<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_XIII" id="CHAPTER_XIII"></SPAN>CHAPTER XIII.</h2>
<h3>MULTIPLE TRANSMISSION.</h3>
<p>Although the printing and automatic systems
of telegraphing are used in America to
some extent, the larger part is done by the
Morse system of sound-reading and copying
from it, either by pen or the typewriter. In
the early days only one message could be sent
over one wire at the same time, but now from
four to six or even more messages may be sent
over the same wire simultaneously without
one message interfering with the other. Like
most other inventions, many inventors have
contributed to the development of multiple
transmission, till finally some one did the last
thing needed to make it a success. The first
attempts were in the line of double transmission,
and many inventors abroad have worked
on this problem.</p>
<p>Moses G. Farmer of Salem, Mass., proposed
it as early as 1852, and patented it in 1858.
Gintl, Preece, Siemens and Halske and others
abroad had from time to time proposed different
methods of double transmission, but no
one of them was a perfect success. When the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_115" id="Page_115"></SPAN></span>
line was very long there was a difficulty that
seemed insurmountable. In the common parlance
of telegraphy, there was a "kick" in the
instrument that came in and mutilated the
signals. About 1872 Joseph B. Stearns of Boston
made a certain application of what is
called a "condenser" to duplex telegraphy
that cured the "kick," and from that time to
this it has been a success. Farther along I will
tell you what occasioned this "kick" and how
it was cured. If this or some other method
could be applied as successfully to cure the
many chronic "kickers" in the world it would
be a great blessing to mankind.</p>
<p>It has always been a mystery to the uninitiated
how two messages could go in opposite
directions and not run into one another
and get wrecked by the way. If you will follow
me closely for a few minutes I will try to
tell you.</p>
<p>We have already stated that an electromagnet
is made by winding an insulated wire
around a soft iron core. If we pass a current
of electricity through this wire the core becomes
magnetic, and remains so as long as the
current passes around it. In duplex telegraphy
we use what is called a differential magnet.
A differential electromagnet is wound with
two insulated wires and so connected to the
battery that the current divides and passes
around the iron core in opposite directions.<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_116" id="Page_116"></SPAN></span>
Now if an equal current is simultaneously
passed through each of the wires of the coil in
opposite directions the effect on the iron will
be nothing, because one current is trying to
develop a certain kind of polarity at each pole
of the magnet, while the current in the other
wire is trying to develop an opposite kind in
each pole. There is an equal struggle between
the two opposing forces, and the result is no
magnetism. This assumes that the two currents
are exactly the same strength.</p>
<p>If we break the current in one of the coils
we immediately have magnetism in the iron;
or if we destroy the balance of the two currents
by making one stronger than the other
we shall have magnetism of a strength that
measures the difference between the two.</p>
<p>Without specifically describing here the entire
mechanism—since this is not a text-book
or a treatise—we may say that a duplex telegraph-line
is fitted with these differentially
wound electromagnets at every station. When
Station A (<SPAN href="#fig3">Fig. 3</SPAN>) is connected to the line
by the positive pole of its battery, Station B
will have its negative pole to line and its positive
to earth. When A depresses his key to
send a message, half the current passes by one
set of coils around his differential magnet
through a short resistance-coil to the earth,
and the other half by the contrary coil around
the magnet to the line, and so to Station B.<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_117" id="Page_117"></SPAN></span>
The divided current does not affect A's own
station, being neutralized by the differential
magnet, but it does affect B, whose instrument
responds and gives him the message.</p>
<p>Now B may at the same time send a message
to A by half of his own divided current from
his own end of the line.</p>
<div class="figcenter"> <SPAN name="fig3" id="fig3"></SPAN> <span class="caption"><big>Fig. 3.</big></span> <ANTIMG src="images/fig3.jpg" width-obs="100%" alt="Fig. 3." title="Fig. 3." /> <p><b>Represents a duplex 500-mile telegraph-line. A and B are the two terminal stations; B B´, the batteries; K K´, the keys; D D´, the small resistance-coils, equal to the battery-resistance
when the latter is not in circuit; R R´, resistances each
equal to the 500-mile line; and C C´, condensers giving the
artificial lines R R´ the same capacity as the 500-mile line.</b></p>
</div>
<p>The puzzle to most people is: How can the
signals pass each other in different directions
on the same wire? But the signals do not have
to pass each other. In effect, they pass; but
in fact, it is like going round a circle—the
earth forming half. A sends his message over
the line to B. B sends his message to A
through the earth and up A's ground-wire.
The operative who is sending with positive
pole to line <i>pushes</i> his current through—so to<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_118" id="Page_118"></SPAN></span>
speak—while the operative who is sending
with the negative pole to line <i>pulls</i> more current
in the same direction through the line
whenever he closes his key.</p>
<p>This may not be a strictly scientific statement;
but, as long as we speak of a "current"
flowing from positive to negative poles
(which is the invariable course electricity
takes), it is the way to look at the matter understandingly.</p>
<p>The short "resistance-coil" at each end, fortified
by a "condenser" made of many leaves
of isolated tin-foil, to give it capacity, offers
precisely the same resistance to the current as
the 500 miles of wire line; so that the twin
currents that run around the differential magnet
exactly neutralize each other and make no
effect in the office the message starts from;
while one of them takes to the earth, and the
other to the line to carry the message.</p>
<p>This condenser is necessary, because the
short resistance-coil affects the current immediately,
while the long line with its greater
amount of metal does not give the same
amount of resistance till it is filled from end
to end, which requires a fraction of a second.
During this time, however, more current is
passing through the differential coil connected
with the line than through the short resistance-coil;
and the unequal flow causes the
relay armature to jump, or "kick." The con<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_119" id="Page_119"></SPAN></span>denser,
with the many leaves of tin-foil, supplies
the greater metal surface to be traversed
by the short line current, causes the flow to be
equal in both circuits at all times, and thus
cures the "kick." It is this quality of a condenser
that enables us to give to an artificial
line of any resistance all the qualities, including
capacity, and exhibit all the phenomena
of a real line of any length, and it was this
quality that enabled Mr. Stearns to take the
"kick" out of duplex transmission and thus
change the whole system, which created a new
era in telegraphy.</p>
<p>We have just spoken of the "capacity" of a
circuit, and stated that it was determined by
the mass of metal used. This capacity is measured
by a standard of capacity that is arbitrary
and consists of a condenser, constructed
so that a given amount of surface of tin-foil
may be plugged in or out. The practical unit
of capacity is called the micro-farad, the real
unit is the farad, and takes its name from
Faraday.</p>
<p>But let us go back to multiple systems of
transmission. There are many other systems
of simultaneous transmission aside from the
duplex, and all of them are classed under the
general head of multiple telegraphy. First
there is the quadruplex, that sends two messages
each way simultaneously, making one
wire do the work of four single wires—as<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_120" id="Page_120"></SPAN></span>
they were used at first. The quadruplex is
very extensively used by the Western Union
Telegraph Company and others. It would be
difficult to explain it in a popular article, so
we will not attempt it. There is another form
of multiple telegraph that was used on the
Postal Telegraph line when it first started—which
was invented and perfected by the
writer—that can be more easily explained.</p>
<p>In 1874 I discovered a method of transmitting
musical tones telegraphically, and the
thing that set my mind in that direction was
a domestic incident. It is a curious fact that
most inventions have their beginnings in some
incident or observation that comes within the
experience of some one who is able to see and
interpret the meaning of such incidents or
observations. I do not mean to say that inventions
are usually the result of a happy
thought, or accident; the germ may be, but
the germ has to have the right kind of soil
to take root in and the right kind of culture
afterward. It is a rare thing that an invention,
either of commercial or scientific importance,
ever comes to perfection without
hard work—midnight oil and daylight toil;
and it is rarely, if ever, that a discovery or
an invention based upon a discovery does not
have, sooner or later, a practical use, although
we sometimes have to wait centuries to find it
put. We had to wait forty-four years after<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_121" id="Page_121"></SPAN></span>
the galvanic battery was discovered before it
became a useful servant of man. It was fifty
years or more after the discovery by Faraday
of magneto-electricity before it found a useful
application beyond that of a mere toy, but
now it is one of the most useful servants we
have, as shown in its wonderful development
in electric lighting and electric railroads, to
say nothing of its heating qualities and the
useful purpose it serves in driving machinery.
The interesting discoveries of Professor
Crookes in passing a current of electricity
through tubes of high vacua waited many
years before they found a practical use in the
X-ray, that promises to be of great service in
medicine and surgery.</p>
<p>The transmission of musical harmonies
telegraphically, while in itself of great scientific
interest, was of no practical use, but it
led to other inventions, of which it is the base,
that are transcendently useful in every-day
life. The transmission of harmonic sounds
by electricity underlies the principle of the
telephone. There is a vast difference, in principle,
between the transmission of simple
melody, which is a combination of musical
tones transmitted successively—one tone following
another—and the transmission of harmony,
which involves the transmission of two
or more tones simultaneously. The former
can be transmitted by a make-and-break cur<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_122" id="Page_122"></SPAN></span>rent.
In the latter case one tone has to be
superposed upon another and must be transmitted
with a varying but a continuously
closed current. I make a distinction between
a closed circuit and a closed current. In the
case of the arc-light the circuit is open (that
is, broken), technically speaking, but the current
is still flowing. The reason why the
Reiss and other metallic contact telephone
transmitters cannot successfully be used for
telephone purposes is that metal points will
not allow of sufficient separation of the transmitting
points without breaking the current
as well as the circuit. Carbon contacts admit
of a much wider separation without actually
stopping the flow of the current, which latter
is a necessity for perfect telephonic transmission,
and it was the use of carbon that made
that form of transmitter a success.</p>
<p>There are other forms, or at least one other
form that does not depend upon the length of
the voltaic arc formed when the electrodes are
separated. Of this we will speak another time.
Now let us go back to the domestic incident
referred to above.</p>
<p>One evening in the winter of 1873-4 I came
home from my laboratory work and went into
the bathroom to make my toilet for dinner. I
found my nephew, Mr. Charles S. Sheppard,
together with some of his playmates, taking
electrical "shocks" from a little medical in<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_123" id="Page_123"></SPAN></span>duction-coil
that I heard humming in the
closet. He had one terminal of the coil connected
to the zinc lining of the bathtub—which
was dry at that time—while he held the
other in his left hand, and with his right was
taking shocks from the lining of the tub by
rubbing his hand against the zinc. I noticed
that each time he made contact with the tub,
as he rubbed it for a short distance, a peculiar
sound was emitted from under his hand, not
unlike the sound made by the electrotome
that was vibrating in the closet. My interest
was immediately aroused, and I took the electrode
out of his hand and for some time experimented
with it, going to the cupboard from
time to time to change the rate of vibration of
the electrotome, and thus change the quality
of the sound. I noticed that the sound or tone
under my hand, if it could be so called,
changed with each change of the rate of vibration.
The thing that most interested me
was that the peculiar characteristics of the
noise were reproduced. In those few minutes
I laid out work enough for years of experiment,
and as a result I was late to dinner.</p>
<p>This discovery opened up to my mind the
possibility of three things—the transmission
of music and of speech or articulate words
through a telegraph-wire, and the transmission
of a number of messages over a single
wire. I constructed a keyboard consisting of<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_124" id="Page_124"></SPAN></span>
one octave and made a set of reeds tuned to
the notes of the scale, and then when some one
would play a melody I could reproduce it in
two ways: One by placing my body in the circuit
and rubbing a metal plate—it might be
the bottom of a tin pan, a joint of stovepipe or
otherwise—anything that was metal and would
vibrate would give the effect. Another way
was to connect an electromagnet (having a
diaphragm or reed across its poles) in the circuit
at the receiving-end and mount it on some
kind of a soundboard. I made a great number
of different kinds of receivers that were
capable of receiving either musical or articulate
sounds, as has many times been proven
by experiment. I carried two sets of experiments
along together; the one looking toward
a system of multiple telegraphy and the other
the transmission of articulate speech. Let us
first look into the multiple telegraph and take
the other up under the head of the telephone.</p>
<p>When the electrical keyboard was completed
I found that I could transmit not only a
melody but a harmony; that more than one
tone could be transmitted simultaneously.
This discovery opened up a long series of experiments
with the view of sending a number
of messages simultaneously by means of
musical tones differing in pitch. I had already
demonstrated that several tones could be transmitted
at once, but they would speak all alike<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_125" id="Page_125"></SPAN></span>
(with the same loudness) on the receiving-instrument.
I now went to work on an instrument
that responded for one note only and
succeeded beyond my expectations. I made
three different kinds of receiving-instruments.
The first was a steel strap about eight inches
long by three-eighths wide. This strap was
mounted in an iron frame in front of an electromagnet.
A thumbscrew enabled me to
stretch the strap till it would vibrate at the
required pitch. If, for instance, the sending-reed
vibrated at the rate of 100 times per second
and the strap of the receiver was stretched
to a tension that would give 100 vibrations per
second when plucked, it would then respond
to the vibrations of the sending-reed but not
to those of another reed of a different rate of
vibration. If we take mounted tuning-forks
tuned in pairs of different pitches, say four
pairs, so that each fork has a mate that is in
exact accord with it, and place them all in the
same room, and sound one of them for a few
seconds and then stop it, upon examining the
other forks you will find all of them quiet except
the mate of the one that was sounded.
This one will be sounding. If we now sound
four of the forks and then stop them the
other four will be sounding from sympathy
because the mate of each one of them has
been sounded. If only two forks differing
in pitch are sounded only two of the others<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_126" id="Page_126"></SPAN></span>
will sound in sympathy. In the first case
only one set of sound-waves were set up
in the air, and the fork that found itself in
accord with this set responded. When four
forks differing in pitch were sounded there
were four sets of tone-waves superposed upon
each other existing in the air, so that each of
the remaining forks found a set of waves in
sympathy with its own natural rate of vibration
and so responded.</p>
<p>Now apply this principle to the harmonic
telegraph and you can understand its operation.
At the transmitting-end of a line of
wire there are a certain number of forks or
reeds kept vibrating continuously. These
reeds each have a fixed rate of vibration and
bear a harmonic relation to each other so as
not to have sound-interference or "beats."
At the receiving-end of the line there are as
many electromagnets as there are transmitting-reeds,
and each magnet has a reed or
strap in front of it tuned to some one of the
transmitting-reeds, so that each transmitting-reed
has a mate in exact harmony with it at
the receiving-end of the line. Keys are so arranged
at the transmitting-end as to throw
the tones corresponding to them to line when
depressed. In other words, when the key belonging
to battery B and vibrator 1 is depressed
(see <SPAN href="#fig4">Fig. 4</SPAN>) the effect is to send
electrical pulsations through the line corre<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_127" id="Page_127"></SPAN></span>sponding
in rate per second to that of the
vibrator. The same is true of battery B´
and vibrator 2. During the time any key
is depressed—we will say of tone No. 1—this
tone will be transmitted through the
line and be reproduced by its mate—the one
tuned in accord with it—at the receiving-station.
By a succession of long and short tones
representing the Morse code a message can be
sent. Numbers two, three and four might be
sending at the same time, but they would not
interfere with number one or with each other.
In 1876-7 the writer succeeded in sending
eight simultaneous messages between New
York and Philadelphia by the harmonic
method.</p>
<div class="figcenter"> <SPAN name="fig4" id="fig4"></SPAN> <span class="caption"><big>Fig. 4.</big></span> <ANTIMG src="images/fig4.jpg" width-obs="100%" alt="Fig. 4." title="Fig. 4." /> <p><b>In this diagram, 1 and 2 are tuned reeds; <span class="smcap">1A 2A</span> are receivers tuned to the reeds 1 and 2 respectively; 1 and <span class="smcap">1A</span> are in unison, also 2 and <span class="smcap">2A</span>, but the two groups (the 1s and the 2s) differ
from each other in pitch.</b></p>
</div>
<p>There were two ways of reading by the harmonic
method. One was by the long and
short tone-sounds and the other by the ordinary
sounder.<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_128" id="Page_128"></SPAN></span></p>
<p>The vibration of the receiving-reed was
made to open and close a local circuit like a
common Morse relay and thus operate the
sounder. It is useless to try to send a message
if the sender and receiver are out of tune with
each other in this system.</p>
<p>What is true in science is true in life. If
we are out of tune with our surroundings we
only beat the air, and our efforts are in vain.
We get no sympathetic response.</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_129" id="Page_129"></SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />