<p><SPAN name="linkW11" id="W11"></SPAN></p>
<div style="height: 4em;">
<p><br/></p>
<p><br/></p>
</div>
<h2> Higher Laws </h2>
<p>As I came home through the woods with my string of fish, trailing my pole,
it being now quite dark, I caught a glimpse of a woodchuck stealing across
my path, and felt a strange thrill of savage delight, and was strongly
tempted to seize and devour him raw; not that I was hungry then, except
for that wildness which he represented. Once or twice, however, while I
lived at the pond, I found myself ranging the woods, like a half-starved
hound, with a strange abandonment, seeking some kind of venison which I
might devour, and no morsel could have been too savage for me. The wildest
scenes had become unaccountably familiar. I found in myself, and still
find, an instinct toward a higher, or, as it is named, spiritual life, as
do most men, and another toward a primitive rank and savage one, and I
reverence them both. I love the wild not less than the good. The wildness
and adventure that are in fishing still recommended it to me. I like
sometimes to take rank hold on life and spend my day more as the animals
do. Perhaps I have owed to this employment and to hunting, when quite
young, my closest acquaintance with Nature. They early introduce us to and
detain us in scenery with which otherwise, at that age, we should have
little acquaintance. Fishermen, hunters, woodchoppers, and others,
spending their lives in the fields and woods, in a peculiar sense a part
of Nature themselves, are often in a more favorable mood for observing
her, in the intervals of their pursuits, than philosophers or poets even,
who approach her with expectation. She is not afraid to exhibit herself to
them. The traveller on the prairie is naturally a hunter, on the head
waters of the Missouri and Columbia a trapper, and at the Falls of St.
Mary a fisherman. He who is only a traveller learns things at second-hand
and by the halves, and is poor authority. We are most interested when
science reports what those men already know practically or instinctively,
for that alone is a true <i>humanity</i>, or account of human experience.</p>
<p>They mistake who assert that the Yankee has few amusements, because he has
not so many public holidays, and men and boys do not play so many games as
they do in England, for here the more primitive but solitary amusements of
hunting, fishing, and the like have not yet given place to the former.
Almost every New England boy among my contemporaries shouldered a
fowling-piece between the ages of ten and fourteen; and his hunting and
fishing grounds were not limited, like the preserves of an English
nobleman, but were more boundless even than those of a savage. No wonder,
then, that he did not oftener stay to play on the common. But already a
change is taking place, owing, not to an increased humanity, but to an
increased scarcity of game, for perhaps the hunter is the greatest friend
of the animals hunted, not excepting the Humane Society.</p>
<p>Moreover, when at the pond, I wished sometimes to add fish to my fare for
variety. I have actually fished from the same kind of necessity that the
first fishers did. Whatever humanity I might conjure up against it was all
factitious, and concerned my philosophy more than my feelings. I speak of
fishing only now, for I had long felt differently about fowling, and sold
my gun before I went to the woods. Not that I am less humane than others,
but I did not perceive that my feelings were much affected. I did not pity
the fishes nor the worms. This was habit. As for fowling, during the last
years that I carried a gun my excuse was that I was studying ornithology,
and sought only new or rare birds. But I confess that I am now inclined to
think that there is a finer way of studying ornithology than this. It
requires so much closer attention to the habits of the birds, that, if for
that reason only, I have been willing to omit the gun. Yet notwithstanding
the objection on the score of humanity, I am compelled to doubt if equally
valuable sports are ever substituted for these; and when some of my
friends have asked me anxiously about their boys, whether they should let
them hunt, I have answered, yes—remembering that it was one of the
best parts of my education—<i>make</i> them hunters, though
sportsmen only at first, if possible, mighty hunters at last, so that they
shall not find game large enough for them in this or any vegetable
wilderness—hunters as well as fishers of men. Thus far I am of the
opinion of Chaucer's nun, who</p>
<p>"yave not of the text a pulled hen<br/>
That saith that hunters ben not holy men."<br/></p>
<p class="nind">
There is a period in the history of the individual, as of the race, when
the hunters are the "best men," as the Algonquins called them. We cannot
but pity the boy who has never fired a gun; he is no more humane, while
his education has been sadly neglected. This was my answer with respect to
those youths who were bent on this pursuit, trusting that they would soon
outgrow it. No humane being, past the thoughtless age of boyhood, will
wantonly murder any creature which holds its life by the same tenure that
he does. The hare in its extremity cries like a child. I warn you,
mothers, that my sympathies do not always make the usual phil-<i>anthropic</i>
distinctions.</p>
<p>Such is oftenest the young man's introduction to the forest, and the most
original part of himself. He goes thither at first as a hunter and fisher,
until at last, if he has the seeds of a better life in him, he
distinguishes his proper objects, as a poet or naturalist it may be, and
leaves the gun and fish-pole behind. The mass of men are still and always
young in this respect. In some countries a hunting parson is no uncommon
sight. Such a one might make a good shepherd's dog, but is far from being
the Good Shepherd. I have been surprised to consider that the only obvious
employment, except wood-chopping, ice-cutting, or the like business, which
ever to my knowledge detained at Walden Pond for a whole half-day any of
my fellow-citizens, whether fathers or children of the town, with just one
exception, was fishing. Commonly they did not think that they were lucky,
or well paid for their time, unless they got a long string of fish, though
they had the opportunity of seeing the pond all the while. They might go
there a thousand times before the sediment of fishing would sink to the
bottom and leave their purpose pure; but no doubt such a clarifying
process would be going on all the while. The Governor and his Council
faintly remember the pond, for they went a-fishing there when they were
boys; but now they are too old and dignified to go a-fishing, and so they
know it no more forever. Yet even they expect to go to heaven at last. If
the legislature regards it, it is chiefly to regulate the number of hooks
to be used there; but they know nothing about the hook of hooks with which
to angle for the pond itself, impaling the legislature for a bait. Thus,
even in civilized communities, the embryo man passes through the hunter
stage of development.</p>
<p>I have found repeatedly, of late years, that I cannot fish without falling
a little in self-respect. I have tried it again and again. I have skill at
it, and, like many of my fellows, a certain instinct for it, which revives
from time to time, but always when I have done I feel that it would have
been better if I had not fished. I think that I do not mistake. It is a
faint intimation, yet so are the first streaks of morning. There is
unquestionably this instinct in me which belongs to the lower orders of
creation; yet with every year I am less a fisherman, though without more
humanity or even wisdom; at present I am no fisherman at all. But I see
that if I were to live in a wilderness I should again be tempted to become
a fisher and hunter in earnest. Beside, there is something essentially
unclean about this diet and all flesh, and I began to see where housework
commences, and whence the endeavor, which costs so much, to wear a tidy
and respectable appearance each day, to keep the house sweet and free from
all ill odors and sights. Having been my own butcher and scullion and
cook, as well as the gentleman for whom the dishes were served up, I can
speak from an unusually complete experience. The practical objection to
animal food in my case was its uncleanness; and besides, when I had caught
and cleaned and cooked and eaten my fish, they seemed not to have fed me
essentially. It was insignificant and unnecessary, and cost more than it
came to. A little bread or a few potatoes would have done as well, with
less trouble and filth. Like many of my contemporaries, I had rarely for
many years used animal food, or tea, or coffee, etc.; not so much because
of any ill effects which I had traced to them, as because they were not
agreeable to my imagination. The repugnance to animal food is not the
effect of experience, but is an instinct. It appeared more beautiful to
live low and fare hard in many respects; and though I never did so, I went
far enough to please my imagination. I believe that every man who has ever
been earnest to preserve his higher or poetic faculties in the best
condition has been particularly inclined to abstain from animal food, and
from much food of any kind. It is a significant fact, stated by
entomologists—I find it in Kirby and Spence—that "some insects
in their perfect state, though furnished with organs of feeding, make no
use of them"; and they lay it down as "a general rule, that almost all
insects in this state eat much less than in that of larvæ. The
voracious caterpillar when transformed into a butterfly... and the
gluttonous maggot when become a fly" content themselves with a drop or two
of honey or some other sweet liquid. The abdomen under the wings of the
butterfly still represents the larva. This is the tidbit which tempts his
insectivorous fate. The gross feeder is a man in the larva state; and
there are whole nations in that condition, nations without fancy or
imagination, whose vast abdomens betray them.</p>
<p>It is hard to provide and cook so simple and clean a diet as will not
offend the imagination; but this, I think, is to be fed when we feed the
body; they should both sit down at the same table. Yet perhaps this may be
done. The fruits eaten temperately need not make us ashamed of our
appetites, nor interrupt the worthiest pursuits. But put an extra
condiment into your dish, and it will poison you. It is not worth the
while to live by rich cookery. Most men would feel shame if caught
preparing with their own hands precisely such a dinner, whether of animal
or vegetable food, as is every day prepared for them by others. Yet till
this is otherwise we are not civilized, and, if gentlemen and ladies, are
not true men and women. This certainly suggests what change is to be made.
It may be vain to ask why the imagination will not be reconciled to flesh
and fat. I am satisfied that it is not. Is it not a reproach that man is a
carnivorous animal? True, he can and does live, in a great measure, by
preying on other animals; but this is a miserable way—as any one who
will go to snaring rabbits, or slaughtering lambs, may learn—and he
will be regarded as a benefactor of his race who shall teach man to
confine himself to a more innocent and wholesome diet. Whatever my own
practice may be, I have no doubt that it is a part of the destiny of the
human race, in its gradual improvement, to leave off eating animals, as
surely as the savage tribes have left off eating each other when they came
in contact with the more civilized.</p>
<p>If one listens to the faintest but constant suggestions of his genius,
which are certainly true, he sees not to what extremes, or even insanity,
it may lead him; and yet that way, as he grows more resolute and faithful,
his road lies. The faintest assured objection which one healthy man feels
will at length prevail over the arguments and customs of mankind. No man
ever followed his genius till it misled him. Though the result were bodily
weakness, yet perhaps no one can say that the consequences were to be
regretted, for these were a life in conformity to higher principles. If
the day and the night are such that you greet them with joy, and life
emits a fragrance like flowers and sweet-scented herbs, is more elastic,
more starry, more immortal—that is your success. All nature is your
congratulation, and you have cause momentarily to bless yourself. The
greatest gains and values are farthest from being appreciated. We easily
come to doubt if they exist. We soon forget them. They are the highest
reality. Perhaps the facts most astounding and most real are never
communicated by man to man. The true harvest of my daily life is somewhat
as intangible and indescribable as the tints of morning or evening. It is
a little star-dust caught, a segment of the rainbow which I have clutched.</p>
<p>Yet, for my part, I was never unusually squeamish; I could sometimes eat a
fried rat with a good relish, if it were necessary. I am glad to have
drunk water so long, for the same reason that I prefer the natural sky to
an opium-eater's heaven. I would fain keep sober always; and there are
infinite degrees of drunkenness. I believe that water is the only drink
for a wise man; wine is not so noble a liquor; and think of dashing the
hopes of a morning with a cup of warm coffee, or of an evening with a dish
of tea! Ah, how low I fall when I am tempted by them! Even music may be
intoxicating. Such apparently slight causes destroyed Greece and Rome, and
will destroy England and America. Of all ebriosity, who does not prefer to
be intoxicated by the air he breathes? I have found it to be the most
serious objection to coarse labors long continued, that they compelled me
to eat and drink coarsely also. But to tell the truth, I find myself at
present somewhat less particular in these respects. I carry less religion
to the table, ask no blessing; not because I am wiser than I was, but, I
am obliged to confess, because, however much it is to be regretted, with
years I have grown more coarse and indifferent. Perhaps these questions
are entertained only in youth, as most believe of poetry. My practice is
"nowhere," my opinion is here. Nevertheless I am far from regarding myself
as one of those privileged ones to whom the Ved refers when it says, that
"he who has true faith in the Omnipresent Supreme Being may eat all that
exists," that is, is not bound to inquire what is his food, or who
prepares it; and even in their case it is to be observed, as a Hindoo
commentator has remarked, that the Vedant limits this privilege to "the
time of distress."</p>
<p>Who has not sometimes derived an inexpressible satisfaction from his food
in which appetite had no share? I have been thrilled to think that I owed
a mental perception to the commonly gross sense of taste, that I have been
inspired through the palate, that some berries which I had eaten on a
hillside had fed my genius. "The soul not being mistress of herself," says
Thseng-tseu, "one looks, and one does not see; one listens, and one does
not hear; one eats, and one does not know the savor of food." He who
distinguishes the true savor of his food can never be a glutton; he who
does not cannot be otherwise. A puritan may go to his brown-bread crust
with as gross an appetite as ever an alderman to his turtle. Not that food
which entereth into the mouth defileth a man, but the appetite with which
it is eaten. It is neither the quality nor the quantity, but the devotion
to sensual savors; when that which is eaten is not a viand to sustain our
animal, or inspire our spiritual life, but food for the worms that possess
us. If the hunter has a taste for mud-turtles, muskrats, and other such
savage tidbits, the fine lady indulges a taste for jelly made of a calf's
foot, or for sardines from over the sea, and they are even. He goes to the
mill-pond, she to her preserve-pot. The wonder is how they, how you and I,
can live this slimy, beastly life, eating and drinking.</p>
<p>Our whole life is startlingly moral. There is never an instant's truce
between virtue and vice. Goodness is the only investment that never fails.
In the music of the harp which trembles round the world it is the
insisting on this which thrills us. The harp is the travelling patterer
for the Universe's Insurance Company, recommending its laws, and our
little goodness is all the assessment that we pay. Though the youth at
last grows indifferent, the laws of the universe are not indifferent, but
are forever on the side of the most sensitive. Listen to every zephyr for
some reproof, for it is surely there, and he is unfortunate who does not
hear it. We cannot touch a string or move a stop but the charming moral
transfixes us. Many an irksome noise, go a long way off, is heard as
music, a proud, sweet satire on the meanness of our lives.</p>
<p>We are conscious of an animal in us, which awakens in proportion as our
higher nature slumbers. It is reptile and sensual, and perhaps cannot be
wholly expelled; like the worms which, even in life and health, occupy our
bodies. Possibly we may withdraw from it, but never change its nature. I
fear that it may enjoy a certain health of its own; that we may be well,
yet not pure. The other day I picked up the lower jaw of a hog, with white
and sound teeth and tusks, which suggested that there was an animal health
and vigor distinct from the spiritual. This creature succeeded by other
means than temperance and purity. "That in which men differ from brute
beasts," says Mencius, "is a thing very inconsiderable; the common herd
lose it very soon; superior men preserve it carefully." Who knows what
sort of life would result if we had attained to purity? If I knew so wise
a man as could teach me purity I would go to seek him forthwith. "A
command over our passions, and over the external senses of the body, and
good acts, are declared by the Ved to be indispensable in the mind's
approximation to God." Yet the spirit can for the time pervade and control
every member and function of the body, and transmute what in form is the
grossest sensuality into purity and devotion. The generative energy,
which, when we are loose, dissipates and makes us unclean, when we are
continent invigorates and inspires us. Chastity is the flowering of man;
and what are called Genius, Heroism, Holiness, and the like, are but
various fruits which succeed it. Man flows at once to God when the channel
of purity is open. By turns our purity inspires and our impurity casts us
down. He is blessed who is assured that the animal is dying out in him day
by day, and the divine being established. Perhaps there is none but has
cause for shame on account of the inferior and brutish nature to which he
is allied. I fear that we are such gods or demigods only as fauns and
satyrs, the divine allied to beasts, the creatures of appetite, and that,
to some extent, our very life is our disgrace.—</p>
<p>"How happy's he who hath due place assigned<br/>
To his beasts and disafforested his mind!<br/>
. . . . . . .<br/>
Can use this horse, goat, wolf, and ev'ry beast,<br/>
And is not ass himself to all the rest!<br/>
Else man not only is the herd of swine,<br/>
But he's those devils too which did incline<br/>
Them to a headlong rage, and made them worse."<br/></p>
<p>All sensuality is one, though it takes many forms; all purity is one. It
is the same whether a man eat, or drink, or cohabit, or sleep sensually.
They are but one appetite, and we only need to see a person do any one of
these things to know how great a sensualist he is. The impure can neither
stand nor sit with purity. When the reptile is attacked at one mouth of
his burrow, he shows himself at another. If you would be chaste, you must
be temperate. What is chastity? How shall a man know if he is chaste? He
shall not know it. We have heard of this virtue, but we know not what it
is. We speak conformably to the rumor which we have heard. From exertion
come wisdom and purity; from sloth ignorance and sensuality. In the
student sensuality is a sluggish habit of mind. An unclean person is
universally a slothful one, one who sits by a stove, whom the sun shines
on prostrate, who reposes without being fatigued. If you would avoid
uncleanness, and all the sins, work earnestly, though it be at cleaning a
stable. Nature is hard to be overcome, but she must be overcome. What
avails it that you are Christian, if you are not purer than the heathen,
if you deny yourself no more, if you are not more religious? I know of
many systems of religion esteemed heathenish whose precepts fill the
reader with shame, and provoke him to new endeavors, though it be to the
performance of rites merely.</p>
<p>I hesitate to say these things, but it is not because of the subject—I
care not how obscene my <i>words</i> are—but because I cannot speak
of them without betraying my impurity. We discourse freely without shame
of one form of sensuality, and are silent about another. We are so
degraded that we cannot speak simply of the necessary functions of human
nature. In earlier ages, in some countries, every function was reverently
spoken of and regulated by law. Nothing was too trivial for the Hindoo
lawgiver, however offensive it may be to modern taste. He teaches how to
eat, drink, cohabit, void excrement and urine, and the like, elevating
what is mean, and does not falsely excuse himself by calling these things
trifles.</p>
<p>Every man is the builder of a temple, called his body, to the god he
worships, after a style purely his own, nor can he get off by hammering
marble instead. We are all sculptors and painters, and our material is our
own flesh and blood and bones. Any nobleness begins at once to refine a
man's features, any meanness or sensuality to imbrute them.</p>
<p>John Farmer sat at his door one September evening, after a hard day's
work, his mind still running on his labor more or less. Having bathed, he
sat down to re-create his intellectual man. It was a rather cool evening,
and some of his neighbors were apprehending a frost. He had not attended
to the train of his thoughts long when he heard some one playing on a
flute, and that sound harmonized with his mood. Still he thought of his
work; but the burden of his thought was, that though this kept running in
his head, and he found himself planning and contriving it against his
will, yet it concerned him very little. It was no more than the scurf of
his skin, which was constantly shuffled off. But the notes of the flute
came home to his ears out of a different sphere from that he worked in,
and suggested work for certain faculties which slumbered in him. They
gently did away with the street, and the village, and the state in which
he lived. A voice said to him—Why do you stay here and live this
mean moiling life, when a glorious existence is possible for you? Those
same stars twinkle over other fields than these.—But how to come out
of this condition and actually migrate thither? All that he could think of
was to practise some new austerity, to let his mind descend into his body
and redeem it, and treat himself with ever increasing respect.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />