<h3><b><SPAN name="2._The_Copiousness_of_Mr._Belloc"></SPAN>2. The Copiousness of Mr. Belloc</b></h3>
<br/>
<p>Mr. Belloc has during the last four or five years become a public
man.
Before that he had been acknowledged a man of genius. But even the fact
that he had sat in the House of Commons never led any great section of
Englishmen to regard him as a figure or an institution. He was
generally
looked on as one who made his bed aggressively among heretics, as a
kind
of Rabelaisian dissenter, as a settled interrupter, half-rude and
half-jesting. And yet there was always in him something of the
pedagogue who has been revealed so famously in these last months. Not
only had he a passion for facts and for stringing facts upon theories.
He had also a high-headed and dogmatic and assured way of imparting his
facts and theories to the human race as it sat—or in so far as it could
be persuaded to sit—on its little forms.</p>
<p>It is his schoolmasterishness which chiefly distinguishes the genius
of
Mr. Belloc from the genius of his great and uproarious comrade, Mr.
Chesterton. Mr. Belloc is not a humorist to anything like the same
degree as Mr. Chesterton. If Mr. Chesterton were a schoolmaster he
would
give all the triangles noses and eyes, and he would turn the Latin
verbs
into nonsense rhymes. Humour is his breath and being. He cannot speak
of
the Kingdom of Heaven or of Robert Browning without it any more than of
asparagus. He is a laughing theologian, a laughing politician, a
laughing critic, a laughing philosopher. He retains a fantastic
cheerfulness even amid the blind furies—and how blindly furious he can
sometimes be!—of controversy. With Mr. Belloc, on the other hand,
laughter is a separate and relinquishable gift. He can at will lay
aside
the mirth of one who has broken bounds for the solemnity of the man in
authority. He can be scapegrace prince and sober king by turns, and in
such a way that the two personalities seem scarcely to be related to
each other. Compared with Mr. Chesterton he is like a man in a mask, or
a series of masks. He reveals more of his intellect to the world than
of
his heart. He is not one of those authors whom one reads with a sense
of
personal intimacy. He is too arrogant even in his merriment for that.</p>
<p>Perhaps the figure we see reflected most obtrusively in his works is
that of a man delighting in immense physical and intellectual energies.
It is this that makes him one of the happiest of travellers. On his
travels, one feels, every inch and nook of his being is intent upon the
passing earth. The world is to him at once a map and a history and a
poem and a church and an ale-house. The birds in the greenwood, the
beer, the site of an old battle, the meaning of an old road, sacred
emblems by the roadside, the comic events of way-faring—he has an equal
appetite for them all. Has he not made a perfect book of these things,
with a thousand fancies added, in <i>The Four Men</i>? In <i>The Four
Men</i> he
has written a travel-book which more than any other of his works has
something of the passion of a personal confession. Here the pilgrim
becomes nearly genial as he indulges in his humours against the rich
and
against policemen and in behalf of Sussex against Kent and the rest of
the inhabited world.</p>
<p>Mr. Chesterton has spoken of Mr. Belloc as one who "did and does
humanly
and heartily love England, not as a duty but as a pleasure, and almost
an indulgence." And <i>The Four Men</i> expresses this love
humorously,
inconsequently, and with a grave stepping eloquence. There are few
speeches in modern books better than the conversations in <i>The Four
Men.</i> Mr. Belloc is not one of those disciples of realism who
believe
that the art of conversation is dead, and that modern people are only
capable of addressing each other in one-line sentences. He has the
traditional love of the fine speech such as we find it in the ancient
poets and historians and dramatists and satirists. He loves a monologue
that passes from mockery to regret, that gathers up by the way anecdote
and history and essay and foolery, that is half a narrative of things
seen and half an irresponsible imagination. He can describe a runaway
horse with the farcical realism of the authors of <i>Some Experiences
of
an Irish R.M.</i>, can parody a judge, can paint a portrait, and can
steep
a landscape in vision. Two recent critics have described him as "the
best English prose writer since Dryden," but that only means that Mr.
Belloc's rush of genius has quite naturally swept them off their feet.</p>
<p>If Mr. Belloc's love of country is an indulgence, his moods of
suspicion and contempt are something of the same kind. He is nothing of
a philanthropist in any sense of the word. He has no illusions about
the
virtue of the human race. He takes pleasure in scorn, and there is a
flavour of bitterness in his jests. His fiction largely belongs to the
comedy of corruption. He enjoys—and so do we—the thought of the poet
in Sussex who had no money except three shillings, "and a French penny,
which last some one had given him out of charity, taking him for a
beggar a little way-out of Brightling that very day." When he describes
the popular rejoicings at the result of Mr. Clutterbuck's election, he
comments: "The populace were wild with joy at their victory, and that
portion of them who as bitterly mourned defeat would have been roughly
handled had they not numbered quite half this vast assembly of human
beings." He is satirist and ironist even more than historian. His
ironical essays are the best of their kind that have been written in
recent years.</p>
<p>Mr. Mandell and Mr. Shanks in their little study, <i>Hilaire
Belloc: the
Man and his Work</i>, are more successful in their exposition of Mr.
Belloc's theory of history and the theory of politics which has risen
out of it—or out of which it has risen—than they are in their
definition of him as a man of letters. They have written a lively book
on him, but they do not sufficiently communicate an impression of the
kind of his exuberance, of his thrusting intellectual ardour, of his
pomp as a narrator, of his blind and doctrinaire injustices, of his
jesting like a Roman Emperor's, of the strength of his happiness upon a
journey, of his buckishness, of the queer lack of surprising phrases in
his work, of his measured omniscience, of the immense weight of
tradition in the manner of his writing. There are many contemporary
writers whose work seems to be a development of journalism. Mr.
Belloc's is the child of four literatures, or, maybe, half a dozen. He
often writes carelessly, sometimes dully but there is the echo of
greatness in his work. He is one of the few contemporary men of genius
whose books are under-estimated rather than over-estimated. He is an
author who has brought back to the world something of the copiousness,
fancy, appetite, power, and unreason of the talk that, one imagines,
was
once to be heard in the Mermaid Tavern.</p>
<br/>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />