<p>What two temperaments did they individually represent?</p>
<p>The scientific. The artistic.</p>
<p>What proofs did Bloom adduce to prove that his tendency was towards
applied, rather than towards pure, science?</p>
<p>Certain possible inventions of which he had cogitated when reclining in a
state of supine repletion to aid digestion, stimulated by his appreciation
of the importance of inventions now common but once revolutionary, for
example, the aeronautic parachute, the reflecting telescope, the spiral
corkscrew, the safety pin, the mineral water siphon, the canal lock with
winch and sluice, the suction pump.</p>
<p>Were these inventions principally intended for an improved scheme of
kindergarten?</p>
<p>Yes, rendering obsolete popguns, elastic airbladders, games of hazard,
catapults. They comprised astronomical kaleidoscopes exhibiting the twelve
constellations of the zodiac from Aries to Pisces, miniature mechanical
orreries, arithmetical gelatine lozenges, geometrical to correspond with
zoological biscuits, globemap playing balls, historically costumed dolls.</p>
<p>What also stimulated him in his cogitations?</p>
<p>The financial success achieved by Ephraim Marks and Charles A. James, the
former by his 1d bazaar at 42 George's street, south, the latter at his 6
1/2d shop and world's fancy fair and waxwork exhibition at 30 Henry
street, admission 2d, children 1d: and the infinite possibilities hitherto
unexploited of the modern art of advertisement if condensed in triliteral
monoideal symbols, vertically of maximum visibility (divined),
horizontally of maximum legibility (deciphered) and of magnetising
efficacy to arrest involuntary attention, to interest, to convince, to
decide.</p>
<p>Such as?</p>
<p>K. II. Kino's 11/- Trousers. House of Keys. Alexander J. Keyes.</p>
<p>Such as not?</p>
<p>Look at this long candle. Calculate when it burns out and you receive
gratis 1 pair of our special non-compo boots, guaranteed 1 candle power.
Address: Barclay and Cook, 18 Talbot street.</p>
<p>Bacilikil (Insect Powder). Veribest (Boot Blacking). Uwantit (Combined
pocket twoblade penknife with corkscrew, nailfile and pipecleaner).</p>
<p>Such as never?</p>
<p>What is home without Plumtree's Potted Meat?</p>
<p>Incomplete.</p>
<p>With it an abode of bliss.</p>
<p>Manufactured by George Plumtree, 23 Merchants' quay, Dublin, put up in 4
oz pots, and inserted by Councillor Joseph P. Nannetti, M. P., Rotunda
Ward, 19 Hardwicke street, under the obituary notices and anniversaries of
deceases. The name on the label is Plumtree. A plumtree in a meatpot,
registered trade mark. Beware of imitations. Peatmot. Trumplee. Moutpat.
Plamtroo.</p>
<p>Which example did he adduce to induce Stephen to deduce that originality,
though producing its own reward, does not invariably conduce to success?</p>
<p>His own ideated and rejected project of an illuminated showcart, drawn by
a beast of burden, in which two smartly dressed girls were to be seated
engaged in writing.</p>
<p>What suggested scene was then constructed by Stephen?</p>
<p>Solitary hotel in mountain pass. Autumn. Twilight. Fire lit. In dark
corner young man seated. Young woman enters. Restless. Solitary. She sits.
She goes to window. She stands. She sits. Twilight. She thinks. On
solitary hotel paper she writes. She thinks. She writes. She sighs. Wheels
and hoofs. She hurries out. He comes from his dark corner. He seizes
solitary paper. He holds it towards fire. Twilight. He reads. Solitary.</p>
<p>What?</p>
<p>In sloping, upright and backhands: Queen's Hotel, Queen's Hotel, Queen's
Hotel. Queen's Ho...</p>
<p>What suggested scene was then reconstructed by Bloom?</p>
<p>The Queen's Hotel, Ennis, county Clare, where Rudolph Bloom (Rudolf Virag)
died on the evening of the 27 June 1886, at some hour unstated, in
consequence of an overdose of monkshood (aconite) selfadministered in the
form of a neuralgic liniment composed of 2 parts of aconite liniment to I
of chloroform liniment (purchased by him at 10.20 a.m. on the morning of
27 June 1886 at the medical hall of Francis Dennehy, 17 Church street,
Ennis) after having, though not in consequence of having, purchased at
3.15 p.m. on the afternoon of 27 June 1886 a new boater straw hat, extra
smart (after having, though not in consequence of having, purchased at the
hour and in the place aforesaid, the toxin aforesaid), at the general
drapery store of James Cullen, 4 Main street, Ennis.</p>
<p>Did he attribute this homonymity to information or coincidence or
intuition?</p>
<p>Coincidence.</p>
<p>Did he depict the scene verbally for his guest to see?</p>
<p>He preferred himself to see another's face and listen to another's words
by which potential narration was realised and kinetic temperament
relieved.</p>
<p>Did he see only a second coincidence in the second scene narrated to him,
described by the narrator as <i>A Pisgah Sight of Palestine or The Parable
of the Plums</i>?</p>
<p>It, with the preceding scene and with others unnarrated but existent by
implication, to which add essays on various subjects or moral apothegms
(e.g. <i>My Favourite Hero or Procrastination is the Thief of Time</i>)
composed during schoolyears, seemed to him to contain in itself and in
conjunction with the personal equation certain possibilities of financial,
social, personal and sexual success, whether specially collected and
selected as model pedagogic themes (of cent per cent merit) for the use of
preparatory and junior grade students or contributed in printed form,
following the precedent of Philip Beaufoy or Doctor Dick or Heblon's <i>Studies
in Blue</i>, to a publication of certified circulation and solvency or
employed verbally as intellectual stimulation for sympathetic auditors,
tacitly appreciative of successful narrative and confidently augurative of
successful achievement, during the increasingly longer nights gradually
following the summer solstice on the day but three following, videlicet,
Tuesday, 21 June (S. Aloysius Gonzaga), sunrise 3.33 a.m., sunset 8.29
p.m.</p>
<p>Which domestic problem as much as, if not more than, any other frequently
engaged his mind?</p>
<p>What to do with our wives.</p>
<p>What had been his hypothetical singular solutions?</p>
<p>Parlour games (dominos, halma, tiddledywinks, spilikins, cup and ball,
nap, spoil five, bezique, twentyfive, beggar my neighbour, draughts, chess
or backgammon): embroidery, darning or knitting for the policeaided
clothing society: musical duets, mandoline and guitar, piano and flute,
guitar and piano: legal scrivenery or envelope addressing: biweekly visits
to variety entertainments: commercial activity as pleasantly commanding
and pleasingly obeyed mistress proprietress in a cool dairy shop or warm
cigar divan: the clandestine satisfaction of erotic irritation in
masculine brothels, state inspected and medically controlled: social
visits, at regular infrequent prevented intervals and with regular
frequent preventive superintendence, to and from female acquaintances of
recognised respectability in the vicinity: courses of evening instruction
specially designed to render liberal instruction agreeable.</p>
<p>What instances of deficient mental development in his wife inclined him in
favour of the lastmentioned (ninth) solution?</p>
<p>In disoccupied moments she had more than once covered a sheet of paper
with signs and hieroglyphics which she stated were Greek and Irish and
Hebrew characters. She had interrogated constantly at varying intervals as
to the correct method of writing the capital initial of the name of a city
in Canada, Quebec. She understood little of political complications,
internal, or balance of power, external. In calculating the addenda of
bills she frequently had recourse to digital aid. After completion of
laconic epistolary compositions she abandoned the implement of calligraphy
in the encaustic pigment, exposed to the corrosive action of copperas,
green vitriol and nutgall. Unusual polysyllables of foreign origin she
interpreted phonetically or by false analogy or by both: metempsychosis
(met him pike hoses), <i>alias</i> (a mendacious person mentioned in
sacred scripture).</p>
<p>What compensated in the false balance of her intelligence for these and
such deficiencies of judgment regarding persons, places and things?</p>
<p>The false apparent parallelism of all perpendicular arms of all balances,
proved true by construction. The counterbalance of her proficiency of
judgment regarding one person, proved true by experiment.</p>
<p>How had he attempted to remedy this state of comparative ignorance?</p>
<p>Variously. By leaving in a conspicuous place a certain book open at a
certain page: by assuming in her, when alluding explanatorily, latent
knowledge: by open ridicule in her presence of some absent other's
ignorant lapse.</p>
<p>With what success had he attempted direct instruction?</p>
<p>She followed not all, a part of the whole, gave attention with interest
comprehended with surprise, with care repeated, with greater difficulty
remembered, forgot with ease, with misgiving reremembered, rerepeated with
error.</p>
<p>What system had proved more effective?</p>
<p>Indirect suggestion implicating selfinterest.</p>
<p>Example?</p>
<p>She disliked umbrella with rain, he liked woman with umbrella, she
disliked new hat with rain, he liked woman with new hat, he bought new hat
with rain, she carried umbrella with new hat.</p>
<p>Accepting the analogy implied in his guest's parable which examples of
postexilic eminence did he adduce?</p>
<p>Three seekers of the pure truth, Moses of Egypt, Moses Maimonides, author
of <i>More Nebukim</i> (Guide of the Perplexed) and Moses Mendelssohn of
such eminence that from Moses (of Egypt) to Moses (Mendelssohn) there
arose none like Moses (Maimonides).</p>
<p>What statement was made, under correction, by Bloom concerning a fourth
seeker of pure truth, by name Aristotle, mentioned, with permission, by
Stephen?</p>
<p>That the seeker mentioned had been a pupil of a rabbinical philosopher,
name uncertain.</p>
<p>Were other anapocryphal illustrious sons of the law and children of a
selected or rejected race mentioned?</p>
<p>Felix Bartholdy Mendelssohn (composer), Baruch Spinoza (philosopher),
Mendoza (pugilist), Ferdinand Lassalle (reformer, duellist).</p>
<p>What fragments of verse from the ancient Hebrew and ancient Irish
languages were cited with modulations of voice and translation of texts by
guest to host and by host to guest?</p>
<p>By Stephen: <i>suil, suil, suil arun, suil go siocair agus suil go cuin</i>
(walk, walk, walk your way, walk in safety, walk with care).</p>
<p>By Bloom: <i>Kkifeloch, harimon rakatejch m'baad l'zamatejch</i> (thy
temple amid thy hair is as a slice of pomegranate).</p>
<p>How was a glyphic comparison of the phonic symbols of both languages made
in substantiation of the oral comparison?</p>
<p>By juxtaposition. On the penultimate blank page of a book of inferior
literary style, entituled <i>Sweets of Sin</i> (produced by Bloom and so
manipulated that its front cover came in contact with the surface of the
table) with a pencil (supplied by Stephen) Stephen wrote the Irish
characters for gee, eh, dee, em, simple and modified, and Bloom in turn
wrote the Hebrew characters ghimel, aleph, daleth and (in the absence of
mem) a substituted qoph, explaining their arithmetical values as ordinal
and cardinal numbers, videlicet 3, 1, 4, and 100.</p>
<p>Was the knowledge possessed by both of each of these languages, the
extinct and the revived, theoretical or practical?</p>
<p>Theoretical, being confined to certain grammatical rules of accidence and
syntax and practically excluding vocabulary.</p>
<p>What points of contact existed between these languages and between the
peoples who spoke them?</p>
<p>The presence of guttural sounds, diacritic aspirations, epenthetic and
servile letters in both languages: their antiquity, both having been
taught on the plain of Shinar 242 years after the deluge in the seminary
instituted by Fenius Farsaigh, descendant of Noah, progenitor of Israel,
and ascendant of Heber and Heremon, progenitors of Ireland: their
archaeological, genealogical, hagiographical, exegetical, homiletic,
toponomastic, historical and religious literatures comprising the works of
rabbis and culdees, Torah, Talmud (Mischna and Ghemara), Massor,
Pentateuch, Book of the Dun Cow, Book of Ballymote, Garland of Howth, Book
of Kells: their dispersal, persecution, survival and revival: the
isolation of their synagogical and ecclesiastical rites in ghetto (S.
Mary's Abbey) and masshouse (Adam and Eve's tavern): the proscription of
their national costumes in penal laws and jewish dress acts: the
restoration in Chanah David of Zion and the possibility of Irish political
autonomy or devolution.</p>
<p>What anthem did Bloom chant partially in anticipation of that multiple,
ethnically irreducible consummation?</p>
<p><i>Kolod balejwaw pnimah<br/>
Nefesch, jehudi, homijah.</i><br/></p>
<p>Why was the chant arrested at the conclusion of this first distich?</p>
<p>In consequence of defective mnemotechnic.</p>
<p>How did the chanter compensate for this deficiency?</p>
<p>By a periphrastic version of the general text.</p>
<p>In what common study did their mutual reflections merge?</p>
<p>The increasing simplification traceable from the Egyptian epigraphic
hieroglyphs to the Greek and Roman alphabets and the anticipation of
modern stenography and telegraphic code in the cuneiform inscriptions
(Semitic) and the virgular quinquecostate ogham writing (Celtic). Did the
guest comply with his host's request?</p>
<p>Doubly, by appending his signature in Irish and Roman characters.</p>
<p>What was Stephen's auditive sensation?</p>
<p>He heard in a profound ancient male unfamiliar melody the accumulation of
the past.</p>
<p>What was Bloom's visual sensation?</p>
<p>He saw in a quick young male familiar form the predestination of a future.</p>
<p>What were Stephen's and Bloom's quasisimultaneous volitional
quasisensations of concealed identities?</p>
<p>Visually, Stephen's: The traditional figure of hypostasis, depicted by
Johannes Damascenus, Lentulus Romanus and Epiphanius Monachus as
leucodermic, sesquipedalian with winedark hair. Auditively, Bloom's: The
traditional accent of the ecstasy of catastrophe.</p>
<p>What future careers had been possible for Bloom in the past and with what
exemplars?</p>
<p>In the church, Roman, Anglican or Nonconformist: exemplars, the very
reverend John Conmee S. J., the reverend T. Salmon, D. D., provost of
Trinity college, Dr Alexander J. Dowie. At the bar, English or Irish:
exemplars, Seymour Bushe, K. C., Rufus Isaacs, K. C. On the stage modern
or Shakespearean: exemplars, Charles Wyndham, high comedian Osmond Tearle
(died 1901), exponent of Shakespeare.</p>
<p>Did the host encourage his guest to chant in a modulated voice a strange
legend on an allied theme?</p>
<p>Reassuringly, their place, where none could hear them talk, being
secluded, reassured, the decocted beverages, allowing for subsolid
residual sediment of a mechanical mixture, water plus sugar plus cream
plus cocoa, having been consumed.</p>
<p>Recite the first (major) part of this chanted legend.</p>
<p><i>Little Harry Hughes and his schoolfellows all<br/>
Went out for to play ball.<br/>
And the very first ball little Harry Hughes played<br/>
He drove it o'er the jew's garden wall.<br/>
And the very second ball little Harry Hughes played<br/>
He broke the jew's windows all.</i><br/></p>
<p>How did the son of Rudolph receive this first part?</p>
<p>With unmixed feeling. Smiling, a jew he heard with pleasure and saw the
unbroken kitchen window.</p>
<p>Recite the second part (minor) of the legend.</p>
<p><i>Then out there came the jew's daughter<br/>
And she all dressed in green.<br/>
"Come back, come back, you pretty little boy,<br/>
And play your ball again."<br/>
<br/>
"I can't come back and I won't come back<br/>
Without my schoolfellows all.<br/>
For if my master he did hear<br/>
He'd make it a sorry ball."<br/>
<br/>
She took him by the lilywhite hand<br/>
And led him along the hall<br/>
Until she led him to a room<br/>
Where none could hear him call.<br/>
<br/>
She took a penknife out of her pocket<br/>
And cut off his little head.<br/>
And now he'll play his ball no more<br/>
For he lies among the dead.</i><br/></p>
<p>How did the father of Millicent receive this second part?</p>
<p>With mixed feelings. Unsmiling, he heard and saw with wonder a jew's
daughter, all dressed in green.</p>
<p>Condense Stephen's commentary.</p>
<p>One of all, the least of all, is the victim predestined. Once by
inadvertence twice by design he challenges his destiny. It comes when he
is abandoned and challenges him reluctant and, as an apparition of hope
and youth, holds him unresisting. It leads him to a strange habitation, to
a secret infidel apartment, and there, implacable, immolates him,
consenting.</p>
<p>Why was the host (victim predestined) sad?</p>
<p>He wished that a tale of a deed should be told of a deed not by him should
by him not be told.</p>
<p>Why was the host (reluctant, unresisting) still?</p>
<p>In accordance with the law of the conservation of energy.</p>
<p>Why was the host (secret infidel) silent?</p>
<p>He weighed the possible evidences for and against ritual murder: the
incitations of the hierarchy, the superstition of the populace, the
propagation of rumour in continued fraction of veridicity, the envy of
opulence, the influence of retaliation, the sporadic reappearance of
atavistic delinquency, the mitigating circumstances of fanaticism,
hypnotic suggestion and somnambulism.</p>
<p>From which (if any) of these mental or physical disorders was he not
totally immune?</p>
<p>From hypnotic suggestion: once, waking, he had not recognised his sleeping
apartment: more than once, waking, he had been for an indefinite time
incapable of moving or uttering sounds. From somnambulism: once, sleeping,
his body had risen, crouched and crawled in the direction of a heatless
fire and, having attained its destination, there, curled, unheated, in
night attire had lain, sleeping.</p>
<p>Had this latter or any cognate phenomenon declared itself in any member of
his family?</p>
<p>Twice, in Holles street and in Ontario terrace, his daughter Millicent
(Milly) at the ages of 6 and 8 years had uttered in sleep an exclamation
of terror and had replied to the interrogations of two figures in night
attire with a vacant mute expression.</p>
<p>What other infantile memories had he of her?</p>
<p>15 June 1889. A querulous newborn female infant crying to cause and lessen
congestion. A child renamed Padney Socks she shook with shocks her
moneybox: counted his three free moneypenny buttons, one, tloo, tlee: a
doll, a boy, a sailor she cast away: blond, born of two dark, she had
blond ancestry, remote, a violation, Herr Hauptmann Hainau, Austrian army,
proximate, a hallucination, lieutenant Mulvey, British navy.</p>
<p>What endemic characteristics were present?</p>
<p>Conversely the nasal and frontal formation was derived in a direct line of
lineage which, though interrupted, would continue at distant intervals to
more distant intervals to its most distant intervals.</p>
<p>What memories had he of her adolescence?</p>
<p>She relegated her hoop and skippingrope to a recess. On the duke's lawn,
entreated by an English visitor, she declined to permit him to make and
take away her photographic image (objection not stated). On the South
Circular road in the company of Elsa Potter, followed by an individual of
sinister aspect, she went half way down Stamer street and turned abruptly
back (reason of change not stated). On the vigil of the 15th anniversary
of her birth she wrote a letter from Mullingar, county Westmeath, making a
brief allusion to a local student (faculty and year not stated).</p>
<p>Did that first division, portending a second division, afflict him?</p>
<p>Less than he had imagined, more than he had hoped.</p>
<p>What second departure was contemporaneously perceived by him similarly, if
differently?</p>
<p>A temporary departure of his cat.</p>
<p>Why similarly, why differently?</p>
<p>Similarly, because actuated by a secret purpose the quest of a new male</p>
<p>(Mullingar student) or of a healing herb (valerian). Differently, because
of different possible returns to the inhabitants or to the habitation.</p>
<p>In other respects were their differences similar?</p>
<p>In passivity, in economy, in the instinct of tradition, in unexpectedness.</p>
<p>As?</p>
<p>Inasmuch as leaning she sustained her blond hair for him to ribbon it for
her (cf neckarching cat). Moreover, on the free surface of the lake in
Stephen's green amid inverted reflections of trees her uncommented spit,
describing concentric circles of waterrings, indicated by the constancy of
its permanence the locus of a somnolent prostrate fish (cf mousewatching
cat).</p>
<p>Again, in order to remember the date, combatants, issue and consequences
of a famous military engagement she pulled a plait of her hair (cf
earwashing cat). Furthermore, silly Milly, she dreamed of having had an
unspoken unremembered conversation with a horse whose name had been Joseph
to whom (which) she had offered a tumblerful of lemonade which it (he) had
appeared to have accepted (cf hearthdreaming cat). Hence, in passivity, in
economy, in the instinct of tradition, in unexpectedness, their
differences were similar.</p>
<p>In what way had he utilised gifts (1) an owl, (2) a clock, given as
matrimonial auguries, to interest and to instruct her?</p>
<p>As object lessons to explain: 1) the nature and habits of oviparous
animals, the possibility of aerial flight, certain abnormalities of
vision, the secular process of imbalsamation: 2) the principle of the
pendulum, exemplified in bob, wheelgear and regulator, the translation in
terms of human or social regulation of the various positions of clockwise
moveable indicators on an unmoving dial, the exactitude of the recurrence
per hour of an instant in each hour when the longer and the shorter
indicator were at the same angle of inclination, <i>videlicet</i>, 5 5/11
minutes past each hour per hour in arithmetical progression.</p>
<p>In what manners did she reciprocate?</p>
<p>She remembered: on the 27th anniversary of his birth she presented to him
a breakfast moustachecup of imitation Crown Derby porcelain ware. She
provided: at quarter day or thereabouts if or when purchases had been made
by him not for her she showed herself attentive to his necessities,
anticipating his desires. She admired: a natural phenomenon having been
explained by him to her she expressed the immediate desire to possess
without gradual acquisition a fraction of his science, the moiety, the
quarter, a thousandth part.</p>
<p>What proposal did Bloom, diambulist, father of Milly, somnambulist, make
to Stephen, noctambulist?</p>
<p>To pass in repose the hours intervening between Thursday (proper) and
Friday (normal) on an extemporised cubicle in the apartment immediately
above the kitchen and immediately adjacent to the sleeping apartment of
his host and hostess.</p>
<p>What various advantages would or might have resulted from a prolongation
of such an extemporisation?</p>
<p>For the guest: security of domicile and seclusion of study. For the host:
rejuvenation of intelligence, vicarious satisfaction. For the hostess:
disintegration of obsession, acquisition of correct Italian pronunciation.</p>
<p>Why might these several provisional contingencies between a guest and a
hostess not necessarily preclude or be precluded by a permanent
eventuality of reconciliatory union between a schoolfellow and a jew's
daughter?</p>
<p>Because the way to daughter led through mother, the way to mother through
daughter.</p>
<p>To what inconsequent polysyllabic question of his host did the guest
return a monosyllabic negative answer?</p>
<p>If he had known the late Mrs Emily Sinico, accidentally killed at Sydney
Parade railway station, 14 October 1903.</p>
<p>What inchoate corollary statement was consequently suppressed by the host?</p>
<p>A statement explanatory of his absence on the occasion of the interment of
Mrs Mary Dedalus (born Goulding), 26 June 1903, vigil of the anniversary
of the decease of Rudolph Bloom (born Virag).</p>
<p>Was the proposal of asylum accepted?</p>
<p>Promptly, inexplicably, with amicability, gratefully it was declined. What
exchange of money took place between host and guest?</p>
<p>The former returned to the latter, without interest, a sum of money
(1-7-0), one pound seven shillings sterling, advanced by the latter to the
former.</p>
<p>What counterproposals were alternately advanced, accepted, modified,
declined, restated in other terms, reaccepted, ratified, reconfirmed?</p>
<p>To inaugurate a prearranged course of Italian instruction, place the
residence of the instructed. To inaugurate a course of vocal instruction,
place the residence of the instructress. To inaugurate a series of static
semistatic and peripatetic intellectual dialogues, places the residence of
both speakers (if both speakers were resident in the same place), the Ship
hotel and tavern, 6 Lower Abbey street (W. and E. Connery, proprietors),
the National Library of Ireland, 10 Kildare street, the National Maternity
Hospital, 29, 30 and 31 Holles street, a public garden, the vicinity of a
place of worship, a conjunction of two or more public thoroughfares, the
point of bisection of a right line drawn between their residences (if both
speakers were resident in different places).</p>
<p>What rendered problematic for Bloom the realisation of these mutually
selfexcluding propositions?</p>
<p>The irreparability of the past: once at a performance of Albert Hengler's
circus in the Rotunda, Rutland square, Dublin, an intuitive particoloured
clown in quest of paternity had penetrated from the ring to a place in the
auditorium where Bloom, solitary, was seated and had publicly declared to
an exhilarated audience that he (Bloom) was his (the clown's) papa. The
imprevidibility of the future: once in the summer of 1898 he (Bloom) had
marked a florin (2/-) with three notches on the milled edge and tendered
it m payment of an account due to and received by J. and T. Davy, family
grocers, 1 Charlemont Mall, Grand Canal, for circulation on the waters of
civic finance, for possible, circuitous or direct, return.</p>
<p>Was the clown Bloom's son?</p>
<p>No.</p>
<p>Had Bloom's coin returned?</p>
<p>Never.</p>
<p>Why would a recurrent frustration the more depress him?</p>
<p>Because at the critical turningpoint of human existence he desired to
amend many social conditions, the product of inequality and avarice and
international animosity. He believed then that human life was infinitely
perfectible, eliminating these conditions?</p>
<p>There remained the generic conditions imposed by natural, as distinct from
human law, as integral parts of the human whole: the necessity of
destruction to procure alimentary sustenance: the painful character of the
ultimate functions of separate existence, the agonies of birth and death:
the monotonous menstruation of simian and (particularly) human females
extending from the age of puberty to the menopause: inevitable accidents
at sea, in mines and factories: certain very painful maladies and their
resultant surgical operations, innate lunacy and congenital criminality,
decimating epidemics: catastrophic cataclysms which make terror the basis
of human mentality: seismic upheavals the epicentres of which are located
in densely populated regions: the fact of vital growth, through
convulsions of metamorphosis, from infancy through maturity to decay.</p>
<p>Why did he desist from speculation?</p>
<p>Because it was a task for a superior intelligence to substitute other more
acceptable phenomena in the place of the less acceptable phenomena to be
removed.</p>
<p>Did Stephen participate in his dejection?</p>
<p>He affirmed his significance as a conscious rational animal proceeding
syllogistically from the known to the unknown and a conscious rational
reagent between a micro and a macrocosm ineluctably constructed upon the
incertitude of the void.</p>
<p>Was this affirmation apprehended by Bloom?</p>
<p>Not verbally. Substantially.</p>
<p>What comforted his misapprehension?</p>
<p>That as a competent keyless citizen he had proceeded energetically from
the unknown to the known through the incertitude of the void.</p>
<p>In what order of precedence, with what attendant ceremony was the exodus
from the house of bondage to the wilderness of inhabitation effected?</p>
<p>Lighted Candle in Stick borne by</p>
<p>BLOOM</p>
<p>Diaconal Hat on Ashplant borne by</p>
<p>STEPHEN:</p>
<p>With what intonation secreto of what commemorative psalm?</p>
<p>The 113th, <i>modus peregrinus: In exitu Israel de Egypto: domus Jacob de
populo barbaro</i>.</p>
<p>What did each do at the door of egress?</p>
<p>Bloom set the candlestick on the floor. Stephen put the hat on his head.</p>
<p>For what creature was the door of egress a door of ingress?</p>
<p>For a cat.</p>
<p>What spectacle confronted them when they, first the host, then the guest,
emerged silently, doubly dark, from obscurity by a passage from the rere
of the house into the penumbra of the garden?</p>
<p>The heaventree of stars hung with humid nightblue fruit.</p>
<p>With what meditations did Bloom accompany his demonstration to his
companion of various constellations?</p>
<p>Meditations of evolution increasingly vaster: of the moon invisible in
incipient lunation, approaching perigee: of the infinite lattiginous
scintillating uncondensed milky way, discernible by daylight by an
observer placed at the lower end of a cylindrical vertical shaft 5000 ft
deep sunk from the surface towards the centre of the earth: of Sirius
(alpha in Canis Maior) 10 lightyears (57,000,000,000,000 miles) distant
and in volume 900 times the dimension of our planet: of Arcturus: of the
precession of equinoxes: of Orion with belt and sextuple sun theta and
nebula in which 100 of our solar systems could be contained: of moribund
and of nascent new stars such as Nova in 1901: of our system plunging
towards the constellation of Hercules: of the parallax or parallactic
drift of socalled fixed stars, in reality evermoving wanderers from
immeasurably remote eons to infinitely remote futures in comparison with
which the years, threescore and ten, of allotted human life formed a
parenthesis of infinitesimal brevity.</p>
<p>Were there obverse meditations of involution increasingly less vast?</p>
<p>Of the eons of geological periods recorded in the stratifications of the
earth: of the myriad minute entomological organic existences concealed in
cavities of the earth, beneath removable stones, in hives and mounds, of
microbes, germs, bacteria, bacilli, spermatozoa: of the incalculable
trillions of billions of millions of imperceptible molecules contained by
cohesion of molecular affinity in a single pinhead: of the universe of
human serum constellated with red and white bodies, themselves universes
of void space constellated with other bodies, each, in continuity, its
universe of divisible component bodies of which each was again divisible
in divisions of redivisible component bodies, dividends and divisors ever
diminishing without actual division till, if the progress were carried far
enough, nought nowhere was never reached.</p>
<p>Why did he not elaborate these calculations to a more precise result?</p>
<p>Because some years previously in 1886 when occupied with the problem of
the quadrature of the circle he had learned of the existence of a number
computed to a relative degree of accuracy to be of such magnitude and of
so many places, e.g., the 9th power of the 9th power of 9, that, the
result having been obtained, 33 closely printed volumes of 1000 pages each
of innumerable quires and reams of India paper would have to be
requisitioned in order to contain the complete tale of its printed
integers of units, tens, hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands, hundreds
of thousands, millions, tens of millions, hundreds of millions, billions,
the nucleus of the nebula of every digit of every series containing
succinctly the potentiality of being raised to the utmost kinetic
elaboration of any power of any of its powers.</p>
<p>Did he find the problems of the inhabitability of the planets and their
satellites by a race, given in species, and of the possible social and
moral redemption of said race by a redeemer, easier of solution?</p>
<p>Of a different order of difficulty. Conscious that the human organism,
normally capable of sustaining an atmospheric pressure of 19 tons, when
elevated to a considerable altitude in the terrestrial atmosphere suffered
with arithmetical progression of intensity, according as the line of
demarcation between troposphere and stratosphere was approximated from
nasal hemorrhage, impeded respiration and vertigo, when proposing this
problem for solution, he had conjectured as a working hypothesis which
could not be proved impossible that a more adaptable and differently
anatomically constructed race of beings might subsist otherwise under
Martian, Mercurial, Veneral, Jovian, Saturnian, Neptunian or Uranian
sufficient and equivalent conditions, though an apogean humanity of beings
created in varying forms with finite differences resulting similar to the
whole and to one another would probably there as here remain inalterably
and inalienably attached to vanities, to vanities of vanities and to all
that is vanity.</p>
<p>And the problem of possible redemption?<br/>
The minor was proved by the major.<br/></p>
<p>Which various features of the constellations were in turn considered?</p>
<p>The various colours significant of various degrees of vitality (white,
yellow, crimson, vermilion, cinnabar): their degrees of brilliancy: their
magnitudes revealed up to and including the 7th: their positions: the
waggoner's star: Walsingham way: the chariot of David: the annular
cinctures of Saturn: the condensation of spiral nebulae into suns: the
interdependent gyrations of double suns: the independent synchronous
discoveries of Galileo, Simon Marius, Piazzi, Le Verrier, Herschel, Galle:
the systematisations attempted by Bode and Kepler of cubes of distances
and squares of times of revolution: the almost infinite compressibility of
hirsute comets and their vast elliptical egressive and reentrant orbits
from perihelion to aphelion: the sidereal origin of meteoric stones: the
Libyan floods on Mars about the period of the birth of the younger
astroscopist: the annual recurrence of meteoric showers about the period
of the feast of S. Lawrence (martyr, lo August): the monthly recurrence
known as the new moon with the old moon in her arms: the posited influence
of celestial on human bodies: the appearance of a star (1st magnitude) of
exceeding brilliancy dominating by night and day (a new luminous sun
generated by the collision and amalgamation in incandescence of two
nonluminous exsuns) about the period of the birth of William Shakespeare
over delta in the recumbent neversetting constellation of Cassiopeia and
of a star (2nd magnitude) of similar origin but of lesser brilliancy which
had appeared in and disappeared from the constellation of the Corona
Septentrionalis about the period of the birth of Leopold Bloom and of
other stars of (presumably) similar origin which had (effectively or
presumably) appeared in and disappeared from the constellation of
Andromeda about the period of the birth of Stephen Dedalus, and in and
from the constellation of Auriga some years after the birth and death of
Rudolph Bloom, junior, and in and from other constellations some years
before or after the birth or death of other persons: the attendant
phenomena of eclipses, solar and lunar, from immersion to emersion,
abatement of wind, transit of shadow, taciturnity of winged creatures,
emergence of nocturnal or crepuscular animals, persistence of infernal
light, obscurity of terrestrial waters, pallor of human beings.</p>
<p>His (Bloom's) logical conclusion, having weighed the matter and allowing
for possible error?</p>
<p>That it was not a heaventree, not a heavengrot, not a heavenbeast, not a
heavenman. That it was a Utopia, there being no known method from the
known to the unknown: an infinity renderable equally finite by the
suppositious apposition of one or more bodies equally of the same and of
different magnitudes: a mobility of illusory forms immobilised in space,
remobilised in air: a past which possibly had ceased to exist as a present
before its probable spectators had entered actual present existence.</p>
<p>Was he more convinced of the esthetic value of the spectacle?</p>
<p>Indubitably in consequence of the reiterated examples of poets in the
delirium of the frenzy of attachment or in the abasement of rejection
invoking ardent sympathetic constellations or the frigidity of the
satellite of their planet.</p>
<p>Did he then accept as an article of belief the theory of astrological
influences upon sublunary disasters?</p>
<p>It seemed to him as possible of proof as of confutation and the
nomenclature employed in its selenographical charts as attributable to
verifiable intuition as to fallacious analogy: the lake of dreams, the sea
of rains, the gulf of dews, the ocean of fecundity.</p>
<p>What special affinities appeared to him to exist between the moon and
woman?</p>
<p>Her antiquity in preceding and surviving successive tellurian generations:
her nocturnal predominance: her satellitic dependence: her luminary
reflection: her constancy under all her phases, rising and setting by her
appointed times, waxing and waning: the forced invariability of her
aspect: her indeterminate response to inaffirmative interrogation: her
potency over effluent and refluent waters: her power to enamour, to
mortify, to invest with beauty, to render insane, to incite to and aid
delinquency: the tranquil inscrutability of her visage: the terribility of
her isolated dominant implacable resplendent propinquity: her omens of
tempest and of calm: the stimulation of her light, her motion and her
presence: the admonition of her craters, her arid seas, her silence: her
splendour, when visible: her attraction, when invisible.</p>
<p>What visible luminous sign attracted Bloom's, who attracted Stephen's,
gaze?</p>
<p>In the second storey (rere) of his (Bloom's) house the light of a paraffin
oil lamp with oblique shade projected on a screen of roller blind supplied
by Frank O'Hara, window blind, curtain pole and revolving shutter
manufacturer, 16 Aungier street.</p>
<p>How did he elucidate the mystery of an invisible attractive person, his
wife Marion (Molly) Bloom, denoted by a visible splendid sign, a lamp?</p>
<p>With indirect and direct verbal allusions or affirmations: with subdued
affection and admiration: with description: with impediment: with
suggestion.</p>
<p>Both then were silent?</p>
<p>Silent, each contemplating the other in both mirrors of the reciprocal
flesh of theirhisnothis fellowfaces.</p>
<p>Were they indefinitely inactive?</p>
<p>At Stephen's suggestion, at Bloom's instigation both, first Stephen, then
Bloom, in penumbra urinated, their sides contiguous, their organs of
micturition reciprocally rendered invisible by manual circumposition,
their gazes, first Bloom's, then Stephen's, elevated to the projected
luminous and semiluminous shadow.</p>
<p>Similarly?</p>
<p>The trajectories of their, first sequent, then simultaneous, urinations
were dissimilar: Bloom's longer, less irruent, in the incomplete form of
the bifurcated penultimate alphabetical letter, who in his ultimate year
at High School (1880) had been capable of attaining the point of greatest
altitude against the whole concurrent strength of the institution, 210
scholars: Stephen's higher, more sibilant, who in the ultimate hours of
the previous day had augmented by diuretic consumption an insistent
vesical pressure.</p>
<p>What different problems presented themselves to each concerning the
invisible audible collateral organ of the other?</p>
<p>To Bloom: the problems of irritability, tumescence, rigidity, reactivity,
dimension, sanitariness, pilosity.</p>
<p>To Stephen: the problem of the sacerdotal integrity of Jesus circumcised
(I January, holiday of obligation to hear mass and abstain from
unnecessary servile work) and the problem as to whether the divine
prepuce, the carnal bridal ring of the holy Roman catholic apostolic
church, conserved in Calcata, were deserving of simple hyperduly or of the
fourth degree of latria accorded to the abscission of such divine
excrescences as hair and toenails.</p>
<p>What celestial sign was by both simultaneously observed?</p>
<p>A star precipitated with great apparent velocity across the firmament from
Vega in the Lyre above the zenith beyond the stargroup of the Tress of
Berenice towards the zodiacal sign of Leo.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />