<h3>ASPASIA OF PERICLES.</h3>
<p class="heading">[B.C. 470.]<br/>
GROTE.</p>
<p>ASPASIA,
daughter of Axiochus, was a native of Miletus, beautiful,
well-educated, and ambitious. She resided at Athens, and is affirmed,
though upon very doubtful evidence, to have kept slave-girls to be let
out as courtesans. Whatever may be the case with this report, which is
probably one of the scandals engendered by political animosity against
Pericles, it is certain that, so remarkable were her own fascinations,
her accomplishments, and her powers, not merely of conversation, but
even of oratory and criticism, that the most distinguished Athenians of
all ages and characters—Socrates among the number—visited her, and
several of them took their wives along with them to hear her also. The
free citizen-women of Athens lived in strict and almost Oriental
recluseness, as well after being married as when single: everything
which concerned their lives, their happiness, or their rights, was
determined or managed for them by male relatives; and they seem to have
been destitute of all mental culture and accomplishments. Their society
presented no charm nor interest, which men accordingly sought for in the
company of the class of women called Het�r�, or courtesans, literally
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_17" id="Page_17"></SPAN></span>
female companions who lived a free life, managed their own affairs, and
supported themselves by their powers of pleasing. These women were
numerous, and were doubtless of every variety of personal character; but
the most distinguished and superior among them, such as Aspasia and
Theodote, appear to have been the only women in Greece, except the
Spartan, who either inspired strong passion or exercised mental
ascendancy.</p>
<p>Pericles had been determined in his choice of a wife by those family
considerations which were held almost obligatory at Athens, and had
married a woman very nearly related to him, by whom he had two sons,
Xanthippus and Paralus. But the marriage, having never been comfortable,
was afterwards dissolved by mutual consent, according to that full
liberty of divorce which the Attic law permitted, and Pericles concurred
with his wife's male relations (who formed her legal guardians) in
giving her away to another husband. He then took Aspasia to live with
him; had a son by her, who bore his name; and continued ever afterwards
on terms of the greatest intimacy and affection with her. Without
adopting those exaggerations which represent Aspasia as having
communicated to Pericles his distinguished eloquence, or even as having
herself composed orations for public delivery, we may well believe her
to have been qualified to take interest and share in that literary and
philosophical society which frequented the house of Pericles, and which
his unprincipled son Xanthippus, disgusted with his father's regular
expenditure as withholding from him the means of supporting an
extravagant establishment, reported abroad with exaggerated calumnies,
and turned into derision. It was from that worthless young man, who died
of the Athenian epidemic during the lifetime of Pericles, that his
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_18" id="Page_18"></SPAN></span>
political enemies and the comic writers of the day were mainly furnished
with scandalous anecdotes to assail the private habits of this
distinguished man. The comic writers attacked him for alleged intrigues
with different women; but the name of Aspasia they treated as public
property, without any mercy or reserve: she was the Omphale, the
Dejanira, or the Here, to the great Heracles or Zeus of Athens. At
length one of these comic writers, Hermippus, not contented with scenic
attacks, indicted her before the dikastery for impiety, as participant
in the philosophical discussions held, and the opinions professed, in
the society of Pericles by Anaxagoras and others. Against Anaxagoras
himself, too, a similar indictment is said to have been preferred,
either by Cleon or by Thucydides, son of Milesias, under a general
resolution recently passed in the public assembly at the instance of
Diopeithes. And such was the sensitive antipathy of the Athenian public,
shown afterwards fatally in the case of Socrates, and embittered in this
instance by all the artifices of political faction, against philosophers
whose opinions conflicted with the received religious dogmas, that
Pericles did not dare to place Anaxagoras on his trial. The latter
retired from Athens, and a sentence of banishment was passed against him
in his absence. But Pericles himself defended Aspasia before the
dikastery: in fact, the indictment was as much against him as against
her. One thing alleged against her, and also against Pheidias, was the
reception of free women to facilitate the intrigues of Pericles.</p>
<p>He defended her successfully, and procured a verdict of acquittal; but
we are not surprised to hear that his speech was marked by the strongest
personal emotions, and even by tears. The dikasts were accustomed to
<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_19" id="Page_19"></SPAN></span>
such appeals to their sympathies, sometimes even to extravagant excess,
from ordinary accused persons; but in Pericles, so manifest an outburst
of emotion stands out as something quite unparalleled, for constant
self-mastery was one of the most prominent features in his character.</p>
<div class="figcenter p4">
<ANTIMG src="images/i020.jpg" width-obs="191" height-obs="163" alt="Decoration" /></div>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_20" id="Page_20"></SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />