<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_XVI" id="CHAPTER_XVI"></SPAN>CHAPTER XVI.</h2>
<h3>HOW THE TELEPHONE TALKS.</h3>
<p>Everybody knows what the telephone is because
it is in almost every man's house. But
while everybody knows what it is, there are
very few (comparatively speaking) that know
how it works. If you remember what has been
said about sound and electromagnetism it will
not be hard to understand.</p>
<p>When any one utters a spoken word the air
is thrown into shivers or vibrations of a peculiar
form, and every different sound has a
different form. Therefore, every articulate
word differs from every other word, not only
as a shape in the air, but as a sensation in the
brain, where the air-vibrations have been conducted
through the organ of hearing; otherwise
we could not distinguish between one
word and another. Every different word produces
a different sensation because there is a
physical difference, as a shape or motion, in
the air where it is uttered. If one word contains
1000 simultaneous air-motions and another
1500 you can see that there is a physical
or mechanical difference in the air.<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_146" id="Page_146"></SPAN></span></p>
<p>The construction of the simplest form of
telephone is as follows: Take a piece of iron
rod one-half or three-quarters of an inch long
and one-quarter inch thick, and after putting
a spool-head on each end to hold the wire in
place wind it full of fine insulated copper
wire; fasten the end of this spool to the end
of a straight-bar permanent magnet. Then
put the whole into a suitable frame, and
mount a thin circular diaphragm (membrane
or plate) of iron or steel, held by its edges, so
that the free end of the spool will come near
to but not touch the center of the diaphragm.
This diaphragm must be held rigidly at the
edges.</p>
<p>Now if the two ends of the insulated copper
wires are brought out to suitable binding-screws
the instrument is done.</p>
<p>The permanent steel magnet serves a double
purpose. When the telephone was first used
commercially, the instrument now used as a
receiver was also used as a transmitter. As a
transmitter it is a dynamo-electric machine.
Every time the iron diaphragm is moved in
the magnetic field of the pole of the permanent
magnet, which in this case is the free end
of the spool (the iron of the spool being magnetic
by contact with the permanent magnet),
there is a current set up in the wire wound on
the spool; a short impulse, lasting only as
long as the movement lasts. The intensity of<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_147" id="Page_147"></SPAN></span>
the impulse will depend upon the amplitude
and quickness of the movement of the diaphragm.
If there is a long movement there
will be a strong current and vice versa. If
a sound is uttered, and even if the multitude
of sounds that are required to form a
word, be spoken to the diaphragm, the latter
partakes in kind of the air-motions that strike
it. It swings or vibrates in the air, and if it
is a perfect diaphragm it moves exactly as the
air does, both as to amplitude and complexity
of movement. You will remember that in the
chapter on sound-quality (Vol. II) it was said
that there were hundreds and sometimes thousands
of superposed motions in the tones of
some voices that gave them the element we
call quality.</p>
<p>All these complex motions are communicated
by the air to the diaphragm, and the
diaphragm sets up electric currents in the wire
wound on the spool, corresponding exactly in
number and form, so that the current is
molded exactly as the air-waves are. Now, if
we connect another telephone in the circuit,
and talk to one of them, the diaphragm of the
other will be vibrated by the electric current
sent, and caused to move in sympathy with it
and make exactly the same motions relatively,
both as to number and amplitude.</p>
<p>It will be plain that if the receiving diaphragm
is making the same motions as the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_148" id="Page_148"></SPAN></span>
transmitting diaphragm, it will put the air
in the same kind of motion that the air is in
at the transmitting end, and will produce the
same sensation when sensed by the brain
through the ear. If the air-motion is that of
any spoken word it will be the same at both
ends of the line, except that it will not be so
intense at the receiving-end; it is the same
relatively. And this is how the telephone
talks.</p>
<p>I have said that the permanent magnet had
two functions. In the case of the transmitter
it is the medium through which mechanical
is converted into electrical energy. It corresponds
to the field-magnet of the dynamo,
while the diaphragm corresponds to the revolving
armature, and the voice is the steam-engine
that drives it. In the second place, it
puts a tension on the diaphragm and also puts
the molecules of the iron core of the magnet
in a state of tension or magnetic strain, and
in that condition both the molecules and the
diaphragm are much more sensitive to the
electric impulses sent over the wire from the
transmitter. This fact was experimented
upon by the writer as far back as 1879 and
published in the Journal of the American
Electrical Society. At the present day this
form of telephone is used only as a receiver.</p>
<p>Transmitters have been made in a variety
of forms, but there are only two generic<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_149" id="Page_149"></SPAN></span>
methods of transmission. One is the magneto
method—the one we have described—and the
other is effected by varying the resistance of
a battery current. The former will work without
a battery, as the voice acting on the wire
around the magnet through the diaphragm
creates the current; in the latter the current
is created by the battery but molded by the
voice. In the latter method the current passes
through carbon contacts that are moved by the
diaphragm. Carbon is the best substance, because
it will bear a wider separation of contact
without actually breaking the current.
When carbon points are separated that have
an electric current passing through them, there
is an arc formed on the same principle as the
electric arc-light.</p>
<p>Great improvements in details have been
made in the telephone since its first use, but
no new principles have been discovered as applied
to transmission.</p>
<p>We have spoken in another place regarding
the various claimants to the invention of the
telephone, but here is one that has been overlooked.
A young man from the country was
in a telegraph-office at one time and was left
alone while the operator went to dinner. Suddenly
the sounder started up and rattled away
at such a rate that the countryman thought
something should be done. He leaned down
close to the instrument and shouted as loudly<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_150" id="Page_150"></SPAN></span>
as possible these words: "The operator has
gone to dinner." From what we know now
of the operation of the telephone I have no
doubt but that he transmitted his voice to
some extent over the wire. This young man's
claims have never been put forward before,
and we are doing him tardy justice. But his
claim is quite as good as many others set forth
by people who think they invent, whenever it
occurs to them that something new might possibly
be done, if only somebody would do it.
And when that somebody does do it they lay
claim to it.</p>
<p>In the early days of the telephone it was not
supposed that a vocal message could be transmitted
to a very great distance. However, as
time went on and experiments were multiplied
the distance to which one could converse with
another through a wire kept on increasing.</p>
<p>In these days, as every one knows, it is a
daily occurrence that business men converse
with each other, telephonically, for a distance
of 1000 miles or more; in fact, it is possible
to transmit the voice through a single circuit
about as great a distance as it is possible to
practically telegraph. This leads us to speak
of another telegraphic apparatus which we
have not heretofore mentioned, and that is the
telegraphic repeater. It is a common notion
that messages are sent through a single circuit
across the continent, but this is not the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_151" id="Page_151"></SPAN></span>
case, although the circuits are very much
longer than they were some years ago. The
repeater is an instrument that repeats a message
automatically from one circuit to another.
For instance, if Chicago is sending a message
to New York through two circuits, the division
being in Buffalo, the repeater will be located
at Buffalo and under the control of both the
operator at Chicago and the operator in New
York. When Chicago is sending, one part of
the repeater works in unison with the Chicago
key and is the key to the New York circuit,
which begins at Buffalo. When New York is
sending the other part of the repeater operates,
which becomes a key which repeats the message
to the Chicago line. In this way the
practical result is the same as though the circuit
were complete from New York to Chicago.
At the present day some of the copper
wires and perhaps some of the larger iron
wires are used direct from Chicago to New
York without repetition, but all messages between
New York and San Francisco are automatically
repeated at least twice and under
certain conditions of weather oftener. I can
remember that in wet weather in the old days,
with such wires as they had then (being No.
9 iron with bad joints, which gave the circuit
a high resistance) that these repeaters would
be inserted at Toledo, Cleveland, Buffalo and
Albany in order to work from Chicago to New<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_152" id="Page_152"></SPAN></span>
York. Under such conditions the transmission
would necessarily be slow, because an
armature time will be lost at each repeater.
Regarding each repeater as a key, when Chicago
depresses his key the armature of the
next repeater must act, and then the next
successively, and all of this takes time, although
only a small fraction of a second.</p>
<p>The repeater was a very delicate instrument
and had to be handled by a skilled operator.
Every wire must be in its place or the instrument
would fail to operate. I remember on
one occasion in Cleveland that along in the
middle of the night the repeater failed to
work. The operator knew nothing of the principle
of its operation, so that when it failed he
had to appeal to some of his superiors.</p>
<p>At this time there was no one in the office
who knew how to adjust it, so they had to
send up to the house of the superintendent and
arouse him from his sleep and bring him down
to the office. He looked under the table and
found that one of the wires had loosened from
its binding-post and was hanging down. He
said immediately, "Here's the trouble; I
should think you could have seen it yourself."
The operator replied, "I did see that, but I
didn't think one wire would make any difference."
He learned the lesson that all electricians
have had to learn—that even one wire
makes all the difference in the world. But<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_153" id="Page_153"></SPAN></span>
this operator was no worse in that respect than
some of his superiors. One of the heads of the
Cleveland office at one time in the early days
wanted to give some directions to the office at
Buffalo. He told the operator at the key to
tell Buffalo so and so, when the operator replied:
"I can't do it; Buffalo has his key
open." The official immediately said with severity:
"Tell him to close it." He forgot that
it would be as difficult for him to tell him to
close it, as it would have been to have sent the
original message.</p>
<p>But let us go back to the telephone. While
it is possible to send a message from New
York to San Francisco by telegraph, it is not
possible to telephone that distance, because as
yet no one has been able to devise a repeater
that will transfer spoken words from one line
to another satisfactorily. But unless the
printer and publisher bestir themselves some
one may accomplish the feat before this little
book reaches the reader. If this proves to be
true, let the writer be the first to congratulate
the successful inventor.</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_154" id="Page_154"></SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />