidity, revealed by
rhabdomantic or hygrometric instruments and exemplified by the well by the hole
in the wall at Ashtown gate, saturation of air, distillation of dew: the
simplicity of its composition, two constituent parts of hydrogen with one
constituent part of oxygen: its healing virtues: its buoyancy in the waters of
the Dead Sea: its persevering penetrativeness in runnels, gullies, inadequate
dams, leaks on shipboard: its properties for cleansing, quenching thirst and
fire, nourishing vegetation: its infallibility as paradigm and paragon: its
metamorphoses as vapour, mist, cloud, rain, sleet, snow, hail: its strength in
rigid hydrants: its variety of forms in loughs and bays and gulfs and bights
and guts and lagoons and atolls and archipelagos and sounds and fjords and
minches and tidal estuaries and arms of sea: its solidity in glaciers,
icebergs, icefloes: its docility in working hydraulic millwheels, turbines,
dynamos, electric power stations, bleachworks, tanneries, scutchmills: its
utility in canals, rivers, if navigable, floating and graving docks: its
potentiality derivable from harnessed tides or watercourses falling from level
to level: its submarine fauna and flora (anacoustic, photophobe), numerically,
if not literally, the inhabitants of the globe: its ubiquity as constituting 90
% of the human body: the noxiousness of its effluvia in lacustrine marshes,
pestilential fens, faded flowerwater, stagnant pools in the waning moon.</p>
<p>Having set the halffilled kettle on the now burning coals, why did he return to
the stillflowing tap?</p>
<p>To wash his soiled hands with a partially consumed tablet of Barrington’s
lemonflavoured soap, to which paper still adhered, (bought thirteen hours
previously for fourpence and still unpaid for), in fresh cold neverchanging
everchanging water and dry them, face and hands, in a long redbordered holland
cloth passed over a wooden revolving roller.</p>
<p>What reason did Stephen give for declining Bloom’s offer?</p>
<p>That he was hydrophobe, hating partial contact by immersion or total by
submersion in cold water, (his last bath having taken place in the month of
October of the preceding year), disliking the aqueous substances of glass and
crystal, distrusting aquacities of thought and language.</p>
<p>What impeded Bloom from giving Stephen counsels of hygiene and prophylactic to
which should be added suggestions concerning a preliminary wetting of the head
and contraction of the muscles with rapid splashing of the face and neck and
thoracic and epigastric region in case of sea or river bathing, the parts of
the human anatomy most sensitive to cold being the nape, stomach and thenar or
sole of foot?</p>
<p>The incompatibility of aquacity with the erratic originality of genius.</p>
<p>What additional didactic counsels did he similarly repress?</p>
<p>Dietary: concerning the respective percentage of protein and caloric energy in
bacon, salt ling and butter, the absence of the former in the lastnamed and the
abundance of the latter in the firstnamed.</p>
<p>Which seemed to the host to be the predominant qualities of his guest?</p>
<p>Confidence in himself, an equal and opposite power of abandonment and
recuperation.</p>
<p>What concomitant phenomenon took place in the vessel of liquid by the agency of
fire?</p>
<p>The phenomenon of ebullition. Fanned by a constant updraught of ventilation
between the kitchen and the chimneyflue, ignition was communicated from the
faggots of precombustible fuel to polyhedral masses of bituminous coal,
containing in compressed mineral form the foliated fossilised decidua of
primeval forests which had in turn derived their vegetative existence from the
sun, primal source of heat (radiant), transmitted through omnipresent
luminiferous diathermanous ether. Heat (convected), a mode of motion developed
by such combustion, was constantly and increasingly conveyed from the source of
calorification to the liquid contained in the vessel, being radiated through
the uneven unpolished dark surface of the metal iron, in part reflected, in
part absorbed, in part transmitted, gradually raising the temperature of the
water from normal to boiling point, a rise in temperature expressible as the
result of an expenditure of 72 thermal units needed to raise 1 pound of water
from 50° to 212° Fahrenheit.</p>
<p>What announced the accomplishment of this rise in temperature?</p>
<p>A double falciform ejection of water vapour from under the kettlelid at both
sides simultaneously.</p>
<p>For what personal purpose could Bloom have applied the water so boiled?</p>
<p>To shave himself.</p>
<p>What advantages attended shaving by night?</p>
<p>A softer beard: a softer brush if intentionally allowed to remain from shave to
shave in its agglutinated lather: a softer skin if unexpectedly encountering
female acquaintances in remote places at incustomary hours: quiet reflections
upon the course of the day: a cleaner sensation when awaking after a fresher
sleep since matutinal noises, premonitions and perturbations, a clattered
milkcan, a postman’s double knock, a paper read, reread while lathering,
relathering the same spot, a shock, a shoot, with thought of aught he sought
though fraught with nought might cause a faster rate of shaving and a nick on
which incision plaster with precision cut and humected and applied adhered:
which was to be done.</p>
<p>Why did absence of light disturb him less than presence of noise?</p>
<p>Because of the surety of the sense of touch in his firm full masculine feminine
passive active hand.</p>
<p>What quality did it (his hand) possess but with what counteracting influence?</p>
<p>The operative surgical quality but that he was reluctant to shed human blood
even when the end justified the means, preferring, in their natural order,
heliotherapy, psychophysicotherapeutics, osteopathic surgery.</p>
<p>What lay under exposure on the lower, middle and upper shelves of the kitchen
dresser, opened by Bloom?</p>
<p>On the lower shelf five vertical breakfast plates, six horizontal breakfast
saucers on which rested inverted breakfast cups, a moustachecup, uninverted,
and saucer of Crown Derby, four white goldrimmed eggcups, an open shammy purse
displaying coins, mostly copper, and a phial of aromatic (violet) comfits. On
the middle shelf a chipped eggcup containing pepper, a drum of table salt, four
conglomerated black olives in oleaginous paper, an empty pot of Plumtree’s
potted meat, an oval wicker basket bedded with fibre and containing one Jersey
pear, a halfempty bottle of William Gilbey and Co’s white invalid port, half
disrobed of its swathe of coralpink tissue paper, a packet of Epps’s soluble
cocoa, five ounces of Anne Lynch’s choice tea at 2/- per lb in a crinkled
leadpaper bag, a cylindrical canister containing the best crystallised lump
sugar, two onions, one, the larger, Spanish, entire, the other, smaller, Irish,
bisected with augmented surface and more redolent, a jar of Irish Model Dairy’s
cream, a jug of brown crockery containing a naggin and a quarter of soured
adulterated milk, converted by heat into water, acidulous serum and
semisolidified curds, which added to the quantity subtracted for Mr Bloom’s and
Mrs Fleming’s breakfasts, made one imperial pint, the total quantity originally
delivered, two cloves, a halfpenny and a small dish containing a slice of fresh
ribsteak. On the upper shelf a battery of jamjars (empty) of various sizes and
proveniences.</p>
<p>What attracted his attention lying on the apron of the dresser?</p>
<p>Four polygonal fragments of two lacerated scarlet betting tickets, numbered 8
87, 88 6.</p>
<p>What reminiscences temporarily corrugated his brow?</p>
<p>Reminiscences of coincidences, truth stranger than fiction, preindicative of
the result of the Gold Cup flat handicap, the official and definitive result of
which he had read in the <i>Evening Telegraph</i>, late pink edition, in the
cabman’s shelter, at Butt bridge.</p>
<p>Where had previous intimations of the result, effected or projected, been
received by him?</p>
<p>In Bernard Kiernan’s licensed premises 8, 9 and 10 little Britain street: in
David Byrne’s licensed premises, 14 Duke street: in O’Connell street lower,
outside Graham Lemon’s when a dark man had placed in his hand a throwaway
(subsequently thrown away), advertising Elijah, restorer of the church in Zion:
in Lincoln place outside the premises of F. W. Sweny and Co (Limited),
dispensing chemists, when, when Frederick M. (Bantam) Lyons had rapidly and
successively requested, perused and restituted the copy of the current issue of
the <i>Freeman’s Journal</i> and <i>National Press</i> which he had been about
to throw away (subsequently thrown away), he had proceeded towards the oriental
edifice of the Turkish and Warm Baths, 11 Leinster street, with the light of
inspiration shining in his countenance and bearing in his arms the secret of
the race, graven in the language of prediction.</p>
<p>What qualifying considerations allayed his perturbations?</p>
<p>The difficulties of interpretation since the significance of any event followed
its occurrence as variably as the acoustic report followed the electrical
discharge and of counterestimating against an actual loss by failure to
interpret the total sum of possible losses proceeding originally from a
successful interpretation.</p>
<p>His mood?</p>
<p>He had not risked, he did not expect, he had not been disappointed, he was
satisfied.</p>
<p>What satisfied him?</p>
<p>To have sustained no positive loss. To have brought a positive gain to others.
Light to the gentiles.</p>
<p>How did Bloom prepare a collation for a gentile?</p>
<p>He poured into two teacups two level spoonfuls, four in all, of Epps’s soluble
cocoa and proceeded according to the directions for use printed on the label,
to each adding after sufficient time for infusion the prescribed ingredients
for diffusion in the manner and in the quantity prescribed.</p>
<p>What supererogatory marks of special hospitality did the host show his guest?</p>
<p>Relinquishing his symposiarchal right to the moustache cup of imitation Crown
Derby presented to him by his only daughter, Millicent (Milly), he substituted
a cup identical with that of his guest and served extraordinarily to his guest
and, in reduced measure, to himself the viscous cream ordinarily reserved for
the breakfast of his wife Marion (Molly).</p>
<p>Was the guest conscious of and did he acknowledge these marks of hospitality?</p>
<p>His attention was directed to them by his host jocosely, and he accepted them
seriously as they drank in jocoserious silence Epps’s massproduct, the creature
cocoa.</p>
<p>Were there marks of hospitality which he contemplated but suppressed, reserving
them for another and for himself on future occasions to complete the act begun?</p>
<p>The reparation of a fissure of the length of 1 1/2 inches in the right side of
his guest’s jacket. A gift to his guest of one of the four lady’s
handkerchiefs, if and when ascertained to be in a presentable condition.</p>
<p>Who drank more quickly?</p>
<p>Bloom, having the advantage of ten seconds at the initiation and taking, from
the concave surface of a spoon along the handle of which a steady flow of heat
was conducted, three sips to his opponent’s one, six to two, nine to three.</p>
<p>What cerebration accompanied his frequentative act?</p>
<p>Concluding by inspection but erroneously that his silent companion was engaged
in mental composition he reflected on the pleasures derived from literature of
instruction rather than of amusement as he himself had applied to the works of
William Shakespeare more than once for the solution of difficult problems in
imaginary or real life.</p>
<p>Had he found their solution?</p>
<p>In spite of careful and repeated reading of certain classical passages, aided
by a glossary, he had derived imperfect conviction from the text, the answers
not bearing in all points.</p>
<p>What lines concluded his first piece of original verse written by him,
potential poet, at the age of 11 in 1877 on the occasion of the offering of
three prizes of 10/-, 5/- and 2/6 respectively for competition by the
<i>Shamrock</i>, a weekly newspaper?</p>
<p class="poem">
An ambition to squint<br/>
At my verses in print<br/>
Makes me hope that for these you’ll find room.<br/>
If you so condescend<br/>
Then please place at the end<br/>
The name of yours truly, L. Bloom.</p>
<p>Did he find four separating forces between his temporary guest and him?</p>
<p>Name, age, race, creed.</p>
<p>What anagrams had he made on his name in youth?</p>
<p>Leopold Bloom<br/>
Ellpodbomool<br/>
Molldopeloob<br/>
Bollopedoom<br/>
Old Ollebo, M. P.</p>
<p>What acrostic upon the abbreviation of his first name had he (kinetic poet)
sent to Miss Marion (Molly) Tweedy on the 14 February 1888?</p>
<p class="poem">
<b>P</b>oets oft have sung in rhyme<br/>
<b>O</b>f music sweet their praise divine.<br/>
<b>L</b>et them hymn it nine times nine.<br/>
<b>D</b>earer far than song or wine.<br/>
<b>Y</b>ou are mine. The world is mine.</p>
<p>What had prevented him from completing a topical song (music by R. G. Johnston)
on the events of the past, or fixtures for the actual, years, entitled <i>If
Brian Boru could but come back and see old Dublin now</i>, commissioned by
Michael Gunn, lessee of the Gaiety Theatre, 46, 47, 48, 49 South King street,
and to be introduced into the sixth scene, the valley of diamonds, of the
second edition (30 January 1893) of the grand annual Christmas pantomime
<i>Sinbad the Sailor</i> (produced by R. Shelton 26 December 1892, written by
Greenleaf Whittier, scenery by George A. Jackson and Cecil Hicks, costumes by
Mrs and Miss Whelan under the personal supervision of Mrs Michael Gunn, ballets
by Jessie Noir, harlequinade by Thomas Otto) and sung by Nelly Bouverist,
principal girl?</p>
<p>Firstly, oscillation between events of imperial and of local interest, the
anticipated diamond jubilee of Queen Victoria (born 1820, acceded 1837) and the
posticipated opening of the new municipal fish market: secondly, apprehension
of opposition from extreme circles on the questions of the respective visits of
Their Royal Highnesses the duke and duchess of York (real) and of His Majesty
King Brian Boru (imaginary): thirdly, a conflict between professional etiquette
and professional emulation concerning the recent erections of the Grand Lyric
Hall on Burgh Quay and the Theatre Royal in Hawkins street: fourthly,
distraction resultant from compassion for Nelly Bouverist’s non-intellectual,
non-political, non-topical expression of countenance and concupiscence caused
by Nelly Bouverist’s revelations of white articles of non-intellectual,
non-political, non-topical underclothing while she (Nelly Bouverist) was in the
articles: fifthly, the difficulties of the selection of appropriate music and
humorous allusions from <i>Everybody’s Book of Jokes</i> (1000 pages and a
laugh in every one): sixthly, the rhymes, homophonous and cacophonous,
associated with the names of the new lord mayor, Daniel Tallon, the new high
sheriff, Thomas Pile and the new solicitorgeneral, Dunbar Plunket Barton.</p>
<p>What relation existed between their ages?</p>
<p>16 years before in 1888 when Bloom was of Stephen’s present age Stephen was 6.
16 years after in 1920 when Stephen would be of Bloom’s present age Bloom would
be 54. In 1936 when Bloom would be 70 and Stephen 54 their ages initially in
the ratio of 16 to 0 would be as 17 1/2 to 13 1/2, the proportion increasing
and the disparity diminishing according as arbitrary future years were added,
for if the proportion existing in 1883 had continued immutable, conceiving that
to be possible, till then 1904 when Stephen was 22 Bloom would be 374 and in
1920 when Stephen would be 38, as Bloom then was, Bloom would be 646 while in
1952 when Stephen would have attained the maximum postdiluvian age of 70 Bloom,
being 1190 years alive having been born in the year 714, would have surpassed
by 221 years the maximum antediluvian age, that of Methusalah, 969 years,
while, if Stephen would continue to live until he would attain that age in the
year 3072 A.D., Bloom would have been obliged to have been alive 83,300 years,
having been obliged to have been born in the year 81,396 B.C.</p>
<p>What events might nullify these calculations?</p>
<p>The cessation of existence of both or either, the inauguration of a new era or
calendar, the annihilation of the world and consequent extermination of the
human species, inevitable but impredictable.</p>
<p>How many previous encounters proved their preexisting acquaintance?</p>
<p>Two. The first in the lilacgarden of Matthew Dillon’s house, Medina Villa,
Kimmage road, Roundtown, in 1887, in the company of Stephen’s mother, Stephen
being then of the age of 5 and reluctant to give his hand in salutation. The
second in the coffeeroom of Breslin’s hotel on a rainy Sunday in the January of
1892, in the company of Stephen’s father and Stephen’s granduncle, Stephen
being then 5 years older.</p>
<p>Did Bloom accept the invitation to dinner given then by the son and afterwards
seconded by the father?</p>
<p>Very gratefully, with grateful appreciation, with sincere appreciative
gratitude, in appreciatively grateful sincerity of regret, he declined.</p>
<p>Did their conversation on the subject of these reminiscences reveal a third
connecting link between them?</p>
<p>Mrs Riordan (Dante), a widow of independent means, had resided in the house of
Stephen’s parents from 1 September 1888 to 29 December 1891 and had also
resided during the years 1892, 1893 and 1894 in the City Arms Hotel owned by
Elizabeth O’Dowd of 54 Prussia street where, during parts of the years 1893 and
1894, she had been a constant informant of Bloom who resided also in the same
hotel, being at that time a clerk in the employment of Joseph Cuffe of 5
Smithfield for the superintendence of sales in the adjacent Dublin Cattle
market on the North Circular road.</p>
<p>Had he performed any special corporal work of mercy for her?</p>
<p>He had sometimes propelled her on warm summer evenings, an infirm widow of
independent, if limited, means, in her convalescent bathchair with slow
revolutions of its wheels as far as the corner of the North Circular road
opposite Mr Gavin Low’s place of business where she had remained for a certain
time scanning through his onelensed binocular fieldglasses unrecognisable
citizens on tramcars, roadster bicycles equipped with inflated pneumatic tyres,
hackney carriages, tandems, private and hired landaus, dogcarts, ponytraps and
brakes passing from the city to the Phoenix Park and <i>vice versa</i>.</p>
<p>Why could he then support that his vigil with the greater equanimity?</p>
<p>Because in middle youth he had often sat observing through a rondel of bossed
glass of a multicoloured pane the spectacle offered with continual changes of
the thoroughfare without, pedestrians, quadrupeds, velocipedes, vehicles,
passing slowly, quickly, evenly, round and round and round the rim of a round
and round precipitous globe.</p>
<p>What distinct different memories had each of her now eight years deceased?</p>
<p>The older, her bezique cards and counters, her Skye terrier, her suppositious
wealth, her lapses of responsiveness and incipient catarrhal deafness: the
younger, her lamp of colza oil before the statue of the Immaculate Conception,
her green and maroon brushes for Charles Stewart Parnell and for Michael
Davitt, her tissue papers.</p>
<p>Were there no means still remaining to him to achieve the rejuvenation which
these reminiscences divulged to a younger companion rendered the more
desirable?</p>
<p>The indoor exercises, formerly intermittently practised, subsequently
abandoned, prescribed in Eugen Sandow’s <i>Physical Strength and How to Obtain
It</i> which, designed particularly for commercial men engaged in sedentary
occupations, were to be made with mental concentration in front of a mirror so
as to bring into play the various families of muscles and produce successively
a pleasant rigidity, a more pleasant relaxation and the most pleasant
repristination of juvenile agility.</p>
<p>Had any special agility been his in earlier youth?</p>
<p>Though ringweight lifting had been beyond his strength and the full circle
gyration beyond his courage yet as a High school scholar he had excelled in his
stable and protracted execution of the half lever movement on the parallel bars
in consequence of his abnormally developed abdominal muscles.</p>
<p>Did either openly allude to their racial difference?</p>
<p>Neither.</p>
<p>What, reduced to their simplest reciprocal form, were Bloom’s thoughts about
Stephen’s thoughts about Bloom and about Stephen’s thoughts about Bloom’s
thoughts about Stephen?</p>
<p>He thought that he thought that he was a jew whereas he knew that he knew that
he knew that he was not.</p>
<p>What, the enclosures of reticence removed, were their respective parentages?</p>
<p>Bloom, only born male transubstantial heir of Rudolf Virag (subsequently
Rudolph Bloom) of Szombathely, Vienna, Budapest, Milan, London and Dublin and
of Ellen Higgins, second daughter of Julius Higgins (born Karoly) and Fanny
Higgins (born Hegarty). Stephen, eldest surviving male consubstantial heir of
Simon Dedalus of Cork and Dublin and of Mary, daughter of Richard and Christina
Goulding (born Grier).</p>
<p>Had Bloom and Stephen been baptised, and where and by whom, cleric or layman?</p>
<p>Bloom (three times), by the reverend Mr Gilmer Johnston M. A., alone, in the
protestant church of Saint Nicholas Without, Coombe, by James O’Connor, Philip
Gilligan and James Fitzpatrick, together, under a pump in the village of
Swords, and by the reverend Charles Malone C. C., in the church of the Three
Patrons, Rathgar. Stephen (once) by the reverend Charles Malone C. C., alone,
in the church of the Three Patrons, Rathgar.</p>
<p>Did they find their educational careers similar?</p>
<p>Substituting Stephen for Bloom Stoom would have passed successively through a
dame’s school and the high school. Substituting Bloom for Stephen Blephen would
have passed successively through the preparatory, junior, middle and senior
grades of the intermediate and through the matriculation, first arts, second
arts and arts degree courses of the royal university.</p>
<p>Why did Bloom refrain from stating that he had frequented the university of
life?</p>
<p>Because of his fluctuating incertitude as to whether this observation had or
had not been already made by him to Stephen or by Stephen to him.</p>
<p>What two temperaments did they individually represent?</p>
<p>The scientific. The artistic.</p>
<p>What proofs did Bloom adduce to prove that his tendency was towards applied,
rather than towards pure, science?</p>
<p>Certain possible inventions of which he had cogitated when reclining in a state
of supine repletion to aid digestion, stimulated by his appreciation of the
importance of inventions now common but once revolutionary, for example, the
aeronautic parachute, the reflecting telescope, the spiral corkscrew, the
safety pin, the mineral water siphon, the canal lock with winch and sluice, the
suction pump.</p>
<p>Were these inventions principally intended for an improved scheme of
kindergarten?</p>
<p>Yes, rendering obsolete popguns, elastic airbladders, games of hazard,
catapults. They comprised astronomical kaleidoscopes exhibiting the twelve
constellations of the zodiac from Aries to Pisces, miniature mechanical
orreries, arithmetical gelatine lozenges, geometrical to correspond with
zoological biscuits, globemap playing balls, historically costumed dolls.</p>
<p>What also stimulated him in his cogitations?</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />