<h2><SPAN name="chap09"></SPAN>CHAPTER IX</h2>
<p class="letter">
Schools—Climate—Water Melons—Fourth of
July—Storms—Pigs—Moving Houses—Mr.
Flint—Literature</p>
<p>Cincinnati contains many schools, but of their rank or merit I had very little
opportunity of judging; the only one which I visited was kept by Dr. Lock, a
gentleman who appears to have liberal and enlarged opinions on the subject of
female education. Should his system produce practical results proportionably
excellent, the ladies of Cincinnati will probably some years hence be much
improved in their powers of companionship. I attended the annual public
exhibition at this school, and perceived, with some surprise, that the higher
branches of science were among the studies of the pretty creatures I saw
assembled there. One lovely girl of sixteen took her degree in mathematics, and
another was examined in moral philosophy. They blushed so sweetly, and looked
so beautifully puzzled and confounded, that it might have been difficult for an
abler judge than I was to decide how far they merited the diploma they
received.</p>
<p>This method of letting young ladies graduate, and granting them diplomas on
quitting the establishment, was quite new to me; at least, I do not remember to
have heard of any thing similar elsewhere. I should fear that the time allowed
to the fair graduates of Cincinnati for the acquirement of these various
branches of education would seldom be sufficient to permit their reaching the
eminence in each which their enlightened instructor anticipates. “A
quarter’s” mathematics, or “two quarters” political
economy, moral philosophy, algebra, and quadratic equations, would seldom, I
should think, enable the teacher and the scholar, by their joint efforts, to
lay in such a stock of these sciences as would stand the wear and tear of half
a score of children, and one help.</p>
<p class="p2">
Towards the end of May we began to feel that we were in a climate warmer than
any we had been accustomed to, and my son suffered severely from the effects of
it. A bilious complaint, attended by a frightful degree of fever, seized him,
and for some days we feared for his life. The treatment he received was, I have
no doubt, judicious, but the quantity of calomel prescribed was enormous. I
asked one day how many grains I should prepare, and was told to give half a
teaspoonful. The difference of climate must, I imagine, make a difference in
the effect of this drug, or the practice of the old and new world could hardly
differ so widely as it does in the use of it. Anstey, speaking of the Bath
physicians, says,</p>
<p class="poem">
“No one e’er viewed<br/>
Any one of the medical gentlemen stewed.”</p>
<p>But I can vouch, upon my own experience, that no similar imputation lies
against the gentlemen who prescribe large quantities of calomel in America. To
give one instance in proof of this, when I was afterwards in Montgomery county,
near Washington, a physician attended one of our neighbours, and complained
that he was himself unwell. “You must take care of yourself,
Doctor,” said the patient; “I do so,” he replied, “I
took forty grains of calomel yesterday, and I feel better than I did.”
Repeated and violent bleeding was also had recourse to in the case of my son,
and in a few days he was able to leave his room, but he was dreadfully
emaciated, and it was many weeks before he recovered his strength.</p>
<p>As the heat of the weather increased we heard of much sickness around us. The
city is full of physicians, and they were all to be seen driving about in their
cabs at a very alarming rate. One of these gentlemen told us, that when a
medical man intended settling in a new situation, he always, if he knew his
business, walked through the streets at nights, before he decided. If he saw
the dismal twinkle of the watch-light from many windows he might be sure that
disease was busy, and the the “location” might suit him well.
Judging, by this criterion, Cincinnati was far from healthy, I began to fear
for our health, and determined to leave the city; but, for a considerable time
I found it impossible to procure a dwelling out of it. There were many
boarding-houses in the vicinity, but they were all overflowing with guests. We
were advised to avoid, as much as possible, walking out in the heat of the day;
but the mornings and evenings were delightful, particularly the former, if
taken sufficiently early. For several weeks I was never in bed after four
o’clock, and at this hour I almost daily accompanied my
“help” to market, where the busy novelty of the scene afforded me
much amusement.</p>
<p>Many waggon-loads of enormous water-melons were brought to market every day,
and I was sure to see groups of men, women, and children seated on the pavement
round the spot where they were sold, sucking in prodigious quantities of this
water-fruit. Their manner of devouring them is extremely unpleasant; the huge
fruit is cut into half a dozen sections, of about a foot long, and then,
dripping as it is with water, applied to the mouth, from either side of which
pour copious streams of the fluid, while, ever and anon, a mouthful of the hard
black seeds are shot out in all directions, to the great annoyance of all
within reach. When I first tasted this fruit I thought it very vile stuff
indeed, but before the end of the season we all learned to like it. When taken
with claret and sugar it makes delicious wine and water.</p>
<p>It is the custom for the gentlemen to go to market at Cincinnati; the smartest
men in the place, and those of the “highest standing” do not
scruple to leave their beds with the sun, six days in the week, and, prepared
with a mighty basket, to sally forth in search of meat, butter, eggs and
vegetables. I have continually seen them returning, with their weighty basket
on one arm and an enormous ham depending from the other.</p>
<p>And now arrived the 4th of July, that greatest of all American festivals. On
the 4th of July, 1776, the declaration of their independence was signed, at the
State-house in Philadelphia.</p>
<p>To me, the dreary coldness and want of enthusiasm in American manners is one of
their greatest defects, and I therefore hailed the demonstrations of general
feeling which this day elicits with real pleasure. On the 4th of July the
hearts of the people seem to awaken from a three hundred and sixty-four
days’ sleep; they appear high-spirited, gay, animated, social, generous,
or at least liberal in expense; and would they but refrain from spitting on
that hallowed day, I should say, that on the 4th of July, at least, they
appeared to be an amiable people. It is true that the women have but little to
do with the pageantry, the splendour, or the gaiety of the day; but, setting
this defect aside, it was indeed a glorious sight to behold a jubilee so
heartfelt as this; and had they not the bad taste and bad feeling to utter an
annual oration, with unvarying abuse of the mother country, to say nothing of
the warlike manifesto called Declaration of Independence, our gracious king
himself might look upon the scene and say that it was good; nay, even rejoice,
that twelve millions of bustling bodies, at four thousand miles distance from
his throne and his altars, should make their own laws, and drink their own tea,
after the fashion that pleased them best.</p>
<p class="p2">
One source of deep interest to us, in this new clime, was the frequent
recurrence of thunderstorms. Those who have only listened to thunder in England
have but a faint idea of the language which the gods speak when they are angry.
Thomson’s description, however, will do: it is hardly possible that words
can better paint the spectacle, or more truly echo to the sound, than his do.
The only point he does not reach is the vast blaze of rose-coloured light that
ever and anon sets the landscape on fire.</p>
<p>In reading this celebrated description in America, and observing how admirably
true it was to nature there, I seemed to get a glimpse at a poet’s
machinery, and to perceive, that in order to produce effect he must give his
images more vast than he finds them in nature; but the proportions must be
just, and the colouring true. Every thing seems colossal on this great
continent; if it rains, if it blows, if it thunders, it is all done
<i>fortissimo</i>; but I often felt terror yield to wonder and delight, so
grand, so glorious were the scenes a storm exhibited. Accidents are certainly
more frequent than with us, but not so much so as reasonably to bring terror
home to one’s bosom every time a mass of lurid clouds is seen rolling up
against the wind.</p>
<p class="p2">
It seems hardly fair to quarrel with a place because its staple commodity is
not pretty, but I am sure I should have liked Cincinnati much better if the
people had not dealt so very largely in hogs. The immense quantity of business
done in this line would hardly be believed by those who had not witnessed it. I
never saw a newspaper without remarking such advertisements as the following:</p>
<p class="letter">
“Wanted, immediately, 4,000 fat hogs.”<br/>
“For sale, 2,000 barrels of prime pork.”</p>
<p>But the annoyance came nearer than this; if I determined upon a walk up
Main-street, the chances were five hundred to one against my reaching the shady
side without brushing by a snout fresh dripping from the kennel; when we had
screwed our courage to the enterprise of mounting a certain noble looking
sugar-loaf hill, that promised pure air and a fine view, we found the brook we
had to cross, at its foot, red with the stream from a pig slaughter house;
while our noses, instead of meeting “the thyme that loves the green
hill’s breast,” were greeted by odours that I will not describe,
and which I heartily hope my readers cannot imagine; our feet, that on leaving
the city had expected to press the flowery sod, literally got entangled in
pigs’ tails and jaw-bones: and thus the prettiest walk in the
neighbourhood was interdicted for ever.</p>
<p class="p2">
One of the sights to stare at in America is that of houses moving from place to
place. We were often amused by watching this exhibition of mechanical skill in
the streets. They make no difficulty of moving dwellings from one part of the
town to another. Those I saw travelling were all of them frame-houses, that is,
built wholly of wood, except the chimneys; but it is said that brick buildings
are sometimes treated in the same manner. The largest dwelling that I saw in
motion was one containing two stories of four rooms each; forty oxen were yoked
to it. The first few yards brought down the two stacks of chimneys, but it
afterwards went on well. The great difficulties were the first getting it in
motion and the stopping exactly in the right place. This locomotive power was
extremely convenient at Cincinnati, as the constant improvements going on there
made it often desirable to change a wooden dwelling for one of brick; and
whenever this happened, we were sure to see the ex No.100 of Main-street or the
ex No.55 of Second street creeping quietly out of town, to take possession of a
humble suburban station on the common above it.</p>
<p class="p2">
The most agreeable acquaintance I made in Cincinnati, and indeed one of the
most talented men I ever met, was Mr. Flint, the author of several extremely
clever volumes, and the editor of the Western Monthly Review. His
conversational powers are of the highest order: he is the only person I
remember to have known with first rate powers of satire, and even of sarcasm,
whose kindness of nature and of manner remained perfectly uninjured. In some of
his critical notices there is a strength and keenness second to nothing of the
kind I have ever read. He is a warm patriot, and so true-hearted an American,
that we could not always be of the same opinion on all the subjects we
discussed; but whether it were the force and brilliancy of his language, his
genuine and manly sincerity of feeling, or his bland and gentleman-like manner
that beguiled me, I know not, but certainly he is the only American I ever
listened to whose unqualified praise of his country did not appear to me
somewhat overstrained and ridiculous.</p>
<p>On one occasion, but not at the house of Mr. Flint, I passed an evening in
company with a gentleman said to be a scholar and a man of reading; he was also
what is called a <i>serious</i> gentleman, and he appeared to have pleasure in
feeling that his claim to distinction was acknowledged in both capacities.
There was a very amiable <i>serious</i> lady in the company, to whom he seemed
to trust for the development of his celestial pretensions, and to me he did the
honour of addressing most of his terrestrial superiority. The difference
between us was, that when he spoke to her, he spoke as to a being who, if not
his equal, was at least deserving high distinction; and he gave her smiles,
such as Michael might have vouchsafed to Eve. To me he spoke as Paul to the
offending Jews; he did not, indeed, shake his raiment at me, but he used his
pocket-handkerchief so as to answer the purpose; and if every sentence did not
end with “I am clean,” pronounced by his lips, his tone, his look,
his action, fully supplied the deficiency.</p>
<p>Our poor Lord Byron, as may be supposed, was the bull’s-eye against which
every dart in his black little quiver was aimed. I had never heard any serious
gentleman talk of Lord Byron at full length before, and I listened attentively.
It was evident that the noble passages which are graven on the hearts of the
genuine lovers of poetry had altogether escaped the serious gentleman’s
attention; and it was equally evident that he knew by rote all those that they
wish the mighty master had never written. I told him so, and I shall not soon
forget the look he gave me.</p>
<p>Of other authors his knowledge was very imperfect, but his criticisms very
amusing. Of Pope, he said, “He is so entirely gone by, that in <i>our</i>
country it is considered quite fustian to speak of him”</p>
<p>But I persevered, and named “the Rape of the Lock” as evincing some
little talent, and being in a tone that might still hope for admittance in the
drawing-room; but, on the mention of this poem, the serious gentleman became
almost as strongly agitated as when he talked of Don Juan; and I was
unfeignedly at a loss to comprehend the nature of his feelings, till he
muttered, with an indignant shake of the handkerchief, “The very
title!”</p>
<p>At the name of Dryden he smiled, and the smile spoke as plainly as a smile
could speak, “How the old woman twaddles!”</p>
<p>“We only know Dryden by quotations. Madam, and these, indeed, are found
only in books that have long since had their day.”</p>
<p>“And Shakspeare, sir?”</p>
<p>“Shakspeare, Madam, is obscene, and, thank God, WE are sufficiently
advanced to have found it out! If we must have the abomination of stage plays,
let them at least be marked by the refinement of the age in which we
live.”</p>
<p>This was certainly being <i>au courant du jour</i>.</p>
<p>Of Massenger he knew nothing. Of Ford he had never heard. Gray had had his day.
Prior he had never read, but understood he was a very childish writer. Chaucer
and Spenser he tied in a couple, and dismissed by saying, that he thought it
was neither more nor less than affectation to talk of authors who wrote in a
tongue no longer intelligible.</p>
<p>This was the most literary conversation I was ever present at in Cincinnati.<SPAN href="#fn1" name="fnref1" id="fnref1"><sup>[1]</sup></SPAN></p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="fn1" id="fn1"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#fnref1">[1]</SPAN>
The pleasant, easy, unpretending talk on all subjects, which I enjoyed in Mr.
Flint’s family, was an exception to every thing else I met at Cincinnati.</p>
<p>In truth, there are many reasons which render a very general diffusion of
literature impossible in America. I can scarcely class the universal reading of
newspapers as an exception to this remark; if I could, my statement would be
exactly the reverse, and I should say that America beat the world in letters.
The fact is, that throughout all ranks of society, from the successful
merchant, which is the highest, to the domestic serving man, which is the
lowest, they are all too actively employed to read, except at such broken
moments as may suffice for a peep at a newspaper. It is for this reason, I
presume, that every <i>American newspaper</i> is more or less a magazine,
wherein the merchant may scan while he holds out his hand for an invoice,
“Stanzas by Mrs. Hemans,” or a garbled extract from Moore’s
Life of Byron; the lawyer may study his brief faithfully, and yet contrive to
pick up the valuable dictum of some American critic, that “Bulwer’s
novels are decidedly superior to Sir Walter Scott’s;” nay, even the
auctioneer may find time, as he bustles to his tub, or his tribune, to support
his pretensions to polite learning, by glancing his quick eye over the columns,
and reading that “Miss Mitford’s descriptions are
indescribable.” If you buy a yard of ribbon, the shopkeeper lays down his
newspaper, perhaps two or three, to measure it. I have seen a brewer’s
drayman perched on the shaft of his dray and reading one newspaper, while
another was tucked under his arm; and I once went into the cottage of a country
shoemaker, of the name of Harris, where I saw a newspaper half full of
“original” poetry, directed to Madison F. Harris. To be sure of the
fact, I asked the man if his name were Madison. “Yes, Madam, Madison
Franklin Harris is my name.” The last and the lyre divided his time, I
fear too equally, for he looked pale and poor.</p>
<p>This, I presume, is what is meant by the general diffusion of knowledge, so
boasted of in the United States; such as it is, the diffusion of it is general
enough, certainly; but I greatly doubt its being advantageous to the
population.</p>
<p>The only reading men I met with were those who made letters their profession;
and of these, there were some who would hold a higher rank in the great
Republic (not of America, but of letters), did they write for persons less
given to the study of magazines and newspapers; and they might hold a higher
rank still, did they write for the few and not for the many. I was always
drawing a parallel, perhaps a childish one, between the external and internal
deficiency of polish and of elegance in the native volumes of the country.
Their compositions have not that condensation of thought, or that elaborate
finish, which the consciousness of writing for the scholar and the man of taste
is calculated to give; nor have their dirty blue paper and slovenly types<SPAN href="#fn2" name="fnref2" id="fnref2"><sup>[2]</sup></SPAN>
the polished elegance that fits a volume for the hand or the eye of the
fastidious epicure in literary enjoyment. The first book I bought in America
was the “Chronicles of the Cannongate.” In asking the price, I was
agreeably surprised to hear a dollar and a half named, being about one sixth of
what I used to pay for its fellows in England; but on opening the grim pages,
it was long before I could again call them cheap. To be sure the pleasure of a
bright well-printed page ought to be quite lost sight of in the glowing,
galloping, bewitching course that the imagination sets out upon with a new
Waverley novel; and so it was with me till I felt the want of it; and then I am
almost ashamed to confess how often, in turning the thin dusky pages, my poor
earth-born spirit paused in its pleasure, to sigh for hot-pressed wire-wove.</p>
<p class="footnote">
<SPAN name="fn2" id="fn2"></SPAN> <SPAN href="#fnref2">[2]</SPAN>
I must make an exception in favour of the American Quarterly Review. To the eye
of the body it is in all respects exactly the same thing as the English
Quarterly Review.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />