<SPAN name="10"></SPAN>
<br/>
<br/>
CHAPTER X.
<br/>
<br/>
THE SUBLIMINAL SELF.
<br/>
<p>While the previous pages of this work were in the press, I received and
read a very interesting and able Book, entitled, "Telepathy and the Subliminal
Self, or an account of recent investigations regarding Hypnotism, Automatism,
Dreams, Phantoms, and related phenomena," by R. OSGOOD MASON, A.M., Fellow of
the New York Academy of Medicine. Dr. MASON, on the whole, may be said to follow
HARTMANN, since he places Thaumaturgy, or working what have been considered as
wonders, miracles, and the deeds of spiritualists, on the evolutionary or
material basis. He is also far less superstitious or prone to seek the
miraculous and mysterious for its own sake, than his predecessors in
<em>occulta,</em> and limits his beliefs to proofs sustained by good authority. He
recognizes a second, or what he calls a subliminal Self, the Spirit of our Soul,
acting independently of Waking Conscious Judgment, a mysterious <em>alter ego,</em>
which has marvelous power.</p>
<p>This second or inner self I have also through this work of mine recognized
as a reality, though it is, like the self-conscious soul, rather an aggregate
than a distinct unity. Thus we may for convenience sake speak of the Memory,
when there are in fact millions of memories, since every image stored away in
the brain is one, and the faculty of revising them for the use of the waking
soul, is certainly apart from the action of bringing them into play in dreams.
In fact if we regard the action of all known faculties, we might assume with the
Egyptians that man had not merely eight distinct souls, but eighty, or even a
countless number. And as the ancients, knowing very little about mental action,
classed it all as one soul, so we may call that which is partially investigated
and mysterious, a second or inner "soul," spirit, or subliminal self—that is to
say provisionally, till more familiar with its nature and relations.</p>
<p>DR. MASON, to his credit be it said, has not accepted for Gospel, as
certain French writers have done, the tricks of self-confessed humbugs. He has
only given us the cream of the most strictly attested cases, as related by
French scientists and people of unquestioned veracity. And yet admitting that in
every instance the witness sincerely believed that he or she spoke the truth,
the aggregate is so far from confirming the tales told, that consideration and
comparison would induce very grave doubt. Thus, who could have been more
sincere, purely honest or pious than JUSTINUS KERNER, whom I knew personally,
SWEDENBORG, ESCHENMAYER and all of their school? Yet how utterly irreconciliable
are all their revelations!</p>
<p>Therefore, while I have cited illustration and example as affording
unproved or hearsay evidence, I, in fact, decidedly reject not only all
tradition, as proof on occult subjects, but all assertion from any quarter,
however trustworthy, asking the reader to believe in nothing which he cannot
execute and make sure unto himself. Tradition and testimony are very useful to
supply ideas or theories, but to actually <em>believe</em> in anything beyond
his experience a man should take sufficient interest in it to <em>prove</em>
it by personal experiment. And, therefore, as I have already declared, I not
only ask, but hope that no reader will put faith in anything which I have
alleged or declared, until he has fully and fairly proved it to be true in his
own person.</p>
<p>The history of true culture, truth, or progress has been that of doubt or
disbelief in all which cannot be scientifically proved or made manifest to
sensation and reflection, and even in this the most scrupulous care must be
exercised, since our senses often deceive us. Therefore, in dealing with
subjects which have undeniably been made the means of deceit and delusion
thousands of times to one authentic instance, it is not well to accept
testimony, or any kind of evidence, or proof, save that which we can establish
for ourself. The day is not yet, but it is coming, when self-evidence will be
claimed, and granted, as to all human knowledge, and the sooner it comes the
better will it be for the world.</p>
<p>But I would be clearly understood as declaring that it is only as regards
making up our minds to absolute faith in what involves what may be called our
mental welfare, which includes the most serious conduct of life, that I would
limit belief to scientific proof. As an example, I will cite the very
interesting case of the hypnotic treatment of a patient by DR. VOISIN, and as
given by MASON.</p>
<p>"In the summer of 1884, there was at the Salp�tri�re a young woman of a
deplorable type, Jeanne S—, who was a criminal lunatic, filthy, violent, and
with a life history of impurity and crime. M. Auguste Voisin, one of the
physicians of the staff, undertook to hypnotize her, May 31. At that time she
was so violent that she could only be kept quiet by a straight-jacket and the
constant cold douche to her head. She would not look at M. Voisin, but raved and
spat at him. He persisted, kept his face near and opposite to hers, and his eyes
following hers constantly. In ten minutes she was in a sound sleep, and soon
passed into a somnambulistic condition. The process was repeated many days, and
she gradually became sane while in the hypnotic condition, but still raved when
she woke.</p>
<p>"Gradually then she began to accept hypnotic suggestion, and would obey
trivial orders given her while asleep, such as to sweep her room, then
suggestions regarding her general behavior; then, in her hypnotic condition, she
began to express regret for her past life, and form resolutions of amendment to
which she finally adhered when she awoke. Two years later she was a nurse in one
of the Paris hospitals, and her conduct was irreproachable. M. Voisin has
followed up this case by others equally striking."</p>
<p>This is not only an unusually well authenticated instance, but one which
seems to carry conviction from the manner of narration. Yet it would be absurd
to declare that the subject neither deceived herself nor others, or that the
doctor made no mistakes either in fact or involuntarily. The whole is, however,
extremely valuable from its <em>probability,</em> and still more from its
suggesting experiment in a much more useful direction than that followed in the
majority of cases recorded in most books, which, especially in France, seem
chiefly to have been conducted from a melodramatic or merely medical point of
view. Very few indeed seem to have ever dreamed that a hypnotized subject was
anything but a being to be cured of some disorder, operated on without pain, or
made to undergo and perform various tricks, often extremely cruel, silly, and
wicked—the main object of all being to advertise the skill of the operator. In
fact, if it were to be accepted that the main object of hypnotism is to repeat
such experiments as are described in most of the French works on the subject,
humanity and decency would join in prohibiting the practice of the art
altogether. These books point out and make clear in the minutest manner, how
every kind of crime can be committed, and the mind brought to regard all that is
evil as a matter of course. The making an innocent person attempt to commit a
murder or steal is among the most usual experiments; while, on the contrary, any
case like that of the reform of Jeanne S— is either very rare, or else is
treated simply as a proof of the skill of some
<em>medico.</em> The fact that if the successes which are recorded are <em>true,</em>
there exists a <em>stupendous</em> power by means of which the average
morality and happiness of mankind can be incredibly advanced and sustained, and
Education, Art in every branch, and, in a word, all Culture be marvelously
developed on a far more secure basis than in the old systems, does not seem to
have occurred to any of those who possessed, as it were, gold, without having
the least idea of its value or even its qualities.</p>
<p>Happiness in the main is a pleasant, contented condition of the mind, that
is to say, "a state of mind." To be perfect, as appears from an enlarged study
of all things or phenomena in their relations (since every part must harmonize
with the whole), this happiness implies duty and altruism, every whit as much as
self-enjoyment. This agrees with and results from scientific experience. Under
the old <em>a priori</em> psychologic system, <em>selfishness</em> (which
meant that every soul was to be chiefly or solely concerned in saving itself,
guided by hope of reward and fear of punishment), it was naturally the basis of
morality.</p>
<p>Now, accepting the definition of Happiness as a state of mind under certain
conditions, it follows that it can be realized to a great degree, and in all
cases to some degree, firstly by forethought or carefully defining what it is or
what we desire, and secondly by making a fixed idea by simple, well-nigh
mechanical means, without any resource to <em>les grands m�yens.</em>
According to the old and now rapidly vanishing philosophy, this was to be
effected by sublime morality, prayer, or adjuration of supernatural beings and
noble heroism, but what is here proposed is much humbler, albeit more practical.
Reading immortal poetry or prose is indeed a splendid power, but to learn the
letters of the alphabet, and to spell, is very simple and unpoetic, yet far more
practical. What I have described has been the mere dull rudiments. It is most
remarkable that the world has always known that the art of RAFFAELLE, MICHAEL
ANGELO, and ALBERT DURER was based, like that of the greatest musicians, on
extensive rudimentary study, and yet has never dreamed that what far surpasses
all art in every way, and even includes the desire for it, may all proceed from,
or be developed by, a process which is even easier than those required for the
lesser branches.</p>
<p>He who can control his own mind by an iron will, and say to the Thoughts
which he would banish, "Be ye my slaves and begone into outer darkness," or to
Peace "Dwell with me forever, come what may," <em>and be obeyed,</em> that man
is a mighty magician who has attained what is worth more than all that Earth
possesses. Absolute self-control under the conditions before defined—since our
happiness to be true must agree with that of others—is absolutely essential to
happiness. There can be no greater hero than the man who can conquer himself and
think exactly as he pleases. That which annoys, tempts, stirs us to being
irritable, wicked, or mean, is an aggregate of evil thoughts or images received
by chance or otherwise into the memory, developed there into vile unions, and
new forms like coalescing animalcule, and so powerful and vivid or objective do
they become that men in all ages have given them a real existence as evil
spirits.</p>
<p>Every sane man living, can if he <em>really</em> desires it, obtain
complete absolute command of himself, exorcise these vile demons and bring in
peace instead, by developing with determination the simple process which I have
described. I have found in my own experience a fierce pleasure in considering
obnoxious and pernicious Thoughts as imps or demons to be conquered, in which
case Pride and even Arrogance become virtues, even as poisons in their place are
wholesome medicines. Thus, he who is haunted with the fixed idea, even well nigh
to monomania, that he will never give way to ill temper, that nothing shall
disturb his equanimity, need not fear evil results any more than the being
haunted by angels. Now we can all have fixed or haunting ideas, on any subject
which we please to entertain—but the idea to create good and beneficent haunting
has not, that I am aware, been suggested by philosophers.</p>
<p>That mental influence can be exerted hypnotically most directly and
certainly by one person upon another is undeniable, but this requires, firstly,
a susceptible subject, or only one person in three or four, and to a degree a
specially gifted operator, and very often "heaven-sent moments."</p>
<p> "However greatly mortals may require it,<br/>
All cannot go to Corinth who desire it."</p>
<p>But forethought, self-suggestion, and the bringing the mind to dwell
continuously on a subject are absolutely within the reach of all who have any
strength of mind whatever, without any aid. Those of feebler ability yield,
however, all the more readily (as in the case of children) to the influence of
others or of hypnotism by a master. Therefore, either subjectively or with
assistance, most human beings can be morally benefited to a limitless degree,
"morally" including intellectually.</p>
<p>We often hear it said of a person that he or she would do well or succeed
if that individual had "application." Now, as Application, or "sticking to it,"
or perseverance in earnest faith, is the main condition for success in all that
I have discussed, I trust that it will be borne in mind that the process
indicated provides from the first lesson or experiment for this chief requisite.
For the <em>fore-thinking</em> and hypnotizing our minds to be in a certain state or
condition all the next day, by what some writers, such as HARTMANN, treat as
magical process—but which is just so much magical as the use of an electrical
machine—is simply a beginning in Attention and Perseverance.</p>
<p> "So, like a snowball rolled in falling snow,<br/>
It gathers size as it doth onward go."</p>
<p>When we make a wish or will, or determine that in future after awaking we
shall be in a given state of mind, we also include Perseverance for the given
time, and as success supposes repetition in all minds, it follows that
Perseverance will be induced gradually and easily.</p>
<p>And here I may remark that while all writers on ethics, duty or morals, cry
continually "Be persevering, be honest, be enterprising, exert your will!" and
so on, and waste thousands of books in illustrating the advantages of all these
fine things, there is not one who tells us <em>how</em> to practically execute
or do them. To follow the hint of a quaint Sunday School picture, they show us a
swarm of Bees, with hive and honey, but do not tell us how to catch <em>one.</em>
And yet a man may be anything he pleases if he will by easy and simple practice
as I have shown, make the conception habitual. I do not tell you as these good
folk do, how to go about it nobly, or heroically, or piously; in fact, I
prescribe a method as humble as making a fire, or a pair of shoes, and yet in
very truth and honor I have profited far more by it than I ever did from all the
exhortations which I ever have read.</p>
<p>Now there are many men who are not so bad in themselves in reality, but who
are so haunted by evil thoughts, impulses, and desires, that they, being taught
by the absurd old heathenish psychology that the "soul" is all one spiritual
entity, believe themselves to be as wicked as Beelzebub could wish, when, in
fact, these sins are nothing but evil weeds which came into the mind as
neglected seeds, and grew apace from sheer carelessness. Regarding them in the
light, as one may say, of bodily and material nuisances, or a kind of vermin,
they can be extirpated by the strong hand of Will, much more easily than under
the old system, whereby they were treated with respect and awe as MILTON hath
done (and most immorally too), DANTE being no better; and they would both have
exerted their gigantic intellects to better purpose by showing man how to
conquer the devil, instead of exalting and exaggerating his stupendous power and
showing how, as regards Humanity (for which expressly the Universe, including
countless millions of solar systems, was created), Satan has by far the victory,
since he secures the majority of souls. For saying which thing a holy bishop
once got himself into no end of trouble.</p>
<p>I say that he who uses his will can crush and drive out vile haunting
thoughts, and the more rudely and harshly he does it the better. In all the old
systems, without exception, they are treated with far too much respect and
reverence, and no great wonder either, since they were regarded as a great
innate portion of the soul. Whether to be cleared out by the allopathic
exorcism, or the gentler homœpathic prayer, the patient never relied on himself.
There is a fine Italian proverb in the collection of GUILLO VARRINO, Venice
1656, which declares that <em>Buona volont� supplice � facolta—</em>"strong
will ekes out ability"—and before the Will (which the Church has ever weakened
or crushed) no evil instincts can hold. The same author tells us that "The
greatest man in the world is he who can govern his own will," also, "To him who
wills naught is impossible." To which I would add that "Whoever chooses to have
a will may do so by culture," or by ever so little to begin with. Nay, I have no
doubt that in time there will be societies, schools, churches, or circles, in
which the Will shall be taught and applied to all moral and mental culture.</p>
<p>He who wills it sincerely can govern his Will, and he who can govern his
Will is a thousand times more fortunate than if he could govern the world. For
to govern the Will is to be without fear, superior and indifferent to all
earthly follies and shams, idols, cants and delusions, it is to be lord of a
thousand isles in the sea of life, and absolutely greater than any living
mortal, as men exist. Small need has that man to heed what his birth or station
in society may be who has mastered himself with the iron will; for he who has
conquered death and the devil need fear no shadows.</p>
<p>He who masters himself by Will has attained to all that is best and noblest
in Stoicism, Epicureanism, Christianity, and Agnosticism; if the latter be
understood not as doubt, but free Inquiry, and could men be made to feel what
all this means and what power it bestows, and how easily it really is to master
it, we should forthwith see all humanity engaged in the work.</p>
<p>It has been declared by many in the past in regard to schooling their minds
to moral and practical ends that, leading busy lives, they had not time to think
of such matters. But I earnestly protest that it is these very men of all others
who most require the discipline which I have taught, and it is as easy for them
as for anybody; as it, indeed, ought to be easier, yes, and far more profitable.
For the one who leads by fortune a quiet life of leisure can often school
himself without a system, while he who toils amid anxious thoughts and with
every mental power severely taxed, will find that he can do his work <em>far</em>
more easily if he determines that he <em>will</em> master it. The amount of
mental action which lies dormant in us all is illimitable and it can all be
realized by the hypnotism of Will.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />