<p>In the savage state every family owns a shelter as good as the best, and
sufficient for its coarser and simpler wants; but I think that I speak
within bounds when I say that, though the birds of the air have their
nests, and the foxes their holes, and the savages their wigwams, in modern
civilized society not more than one half the families own a shelter. In
the large towns and cities, where civilization especially prevails, the
number of those who own a shelter is a very small fraction of the whole.
The rest pay an annual tax for this outside garment of all, become
indispensable summer and winter, which would buy a village of Indian
wigwams, but now helps to keep them poor as long as they live. I do not
mean to insist here on the disadvantage of hiring compared with owning,
but it is evident that the savage owns his shelter because it costs so
little, while the civilized man hires his commonly because he cannot
afford to own it; nor can he, in the long run, any better afford to hire.
But, answers one, by merely paying this tax, the poor civilized man
secures an abode which is a palace compared with the savage's. An annual
rent of from twenty-five to a hundred dollars (these are the country
rates) entitles him to the benefit of the improvements of centuries,
spacious apartments, clean paint and paper, Rumford fire-place, back
plastering, Venetian blinds, copper pump, spring lock, a commodious
cellar, and many other things. But how happens it that he who is said to
enjoy these things is so commonly a poor civilized man, while the savage,
who has them not, is rich as a savage? If it is asserted that civilization
is a real advance in the condition of man—and I think that it is,
though only the wise improve their advantages—it must be shown that
it has produced better dwellings without making them more costly; and the
cost of a thing is the amount of what I will call life which is required
to be exchanged for it, immediately or in the long run. An average house
in this neighborhood costs perhaps eight hundred dollars, and to lay up
this sum will take from ten to fifteen years of the laborer's life, even
if he is not encumbered with a family—estimating the pecuniary value
of every man's labor at one dollar a day, for if some receive more, others
receive less;—so that he must have spent more than half his life
commonly before his wigwam will be earned. If we suppose him to pay a rent
instead, this is but a doubtful choice of evils. Would the savage have
been wise to exchange his wigwam for a palace on these terms?</p>
<p>It may be guessed that I reduce almost the whole advantage of holding this
superfluous property as a fund in store against the future, so far as the
individual is concerned, mainly to the defraying of funeral expenses. But
perhaps a man is not required to bury himself. Nevertheless this points to
an important distinction between the civilized man and the savage; and, no
doubt, they have designs on us for our benefit, in making the life of a
civilized people an <i>institution</i>, in which the life of the
individual is to a great extent absorbed, in order to preserve and perfect
that of the race. But I wish to show at what a sacrifice this advantage is
at present obtained, and to suggest that we may possibly so live as to
secure all the advantage without suffering any of the disadvantage. What
mean ye by saying that the poor ye have always with you, or that the
fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children's teeth are set on edge?</p>
<p>"As I live, saith the Lord God, ye shall not have occasion any more to use
this proverb in Israel.</p>
<p>"Behold all souls are mine; as the soul of the father, so also the soul of
the son is mine: the soul that sinneth, it shall die."</p>
<p>When I consider my neighbors, the farmers of Concord, who are at least as
well off as the other classes, I find that for the most part they have
been toiling twenty, thirty, or forty years, that they may become the real
owners of their farms, which commonly they have inherited with
encumbrances, or else bought with hired money—and we may regard one
third of that toil as the cost of their houses—but commonly they
have not paid for them yet. It is true, the encumbrances sometimes
outweigh the value of the farm, so that the farm itself becomes one great
encumbrance, and still a man is found to inherit it, being well acquainted
with it, as he says. On applying to the assessors, I am surprised to learn
that they cannot at once name a dozen in the town who own their farms free
and clear. If you would know the history of these homesteads, inquire at
the bank where they are mortgaged. The man who has actually paid for his
farm with labor on it is so rare that every neighbor can point to him. I
doubt if there are three such men in Concord. What has been said of the
merchants, that a very large majority, even ninety-seven in a hundred, are
sure to fail, is equally true of the farmers. With regard to the
merchants, however, one of them says pertinently that a great part of
their failures are not genuine pecuniary failures, but merely failures to
fulfil their engagements, because it is inconvenient; that is, it is the
moral character that breaks down. But this puts an infinitely worse face
on the matter, and suggests, beside, that probably not even the other
three succeed in saving their souls, but are perchance bankrupt in a worse
sense than they who fail honestly. Bankruptcy and repudiation are the
springboards from which much of our civilization vaults and turns its
somersets, but the savage stands on the unelastic plank of famine. Yet the
Middlesex Cattle Show goes off here with <i>�clat</i> annually, as if all
the joints of the agricultural machine were suent.</p>
<p>The farmer is endeavoring to solve the problem of a livelihood by a
formula more complicated than the problem itself. To get his shoestrings
he speculates in herds of cattle. With consummate skill he has set his
trap with a hair spring to catch comfort and independence, and then, as he
turned away, got his own leg into it. This is the reason he is poor; and
for a similar reason we are all poor in respect to a thousand savage
comforts, though surrounded by luxuries. As Chapman sings,</p>
<p>"The false society of men—<br/>
—for earthly greatness<br/>
All heavenly comforts rarefies to air."<br/></p>
<p class="nind">
And when the farmer has got his house, he may not be the richer but the
poorer for it, and it be the house that has got him. As I understand it,
that was a valid objection urged by Momus against the house which Minerva
made, that she "had not made it movable, by which means a bad neighborhood
might be avoided"; and it may still be urged, for our houses are such
unwieldy property that we are often imprisoned rather than housed in them;
and the bad neighborhood to be avoided is our own scurvy selves. I know
one or two families, at least, in this town, who, for nearly a generation,
have been wishing to sell their houses in the outskirts and move into the
village, but have not been able to accomplish it, and only death will set
them free.</p>
<p>Granted that the majority are able at last either to own or hire the
modern house with all its improvements. While civilization has been
improving our houses, it has not equally improved the men who are to
inhabit them. It has created palaces, but it was not so easy to create
noblemen and kings. And <i>if the civilized man's pursuits are no worthier
than the savage's, if he is employed the greater part of his life in
obtaining gross necessaries and comforts merely, why should he have a
better dwelling than the former?</i></p>
<p>But how do the poor minority fare? Perhaps it will be found that just in
proportion as some have been placed in outward circumstances above the
savage, others have been degraded below him. The luxury of one class is
counterbalanced by the indigence of another. On the one side is the
palace, on the other are the almshouse and "silent poor." The myriads who
built the pyramids to be the tombs of the Pharaohs were fed on garlic, and
it may be were not decently buried themselves. The mason who finishes the
cornice of the palace returns at night perchance to a hut not so good as a
wigwam. It is a mistake to suppose that, in a country where the usual
evidences of civilization exist, the condition of a very large body of the
inhabitants may not be as degraded as that of savages. I refer to the
degraded poor, not now to the degraded rich. To know this I should not
need to look farther than to the shanties which everywhere border our
railroads, that last improvement in civilization; where I see in my daily
walks human beings living in sties, and all winter with an open door, for
the sake of light, without any visible, often imaginable, wood-pile, and
the forms of both old and young are permanently contracted by the long
habit of shrinking from cold and misery, and the development of all their
limbs and faculties is checked. It certainly is fair to look at that class
by whose labor the works which distinguish this generation are
accomplished. Such too, to a greater or less extent, is the condition of
the operatives of every denomination in England, which is the great
workhouse of the world. Or I could refer you to Ireland, which is marked
as one of the white or enlightened spots on the map. Contrast the physical
condition of the Irish with that of the North American Indian, or the
South Sea Islander, or any other savage race before it was degraded by
contact with the civilized man. Yet I have no doubt that that people's
rulers are as wise as the average of civilized rulers. Their condition
only proves what squalidness may consist with civilization. I hardly need
refer now to the laborers in our Southern States who produce the staple
exports of this country, and are themselves a staple production of the
South. But to confine myself to those who are said to be in <i>moderate</i>
circumstances.</p>
<p>Most men appear never to have considered what a house is, and are actually
though needlessly poor all their lives because they think that they must
have such a one as their neighbors have. As if one were to wear any sort
of coat which the tailor might cut out for him, or, gradually leaving off
palm-leaf hat or cap of woodchuck skin, complain of hard times because he
could not afford to buy him a crown! It is possible to invent a house
still more convenient and luxurious than we have, which yet all would
admit that man could not afford to pay for. Shall we always study to
obtain more of these things, and not sometimes to be content with less?
Shall the respectable citizen thus gravely teach, by precept and example,
the necessity of the young man's providing a certain number of superfluous
glow-shoes, and umbrellas, and empty guest chambers for empty guests,
before he dies? Why should not our furniture be as simple as the Arab's or
the Indian's? When I think of the benefactors of the race, whom we have
apotheosized as messengers from heaven, bearers of divine gifts to man, I
do not see in my mind any retinue at their heels, any carload of
fashionable furniture. Or what if I were to allow—would it not be a
singular allowance?—that our furniture should be more complex than
the Arab's, in proportion as we are morally and intellectually his
superiors! At present our houses are cluttered and defiled with it, and a
good housewife would sweep out the greater part into the dust hole, and
not leave her morning's work undone. Morning work! By the blushes of
Aurora and the music of Memnon, what should be man's <i>morning work</i>
in this world? I had three pieces of limestone on my desk, but I was
terrified to find that they required to be dusted daily, when the
furniture of my mind was all undusted still, and threw them out the window
in disgust. How, then, could I have a furnished house? I would rather sit
in the open air, for no dust gathers on the grass, unless where man has
broken ground.</p>
<p>It is the luxurious and dissipated who set the fashions which the herd so
diligently follow. The traveller who stops at the best houses, so called,
soon discovers this, for the publicans presume him to be a Sardanapalus,
and if he resigned himself to their tender mercies he would soon be
completely emasculated. I think that in the railroad car we are inclined
to spend more on luxury than on safety and convenience, and it threatens
without attaining these to become no better than a modern drawing-room,
with its divans, and ottomans, and sun-shades, and a hundred other
oriental things, which we are taking west with us, invented for the ladies
of the harem and the effeminate natives of the Celestial Empire, which
Jonathan should be ashamed to know the names of. I would rather sit on a
pumpkin and have it all to myself than be crowded on a velvet cushion. I
would rather ride on earth in an ox cart, with a free circulation, than go
to heaven in the fancy car of an excursion train and breathe a <i>malaria</i>
all the way.</p>
<p>The very simplicity and nakedness of man's life in the primitive ages
imply this advantage, at least, that they left him still but a sojourner
in nature. When he was refreshed with food and sleep, he contemplated his
journey again. He dwelt, as it were, in a tent in this world, and was
either threading the valleys, or crossing the plains, or climbing the
mountain-tops. But lo! men have become the tools of their tools. The man
who independently plucked the fruits when he was hungry is become a
farmer; and he who stood under a tree for shelter, a housekeeper. We now
no longer camp as for a night, but have settled down on earth and
forgotten heaven. We have adopted Christianity merely as an improved
method of <i>agri</i>-culture. We have built for this world a family
mansion, and for the next a family tomb. The best works of art are the
expression of man's struggle to free himself from this condition, but the
effect of our art is merely to make this low state comfortable and that
higher state to be forgotten. There is actually no place in this village
for a work of <i>fine</i> art, if any had come down to us, to stand, for
our lives, our houses and streets, furnish no proper pedestal for it.
There is not a nail to hang a picture on, nor a shelf to receive the bust
of a hero or a saint. When I consider how our houses are built and paid
for, or not paid for, and their internal economy managed and sustained, I
wonder that the floor does not give way under the visitor while he is
admiring the gewgaws upon the mantelpiece, and let him through into the
cellar, to some solid and honest though earthy foundation. I cannot but
perceive that this so-called rich and refined life is a thing jumped at,
and I do not get on in the enjoyment of the fine arts which adorn it, my
attention being wholly occupied with the jump; for I remember that the
greatest genuine leap, due to human muscles alone, on record, is that of
certain wandering Arabs, who are said to have cleared twenty-five feet on
level ground. Without factitious support, man is sure to come to earth
again beyond that distance. The first question which I am tempted to put
to the proprietor of such great impropriety is, Who bolsters you? Are you
one of the ninety-seven who fail, or the three who succeed? Answer me
these questions, and then perhaps I may look at your bawbles and find them
ornamental. The cart before the horse is neither beautiful nor useful.
Before we can adorn our houses with beautiful objects the walls must be
stripped, and our lives must be stripped, and beautiful housekeeping and
beautiful living be laid for a foundation: now, a taste for the beautiful
is most cultivated out of doors, where there is no house and no
housekeeper.</p>
<p>Old Johnson, in his "Wonder-Working Providence," speaking of the first
settlers of this town, with whom he was contemporary, tells us that "they
burrow themselves in the earth for their first shelter under some
hillside, and, casting the soil aloft upon timber, they make a smoky fire
against the earth, at the highest side." They did not "provide them
houses," says he, "till the earth, by the Lord's blessing, brought forth
bread to feed them," and the first year's crop was so light that "they
were forced to cut their bread very thin for a long season." The secretary
of the Province of New Netherland, writing in Dutch, in 1650, for the
information of those who wished to take up land there, states more
particularly that "those in New Netherland, and especially in New England,
who have no means to build farmhouses at first according to their wishes,
dig a square pit in the ground, cellar fashion, six or seven feet deep, as
long and as broad as they think proper, case the earth inside with wood
all round the wall, and line the wood with the bark of trees or something
else to prevent the caving in of the earth; floor this cellar with plank,
and wainscot it overhead for a ceiling, raise a roof of spars clear up,
and cover the spars with bark or green sods, so that they can live dry and
warm in these houses with their entire families for two, three, and four
years, it being understood that partitions are run through those cellars
which are adapted to the size of the family. The wealthy and principal men
in New England, in the beginning of the colonies, commenced their first
dwelling-houses in this fashion for two reasons: firstly, in order not to
waste time in building, and not to want food the next season; secondly, in
order not to discourage poor laboring people whom they brought over in
numbers from Fatherland. In the course of three or four years, when the
country became adapted to agriculture, they built themselves handsome
houses, spending on them several thousands."</p>
<p>In this course which our ancestors took there was a show of prudence at
least, as if their principle were to satisfy the more pressing wants
first. But are the more pressing wants satisfied now? When I think of
acquiring for myself one of our luxurious dwellings, I am deterred, for,
so to speak, the country is not yet adapted to <i>human</i> culture, and
we are still forced to cut our <i>spiritual</i> bread far thinner than our
forefathers did their wheaten. Not that all architectural ornament is to
be neglected even in the rudest periods; but let our houses first be lined
with beauty, where they come in contact with our lives, like the tenement
of the shellfish, and not overlaid with it. But, alas! I have been inside
one or two of them, and know what they are lined with.</p>
<p>Though we are not so degenerate but that we might possibly live in a cave
or a wigwam or wear skins today, it certainly is better to accept the
advantages, though so dearly bought, which the invention and industry of
mankind offer. In such a neighborhood as this, boards and shingles, lime
and bricks, are cheaper and more easily obtained than suitable caves, or
whole logs, or bark in sufficient quantities, or even well-tempered clay
or flat stones. I speak understandingly on this subject, for I have made
myself acquainted with it both theoretically and practically. With a
little more wit we might use these materials so as to become richer than
the richest now are, and make our civilization a blessing. The civilized
man is a more experienced and wiser savage. But to make haste to my own
experiment.</p>
<p>Near the end of March, 1845, I borrowed an axe and went down to the woods
by Walden Pond, nearest to where I intended to build my house, and began
to cut down some tall, arrowy white pines, still in their youth, for
timber. It is difficult to begin without borrowing, but perhaps it is the
most generous course thus to permit your fellow-men to have an interest in
your enterprise. The owner of the axe, as he released his hold on it, said
that it was the apple of his eye; but I returned it sharper than I
received it. It was a pleasant hillside where I worked, covered with pine
woods, through which I looked out on the pond, and a small open field in
the woods where pines and hickories were springing up. The ice in the pond
was not yet dissolved, though there were some open spaces, and it was all
dark-colored and saturated with water. There were some slight flurries of
snow during the days that I worked there; but for the most part when I
came out on to the railroad, on my way home, its yellow sand heap
stretched away gleaming in the hazy atmosphere, and the rails shone in the
spring sun, and I heard the lark and pewee and other birds already come to
commence another year with us. They were pleasant spring days, in which
the winter of man's discontent was thawing as well as the earth, and the
life that had lain torpid began to stretch itself. One day, when my axe
had come off and I had cut a green hickory for a wedge, driving it with a
stone, and had placed the whole to soak in a pond-hole in order to swell
the wood, I saw a striped snake run into the water, and he lay on the
bottom, apparently without inconvenience, as long as I stayed there, or
more than a quarter of an hour; perhaps because he had not yet fairly come
out of the torpid state. It appeared to me that for a like reason men
remain in their present low and primitive condition; but if they should
feel the influence of the spring of springs arousing them, they would of
necessity rise to a higher and more ethereal life. I had previously seen
the snakes in frosty mornings in my path with portions of their bodies
still numb and inflexible, waiting for the sun to thaw them. On the 1st of
April it rained and melted the ice, and in the early part of the day,
which was very foggy, I heard a stray goose groping about over the pond
and cackling as if lost, or like the spirit of the fog.</p>
<p>So I went on for some days cutting and hewing timber, and also studs and
rafters, all with my narrow axe, not having many communicable or
scholar-like thoughts, singing to myself,—</p>
<p>Men say they know many things;<br/>
But lo! they have taken wings—<br/>
The arts and sciences,<br/>
And a thousand appliances;<br/>
The wind that blows<br/>
Is all that any body knows.<br/></p>
<p class="nind">
I hewed the main timbers six inches square, most of the studs on two sides
only, and the rafters and floor timbers on one side, leaving the rest of
the bark on, so that they were just as straight and much stronger than
sawed ones. Each stick was carefully mortised or tenoned by its stump, for
I had borrowed other tools by this time. My days in the woods were not
very long ones; yet I usually carried my dinner of bread and butter, and
read the newspaper in which it was wrapped, at noon, sitting amid the
green pine boughs which I had cut off, and to my bread was imparted some
of their fragrance, for my hands were covered with a thick coat of pitch.
Before I had done I was more the friend than the foe of the pine tree,
though I had cut down some of them, having become better acquainted with
it. Sometimes a rambler in the wood was attracted by the sound of my axe,
and we chatted pleasantly over the chips which I had made.</p>
<p>By the middle of April, for I made no haste in my work, but rather made
the most of it, my house was framed and ready for the raising. I had
already bought the shanty of James Collins, an Irishman who worked on the
Fitchburg Railroad, for boards. James Collins' shanty was considered an
uncommonly fine one. When I called to see it he was not at home. I walked
about the outside, at first unobserved from within, the window was so deep
and high. It was of small dimensions, with a peaked cottage roof, and not
much else to be seen, the dirt being raised five feet all around as if it
were a compost heap. The roof was the soundest part, though a good deal
warped and made brittle by the sun. Doorsill there was none, but a
perennial passage for the hens under the door board. Mrs. C. came to the
door and asked me to view it from the inside. The hens were driven in by
my approach. It was dark, and had a dirt floor for the most part, dank,
clammy, and aguish, only here a board and there a board which would not
bear removal. She lighted a lamp to show me the inside of the roof and the
walls, and also that the board floor extended under the bed, warning me
not to step into the cellar, a sort of dust hole two feet deep. In her own
words, they were "good boards overhead, good boards all around, and a good
window"—of two whole squares originally, only the cat had passed out
that way lately. There was a stove, a bed, and a place to sit, an infant
in the house where it was born, a silk parasol, gilt-framed looking-glass,
and a patent new coffee-mill nailed to an oak sapling, all told. The
bargain was soon concluded, for James had in the meanwhile returned. I to
pay four dollars and twenty-five cents tonight, he to vacate at five
tomorrow morning, selling to nobody else meanwhile: I to take possession
at six. It were well, he said, to be there early, and anticipate certain
indistinct but wholly unjust claims on the score of ground rent and fuel.
This he assured me was the only encumbrance. At six I passed him and his
family on the road. One large bundle held their all—bed,
coffee-mill, looking-glass, hens—all but the cat; she took to the
woods and became a wild cat, and, as I learned afterward, trod in a trap
set for woodchucks, and so became a dead cat at last.</p>
<p>I took down this dwelling the same morning, drawing the nails, and removed
it to the pond-side by small cartloads, spreading the boards on the grass
there to bleach and warp back again in the sun. One early thrush gave me a
note or two as I drove along the woodland path. I was informed
treacherously by a young Patrick that neighbor Seeley, an Irishman, in the
intervals of the carting, transferred the still tolerable, straight, and
drivable nails, staples, and spikes to his pocket, and then stood when I
came back to pass the time of day, and look freshly up, unconcerned, with
spring thoughts, at the devastation; there being a dearth of work, as he
said. He was there to represent spectatordom, and help make this seemingly
insignificant event one with the removal of the gods of Troy.</p>
<p>I dug my cellar in the side of a hill sloping to the south, where a
woodchuck had formerly dug his burrow, down through sumach and blackberry
roots, and the lowest stain of vegetation, six feet square by seven deep,
to a fine sand where potatoes would not freeze in any winter. The sides
were left shelving, and not stoned; but the sun having never shone on
them, the sand still keeps its place. It was but two hours' work. I took
particular pleasure in this breaking of ground, for in almost all
latitudes men dig into the earth for an equable temperature. Under the
most splendid house in the city is still to be found the cellar where they
store their roots as of old, and long after the superstructure has
disappeared posterity remark its dent in the earth. The house is still but
a sort of porch at the entrance of a burrow.</p>
<p>At length, in the beginning of May, with the help of some of my
acquaintances, rather to improve so good an occasion for neighborliness
than from any necessity, I set up the frame of my house. No man was ever
more honored in the character of his raisers than I. They are destined, I
trust, to assist at the raising of loftier structures one day. I began to
occupy my house on the 4th of July, as soon as it was boarded and roofed,
for the boards were carefully feather-edged and lapped, so that it was
perfectly impervious to rain, but before boarding I laid the foundation of
a chimney at one end, bringing two cartloads of stones up the hill from
the pond in my arms. I built the chimney after my hoeing in the fall,
before a fire became necessary for warmth, doing my cooking in the
meanwhile out of doors on the ground, early in the morning: which mode I
still think is in some respects more convenient and agreeable than the
usual one. When it stormed before my bread was baked, I fixed a few boards
over the fire, and sat under them to watch my loaf, and passed some
pleasant hours in that way. In those days, when my hands were much
employed, I read but little, but the least scraps of paper which lay on
the ground, my holder, or tablecloth, afforded me as much entertainment,
in fact answered the same purpose as the Iliad.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<p>It would be worth the while to build still more deliberately than I did,
considering, for instance, what foundation a door, a window, a cellar, a
garret, have in the nature of man, and perchance never raising any
superstructure until we found a better reason for it than our temporal
necessities even. There is some of the same fitness in a man's building
his own house that there is in a bird's building its own nest. Who knows
but if men constructed their dwellings with their own hands, and provided
food for themselves and families simply and honestly enough, the poetic
faculty would be universally developed, as birds universally sing when
they are so engaged? But alas! we do like cowbirds and cuckoos, which lay
their eggs in nests which other birds have built, and cheer no traveller
with their chattering and unmusical notes. Shall we forever resign the
pleasure of construction to the carpenter? What does architecture amount
to in the experience of the mass of men? I never in all my walks came
across a man engaged in so simple and natural an occupation as building
his house. We belong to the community. It is not the tailor alone who is
the ninth part of a man; it is as much the preacher, and the merchant, and
the farmer. Where is this division of labor to end? and what object does
it finally serve? No doubt another <i>may</i> also think for me; but it is
not therefore desirable that he should do so to the exclusion of my
thinking for myself.</p>
<p>True, there are architects so called in this country, and I have heard of
one at least possessed with the idea of making architectural ornaments
have a core of truth, a necessity, and hence a beauty, as if it were a
revelation to him. All very well perhaps from his point of view, but only
a little better than the common dilettantism. A sentimental reformer in
architecture, he began at the cornice, not at the foundation. It was only
how to put a core of truth within the ornaments, that every sugarplum, in
fact, might have an almond or caraway seed in it—though I hold that
almonds are most wholesome without the sugar—and not how the
inhabitant, the indweller, might build truly within and without, and let
the ornaments take care of themselves. What reasonable man ever supposed
that ornaments were something outward and in the skin merely—that
the tortoise got his spotted shell, or the shell-fish its mother-o'-pearl
tints, by such a contract as the inhabitants of Broadway their Trinity
Church? But a man has no more to do with the style of architecture of his
house than a tortoise with that of its shell: nor need the soldier be so
idle as to try to paint the precise color of his virtue on his standard.
The enemy will find it out. He may turn pale when the trial comes. This
man seemed to me to lean over the cornice, and timidly whisper his half
truth to the rude occupants who really knew it better than he. What of
architectural beauty I now see, I know has gradually grown from within
outward, out of the necessities and character of the indweller, who is the
only builder—out of some unconscious truthfulness, and nobleness,
without ever a thought for the appearance and whatever additional beauty
of this kind is destined to be produced will be preceded by a like
unconscious beauty of life. The most interesting dwellings in this
country, as the painter knows, are the most unpretending, humble log huts
and cottages of the poor commonly; it is the life of the inhabitants whose
shells they are, and not any peculiarity in their surfaces merely, which
makes them picturesque; and equally interesting will be the citizen's
suburban box, when his life shall be as simple and as agreeable to the
imagination, and there is as little straining after effect in the style of
his dwelling. A great proportion of architectural ornaments are literally
hollow, and a September gale would strip them off, like borrowed plumes,
without injury to the substantials. They can do without architecture who
have no olives nor wines in the cellar. What if an equal ado were made
about the ornaments of style in literature, and the architects of our
bibles spent as much time about their cornices as the architects of our
churches do? So are made the <i>belles-lettres</i> and the <i>beaux-arts</i>
and their professors. Much it concerns a man, forsooth, how a few sticks
are slanted over him or under him, and what colors are daubed upon his
box. It would signify somewhat, if, in any earnest sense, he slanted them
and daubed it; but the spirit having departed out of the tenant, it is of
a piece with constructing his own coffin—the architecture of the
grave—and "carpenter" is but another name for "coffin-maker." One
man says, in his despair or indifference to life, take up a handful of the
earth at your feet, and paint your house that color. Is he thinking of his
last and narrow house? Toss up a copper for it as well. What an abundance
of leisure he must have! Why do you take up a handful of dirt? Better
paint your house your own complexion; let it turn pale or blush for you.
An enterprise to improve the style of cottage architecture! When you have
got my ornaments ready, I will wear them.</p>
<p>Before winter I built a chimney, and shingled the sides of my house, which
were already impervious to rain, with imperfect and sappy shingles made of
the first slice of the log, whose edges I was obliged to straighten with a
plane.</p>
<p>I have thus a tight shingled and plastered house, ten feet wide by fifteen
long, and eight-feet posts, with a garret and a closet, a large window on
each side, two trap doors, one door at the end, and a brick fireplace
opposite. The exact cost of my house, paying the usual price for such
materials as I used, but not counting the work, all of which was done by
myself, was as follows; and I give the details because very few are able
to tell exactly what their houses cost, and fewer still, if any, the
separate cost of the various materials which compose them:—</p>
<p>Boards.......................... $ 8.03-1/2;, mostly shanty boards.<br/>
Refuse shingles for roof sides... 4.00<br/>
Laths............................ 1.25<br/>
Two second-hand windows<br/>
with glass.................... 2.43<br/>
One thousand old brick........... 4.00<br/>
Two casks of lime................ 2.40 That was high.<br/>
Hair............................. 0.31 More than I needed.<br/>
Mantle-tree iron................. 0.15<br/>
Nails............................ 3.90<br/>
Hinges and screws................ 0.14<br/>
Latch............................ 0.10<br/>
Chalk............................ 0.01<br/>
Transportation................... 1.40 I carried a good part<br/>
———— on my back.<br/>
In all...................... $28.12-1/2<br/></p>
<p class="nind">
These are all the materials, excepting the timber, stones, and sand, which
I claimed by squatter's right. I have also a small woodshed adjoining,
made chiefly of the stuff which was left after building the house.</p>
<p>I intend to build me a house which will surpass any on the main street in
Concord in grandeur and luxury, as soon as it pleases me as much and will
cost me no more than my present one.</p>
<p>I thus found that the student who wishes for a shelter can obtain one for
a lifetime at an expense not greater than the rent which he now pays
annually. If I seem to boast more than is becoming, my excuse is that I
brag for humanity rather than for myself; and my shortcomings and
inconsistencies do not affect the truth of my statement. Notwithstanding
much cant and hypocrisy—chaff which I find it difficult to separate
from my wheat, but for which I am as sorry as any man—I will breathe
freely and stretch myself in this respect, it is such a relief to both the
moral and physical system; and I am resolved that I will not through
humility become the devil's attorney. I will endeavor to speak a good word
for the truth. At Cambridge College the mere rent of a student's room,
which is only a little larger than my own, is thirty dollars each year,
though the corporation had the advantage of building thirty-two side by
side and under one roof, and the occupant suffers the inconvenience of
many and noisy neighbors, and perhaps a residence in the fourth story. I
cannot but think that if we had more true wisdom in these respects, not
only less education would be needed, because, forsooth, more would already
have been acquired, but the pecuniary expense of getting an education
would in a great measure vanish. Those conveniences which the student
requires at Cambridge or elsewhere cost him or somebody else ten times as
great a sacrifice of life as they would with proper management on both
sides. Those things for which the most money is demanded are never the
things which the student most wants. Tuition, for instance, is an
important item in the term bill, while for the far more valuable education
which he gets by associating with the most cultivated of his
contemporaries no charge is made. The mode of founding a college is,
commonly, to get up a subscription of dollars and cents, and then,
following blindly the principles of a division of labor to its extreme—a
principle which should never be followed but with circumspection—to
call in a contractor who makes this a subject of speculation, and he
employs Irishmen or other operatives actually to lay the foundations,
while the students that are to be are said to be fitting themselves for
it; and for these oversights successive generations have to pay. I think
that it would be better <i>than this</i>, for the students, or those who
desire to be benefited by it, even to lay the foundation themselves. The
student who secures his coveted leisure and retirement by systematically
shirking any labor necessary to man obtains but an ignoble and
unprofitable leisure, defrauding himself of the experience which alone can
make leisure fruitful. "But," says one, "you do not mean that the students
should go to work with their hands instead of their heads?" I do not mean
that exactly, but I mean something which he might think a good deal like
that; I mean that they should not <i>play</i> life, or <i>study</i> it
merely, while the community supports them at this expensive game, but
earnestly live it from beginning to end. How could youths better learn to
live than by at once trying the experiment of living? Methinks this would
exercise their minds as much as mathematics. If I wished a boy to know
something about the arts and sciences, for instance, I would not pursue
the common course, which is merely to send him into the neighborhood of
some professor, where anything is professed and practised but the art of
life;—to survey the world through a telescope or a microscope, and
never with his natural eye; to study chemistry, and not learn how his
bread is made, or mechanics, and not learn how it is earned; to discover
new satellites to Neptune, and not detect the motes in his eyes, or to
what vagabond he is a satellite himself; or to be devoured by the monsters
that swarm all around him, while contemplating the monsters in a drop of
vinegar. Which would have advanced the most at the end of a month—the
boy who had made his own jackknife from the ore which he had dug and
smelted, reading as much as would be necessary for this—or the boy
who had attended the lectures on metallurgy at the Institute in the
meanwhile, and had received a Rodgers' penknife from his father? Which
would be most likely to cut his fingers?... To my astonishment I was
informed on leaving college that I had studied navigation!—why, if I
had taken one turn down the harbor I should have known more about it. Even
the poor student studies and is taught only <i>political</i> economy,
while that economy of living which is synonymous with philosophy is not
even sincerely professed in our colleges. The consequence is, that while
he is reading Adam Smith, Ricardo, and Say, he runs his father in debt
irretrievably.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />