<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0051" id="link2H_4_0051"></SPAN></p>
<h2> VII. BIDAULT-COQUILLE AND MANIFLORE, THE SOCIALISTS </h2>
<p>Whilst the wind of anger and hatred blew in Alca, Eugine Bidault-Coquille,
poorest and happiest of astronomers, installed in an old steam-engine of
the time of the Draconides, was observing the heavens through a bad
telescope, and photographing the paths of the meteors upon some damaged
photographic plates. His genius corrected the errors of his instruments
and his love of science triumphed over the worthlessness of his apparatus.
With an inextinguishable ardour he observed aerolites, meteors, and
fire-balls, and all the glowing ruins and blazing sparks which pass
through the terrestrial atmosphere with prodigious speed, and as a reward
for is studious vigils he received the indifference of the public, the
ingratitude of the State and the blame of the learned societies. Engulfed
in the celestial spaces he knew not what occurred upon the surface of the
earth. He never read the newspapers, and when he walked through the town
his mind was occupied with the November asteroids, and more than once he
found himself at the bottom of a pond in one of the public parks or
beneath the wheels of a motor omnibus.</p>
<p>Elevated in stature as in thought he respected himself and others. This
was shown by his cold politeness as well as by a very thin black frock
coat and a tall hat which gave to his person an appearance at once
emaciated and sublime. He took his meals in a little restaurant from which
all customers less intellectual than himself had fled, and thenceforth his
napkin bound by its wooden ring rested alone in the abandoned rack.</p>
<p>In this cook-shop his eyes fell one evening upon Colomban's memorandum in
favour of Pyrot. He read it as he was cracking some bad nuts and suddenly,
exalted with astonishment, admiration, horror, and pity, he forgot all
about falling meteors and shooting stars and saw nothing but the innocent
man hanging in his cage exposed to the winds of heaven and the ravens
perching upon it.</p>
<p>That image did not leave him. For a week he had been obsessed by the
innocent convict, when, as he was leaving his cook-shop, he saw a crowd of
citizens entering a public-house in which a public meeting was going on.
He went in. The meeting was disorderly; they were yelling, abusing one
another and knocking one another down in the smoke-laden hall. The
Pyrotists and the Anti-Pyrotists spoke in turn and were alternately
cheered and hissed at. An obscure and confused enthusiasm moved the
audience. With the audacity of a timid and retired man Bidault-Coquille
leaped upon the platform and spoke for three-quarters of an hour. He spoke
very quickly, without order, but with vehemence, and with all the
conviction of a mathematical mystic. He was cheered. When he got down from
the platform a big woman of uncertain age, dressed in red, and wearing an
immense hat trimmed with heroic feathers, throwing herself into his arms,
embraced him, and said to him:</p>
<p>"You are splendid!"</p>
<p>He thought in his simplicity that there was some truth in the statement.</p>
<p>She declared to him that henceforth she would live but for Pyrot's defence
and Colomban's glory. He thought her sublime and beautiful. She was
Maniflore, a poor old courtesan, now forgotten and discarded, who had
suddenly become a vehement politician.</p>
<p>She never left him. They spent glorious hours together in doss-houses and
in lodgings beautified by their love, in newspaper offices, in
meeting-halls and in lecture-halls. As he was an idealist, he persisted in
thinking her beautiful, although she gave him abundant opportunity of
seeing that she had preserved no charm of any kind. From her past beauty
she only retained a confidence in her capacity for pleasing and a lofty
assurance in demanding homage. Still, it must be admitted that this Pyrot
affair, so fruitful in prodigies, invested Maniflore with a sort of civic
majesty, and transformed her, at public meetings, into an august symbol of
justice and truth.</p>
<p>Bidault-Coquille and Maniflore did not kindle the least spark of irony or
amusement in a single Anti-Pyrotist, a single defender of Greatauk, or a
single supporter of the army. The gods, in their anger, had refused to
those men the precious gift of humour. They gravely accused the courtesan
and the astronomer of being spies, of treachery, and of plotting against
their country. Bidault-Coquille and Maniflore grew visibly greater beneath
insult, abuse, and calumny.</p>
<p>For long months Penguinia had been divided into two camps and, though at
first sight it may appear strange, hitherto the socialists had taken no
part in the contest. Their groups comprised almost all the manual workers
in the country, necessarily scattered, confused, broken up, and divided,
but formidable. The Pyrot affair threw the group leaders into a singular
embarrassment. They did not wish to place themselves either on the side of
the financiers or on the side of the army. They regarded the Jews, both
great and small, as their uncompromising opponents. Their principles were
not at stake, nor were their interests concerned in the affair. Still the
greater number felt how difficult it was growing for them to remain aloof
from struggles in which all Penguinia was engaged.</p>
<p>Their leaders called a sitting of their federation at the Rue de la
Queue-du-diable-St. Mael, to take into consideration the conduct they
ought to adopt in the present circumstances and in future eventualities.</p>
<p>Comrade Phoenix was the first to speak.</p>
<p>"A crime," said he, "the most odious and cowardly of crimes, a judicial
crime, has been committed. Military judges, coerced or misled by their
superior officers, have condemned an innocent man to an infamous and cruel
punishment. Let us not say that the victim is not one of our own party,
that he belongs to a caste which was, and always will be, our enemy. Our
party is the party of social justice; it can look upon no iniquity with
indifference.</p>
<p>"It would be a shame for us if we left it to Kerdanic, a radical, to
Colomban, a member of the middle classes, and to a few moderate
Republicans, alone to proceed against the crimes of the army. If the
victim is not one of us, his executioners are our brothers' executioners,
and before Greatauk struck down this soldier he shot our comrades who were
on strike.</p>
<p>"Comrades, by an intellectual, moral and material effort you must rescue
Pyrot from his torment, and in performing this generous act you are not
turning aside from the liberating and revolutionary task you have
undertaken, for Pyrot his become the symbol of the oppressed and of all
the social iniquities that now exist; by destroying one you make all the
others tremble."</p>
<p>When Phoenix ended, comrade Sapor spoke in these terms:</p>
<p>"You are advised to abandon your task in order to do something with which
you have no concern. Why throw yourselves into a conflict where, on
whatever side you turn, you will find none but your natural,
uncompromising, even necessary opponents? Are the financiers to be less
hated by us than the army? What inept and criminal generosity is it that
hurries you to save those seven hundred Pyrotists whom you will always
find confronting you in the social war?</p>
<p>"It is proposed that you act the part of the police for your enemies, and
that you are to re-establish for them the order which their own crimes
have disturbed. Magnanimity pushed to this degree changes its name.</p>
<p>"Comrades, there is a point at which infamy becomes fatal to a society.
Penguin society is being strangled by its infamy, and you are requested to
save it, to give it air that it can breathe. This is simply turning you
into ridicule.</p>
<p>"Leave is to smother itself and let us gaze at its last convulsions with
joyful contempt, only regretting that it has so entirely corrupted the
soil on which it has been built that we shall find nothing but poisoned
mud on which to lay the foundations of a new society."</p>
<p>When Sapor had ended his speech comrade Lapersonne pronounced these few
words:</p>
<p>"Phoenix calls us to Pyrot's help for the reason that Pyrot is innocent.
It seems to me that that is a very bad reason. If Pyrot is innocent he has
behaved like a good soldier and has always conscientiously worked at his
trade, which principally consists in shooting the people. That is not a
motive to make the people brave all dangers in his defence. When it is
demonstrated to me that Pyrot is guilty and that he stole the army hay, I
shall be on his side."</p>
<p>Comrade Larrivee afterwards spoke.</p>
<p>"I am not of my friend, Phoenix's opinion but I am not with my friend
Sapor either. I do not believe that the party is bound to embrace a cause
as soon as we are told that that cause is just. That, I am afraid, is a
grievous abuse of words and a dangerous equivocation. For social justice
is not revolutionary justice. They are both in perpetual antagonism: to
serve the one is to oppose the other. As for me, my choice is made. I am
for revolutionary justice as against social justice. Still, in the present
case I am against abstention. I say that when a lucky chance brings us an
affair like this we should be fools not to profit by it.</p>
<p>"How? We are given an opportunity of striking terrible, perhaps fatal,
blows against militarism. And am I to fold my arms? I tell you, comrades,
I am not a fakir, I have never been a fakir, and if there are fakirs here
let them not count on me. To sit in meditation is a policy without results
and one which I shall never adopt.</p>
<p>"A party like ours ought to be continually asserting itself. It ought to
prove its existence by continual action. We will intervene in the Pyrot
affair but we will intervene in it in a revolutionary manner; we will
adopt violent action. . . . Perhaps you think that violence is
old-fashioned and superannuated, to be scrapped along with diligences,
hand-presses and aerial telegraphy. You are mistaken. To-day as yesterday
nothing is obtained except by violence; it is the one efficient
instrument. The only thing necessary is to know how to use it. You ask
what will our action be? I will tell you: it will be to stir up the
governing classes against one another, to put the army in conflict with
the capitalists, the government with the magistracy, the nobility and
clergy with the Jews, and if possible to drive them all to destroy one
another. To do this would be to carry on an agitation which would weaken
government in the same way that fever wears out the sick.</p>
<p>"The Pyrot affair, little as we know how to turn it to advantage, will put
forward by ten years the growth of the Social party and the emancipation
of the proletariat, by disarmament, the general strike, and revolution."</p>
<p>The leaders of the party having each expressed a different opinion, the
discussion was continued, not without vivacity. The orators, as always
happens in such a case, reproduced the arguments they had already brought
forward, though with less order and moderation than before. The dispute
was prolonged and none changed his opinion. These opinions, in the final
analysis, were reduced to two: that of Sapor and Lapersonne who advised
abstention, and that of Phoenix and Larrivee, who wanted intervention.
Even these two contrary opinions were united in a common hatred of the
heads of the army and of their justice, and in a common belief in Pyrot's
innocence. So that public opinion was hardly mistaken in regarding all the
Socialist leaders as pernicious Anti-Pyrotists.</p>
<p>As for the vast masses in whose name they spoke and whom they represented
as far as speech can express the impossible—as for the proletarians
whose thought is difficult to know and who do not know it themselves, it
seemed that the Pyrot affair did not interest them. It was too literary
for them, it was in too classical a style, and had an upper-middle-class
and high-finance tone about it that did not please them much.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />