<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0047" id="link2H_4_0047"></SPAN></p>
<h2> LETTER XLV </h2>
<p>MISS CLARISSA HARLOWE, TO MISS HOWE. [IN ANSWER TO LETTER XLIII.] SUNDAY
MORNING, APRIL 9.</p>
<p>Do not think, my beloved friend, although you have given me in yours of
yesterday a severer instance of what, nevertheless, I must call your
impartial love, than ever yet I received from you, that I would be
displeased with you for it. That would be to put myself into the
inconvenient situation of royalty: that is to say, out of the way of ever
being told of my faults; of ever mending them: and in the way of making
the sincerest and warmest friendship useless to me.</p>
<p>And then how brightly, how nobly glows in your bosom the sacred flame of
friendship; since it can make you ready to impute to the unhappy sufferer
a less degree of warmth in her own cause, than you have for her, because
of the endeavours to divest herself of self so far as to leave others to
the option which they have a right to make!—Ought I, my dear, to
blame, ought I not rather to admire you for this ardor?</p>
<p>But nevertheless, lest you should think that there is any foundation for a
surmise which (although it owe its rise to your friendship) would, if
there were, leave me utterly inexcusable, I must, in justice to myself,
declare, that I know not my own heart if I have any of that latent or
unowned inclination, which you would impute to any other but me. Nor does
the important alternative sit lightly on my mind. And yet I must excuse
your mother, were it but on this single consideration, that I could not
presume to reckon upon her favour, as I could upon her daughter's, so as
to make the claim of friendship upon her, to whom, as the mother of my
dearest friend, a veneration is owing, which can hardly be compatible with
that sweet familiarity which is one of the indispensable requisites of the
sacred tie by which your heart and mine are bound in one.</p>
<p>What therefore I might expect from my Anna Howe, I ought not from her
mother; for would it not be very strange, that a person of her experience
should be reflected upon because she gave not up her own judgment, where
the consequence of her doing so would be to embroil herself, as she
apprehends, with a family she has lived well with, and in behalf of a
child against her parents?—as she has moreover a daughter of her
own:—a daughter too, give me leave to say, of whose vivacity and
charming spirits she is more apprehensive than she need to be, because her
truly maternal cares make her fear more from her youth, than she hopes for
her prudence; which, nevertheless, she and all the world know to be beyond
her years.</p>
<p>And here let me add, that whatever you may generously, and as the result
of an ardent affection for your unhappy friend, urge on this head, in my
behalf, or harshly against any one who may refuse me protection in the
extraordinary circumstances I find myself in, I have some pleasure in
being able to curb undue expectations upon my indulgent friends, whatever
were to befal myself from those circumstances, for I should be extremely
mortified, were I by my selfish forwardness to give occasion for such a
check, as to be told, that I had encouraged an unreasonable hope, or,
according to the phrase you mention, wished to take a thorn out of my own
foot, and to put in to that of my friend. Nor should I be better pleased
with myself, if, having been taught by my good Mrs. Norton, that the best
of schools is that of affliction, I should rather learn impatience than
the contrary, by the lessons I am obliged to get by heart in it; and if I
should judge of the merits of others, as they were kind to me; and that at
the expense of their own convenience or peace of mind. For is not this to
suppose myself ever in the right; and all who do not act as I would have
them act, perpetually in the wrong? In short, to make my sake God's sake,
in the sense of Mr. Solmes's pitiful plea to me?</p>
<p>How often, my dear, have you and I endeavoured to detect and censure this
partial spirit in others?</p>
<p>But I know you do not always content yourself with saying what you think
may justly be said; but, in order the shew the extent of a penetration
which can go to the bottom of any subject, delight to say or to write all
that can be said or written, or even thought, on the particular occasion;
and this partly perhaps from being desirous [pardon me, my dear!] to be
thought mistress of a sagacity that is aforehand with events. But who
would wish to drain off or dry up a refreshing current, because it
now-and-then puts us to some little inconvenience by its over-flowings? In
other words, who would not allow for the liveliness of a spirit which for
one painful sensibility gives an hundred pleasurable ones; and the one in
consequence of the other?</p>
<p>But now I come to the two points in your letter, which most sensibly
concern me: Thus you put them:</p>
<p>'Whether I choose not rather to go off [shocking words!] with one of my
own sex; with my ANNA HOWE—than with one of the other; with Mr.
LOVELACE?'</p>
<p>And if not,</p>
<p>'Whether I should not marry him as soon as possible?'</p>
<p>You know, my dear, my reasons for rejecting your proposal, and even for
being earnest that you should not be known to be assisting me in an
enterprise in which a cruel necessity induced me to think of engaging; and
for which you have not the same plea. At this rate, well might your mother
be uneasy at our correspondence, not knowing to what inconveniencies it
might subject her and you!—If I am hardly excusable to think of
withdrawing from my unkind friends, what could you have to say for
yourself, were you to abandon a mother so indulgent? Does she suspect that
your fervent friendship may lead you to a small indiscretion? and does
this suspicion offend you? And would you, in resentment, shew her and the
world, that you can voluntarily rush into the highest error that any of
our sex can be guilty of?</p>
<p>And is it worthy of your generosity [I ask you, my dear, is it?] to think
of taking so undutiful a step, because you believe your mother would be
glad to receive you again?</p>
<p>I do assure you, that were I to take this step myself, I would run all
risks rather than you should accompany me in it. Have I, do you think, a
desire to double and treble my own fault in the eye of the world? in the
eye of that world which, cruelly as I am used, (not knowing all,) would
not acquit me?</p>
<p>But, my dearest, kindest friend, let me tell you, that we will neither of
us take such a step. The manner of putting your questions abundantly
convinces me, that I ought not, in your opinion, to attempt it. You no
doubt intend that I shall so take it; and I thank you for the equally
polite and forcible conviction.</p>
<p>It is some satisfaction to me (taking the matter in this light) that I had
begun to waver before I received your last. And now I tell you, that it
has absolutely determined me not to go off; at least not to-morrow.</p>
<p>If you, my dear, think the issue of the alternative (to use your own
words) sits so lightly upon my mind, in short, that my inclination is
faulty; the world would treat me much less scrupulously. When therefore
you represent, that all punctilio must be at an end the moment I am out of
my father's house; and hint, that I must submit it to Mr. Lovelace to
judge when he can leave me with safety; that is to say, give him the
option whether he will leave me, or not; who can bear these reflections,
who can resolve to incur these inconveniencies, that has the question
still in her own power to decide upon?</p>
<p>While I thought only of an escape from this house as an escape from Mr.
Solmes; that already my reputation suffered by my confinement; and that it
would be in my own option either to marry Mr. Lovelace, or wholly to
renounce him; bold as the step was, I thought, treated as I am treated,
something was to be said in excuse of it—if not to the world, to
myself: and to be self-acquitted, is a blessing to be preferred to the
option of all the world. But, after I have censured most severely, as I
have ever done, those giddy girls, who have in the same hour, as I may
say, that they have fled from their chamber, presented themselves at the
altar that is witness to their undutiful rashness; after I have stipulated
with Mr. Lovelace for time, and for an ultimate option whether to accept
or refuse him; and for his leaving me, as soon as I am in a place of
safety (which, as you observe, he must be the judge of); and after he has
signified to me his compliance with these terms; so that I cannot, if I
would, recall them, and suddenly marry;—you see, my dear, that I
have nothing left me but to resolve not to go away with him!</p>
<p>But, how, on this revocation of my appointment, shall I be able to pacify
him?</p>
<p>How!—Why assert the privilege of my sex!—Surely, on this side
of the solemnity he has no right to be displeased. Besides, did I not
reserve a power of receding, as I saw fit? To what purpose, as I asked in
the case between your mother and you, has any body an option, if the
making use of it shall give the refused a right to be disgusted?</p>
<p>Far, very far, would those, who, according to the old law, have a right of
absolving or confirming a child's promise, be from ratifying mine, had it
been ever so solemn a one.* But this was rather an appointment than a
promise: and suppose it had been the latter; and that I had not reserved
to myself a liberty of revoking it; was it to preclude better or maturer
consideration?—If so, how unfit to be given!—how ungenerous to
be insisted upon!—And how unfitter still to be kept!—Is there
a man living who ought to be angry that a woman whom he hopes one day to
call his, shall refuse to keep a rash promise, when, on the maturest
deliberation, she is convinced that it was a rash one?</p>
<p>* See Numb. XXX. Where it is declared, whose vows shall be<br/>
binding, and whose not. The vows of a man, or of a widow,<br/>
are there pronounced to be indispensable; because they are<br/>
sole, and subject to no other domestic authority. But the<br/>
vows of a single woman, or of a wife, if the father of the<br/>
one, or the husband of the other, disallow of them as soon<br/>
as they know them, are to be of no force.<br/>
<br/>
A matter highly necessary to be known; by all young ladies<br/>
especially, whose designing addressers too often endeavour<br/>
to engage them by vows; and then plead conscience and honour<br/>
to them to hold them down to the performance.<br/>
<br/>
It cannot be amiss to recite the very words.<br/>
<br/>
Ver. 3 If a woman vow a vow unto the Lord, and bind herself<br/>
by a bond, being in her father's house in her youth;<br/>
<br/>
4. And her father hear her vow, and her bond wherewith she<br/>
hath bound her soul, and her father shall hold his peace at<br/>
her; then all her vows shall stand, and every bond wherewith<br/>
she hath bound her soul shall stand.<br/>
<br/>
5. But if her father disallow her in the day that he<br/>
heareth; not any of her vows or of her bonds wherewith she<br/>
hath bound her soul shall stand: and the Lord shall forgive<br/>
her, because her father disallowed her.<br/>
<br/>
The same in the case of a wife, as said above. See ver. 6,<br/>
7, 8, &c.—All is thus solemnly closed:<br/>
<br/>
Ver. 16. These are the statutes which the Lord commanded<br/>
Moses between a man and his wife, between the father and his<br/>
daughter, being yet in her youth in her father's house.<br/></p>
<p>I resolve then, upon the whole, to stand this one trial of Wednesday next—or,
perhaps, I should rather say, of Tuesday evening, if my father hold his
purpose of endeavouring, in person, to make me read, or hear read, and
then sign, the settlements.—That, that must be the greatest trial of
all.</p>
<p>If I am compelled to sign them over-night—then (the Lord bless me!)
must all I dread follow, as of course, on Wednesday. If I can prevail upon
them by my prayers [perhaps I shall fall into fits; for the very first
appearance of my father, after having been so long banished his presence,
will greatly affect me—if, I say, I can prevail upon them by my
prayers] to lay aside their views; or to suspend the day, if but for one
week; but if not, but for two or three days; still Wednesday will be a
lighter day of trial. They will surely give me time to consider: to argue
with myself. This will not be promising. As I have made no effort to get
away, they have no reason to suspect me; so I may have an opportunity, in
the last resort, to withdraw. Mrs. Norton is to be with me: she, although
she should be chidden for it, will, in my extremity, plead for me. My aunt
Hervey may, in such an extremity, join with her. Perhaps my mother may be
brought over. I will kneel to each, one by one, to make a friend. Some of
them have been afraid to see me, lest they should be moved in my favour:
does not this give a reasonable hope that I may move them? My brother's
counsel, heretofore given, to turn me out of doors to my evil destiny, may
again be repeated, and may prevail; then shall I be in no worse case than
now, as to the displeasure of my friends; and thus far better, that it
will not be my fault that I seek another protection: which even then ought
to be my cousin Morden's, rather than Mr. Lovelace's, or any other
person's.</p>
<p>My heart, in short, misgives me less, when I resolve this way, than when I
think of the other: and in so strong and involuntary a bias, the heart is,
as I may say, conscience. And well cautions the wise man: 'Let the counsel
of thine own heart stand; for there is no man more faithful to thee than
it: for a man's mind is sometimes wont to tell him more than seven
watchmen, that sit above in a high tower.'*</p>
<p>* Ecclus. xxxvii. 13, 14.<br/></p>
<p>Forgive these indigested self-reasonings. I will close here: and instantly
set about a letter of revocation to Mr. Lovelace; take it as he will. It
will only be another trial of temper to him. To me of infinite importance.
And has he not promised temper and acquiescence, on the supposition of a
change in my mind?</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />