<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[87]</SPAN></span></p>
<h2>CHAPTER IX</h2>
<h3>CAPTORS AND CAPTIVES</h3>
<p>One morning just before <i>Appell</i>, a Frenchman
came along the passage and announced in each
room that Colonel Tardieu was not going out to
<i>Appell</i> that morning, and would be obliged if other officers
would remain in their rooms when the bell went. We did
not know exactly what the reason was, and I don't know
now, but I think the Colonel had some right on his side—as
much right as we usually had in Fort 9. Soon after
this announcement a deputation of Russians waited on
Major Gaskell to find out what the English intended to do.
I may as well say here that Gaskell and most of the other
Englishmen (myself included) did not altogether approve
of this rowdyism on <i>Appell</i>, as we thought it might lead
to serious restriction of our exercise and consequently of
our chances of escaping, which was of course the only
thing worth considering.</p>
<p>As the Russian colonel insisted on acting as interpreter
for the deputation, the discussion lasted a quarter of an
hour before we understood that the Russians thought it
would be better to go out, as they considered it probable
that the Germans would treat our refusal as an organized
mutiny. But they were, they said, prepared to follow our
lead.<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[88]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>Gaskell and I then went off to see Colonel Tardieu. The
Colonel said that, though it was best for us to stick together,
this case was a purely personal matter, and we
could please ourselves—he could only say that he was not
going out, and that the French would follow his lead.
Gaskell and I determined to compromise by leaving the
matter unsettled, but to go out ourselves to <i>Appell</i> very late.
In this way it was quite impossible for the Germans to
prove organized mutiny against us, and equally impossible
to hold <i>Appell</i> outside—and the whole thing could
easily be put down to mismanagement and the lack of
clear orders on the part of the Germans. This was, in
fact, just what happened. The Germans were furious,
but we pointed out that they had given so many contradictory
orders about <i>Appell</i> that no one knew what they
wanted. They soon saw that there was no case against
us for organized mutiny and let the matter drop. The
real trouble was that the Commandant was a man who
was simply made to be ragged.</p>
<p>A more unfortunate choice for a C.O. of a <i>strafe</i> camp
can scarcely be imagined. He was a short, thick-set, dark
man, about fifty years old, with a large drooping moustache
and an inclination to stoutness. His hair was rather long,
and he wore pince-nez for reading. I think he had only
been C.O. of Fort 9 for a few months when we first went
there, but some of the prisoners had known him when he
had been in command of another camp, and he then had
the reputation for being a kindly and sympathetic commandant.
But when we first knew him constant badgering
had already soured his temper. He was rather like<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[89]</SPAN></span>
a schoolmaster whose form has got quite out of control,
uncertain whether his boys were intending to be insolent
or not. He never pretended to stand on his dignity—his
appearance and behavior stamped him as an amiable
shopkeeper cursed with occasional fits of violent temper.
Then he laid himself open to be ragged so dreadfully.
Although he knew little about the business of the fort and
had to appeal to his <i>Feldwebel</i> on almost every point, yet
he insisted on attending personally to nearly every officer
who came into the bureau. The <i>Feldwebel</i> and two extremely
efficient N.C.O.'s, known as Abel and the "Blue
Boy," really managed the fort.</p>
<p>This reminds me of a most amusing caricature of the
<i>Feldwebel</i> ordering the C.O. about, which was pinned up in
a conspicuous place. I think a <i>Reclamation</i> or official letter
was sent in to General Peters, protesting against this state
of affairs, for which the author got a few days' "jug." A
few days' "jug" was just a farce. The cells were always
full, and when you got your <i>Bestrafung</i> you were put on a
waiting list and did your period of solitary confinement
from three to five months later. One angry Frenchman
wrote a furious <i>Reclamation</i> talking of justice and favoritism
because Oliphant had been allowed to do a "slice
of four days' jug" out of his turn on the list. A sheaf
of <i>Reclamations</i> (the word was pronounced in either German
or French way) used to go in daily to General Peters
on every conceivable subject, from serious grievances to
humorous insults, from a protest against the filthy habits
of Bavarian sentries to an accusation of poisoning a pet
rabbit.<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[90]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>Some men used to spend a great deal of their time
writing <i>Reclamations</i> conveying veiled insults to the Germans.
It seemed to me rather a waste of time, but they
caused a great deal of amusement. It was just like composing
a sarcastically offensive letter to a Government
department. Some of the results were really very humorous
and witty, but I am afraid they were wasted on the
Bosche, and I have no doubt they all went straight into
Peters' wastepaper-basket—at any rate, I never heard of a
<i>Reclamation</i> having any effect except three days' "jug"
for the author of the most offensive ones.</p>
<p>When we first came to the fort we were told that some
of the French had sworn an oath to drive the Commandant
off his head. He was pretty far gone. Some of the
Englishmen, chiefly Oliphant, Medlicott, and Buckley,
with these Frenchmen, used to get an enormous amount
of amusement by baiting the old fool.</p>
<p>I remember once a conversation something as follows:—</p>
<p><i>Frenchman.</i>—"The German food you give us is very
bad."</p>
<p><i>Commandant.</i>—"Es tut mir sehr leid, aber——"</p>
<p><i>Frenchman.</i>—"And it is impossible for any one but a
Bavarian to eat it without wine."</p>
<p>"Was meinen Sie, das dürfen Sie nicht sagen," answered
the Commandant furiously.</p>
<p>"Why won't you give us wine?" shouted the Frenchman.</p>
<p>"You have got no right to speak to me like that."</p>
<p>"And you don't know how to speak to a French officer;
it's disgusting that when you give," etc.<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[91]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>"Sofort aus dem Bureau gehen?" (Will you go out
of the bureau?)</p>
<p>Both start shouting simultaneously:</p>
<p>"Why won't you give us wine?"</p>
<p>"Aus dem Bureau ... I will report you to General
Peters."</p>
<p>"Je m'en fous de General Peters—I won't go out till
you speak politely to a French officer."</p>
<p>"Go out of this bureau immediately when I tell you to."</p>
<p>"I won't go till you learn to speak politely to me."</p>
<p>The Commandant then rushed at the telephone and pretended
to wind the handle violently, but without really
calling up at all. He put the instrument to his ear and
said:</p>
<p>"Herr General Peters. Are you there? I am Hauptmann
L'Hirsch. There is a Frenchman in the office who
won't go away. What shall I do?"</p>
<p>Slight pause for Peter's reply. Then to the Frenchman
in French:</p>
<p>"The General says that you must leave the bureau immediately."</p>
<p>"Did the General speak politely?"</p>
<p>"Yes."</p>
<p>"Eh bien je sors."</p>
<p>I have already given a description of a scene which took
place the first time I ever entered the bureau—and these
sort of scenes used to happen daily and hourly. Whenever
the Commandant lost his temper, which he did without
fail every time, he threw his arms about, clenched
his fists, gesticulated furiously, and shouted at the top of<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[92]</SPAN></span>
his voice. Soon after the Bojah affair, which I will
describe later, when rows of this sort multiplied exceedingly,
he was removed from the fort nothing less than a
raving maniac with occasional sane intervals. In the
court-martial which followed the Bojah case, the witnesses
for the defense attempted to prove that the insane behavior
of Hauptmann L'Hirsch was the main cause of all trouble
in Fort 9. In an impartial court of justice, which this
court-martial was not, I have not the smallest doubt that
they would have succeeded in proving this, owing to
L'Hirsch's behavior during the trial.</p>
<p>The food given us by the Germans was not only very
nasty, but there was not enough of it to keep a man alive.
Perhaps this is an exaggeration, as I know that a man can
keep alive, though weak, with very little food. But lack
of food to this extent, combined with the hardships of
a winter at Fort 9, would, I am sure, be enough to kill
most strong men. Every day each man received a loaf
of bread, shaped like a bun, about 4-1/2 inches across the
bottom and 2 inches in depth. It was of a dirty brown
color and, though unpleasant, it was eatable. Some even
said they liked it. I don't know what it was made of,
but I should think from the taste that rye, sawdust, and
potatoes formed the ingredients, the latter predominating.
It was sometimes very stodgy, and sometimes sour, but
on the whole was better bread than we received either at
Gütersloh or Clausthal. Later on, the size of the loaf
was reduced by more than a third and the quality deteriorated
very much, the percentage of sawdust and other unpleasant
ingredients being much increased. We never ate<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[93]</SPAN></span>
it unless we were very hard up, but, if left for a few days,
it became as hard as a brick and was most useful as a
firelighter. I remember an officer telling us that when he
was a prisoner at Magdeburg in the early days of the war,
the English prisoners had started playing rugger in the
exercise yard with a piece of bread that had dropped in
the mud. There was a terrible scene of indignation and
excitement among the Germans. The guard turned out—fixed
bayonets—charged—rescued the loaf—arrested every
one, and I don't remember what happened after that, but
all the criminals were severely punished. It must have
been terrible to have been a prisoner in those early days.
I heard hundreds of stories from the poor devils who were
caught in 1914. Some of these stories were funny, some
were filthy, that is to say, funny to a German mind, and
some were enough to make a man swear, as many have
sworn, never to speak to a German in peace time and never
to show mercy to one in war.<SPAN name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></SPAN><SPAN href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</SPAN></p>
<p>Besides this ration of bread, we were given a small basin
of soup daily—it was just greasy hot water with some
vegetable, nearly always cabbage, in it. The amount of
meat we received used to provide each of us with one
helping of meat once every ten days. Two or three times
during my stay at Ingolstadt I remember the meat was
quite good, and, if it was eatable at all, we enjoyed it
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[94]</SPAN></span>enormously, as fresh meat was such a welcome change
after the tinned food which we ate continually. Usually,
however, it was impossibly tough, and sometimes merely
a piece of bone and gristle. We tried keeping it for
several days, but it always got high before it got tender.
At the end of my time there, when Moretti had been elected
chef of Room 42, we always used to make soup from it.
Moretti used it five times for soup before he would throw
it away, and announced, as he put the soup on the table,
"La première," or "La troisième séance," or "La
cinquième et dernière séance," whichever it was. The
Germans also gave us a certain amount of perfectly undrinkable
acorn coffee, and sugar at the rate of about two lumps
per man per day. Sometimes they gave us some very
nasty beans and sometimes some really horrible dried
fish—I think it was haddock. It was very salt, and stank
so that we used always to throw it away immediately—we
simply could not stand it in the room. Room 39 used
to hang all their fish outside the window during the cold
weather—a revolting sight. It was their reserve rations,
they said. Some of the Russians managed to eat their
fish, and I believe there was a French room which had a
special method of treating it, but it was generally voted
uneatable throughout the fort. About one moderate sized
potato per day per head concluded the food rations.
This may seem a fairly generous allowance of food, even
if it was not of very high quality, but in reality it was
very little indeed. A day's rations would work out
something as follows: one potato, one small plateful of
hot-water soup, one cup acorn coffee, one lump of sugar,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[95]</SPAN></span>
two mouthfuls of fish, one mouthful of meat, four or five
beans, and the loaf of bread. If any one thinks he can
live on that, I should like him to try for a few months in
cold weather. We had not many luxuries and comforts in
Fort 9, and we did look forward to and enjoy the good
things to eat that came from home. It is only people
who have never been hungry who can pretend to be indifferent
about food—that is to say, if they are well and
in hard training as we were. The arrival of the parcel
cart was hailed with enormous enthusiasm. I think our
people at home would have been well repaid for all the
trouble they took in packing the parcels if they could
have seen the pleasure it gave us receiving them. Excitement
reached a high pitch when we knew that a map or
compass was hidden in one of the parcels.</p>
<p>All the work of the fort—cleaning, cooking, emptying
dust-bins, etc.—was done by French and Russian orderlies
under the orders of German N.C.O.'s, and when our
parcels came they were taken out of the cart and wheeled
in on a hand-cart from the outside courtyard to the packet
office. There they were sorted by Abel, a German N.C.O.,
with the help of a French orderly. When this had been
done, usually the day after the arrival of the parcels, a
list was put up of those who had received any, just inside
the main gateway, on the official notice board. The giving
out of the <i>paquets</i> was a pretty lengthy process, as each
was opened by Abel or an assistant Hun and carefully
searched. Each wing alternately was served first, and
an orderly warned each room when the parcels for that
room would be given out. This prevented there being a<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_96" id="Page_96">[96]</SPAN></span>
long queue of officers waiting outside the <i>paquet</i> office. A
sentry stood outside the door and admitted three officers
at a time. A couple of yards inside the door there was a
counter right across the room, and on the far side two
German N.C.O.'s stood, each armed with a knife and a
skewer—the first for opening the parcels, the latter for
probing the contents for forbidden articles. You signed
for your parcels and paid 5 Pf. or 10 Pf. for the cost
of carting them up.</p>
<p>The Germans, after showing you the address on the
outside, cut them open and examined the contents, sometimes
minutely and sometimes carelessly. Abel was an
oily little brute, very efficient; we hated him and he hated
us with a bitter hatred—not without reason on both sides.
I think he hated the French more than he did the English,
but he hated Medlicott more than all the rest put together.
About two months before I left Fort 9 a rumor went round,
to the intense joy of every one, that Abel was under orders
for the West Front, and we all wished him luck, and he
knew what we meant. Abel was just a bit too clever, and
consequently got done in the eye sometimes; but I must
own that he had a tremendous amount of work to do and
did it very quickly and efficiently. His very capable
assistant was the "Blue Boy," whose chief job was to lurk
about the fort and try and catch us out. He was always
standing in dark corners and turning up unexpectedly.
It was his job to tap the bars of our windows with a sledge
hammer every three days, and he took an active part in
the pursuit if any one escaped.</p>
<p>He was not so clever as Abel, but he had more time for<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[97]</SPAN></span>
spying and was more persistent. It always seemed to me
to be worth keeping on fairly decent terms with these two.
It was only necessary to refrain from being offensive to
be on better terms than most people in the fort.</p>
<p>It was very different with that swine of a <i>Feldwebel</i>.
He never walked about without a revolver in his pocket,
and he never came alone down any dark passage; "et il
avait raison," as the French said, as he had several pretty
narrow shaves with brickbats as it was. At one time
those tins and jars, such as butter, jam, quaker-oats, which
had been packed and sealed in a shop, were passed over
to us unopened, and only home-made and home-packed
articles were examined. Later on, however, everything
had to be turned out on a plate and the Germans kept
the tin.</p>
<p>Although very nearly all our parcels arrived eventually,
they used to come rather irregularly, and several times as
many as twenty to thirty parcels would arrive for the six
of us who were in one room. Consequently, if all the
food had been opened immediately, much of it would have
gone bad before we could eat it. To obviate this difficulty,
the Germans made shelves in the parcel office, and each
room or mess could leave there the food which it did not
need for the moment.</p>
<p>At first sight it would seem that this arrangement would
make the smuggling through of forbidden goods almost
impossible, or at any rate that our difficulties would be
greatly increased. In reality the business was simplified.
As long as we knew in which tin or small package the
map, compass, or what-not was coming, we could make<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[98]</SPAN></span>
fairly certain, by methods which I shall describe later, of
getting it without it ever being opened by the Germans.</p>
<p>After <i>Appell</i> all the fort except the English had dinner.
This was the hour when the potato, wood, oil, and coal
stealing fatigues did their duty. For some weeks our
French orderly used to steal potatoes for us as we needed
them. He knew the ropes very well, as he had been in
the fort for more than a year. One day, however, he said
that this stealing in small quantities was a mistake, and
that it would be safer to have one big steal once a month
or so. Four of us, under the leadership of Carpentier,
stole eight small sacks without much difficulty. It was
just a matter of knowing the habits of our jailers and
timing it accurately. The Germans were not so suspicious
in those days as they became later. There was a small
trap-door 6 feet up the wall in the central passage, which
Carpentier knew how to open. He got in, filled the bags,
and passed them out to us. To carry the full bags back
to our rooms we had to pass under the eyes of a sentry.
But that is just the best of a German sentry. He had had
no orders to spot prisoners carrying bags, and he had also
no imagination, so he took no notice.</p>
<p>Between the hours of twelve and two we did our lessons.
From two till four we played hockey or tennis. Tea was
at four, when some Frenchmen usually came in to see us.
<i>Appell</i> took place and the doors of the courtyards were shut
about half an hour before sunset. After this <i>Appell</i>, till
the evening <i>Appell</i> at nine o'clock, a sentry was left in our
passage; but we could still communicate with the other
wing. Bridge, reading, lessons, lectures, and preparation<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[99]</SPAN></span>
for dinner took place during this period. The great
amusement was lamp-stealing. During the winter the
Germans allowed us, as we thought, a totally insufficient
supply of oil, which only enabled us to burn our lamps for
four hours out of the twenty-four. This meant going to
bed at nine, which was of course ridiculous. The gloomy
passages of the fort were mainly lit by oil lamps, and
from these we used to steal the oil systematically. After
a month or two the Germans realized that this was going
on and reduced the number of lamps, and in the long
passage where it was obviously impossible to stop us
stealing oil they put acetylene lamps. Two lamps to a
passage 70 yards long was not a generous allowance.</p>
<p>Between 5 and 9 p.m. the sentry in the passage had
special orders, a loaded rifle, and a fixed bayonet, to see
that these lamps were not stolen. As all the sentries had
been stuffed up by the <i>Feldwebel</i> with horrible stories about
the murderous and criminal characters of the prisoners, it
is not surprising that each sentry showed the greatest
keenness in preventing us from stealing the lamps and
leaving him, an isolated Hun, in total darkness and at the
mercy of the prisoners. As any man came out of his
room and passed one of the lamps, which were on brackets
about 7 feet from the ground, the sentry would eye him
anxiously and hold himself in readiness to yell "Halt!"
and charge up the passage. The lamps were about 30
yards apart, and someone would come up, walk up to a
lamp, and stop beneath it—the sentry would advance on
him, and when he was sufficiently attracted, the officer
would take out his watch and look at it by the light of<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[100]</SPAN></span>
the lamp. Meanwhile a second officer would come quickly
out of his room and take down the other lamp. As soon
as the sentry perceived this he would immediately charge,
with loud yells of "Halt! Halt!" but as he turned both
lamps would be blown out simultaneously, and the officers
would disappear into their respective rooms, leaving the
passage in total darkness. The amusing part was that
this used to happen every night, and the sentries knew it
was going to happen; but against tactics of this sort,
varied occasionally, of course, but always ending with the
lights being blown out simultaneously, they were quite
powerless!</p>
<p>The evening, after the sentry had been withdrawn at
9 p.m., was spent in the ordinary occupations of gambling,
reading, tracing maps, making German uniforms and
pork-pie caps, with occasional fancy-dress balls or impromptu
concerts. Sometimes mysterious lights would
be seen in odd corners of the passage, where someone was
industriously working at making a hole through the wall,
removing the blocks of stone noiselessly one by one; and
sometimes one would run up against a few men round a
wonderful structure of tables and chairs in the middle
of the passage, where someone was climbing up the skylight
to inspect the sentries on their beats on the top
parapet, but usually all was peace and quiet till about
11 p.m. At that hour the sentries were supposed to make
us put out the lights in our rooms, but when they found
that we paid little or no attention to repeated cries of
"Licht ausmachen," and as there was no method, short
of firing through the bars into a lighted bedroom, to make<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[101]</SPAN></span>
us put them out, they eventually gave up these attempts,
and, except for an occasional very offensive or conscientious
sentry, we put out our lamps or candles when
we wished.</p>
<div class="figcenter"> <span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_102" id="Page_102">[102]</SPAN></span> <SPAN href="images/i110-hi.jpg"><ANTIMG src="images/i110.jpg" width-obs="600" height-obs="438" alt="SKETCH MAP OF FORT 9 INGOLSTADT" title="" /></SPAN> <span class="caption">SKETCH MAP OF FORT 9 INGOLSTADT</span></div>
<p><br/></p>
<div class="footnotes"><h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3>
<div class="footnote"><p><SPAN name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></SPAN><SPAN href="#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></SPAN> The Germans varied their treatment of their prisoners inversely
with their prospects of victory. When things were going badly with
them—during most of 1916, for instance—much unnecessary harshness
towards their prisoners was relaxed. When once more their
hopes of final victory were raised by the invasion of Roumania
and the checking of the Somme offensive, the poor prisoners had a
rough time. Such is the way with bullies.</p>
</div>
</div>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />