<h3><SPAN name="chap_4"></SPAN>CHAPTER IV.</h3>
<h5>THE WALL BASE.</h5>
<p><span class="scs">I</span>. <span class="sc">Our</span> first business, then, is with Wall, and to find out
wherein lies the true excellence of the “Wittiest Partition.”
For it is rather strange that, often as we speak of a “dead”
wall, and that with considerable disgust, we have not often,
since Snout’s time, heard of a living one. But the common
epithet of opprobrium is justly bestowed, and marks a right
feeling. A wall has no business to be dead. It ought to have
members in its make, and purposes in its existence, like an organized
creature, and to answer its ends in a living and energetic
way; and it is only when we do not choose to put any
strength nor organization into it, that it offends us by its deadness.
Every wall ought to be a “sweet and lovely wall.” I
do not care about its having ears; but, for instruction and exhortation,
I would often have it to “hold up its fingers.” What
its necessary members and excellences are, it is our present
business to discover.</p>
<p><span class="scs">II</span>. A wall has been defined to be an even and united
fence of wood, earth, stone, or metal. Metal fences, however,
seldom, if ever, take the form of walls, but of railings; and,
like all other metal constructions, must be left out of our
present investigation; as may be also walls composed merely
of light planks or laths for purposes of partition or inclosure.
Substantial walls, whether of wood or earth (I use the word
earth as including clay, baked or unbaked, and stone), have,
in their perfect form, three distinct members;—the Foundation,
Body or Veil, and Cornice.</p>
<p><span class="scs">III</span>. The foundation is to the wall what the paw is to an
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page053"></SPAN>53</span>
animal. It is a long foot, wider than the wall, on which the
wall is to stand, and which keeps it from settling into the
ground. It is most necessary that this great element of
security should be visible to the eye, and therefore made a
part of the structure above ground. Sometimes, indeed, it
becomes incorporated with the entire foundation of the building,
a vast table on which walls or piers are alike set: but
even then, the eye, taught by the reason, requires some additional
preparation or foot for the wall, and the building is
felt to be imperfect without it. This foundation we shall call
the Base of the wall.</p>
<p><span class="scs">IV</span>. The body of the wall is of course the principal mass
of it, formed of mud or clay, of bricks or stones, of logs or
hewn timber; the condition of structure being, that it is of
equal thickness everywhere, below and above. It may be
half a foot thick, or six feet thick, or fifty feet thick; but if
of equal thickness everywhere, it is still a wall proper: if to
its fifty feet of proper thickness there be added so much as
an inch of thickness in particular parts, that added thickness
is to be considered as some form of buttress or pier, or other
appliance.<SPAN name="FnAnchor_33" href="#Footnote_33"><span class="sp">33</span></SPAN></p>
<p>In perfect architecture, however, the walls are generally
kept of moderate thickness, and strengthened by piers or
buttresses; and the part of the wall between these, being
generally intended only to secure privacy, or keep out the
slighter forces of weather, may be properly called a Wall
Veil. I shall always use this word “Veil” to signify the even
portion of a wall, it being more expressive than the term
Body.</p>
<p><span class="scs">V</span>. When the materials with which this veil is built are
very loose, or of shapes which do not fit well together, it
sometimes becomes necessary, or at least adds to security, to
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page054"></SPAN>54</span>
introduce courses of more solid material. Thus, bricks
alternate with rolled pebbles in the old walls of Verona, and
hewn stones with brick in its Lombard churches. A banded
structure, almost a stratification of the wall, is thus produced;
and the courses of more solid material are sometimes decorated
with carving. Even when the wall is not thus banded
through its whole height, it frequently becomes expedient to
lay a course of stone, or at least of more carefully chosen
materials, at regular heights; and such belts or bands we may
call String courses. These are a kind of epochs in the wall’s
existence; something like periods of rest and reflection in human
life, before entering on a new career. Or else, in the building,
they correspond to the divisions of its stories within, express its
internal structure, and mark off some portion of the ends of
its existence already attained.</p>
<p><span class="scs">VI</span>. Finally, on the top of the wall some protection from
the weather is necessary, or some preparation for the reception
of superincumbent weight, called a coping, or Cornice.
I shall use the word Cornice for both; for, in fact, a coping
is a roof to the wall itself, and is carried by a small cornice
as the roof of the building by a large one. In either case, the
cornice, small or large, is the termination of the wall’s existence,
the accomplishment of its work. When it is meant to carry
some superincumbent weight, the cornice may be considered as
its hand, opened to carry something above its head; as the base
was considered its foot: and the three parts should grow out
of each other and form one whole, like the root, stalk, and bell
of a flower.</p>
<p>These three parts we shall examine in succession; and, first,
the Base.</p>
<p><span class="scs">VII</span>. It may be sometimes in our power, and it is always
expedient, to prepare for the whole building some settled
foundation, level and firm, out of sight. But this has not
been done in some of the noblest buildings in existence. It
cannot always be done perfectly, except at enormous expense;
and, in reasoning upon the superstructure, we shall never
suppose it to be done. The mind of the spectator does not
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page055"></SPAN>55</span>
conceive it; and he estimates the merits of the edifice on the
supposition of its being built upon the ground. Even if there
be a vast table land of foundation elevated for the whole of
it, accessible by steps all round, as at Pisa, the surface of this
table is always conceived as capable of yielding somewhat to
superincumbent weight, and generally is so; and we shall
base all our arguments on the widest possible supposition,
that is to say, that the building stands on a surface either of
earth, or, at all events, capable of yielding in some degree to
its weight.</p>
<table style="float: right; width: auto" summary="Illustration">
<tr>
<td class="caption1">Fig. II.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="figright2">
<SPAN name="fig_2"><ANTIMG src="images/img055.jpg" width-obs="350" height-obs="323" alt="Fig. II." title="Fig. II." /></SPAN></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><span class="scs">VIII</span>. Now, let the reader simply ask himself how, on
such a surface, he would
set about building a substantial
wall, that should be
able to bear weight and to
stand for ages. He would
assuredly look about for the
largest stones he had at
his disposal, and, rudely levelling
the ground, he would
lay these well together over
a considerably larger width
than he required the wall to
be (suppose as at <i>a</i>, <SPAN href="#fig_2">Fig. II.</SPAN>),
in order to equalise the pressure of the wall over a large surface,
and form its foot. On the top of these he would perhaps
lay a second tier of large stones, <i>b</i>, or even the third, <i>c</i>, making
the breadth somewhat less each time, so as to prepare for the
pressure of the wall on the centre, and, naturally or necessarily,
using somewhat smaller stones above than below (since
we supposed him to look about for the largest first), and
cutting them more neatly. His third tier, if not his second,
will probably appear a sufficiently secure foundation for finer
work; for if the earth yield at all, it will probably yield pretty
equally under the great mass of masonry now knit together
over it. So he will prepare for the wall itself at once by
sloping off the next tier of stones to the right diameter, as
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page056"></SPAN>56</span>
at <i>d</i>. If there be any joints in this tier within the wall, he
may perhaps, for further security, lay a binding stone across
them, <i>e</i>, and then begin the work of the wall veil itself,
whether in bricks or stones.</p>
<p><span class="scs">IX</span>. I have supposed the preparation here to be for a large
wall, because such a preparation will give us the best general
type. But it is evident that the essential features of the arrangement
are only two, that is to say, one tier of massy work
for foundation, suppose <i>c</i>, missing the first two; and the receding
tier or real foot of the wall, <i>d</i>. The reader will find these
members, though only of brick, in most of the considerable
and independent walls in the suburbs of London.</p>
<p><span class="scs">X</span>. It is evident, however, that the general type, <SPAN href="#fig_2">Fig. II.</SPAN>,
will be subject to many different modifications in different
circumstances. Sometimes the ledges of the tiers <i>a</i> and <i>b</i>
may be of greater width; and when the building is in a
secure place, and of finished masonry, these may be sloped
off also like the main foot <i>d</i>. In Venetian buildings these
lower ledges are exposed to the sea, and therefore left rough
hewn; but in fine work and in important positions the lower
ledges may be bevelled and decorated like the upper, or
another added above <i>d</i>; and all these parts may be in
different proportions, according to the disposition of the
building above them. But we have nothing to do with any
of these variations at present, they being all more or less
dependent upon decorative considerations, except only one of
very great importance, that is to say, the widening of the
lower ledge into a stone seat, which may be often done in
buildings of great size with most beautiful effect: it looks
kind and hospitable, and preserves the work above from
violence. In St. Mark’s at Venice, which is a small and low
church, and needing no great foundation for the wall veils
of it, we find only the three members, <i>b</i>, <i>c</i>, and <i>d</i>. Of these
the first rises about a foot above the pavement of St. Mark’s
Place, and forms an elevated dais in some of the recesses of
the porches, chequered red and white; <i>c</i> forms a seat which
follows the line of the walls, while its basic character is
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page057"></SPAN>57</span>
marked by its also carrying certain shafts with which we
have here no concern; <i>d</i> is of white marble; and all are
enriched and decorated in the simplest and most perfect
manner possible, as we shall see in <SPAN href="#chap_25">Chap. XXV.</SPAN> And thus
much may serve to fix the type of wall bases, a type oftener
followed in real practice than any other we shall hereafter be
enabled to determine: for wall bases of necessity must be
solidly built, and the architect is therefore driven into the
adoption of the right form; or if he deviate from it, it is
generally in meeting some necessity of peculiar circumstances,
as in obtaining cellars and underground room, or in preparing
for some grand features or particular parts of the wall, or in
some mistaken idea of decoration,—into which errors we had
better not pursue him until we understand something more
of the rest of the building: let us therefore proceed to consider
the wall veil.</p>
<hr class="foot" />
<div class="note">
<p><SPAN name="Footnote_33" href="#FnAnchor_33"><span class="fn">33</span></SPAN> Many walls are slightly sloped or curved towards their tops, and have
buttresses added to them (that of the Queen’s Bench Prison is a curious
instance of the vertical buttress and inclined wall); but in all such instances
the slope of the wall is properly to be considered a condition of incorporated
buttress.</p>
</div>
<hr class="art" />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="page058"></SPAN>58</span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />