<SPAN name="startofbook"></SPAN>
<h1>LORD ARTHUR SAVILE’S<br/> CRIME<br/> THE PORTRAIT OF <span class="smcap">Mr.</span> W. H.<br/> <span class="GutSmall">AND OTHER STORIES</span></h1>
<p style="text-align: center"><span class="GutSmall">BY</span><br/>
OSCAR WILDE</p>
<div class="gapspace"> </div>
<p style="text-align: center"><span class="GutSmall">METHUEN
& CO. LTD.</span><br/>
<span class="GutSmall">36 ESSEX STREET W.C.</span><br/>
<span class="GutSmall">LONDON</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><i>Tenth Edition</i></p>
<div class="gapspace"> </div>
<table>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"><p><i>First Published</i>—</p>
</td>
<td><p> </p>
</td>
<td><p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p> </p>
</td>
<td><p><i>Lord Arthur Savile’s Crime</i>, <i>The
Canterville Ghost</i>, <i>The Sphinx without a Secret</i>, <i>and
the Model Millionaire</i></p>
</td>
<td><p> </p>
</td>
<td><p><i>1887</i></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p> </p>
</td>
<td><p><i>Issued in Collected Form</i></p>
</td>
<td><p> </p>
</td>
<td><p><i>1891</i></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p> </p>
</td>
<td><p><i>The Portrait of Mr. W. H.</i></p>
</td>
<td><p> </p>
</td>
<td><p><i>1889</i></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"><p><i>First Issued by Methuen and Co.</i>
(<i>Limited Edition on Handmade Paper and Japanese
Vellum</i>)</p>
</td>
<td><p><i>March</i></p>
</td>
<td><p><i>1908</i></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"><p><i>Third Edition</i> (<i>F’cap. 8vo 5s.
net</i>)</p>
</td>
<td><p><i>September</i></p>
</td>
<td><p><i>1908</i></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"><p><i>Fourth Edition</i> (<i>5s. net</i>)</p>
</td>
<td><p><i>October</i></p>
</td>
<td><p><i>1909</i></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"><p><i>Fifth Edition</i> (<i>5s. net</i>)</p>
</td>
<td><p><i>March</i></p>
</td>
<td><p><i>1911</i></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"><p><i>Sixth and Seventh Editions</i>
(<i>F’cap. 8vo 1s. net</i>)</p>
</td>
<td><p><i>April</i></p>
</td>
<td><p><i>1912</i></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"><p><i>Eighth Edition</i> (<i>1s. net</i>)</p>
</td>
<td><p><i>September</i></p>
</td>
<td><p><i>1912</i></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"><p><i>Ninth Edition</i> (<i>1s.net</i>)</p>
</td>
<td><p><i>May</i></p>
</td>
<td><p><i>1913</i></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2"><p><i>Tenth Edition</i> (<i>5s. net</i>)</p>
</td>
<td colspan="2"><p style="text-align: center"><i>1913</i></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h2>CONTENTS</h2>
<table>
<tr>
<td><p> </p>
</td>
<td><p style="text-align: right"><span class="GutSmall">PAGE</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>LORD ARTHUR SAVILE’S CRIME</p>
</td>
<td><p style="text-align: right"><span class="indexpageno"><SPAN href="#page3">3</SPAN></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>THE CANTERVILLE GHOST</p>
</td>
<td><p style="text-align: right"><span class="indexpageno"><SPAN href="#page65">65</SPAN></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>THE SPHINX WITHOUT A SECRET</p>
</td>
<td><p style="text-align: right"><span class="indexpageno"><SPAN href="#page121">121</SPAN></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>THE MODEL MILLIONAIRE</p>
</td>
<td><p style="text-align: right"><span class="indexpageno"><SPAN href="#page133">133</SPAN></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>THE PORTRAIT OF MR. W. H.</p>
</td>
<td><p style="text-align: right"><span class="indexpageno"><SPAN href="#page145">145</SPAN></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h2><SPAN name="page3"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>LORD ARTHUR SAVILE’S CRIME<br/> <span class="GutSmall">A STUDY OF DUTY</span></h2>
<h3>CHAPTER I</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">It</span> was Lady Windermere’s last
reception before Easter, and Bentinck House was even more crowded
than usual. Six Cabinet Ministers had come on from the
Speaker’s Levée in their stars and ribands, all the
pretty women wore their smartest dresses, and at the end of the
picture-gallery stood the Princess Sophia of Carlsrühe, a
heavy Tartar-looking lady, with tiny black eyes and wonderful
emeralds, talking bad French at the top of her voice, and
laughing immoderately at everything that was said to her.
It was certainly a wonderful medley of people. Gorgeous
peeresses chatted affably to violent Radicals, popular preachers
brushed coat-tails with eminent sceptics, a perfect bevy of
bishops kept following a stout prima-donna from room to room, on
the staircase stood several Royal Academicians, disguised as
artists, and it was said that at one time the supper-room was
absolutely crammed with geniuses. In fact, it was one of
Lady Windermere’s best nights, and the Princess stayed till
nearly half-past eleven.</p>
<p>As soon as she had gone, Lady Windermere returned to the
picture-gallery, where a celebrated political economist was
solemnly explaining the scientific theory of music to an
indignant virtuoso from Hungary, and began to talk to the Duchess
of Paisley. She looked wonderfully beautiful with her grand
ivory throat, her large blue forget-me-not eyes, and her heavy
coils of golden hair. <i>Or pur</i> they were—not
that pale straw colour that nowadays usurps the gracious name of
gold, but such gold as is woven into sunbeams or hidden in
strange amber; and they gave to her face something of the frame
of a saint, with not a little of the fascination of a
sinner. She was a curious psychological study. Early
in life she had discovered the important truth that nothing looks
so like innocence as an indiscretion; and by a series of reckless
escapades, half of them quite harmless, she had acquired all the
privileges of a personality. She had more than once changed
her husband; indeed, Debrett credits her with three marriages;
but as she had never changed her lover, the world had long ago
ceased to talk scandal about her. She was now forty years
of age, childless, and with that inordinate passion for pleasure
which is the secret of remaining young.</p>
<p>Suddenly she looked eagerly round the room, and said, in her
clear contralto voice, ‘Where is my
cheiromantist?’</p>
<p>‘Your what, Gladys?’ exclaimed the Duchess, giving
an involuntary start.</p>
<p>‘My cheiromantist, Duchess; I can’t live without
him at present.’</p>
<p>‘Dear Gladys! you are always so original,’
murmured the Duchess, trying to remember what a cheiromantist
really was, and hoping it was not the same as a cheiropodist.</p>
<p>‘He comes to see my hand twice a week regularly,’
continued Lady Windermere, ‘and is most interesting about
it.’</p>
<p>‘Good heavens!’ said the Duchess to herself,
‘he is a sort of cheiropodist after all. How very
dreadful. I hope he is a foreigner at any rate. It
wouldn’t be quite so bad then.’</p>
<p>‘I must certainly introduce him to you.’</p>
<p>‘Introduce him!’ cried the Duchess; ‘you
don’t mean to say he is here?’ and she began looking
about for a small tortoise-shell fan and a very tattered lace
shawl, so as to be ready to go at a moment’s notice.</p>
<p>‘Of course he is here; I would not dream of giving a
party without him. He tells me I have a pure psychic hand,
and that if my thumb had been the least little bit shorter, I
should have been a confirmed pessimist, and gone into a
convent.’</p>
<p>‘Oh, I see!’ said the Duchess, feeling very much
relieved; ‘he tells fortunes, I suppose?’</p>
<p>‘And misfortunes, too,’ answered Lady Windermere,
‘any amount of them. Next year, for instance, I am in
great danger, both by land and sea, so I am going to live in a
balloon, and draw up my dinner in a basket every evening.
It is all written down on my little finger, or on the palm of my
hand, I forget which.’</p>
<p>‘But surely that is tempting Providence,
Gladys.’</p>
<p>‘My dear Duchess, surely Providence can resist
temptation by this time. I think every one should have
their hands told once a month, so as to know what not to
do. Of course, one does it all the same, but it is so
pleasant to be warned. Now if some one doesn’t go and
fetch Mr. Podgers at once, I shall have to go myself.’</p>
<p>‘Let me go, Lady Windermere,’ said a tall handsome
young man, who was standing by, listening to the conversation
with an amused smile.</p>
<p>‘Thanks so much, Lord Arthur; but I am afraid you
wouldn’t recognise him.’</p>
<p>‘If he is as wonderful as you say, Lady Windermere, I
couldn’t well miss him. Tell me what he is like, and
I’ll bring him to you at once.’</p>
<p>‘Well, he is not a bit like a cheiromantist. I
mean he is not mysterious, or esoteric, or
romantic-looking. He is a little, stout man, with a funny,
bald head, and great gold-rimmed spectacles; something between a
family doctor and a country attorney. I’m really very
sorry, but it is not my fault. People are so
annoying. All my pianists look exactly like poets, and all
my poets look exactly like pianists; and I remember last season
asking a most dreadful conspirator to dinner, a man who had blown
up ever so many people, and always wore a coat of mail, and
carried a dagger up his shirt-sleeve; and do you know that when
he came he looked just like a nice old clergyman, and cracked
jokes all the evening? Of course, he was very amusing, and
all that, but I was awfully disappointed; and when I asked him
about the coat of mail, he only laughed, and said it was far too
cold to wear in England. Ah, here is Mr. Podgers!
Now, Mr. Podgers, I want you to tell the Duchess of
Paisley’s hand. Duchess, you must take your glove
off. No, not the left hand, the other.’</p>
<p>‘Dear Gladys, I really don’t think it is quite
right,’ said the Duchess, feebly unbuttoning a rather
soiled kid glove.</p>
<p>‘Nothing interesting ever is,’ said Lady
Windermere: ‘<i>on a fait le monde ainsi</i>. But I
must introduce you. Duchess, this is Mr. Podgers, my pet
cheiromantist. Mr. Podgers, this is the Duchess of Paisley,
and if you say that she has a larger mountain of the moon than I
have, I will never believe in you again.’</p>
<p>‘I am sure, Gladys, there is nothing of the kind in my
hand,’ said the Duchess gravely.</p>
<p>‘Your Grace is quite right,’ said Mr. Podgers,
glancing at the little fat hand with its short square fingers,
‘the mountain of the moon is not developed. The line
of life, however, is excellent. Kindly bend the
wrist. Thank you. Three distinct lines on the
<i>rascette</i>! You will live to a great age, Duchess, and
be extremely happy. Ambition—very moderate, line of
intellect not exaggerated, line of heart—’</p>
<p>‘Now, do be indiscreet, Mr. Podgers,’ cried Lady
Windermere.</p>
<p>‘Nothing would give me greater pleasure,’ said Mr.
Podgers, bowing, ‘if the Duchess ever had been, but I am
sorry to say that I see great permanence of affection, combined
with a strong sense of duty.’</p>
<p>‘Pray go on, Mr. Podgers,’ said the Duchess,
looking quite pleased.</p>
<p>‘Economy is not the least of your Grace’s
virtues,’ continued Mr. Podgers, and Lady Windermere went
off into fits of laughter.</p>
<p>‘Economy is a very good thing,’ remarked the
Duchess complacently; ‘when I married Paisley he had eleven
castles, and not a single house fit to live in.’</p>
<p>‘And now he has twelve houses, and not a single
castle,’ cried Lady Windermere.</p>
<p>‘Well, my dear,’ said the Duchess, ‘I
like—’</p>
<p>‘Comfort,’ said Mr. Podgers, ‘and modern
improvements, and hot water laid on in every bedroom. Your
Grace is quite right. Comfort is the only thing our
civilisation can give us.</p>
<p>‘You have told the Duchess’s character admirably,
Mr. Podgers, and now you must tell Lady Flora’s’; and
in answer to a nod from the smiling hostess, a tall girl, with
sandy Scotch hair, and high shoulder-blades, stepped awkwardly
from behind the sofa, and held out a long, bony hand with
spatulate fingers.</p>
<p>‘Ah, a pianist! I see,’ said Mr. Podgers,
‘an excellent pianist, but perhaps hardly a musician.
Very reserved, very honest, and with a great love of
animals.’</p>
<p>‘Quite true!’ exclaimed the Duchess, turning to
Lady Windermere, ‘absolutely true! Flora keeps two
dozen collie dogs at Macloskie, and would turn our town house
into a menagerie if her father would let her.’</p>
<p>‘Well, that is just what I do with my house every
Thursday evening,’ cried Lady Windermere, laughing,
‘only I like lions better than collie dogs.’</p>
<p>‘Your one mistake, Lady Windermere,’ said Mr.
Podgers, with a pompous bow.</p>
<p>‘If a woman can’t make her mistakes charming, she
is only a female,’ was the answer. ‘But you
must read some more hands for us. Come, Sir Thomas, show
Mr. Podgers yours’; and a genial-looking old gentleman, in
a white waistcoat, came forward, and held out a thick rugged
hand, with a very long third finger.</p>
<p>‘An adventurous nature; four long voyages in the past,
and one to come. Been ship-wrecked three times. No,
only twice, but in danger of a shipwreck your next journey.
A strong Conservative, very punctual, and with a passion for
collecting curiosities. Had a severe illness between the
ages sixteen and eighteen. Was left a fortune when about
thirty. Great aversion to cats and Radicals.’</p>
<p>‘Extraordinary!’ exclaimed Sir Thomas; ‘you
must really tell my wife’s hand, too.’</p>
<p>‘Your second wife’s,’ said Mr. Podgers
quietly, still keeping Sir Thomas’s hand in his.
‘Your second wife’s. I shall be charmed’;
but Lady Marvel, a melancholy-looking woman, with brown hair and
sentimental eyelashes, entirely declined to have her past or her
future exposed; and nothing that Lady Windermere could do would
induce Monsieur de Koloff, the Russian Ambassador, even to take
his gloves off. In fact, many people seemed afraid to face
the odd little man with his stereotyped smile, his gold
spectacles, and his bright, beady eyes; and when he told poor
Lady Fermor, right out before every one, that she did not care a
bit for music, but was extremely fond of musicians, it was
generally felt that cheiromancy was a most dangerous science, and
one that ought not to be encouraged, except in a
<i>tête-à-tête</i>.</p>
<p>Lord Arthur Savile, however, who did not know anything about
Lady Fermor’s unfortunate story, and who had been watching
Mr. Podgers with a great deal of interest, was filled with an
immense curiosity to have his own hand read, and feeling somewhat
shy about putting himself forward, crossed over the room to where
Lady Windermere was sitting, and, with a charming blush, asked
her if she thought Mr. Podgers would mind.</p>
<p>‘Of course, he won’t mind,’ said Lady
Windermere, ‘that is what he is here for. All my
lions, Lord Arthur, are performing lions, and jump through hoops
whenever I ask them. But I must warn you beforehand that I
shall tell Sybil everything. She is coming to lunch with me
to-morrow, to talk about bonnets, and if Mr. Podgers finds out
that you have a bad temper, or a tendency to gout, or a wife
living in Bayswater, I shall certainly let her know all about
it.’</p>
<p>Lord Arthur smiled, and shook his head. ‘I am not
afraid,’ he answered. ‘Sybil knows me as well
as I know her.’</p>
<p>‘Ah! I am a little sorry to hear you say
that. The proper basis for marriage is a mutual
misunderstanding. No, I am not at all cynical, I have
merely got experience, which, however, is very much the same
thing. Mr. Podgers, Lord Arthur Savile is dying to have his
hand read. Don’t tell him that he is engaged to one
of the most beautiful girls in London, because that appeared in
the <i>Morning Post</i> a month ago.</p>
<p>‘Dear Lady Windermere,’ cried the Marchioness of
Jedburgh, ‘do let Mr. Podgers stay here a little
longer. He has just told me I should go on the stage, and I
am so interested.’</p>
<p>‘If he has told you that, Lady Jedburgh, I shall
certainly take him away. Come over at once, Mr. Podgers,
and read Lord Arthur’s hand.’</p>
<p>‘Well,’ said Lady Jedburgh, making a little
<i>moue</i> as she rose from the sofa, ‘if I am not to be
allowed to go on the stage, I must be allowed to be part of the
audience at any rate.’</p>
<p>‘Of course; we are all going to be part of the
audience,’ said Lady Windermere; ‘and now, Mr.
Podgers, be sure and tell us something nice. Lord Arthur is
one of my special favourites.’</p>
<p>But when Mr. Podgers saw Lord Arthur’s hand he grew
curiously pale, and said nothing. A shudder seemed to pass
through him, and his great bushy eyebrows twitched convulsively,
in an odd, irritating way they had when he was puzzled.
Then some huge beads of perspiration broke out on his yellow
forehead, like a poisonous dew, and his fat fingers grew cold and
clammy.</p>
<p>Lord Arthur did not fail to notice these strange signs of
agitation, and, for the first time in his life, he himself felt
fear. His impulse was to rush from the room, but he
restrained himself. It was better to know the worst,
whatever it was, than to be left in this hideous uncertainty.</p>
<p>‘I am waiting, Mr. Podgers,’ he said.</p>
<p>‘We are all waiting,’ cried Lady Windermere, in
her quick, impatient manner, but the cheiromantist made no
reply.</p>
<p>‘I believe Arthur is going on the stage,’ said
Lady Jedburgh, ‘and that, after your scolding, Mr. Podgers
is afraid to tell him so.’</p>
<p>Suddenly Mr. Podgers dropped Lord Arthur’s right hand,
and seized hold of his left, bending down so low to examine it
that the gold rims of his spectacles seemed almost to touch the
palm. For a moment his face became a white mask of horror,
but he soon recovered his <i>sang-froid</i>, and looking up at
Lady Windermere, said with a forced smile, ‘It is the hand
of a charming young man.</p>
<p>‘Of course it is!’ answered Lady Windermere,
‘but will he be a charming husband? That is what I
want to know.’</p>
<p>‘All charming young men are,’ said Mr.
Podgers.</p>
<p>‘I don’t think a husband should be too
fascinating,’ murmured Lady Jedburgh pensively, ‘it
is so dangerous.’</p>
<p>‘My dear child, they never are too fascinating,’
cried Lady Windermere. ‘But what I want are
details. Details are the only things that interest.
What is going to happen to Lord Arthur?’</p>
<p>‘Well, within the next few months Lord Arthur will go a
voyage—’</p>
<p>‘Oh yes, his honeymoon, of course!’</p>
<p>‘And lose a relative.’</p>
<p>‘Not his sister, I hope?’ said Lady Jedburgh, in a
piteous tone of voice.</p>
<p>‘Certainly not his sister,’ answered Mr. Podgers,
with a deprecating wave of the hand, ‘a distant relative
merely.’</p>
<p>‘Well, I am dreadfully disappointed,’ said Lady
Windermere. ‘I have absolutely nothing to tell Sybil
to-morrow. No one cares about distant relatives
nowadays. They went out of fashion years ago.
However, I suppose she had better have a black silk by her; it
always does for church, you know. And now let us go to
supper. They are sure to have eaten everything up, but we
may find some hot soup. François used to make
excellent soup once, but he is so agitated about politics at
present, that I never feel quite certain about him. I do
wish General Boulanger would keep quiet. Duchess, I am sure
you are tired?’</p>
<p>‘Not at all, dear Gladys,’ answered the Duchess,
waddling towards the door. ‘I have enjoyed myself
immensely, and the cheiropodist, I mean the cheiromantist, is
most interesting. Flora, where can my tortoise-shell fan
be? Oh, thank you, Sir Thomas, so much. And my lace
shawl, Flora? Oh, thank you, Sir Thomas, very kind,
I’m sure’; and the worthy creature finally managed to
get downstairs without dropping her scent-bottle more than
twice.</p>
<p>All this time Lord Arthur Savile had remained standing by the
fireplace, with the same feeling of dread over him, the same
sickening sense of coming evil. He smiled sadly at his
sister, as she swept past him on Lord Plymdale’s arm,
looking lovely in her pink brocade and pearls, and he hardly
heard Lady Windermere when she called to him to follow her.
He thought of Sybil Merton, and the idea that anything could come
between them made his eyes dim with tears.</p>
<p>Looking at him, one would have said that Nemesis had stolen
the shield of Pallas, and shown him the Gorgon’s
head. He seemed turned to stone, and his face was like
marble in its melancholy. He had lived the delicate and
luxurious life of a young man of birth and fortune, a life
exquisite in its freedom from sordid care, its beautiful boyish
insouciance; and now for the first time he became conscious of
the terrible mystery of Destiny, of the awful meaning of
Doom.</p>
<p>How mad and monstrous it all seemed! Could it be that
written on his hand, in characters that he could not read
himself, but that another could decipher, was some fearful secret
of sin, some blood-red sign of crime? Was there no escape
possible? Were we no better than chessmen, moved by an
unseen power, vessels the potter fashions at his fancy, for
honour or for shame? His reason revolted against it, and
yet he felt that some tragedy was hanging over him, and that he
had been suddenly called upon to bear an intolerable
burden. Actors are so fortunate. They can choose
whether they will appear in tragedy or in comedy, whether they
will suffer or make merry, laugh or shed tears. But in real
life it is different. Most men and women are forced to
perform parts for which they have no qualifications. Our
Guildensterns play Hamlet for us, and our Hamlets have to jest
like Prince Hal. The world is a stage, but the play is
badly cast.</p>
<p>Suddenly Mr. Podgers entered the room. When he saw Lord
Arthur he started, and his coarse, fat face became a sort of
greenish-yellow colour. The two men’s eyes met, and
for a moment there was silence.</p>
<p>‘The Duchess has left one of her gloves here, Lord
Arthur, and has asked me to bring it to her,’ said Mr.
Podgers finally. ‘Ah, I see it on the sofa!
Good evening.’</p>
<p>‘Mr. Podgers, I must insist on your giving me a
straightforward answer to a question I am going to put to
you.’</p>
<p>‘Another time, Lord Arthur, but the Duchess is
anxious. I am afraid I must go.’</p>
<p>‘You shall not go. The Duchess is in no
hurry.’</p>
<p>‘Ladies should not be kept waiting, Lord Arthur,’
said Mr. Podgers, with his sickly smile. ‘The fair
sex is apt to be impatient.’</p>
<p>Lord Arthur’s finely-chiselled lips curled in petulant
disdain. The poor Duchess seemed to him of very little
importance at that moment. He walked across the room to
where Mr. Podgers was standing, and held his hand out.</p>
<p>‘Tell me what you saw there,’ he said.
‘Tell me the truth. I must know it. I am not a
child.’</p>
<p>Mr. Podgers’s eyes blinked behind his gold-rimmed
spectacles, and he moved uneasily from one foot to the other,
while his fingers played nervously with a flash watch-chain.</p>
<p>‘What makes you think that I saw anything in your hand,
Lord Arthur, more than I told you?’</p>
<p>‘I know you did, and I insist on your telling me what it
was. I will pay you. I will give you a cheque for a
hundred pounds.’</p>
<p>The green eyes flashed for a moment, and then became dull
again.</p>
<p>‘Guineas?’ said Mr. Podgers at last, in a low
voice.</p>
<p>‘Certainly. I will send you a cheque
to-morrow. What is your club?’</p>
<p>‘I have no club. That is to say, not just at
present. My address is—, but allow me to give you my
card’; and producing a bit of gilt-edge pasteboard from his
waistcoat pocket, Mr. Podgers handed it, with a low bow, to Lord
Arthur, who read on it,</p>
<blockquote><p style="text-align: center"><i>Mr. SEPTIMUS R.
PODGERS</i><br/>
<i>Professional Cheiromantist</i><br/>
103<i>a</i> <i>West Moon Street</i></p>
</blockquote>
<p>‘My hours are from ten to four,’ murmured Mr.
Podgers mechanically, ‘and I make a reduction for
families.’</p>
<p>‘Be quick,’ cried Lord Arthur, looking very pale,
and holding his hand out.</p>
<p>Mr. Podgers glanced nervously round, and drew the heavy
<i>portière</i> across the door.</p>
<p>‘It will take a little time, Lord Arthur, you had better
sit down.’</p>
<p>‘Be quick, sir,’ cried Lord Arthur again, stamping
his foot angrily on the polished floor.</p>
<p>Mr. Podgers smiled, drew from his breast-pocket a small
magnifying glass, and wiped it carefully with his
handkerchief.</p>
<p>‘I am quite ready,’ he said.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER II</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">Ten</span> minutes later, with face
blanched by terror, and eyes wild with grief, Lord Arthur Savile
rushed from Bentinck House, crushing his way through the crowd of
fur-coated footmen that stood round the large striped awning, and
seeming not to see or hear anything. The night was bitter
cold, and the gas-lamps round the square flared and flickered in
the keen wind; but his hands were hot with fever, and his
forehead burned like fire. On and on he went, almost with
the gait of a drunken man. A policeman looked curiously at
him as he passed, and a beggar, who slouched from an archway to
ask for alms, grew frightened, seeing misery greater than his
own. Once he stopped under a lamp, and looked at his
hands. He thought he could detect the stain of blood
already upon them, and a faint cry broke from his trembling
lips.</p>
<p>Murder! that is what the cheiromantist had seen there.
Murder! The very night seemed to know it, and the desolate
wind to howl it in his ear. The dark corners of the streets
were full of it. It grinned at him from the roofs of the
houses.</p>
<p>First he came to the Park, whose sombre woodland seemed to
fascinate him. He leaned wearily up against the railings,
cooling his brow against the wet metal, and listening to the
tremulous silence of the trees. ‘Murder!
murder!’ he kept repeating, as though iteration could dim
the horror of the word. The sound of his own voice made him
shudder, yet he almost hoped that Echo might hear him, and wake
the slumbering city from its dreams. He felt a mad desire
to stop the casual passer-by, and tell him everything.</p>
<p>Then he wandered across Oxford Street into narrow, shameful
alleys. Two women with painted faces mocked at him as he
went by. From a dark courtyard came a sound of oaths and
blows, followed by shrill screams, and, huddled upon a damp
door-step, he saw the crook-backed forms of poverty and
eld. A strange pity came over him. Were these
children of sin and misery predestined to their end, as he to
his? Were they, like him, merely the puppets of a monstrous
show?</p>
<p>And yet it was not the mystery, but the comedy of suffering
that struck him; its absolute uselessness, its grotesque want of
meaning. How incoherent everything seemed! How
lacking in all harmony! He was amazed at the discord
between the shallow optimism of the day, and the real facts of
existence. He was still very young.</p>
<p>After a time he found himself in front of Marylebone
Church. The silent roadway looked like a long riband of
polished silver, flecked here and there by the dark arabesques of
waving shadows. Far into the distance curved the line of
flickering gas-lamps, and outside a little walled-in house stood
a solitary hansom, the driver asleep inside. He walked
hastily in the direction of Portland Place, now and then looking
round, as though he feared that he was being followed. At
the corner of Rich Street stood two men, reading a small bill
upon a hoarding. An odd feeling of curiosity stirred him,
and he crossed over. As he came near, the word
‘Murder,’ printed in black letters, met his
eye. He started, and a deep flush came into his
cheek. It was an advertisement offering a reward for any
information leading to the arrest of a man of medium height,
between thirty and forty years of age, wearing a billy-cock hat,
a black coat, and check trousers, and with a scar upon his right
cheek. He read it over and over again, and wondered if the
wretched man would be caught, and how he had been scarred.
Perhaps, some day, his own name might be placarded on the walls
of London. Some day, perhaps, a price would be set on his
head also.</p>
<p>The thought made him sick with horror. He turned on his
heel, and hurried on into the night.</p>
<p>Where he went he hardly knew. He had a dim memory of
wandering through a labyrinth of sordid houses, of being lost in
a giant web of sombre streets, and it was bright dawn when he
found himself at last in Piccadilly Circus. As he strolled
home towards Belgrave Square, he met the great waggons on their
way to Covent Garden. The white-smocked carters, with their
pleasant sunburnt faces and coarse curly hair, strode sturdily
on, cracking their whips, and calling out now and then to each
other; on the back of a huge grey horse, the leader of a jangling
team, sat a chubby boy, with a bunch of primroses in his battered
hat, keeping tight hold of the mane with his little hands, and
laughing; and the great piles of vegetables looked like masses of
jade against the morning sky, like masses of green jade against
the pink petals of some marvellous rose. Lord Arthur felt
curiously affected, he could not tell why. There was
something in the dawn’s delicate loveliness that seemed to
him inexpressibly pathetic, and he thought of all the days that
break in beauty, and that set in storm. These rustics, too,
with their rough, good-humoured voices, and their nonchalant
ways, what a strange London they saw! A London free from
the sin of night and the smoke of day, a pallid, ghost-like city,
a desolate town of tombs! He wondered what they thought of
it, and whether they knew anything of its splendour and its
shame, of its fierce, fiery-coloured joys, and its horrible
hunger, of all it makes and mars from morn to eve. Probably
it was to them merely a mart where they brought their fruits to
sell, and where they tarried for a few hours at most, leaving the
streets still silent, the houses still asleep. It gave him
pleasure to watch them as they went by. Rude as they were,
with their heavy, hob-nailed shoes, and their awkward gait, they
brought a little of a ready with them. He felt that they
had lived with Nature, and that she had taught them peace.
He envied them all that they did not know.</p>
<p>By the time he had reached Belgrave Square the sky was a faint
blue, and the birds were beginning to twitter in the gardens.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER III</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">When</span> Lord Arthur woke it was twelve
o’clock, and the midday sun was streaming through the
ivory-silk curtains of his room. He got up and looked out
of the window. A dim haze of heat was hanging over the
great city, and the roofs of the houses were like dull
silver. In the flickering green of the square below some
children were flitting about like white butterflies, and the
pavement was crowded with people on their way to the Park.
Never had life seemed lovelier to him, never had the things of
evil seemed more remote.</p>
<p>Then his valet brought him a cup of chocolate on a tray.
After he had drunk it, he drew aside a heavy
<i>portière</i> of peach-coloured plush, and passed into
the bathroom. The light stole softly from above, through
thin slabs of transparent onyx, and the water in the marble tank
glimmered like a moonstone. He plunged hastily in, till the
cool ripples touched throat and hair, and then dipped his head
right under, as though he would have wiped away the stain of some
shameful memory. When he stepped out he felt almost at
peace. The exquisite physical conditions of the moment had
dominated him, as indeed often happens in the case of very
finely-wrought natures, for the senses, like fire, can purify as
well as destroy.</p>
<p>After breakfast, he flung himself down on a divan, and lit a
cigarette. On the mantel-shelf, framed in dainty old
brocade, stood a large photograph of Sybil Merton, as he had seen
her first at Lady Noel’s ball. The small,
exquisitely-shaped head drooped slightly to one side, as though
the thin, reed-like throat could hardly bear the burden of so
much beauty; the lips were slightly parted, and seemed made for
sweet music; and all the tender purity of girlhood looked out in
wonder from the dreaming eyes. With her soft, clinging
dress of <i>crêpe-de-chine</i>, and her large leaf-shaped
fan, she looked like one of those delicate little figures men
find in the olive-woods near Tanagra; and there was a touch of
Greek grace in her pose and attitude. Yet she was not
<i>petite</i>. She was simply perfectly
proportioned—a rare thing in an age when so many women are
either over life-size or insignificant.</p>
<p>Now as Lord Arthur looked at her, he was filled with the
terrible pity that is born of love. He felt that to marry
her, with the doom of murder hanging over his head, would be a
betrayal like that of Judas, a sin worse than any the Borgia had
ever dreamed of. What happiness could there be for them,
when at any moment he might be called upon to carry out the awful
prophecy written in his hand? What manner of life would be
theirs while Fate still held this fearful fortune in the
scales? The marriage must be postponed, at all costs.
Of this he was quite resolved. Ardently though he loved the
girl, and the mere touch of her fingers, when they sat together,
made each nerve of his body thrill with exquisite joy, he
recognised none the less clearly where his duty lay, and was
fully conscious of the fact that he had no right to marry until
he had committed the murder. This done, he could stand
before the altar with Sybil Merton, and give his life into her
hands without terror of wrongdoing. This done, he could
take her to his arms, knowing that she would never have to blush
for him, never have to hang her head in shame. But done it
must be first; and the sooner the better for both.</p>
<p>Many men in his position would have preferred the primrose
path of dalliance to the steep heights of duty; but Lord Arthur
was too conscientious to set pleasure above principle.
There was more than mere passion in his love; and Sybil was to
him a symbol of all that is good and noble. For a moment he
had a natural repugnance against what he was asked to do, but it
soon passed away. His heart told him that it was not a sin,
but a sacrifice; his reason reminded him that there was no other
course open. He had to choose between living for himself
and living for others, and terrible though the task laid upon him
undoubtedly was, yet he knew that he must not suffer selfishness
to triumph over love. Sooner or later we are all called
upon to decide on the same issue—of us all, the same
question is asked. To Lord Arthur it came early in
life—before his nature had been spoiled by the calculating
cynicism of middle-age, or his heart corroded by the shallow,
fashionable egotism of our day, and he felt no hesitation about
doing his duty. Fortunately also, for him, he was no mere
dreamer, or idle dilettante. Had he been so, he would have
hesitated, like Hamlet, and let irresolution mar his
purpose. But he was essentially practical. Life to
him meant action, rather than thought. He had that rarest
of all things, common sense.</p>
<p>The wild, turbid feelings of the previous night had by this
time completely passed away, and it was almost with a sense of
shame that he looked back upon his mad wanderings from street to
street, his fierce emotional agony. The very sincerity of
his sufferings made them seem unreal to him now. He
wondered how he could have been so foolish as to rant and rave
about the inevitable. The only question that seemed to
trouble him was, whom to make away with; for he was not blind to
the fact that murder, like the religions of the Pagan world,
requires a victim as well as a priest. Not being a genius,
he had no enemies, and indeed he felt that this was not the time
for the gratification of any personal pique or dislike, the
mission in which he was engaged being one of great and grave
solemnity. He accordingly made out a list of his friends
and relatives on a sheet of notepaper, and after careful
consideration, decided in favour of Lady Clementina Beauchamp, a
dear old lady who lived in Curzon Street, and was his own second
cousin by his mother’s side. He had always been very
fond of Lady Clem, as every one called her, and as he was very
wealthy himself, having come into all Lord Rugby’s property
when he came of age, there was no possibility of his deriving any
vulgar monetary advantage by her death. In fact, the more
he thought over the matter, the more she seemed to him to be just
the right person, and, feeling that any delay would be unfair to
Sybil, he determined to make his arrangements at once.</p>
<p>The first thing to be done was, of course, to settle with the
cheiromantist; so he sat down at a small Sheraton writing-table
that stood near the window, drew a cheque for £105, payable
to the order of Mr. Septimus Podgers, and, enclosing it in an
envelope, told his valet to take it to West Moon Street. He
then telephoned to the stables for his hansom, and dressed to go
out. As he was leaving the room he looked back at Sybil
Merton’s photograph, and swore that, come what may, he
would never let her know what he was doing for her sake, but
would keep the secret of his self-sacrifice hidden always in his
heart.</p>
<p>On his way to the Buckingham, he stopped at a florist’s,
and sent Sybil a beautiful basket of narcissus, with lovely white
petals and staring pheasants’ eyes, and on arriving at the
club, went straight to the library, rang the bell, and ordered
the waiter to bring him a lemon-and-soda, and a book on
Toxicology. He had fully decided that poison was the best
means to adopt in this troublesome business. Anything like
personal violence was extremely distasteful to him, and besides,
he was very anxious not to murder Lady Clementina in any way that
might attract public attention, as he hated the idea of being
lionised at Lady Windermere’s, or seeing his name figuring
in the paragraphs of vulgar society—newspapers. He
had also to think of Sybil’s father and mother, who were
rather old-fashioned people, and might possibly object to the
marriage if there was anything like a scandal, though he felt
certain that if he told them the whole facts of the case they
would be the very first to appreciate the motives that had
actuated him. He had every reason, then, to decide in
favour of poison. It was safe, sure, and quiet, and did
away with any necessity for painful scenes, to which, like most
Englishmen, he had a rooted objection.</p>
<p>Of the science of poisons, however, he knew absolutely
nothing, and as the waiter seemed quite unable to find anything
in the library but <i>Ruff’s Guide</i> and
<i>Bailey’s Magazine</i>, he examined the book-shelves
himself, and finally came across a handsomely-bound edition of
the <i>Pharmacopoeia</i>, and a copy of Erskine’s
<i>Toxicology</i>, edited by Sir Mathew Reid, the President of
the Royal College of Physicians, and one of the oldest members of
the Buckingham, having been elected in mistake for somebody else;
a <i>contretemps</i> that so enraged the Committee, that when the
real man came up they black-balled him unanimously. Lord
Arthur was a good deal puzzled at the technical terms used in
both books, and had begun to regret that he had not paid more
attention to his classics at Oxford, when in the second volume of
Erskine, he found a very interesting and complete account of the
properties of aconitine, written in fairly clear English.
It seemed to him to be exactly the poison he wanted. It was
swift—indeed, almost immediate, in its
effect—perfectly painless, and when taken in the form of a
gelatine capsule, the mode recommended by Sir Mathew, not by any
means unpalatable. He accordingly made a note, upon his
shirt-cuff, of the amount necessary for a fatal dose, put the
books back in their places, and strolled up St. James’s
Street, to Pestle and Humbey’s, the great chemists.
Mr. Pestle, who always attended personally on the aristocracy,
was a good deal surprised at the order, and in a very deferential
manner murmured something about a medical certificate being
necessary. However, as soon as Lord Arthur explained to him
that it was for a large Norwegian mastiff that he was obliged to
get rid of, as it showed signs of incipient rabies, and had
already bitten the coachman twice in the calf of the leg, he
expressed himself as being perfectly satisfied, complimented Lord
Arthur on his wonderful knowledge of Toxicology, and had the
prescription made up immediately.</p>
<p>Lord Arthur put the capsule into a pretty little silver
<i>bonbonnière</i> that he saw in a shop window in Bond
Street, threw away Pestle and Hambey’s ugly pill-box, and
drove off at once to Lady Clementina’s.</p>
<p>‘Well, <i>monsieur le mauvais sujet</i>,’ cried
the old lady, as he entered the room, ‘why haven’t
you been to see me all this time?’</p>
<p>‘My dear Lady Clem, I never have a moment to
myself,’ said Lord Arthur, smiling.</p>
<p>‘I suppose you mean that you go about all day long with
Miss Sybil Merton, buying <i>chiffons</i> and talking
nonsense? I cannot understand why people make such a fuss
about being married. In my day we never dreamed of billing
and cooing in public, or in private for that matter.’</p>
<p>‘I assure you I have not seen Sybil for twenty-four
hours, Lady Clem. As far as I can make out, she belongs
entirely to her milliners.’</p>
<p>‘Of course; that is the only reason you come to see an
ugly old woman like myself. I wonder you men don’t
take warning. <i>On a fait des folies pour moi</i>, and
here I am, a poor rheumatic creature, with a false front and a
bad temper. Why, if it were not for dear Lady Jansen, who
sends me all the worst French novels she can find, I don’t
think I could get through the day. Doctors are no use at
all, except to get fees out of one. They can’t even
cure my heartburn.’</p>
<p>‘I have brought you a cure for that, Lady Clem,’
said Lord Arthur gravely. ‘It is a wonderful thing,
invented by an American.’</p>
<p>‘I don’t think I like American inventions,
Arthur. I am quite sure I don’t. I read some
American novels lately, and they were quite
nonsensical.’</p>
<p>‘Oh, but there is no nonsense at all about this, Lady
Clem! I assure you it is a perfect cure. You must
promise to try it’; and Lord Arthur brought the little box
out of his pocket, and handed it to her.</p>
<p>‘Well, the box is charming, Arthur. Is it really a
present? That is very sweet of you. And is this the
wonderful medicine? It looks like a <i>bonbon</i>.
I’ll take it at once.’</p>
<p>‘Good heavens! Lady Clem,’ cried Lord
Arthur, catching hold of her hand, ‘you mustn’t do
anything of the kind. It is a homoeopathic medicine, and if
you take it without having heartburn, it might do you no end of
harm. Wait till you have an attack, and take it then.
You will be astonished at the result.’</p>
<p>‘I should like to take it now,’ said Lady
Clementina, holding up to the light the little transparent
capsule, with its floating bubble of liquid aconitine. I am
sure it is delicious. The fact is that, though I hate
doctors, I love medicines. However, I’ll keep it till
my next attack.’</p>
<p>‘And when will that be?’ asked Lord Arthur
eagerly. ‘Will it be soon?’</p>
<p>‘I hope not for a week. I had a very bad time
yesterday morning with it. But one never knows.’</p>
<p>‘You are sure to have one before the end of the month
then, Lady Clem?’</p>
<p>‘I am afraid so. But how sympathetic you are
to-day, Arthur! Really, Sybil has done you a great deal of
good. And now you must run away, for I am dining with some
very dull people, who won’t talk scandal, and I know that
if I don’t get my sleep now I shall never be able to keep
awake during dinner. Good-bye, Arthur, give my love to
Sybil, and thank you so much for the American
medicine.’</p>
<p>‘You won’t forget to take it, Lady Clem, will
you?’ said Lord Arthur, rising from his seat.</p>
<p>‘Of course I won’t, you silly boy. I think
it is most kind of you to think of me, and I shall write and tell
you if I want any more.’</p>
<p>Lord Arthur left the house in high spirits, and with a feeling
of immense relief.</p>
<p>That night he had an interview with Sybil Merton. He
told her how he had been suddenly placed in a position of
terrible difficulty, from which neither honour nor duty would
allow him to recede. He told her that the marriage must be
put off for the present, as until he had got rid of his fearful
entanglements, he was not a free man. He implored her to
trust him, and not to have any doubts about the future.
Everything would come right, but patience was necessary.</p>
<p>The scene took place in the conservatory of Mr. Merton’s
house, in Park Lane, where Lord Arthur had dined as usual.
Sybil had never seemed more happy, and for a moment Lord Arthur
had been tempted to play the coward’s part, to write to
Lady Clementina for the pill, and to let the marriage go on as if
there was no such person as Mr. Podgers in the world. His
better nature, however, soon asserted itself, and even when Sybil
flung herself weeping into his arms, he did not falter. The
beauty that stirred his senses had touched his conscience
also. He felt that to wreck so fair a life for the sake of
a few months’ pleasure would be a wrong thing to do.</p>
<p>He stayed with Sybil till nearly midnight, comforting her and
being comforted in turn, and early the next morning he left for
Venice, after writing a manly, firm letter to Mr. Merton about
the necessary postponement of the marriage.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER IV</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">In</span> Venice he met his brother, Lord
Surbiton, who happened to have come over from Corfu in his
yacht. The two young men spent a delightful fortnight
together. In the morning they rode on the Lido, or glided
up and down the green canals in their long black gondola; in the
afternoon they usually entertained visitors on the yacht; and in
the evening they dined at Florian’s, and smoked innumerable
cigarettes on the Piazza. Yet somehow Lord Arthur was not
happy. Every day he studied the obituary column in the
<i>Times</i>, expecting to see a notice of Lady
Clementina’s death, but every day he was
disappointed. He began to be afraid that some accident had
happened to her, and often regretted that he had prevented her
taking the aconitine when she had been so anxious to try its
effect. Sybil’s letters, too, though full of love,
and trust, and tenderness, were often very sad in their tone, and
sometimes he used to think that he was parted from her for
ever.</p>
<p>After a fortnight Lord Surbiton got bored with Venice, and
determined to run down the coast to Ravenna, as he heard that
there was some capital cock-shooting in the Pinetum. Lord
Arthur at first refused absolutely to come, but Surbiton, of whom
he was extremely fond, finally persuaded him that if he stayed at
Danieli’s by himself he would be moped to death, and on the
morning of the 15th they started, with a strong nor’-east
wind blowing, and a rather choppy sea. The sport was
excellent, and the free, open-air life brought the colour back to
Lord Arthur’s cheek, but about the 22nd he became anxious
about Lady Clementina, and, in spite of Surbiton’s
remonstrances, came back to Venice by train.</p>
<p>As he stepped out of his gondola on to the hotel steps, the
proprietor came forward to meet him with a sheaf of
telegrams. Lord Arthur snatched them out of his hand, and
tore them open. Everything had been successful. Lady
Clementina had died quite suddenly on the night of the 17th!</p>
<p>His first thought was for Sybil, and he sent her off a
telegram announcing his immediate return to London. He then
ordered his valet to pack his things for the night mail, sent his
gondoliers about five times their proper fare, and ran up to his
sitting-room with a light step and a buoyant heart. There
he found three letters waiting for him. One was from Sybil
herself, full of sympathy and condolence. The others were
from his mother, and from Lady Clementina’s
solicitor. It seemed that the old lady had dined with the
Duchess that very night, had delighted every one by her wit and
<i>esprit</i>, but had gone home somewhat early, complaining of
heartburn. In the morning she was found dead in her bed,
having apparently suffered no pain. Sir Mathew Reid had
been sent for at once, but, of course, there was nothing to be
done, and she was to be buried on the 22nd at Beauchamp
Chalcote. A few days before she died she had made her will,
and left Lord Arthur her little house in Curzon Street, and all
her furniture, personal effects, and pictures, with the exception
of her collection of miniatures, which was to go to her sister,
Lady Margaret Rufford, and her amethyst necklace, which Sybil
Merton was to have. The property was not of much value; but
Mr. Mansfield, the solicitor, was extremely anxious for Lord
Arthur to return at once, if possible, as there were a great many
bills to be paid, and Lady Clementina had never kept any regular
accounts.</p>
<p>Lord Arthur was very much touched by Lady Clementina’s
kind remembrance of him, and felt that Mr. Podgers had a great
deal to answer for. His love of Sybil, however, dominated
every other emotion, and the consciousness that he had done his
duty gave him peace and comfort. When he arrived at Charing
Cross, he felt perfectly happy.</p>
<p>The Mertons received him very kindly. Sybil made him
promise that he would never again allow anything to come between
them, and the marriage was fixed for the 7th June. Life
seemed to him once more bright and beautiful, and all his old
gladness came back to him again.</p>
<p>One day, however, as he was going over the house in Curzon
Street, in company with Lady Clementina’s solicitor and
Sybil herself, burning packages of faded letters, and turning out
drawers of odd rubbish, the young girl suddenly gave a little cry
of delight.</p>
<p>‘What have you found, Sybil?’ said Lord Arthur,
looking up from his work, and smiling.</p>
<p>‘This lovely little silver <i>bonbonnière</i>,
Arthur. Isn’t it quaint and Dutch? Do give it
to me! I know amethysts won’t become me till I am
over eighty.’</p>
<p>It was the box that had held the aconitine.</p>
<p>Lord Arthur started, and a faint blush came into his
cheek. He had almost entirely forgotten what he had done,
and it seemed to him a curious coincidence that Sybil, for whose
sake he had gone through all that terrible anxiety, should have
been the first to remind him of it.</p>
<p>‘Of course you can have it, Sybil. I gave it to
poor Lady Clem myself.’</p>
<p>‘Oh! thank you, Arthur; and may I have the <i>bonbon</i>
too? I had no notion that Lady Clementina liked
sweets. I thought she was far too intellectual.’</p>
<p>Lord Arthur grew deadly pale, and a horrible idea crossed his
mind.</p>
<p>‘<i>Bonbon</i>, Sybil? What do you mean?’ he
said in a slow, hoarse voice.</p>
<p>‘There is one in it, that is all. It looks quite
old and dusty, and I have not the slightest intention of eating
it. What is the matter, Arthur? How white you
look!’</p>
<p>Lord Arthur rushed across the room, and seized the box.
Inside it was the amber-coloured capsule, with its
poison-bubble. Lady Clementina had died a natural death
after all!</p>
<p>The shock of the discovery was almost too much for him.
He flung the capsule into the fire, and sank on the sofa with a
cry of despair.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER V</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">Mr.</span> Merton was a good deal
distressed at the second postponement of the marriage, and Lady
Julia, who had already ordered her dress for the wedding, did all
in her power to make Sybil break off the match. Dearly,
however, as Sybil loved her mother, she had given her whole life
into Lord Arthur’s hands, and nothing that Lady Julia could
say could make her waver in her faith. As for Lord Arthur
himself, it took him days to get over his terrible
disappointment, and for a time his nerves were completely
unstrung. His excellent common sense, however, soon
asserted itself, and his sound, practical mind did not leave him
long in doubt about what to do. Poison having proved a
complete failure, dynamite, or some other form of explosive, was
obviously the proper thing to try.</p>
<p>He accordingly looked again over the list of his friends and
relatives, and, after careful consideration, determined to blow
up his uncle, the Dean of Chichester. The Dean, who was a
man of great culture and learning, was extremely fond of clocks,
and had a wonderful collection of timepieces, ranging from the
fifteenth century to the present day, and it seemed to Lord
Arthur that this hobby of the good Dean’s offered him an
excellent opportunity for carrying out his scheme. Where to
procure an explosive machine was, of course, quite another
matter. The London Directory gave him no information on the
point, and he felt that there was very little use in going to
Scotland Yard about it, as they never seemed to know anything
about the movements of the dynamite faction till after an
explosion had taken place, and not much even then.</p>
<p>Suddenly he thought of his friend Rouvaloff, a young Russian
of very revolutionary tendencies, whom he had met at Lady
Windermere’s in the winter. Count Rouvaloff was
supposed to be writing a life of Peter the Great, and to have
come over to England for the purpose of studying the documents
relating to that Tsar’s residence in this country as a ship
carpenter; but it was generally suspected that he was a Nihilist
agent, and there was no doubt that the Russian Embassy did not
look with any favour upon his presence in London. Lord
Arthur felt that he was just the man for his purpose, and drove
down one morning to his lodgings in Bloomsbury, to ask his advice
and assistance.</p>
<p>‘So you are taking up politics seriously?’ said
Count Rouvaloff, when Lord Arthur had told him the object of his
mission; but Lord Arthur, who hated swagger of any kind, felt
bound to admit to him that he had not the slightest interest in
social questions, and simply wanted the explosive machine for a
purely family matter, in which no one was concerned but
himself.</p>
<p>Count Rouvaloff looked at him for some moments in amazement,
and then seeing that he was quite serious, wrote an address on a
piece of paper, initialled it, and handed it to him across the
table.</p>
<p>‘Scotland Yard would give a good deal to know this
address, my dear fellow.’</p>
<p>‘They shan’t have it,’ cried Lord Arthur,
laughing; and after shaking the young Russian warmly by the hand
he ran downstairs, examined the paper, and told the coachman to
drive to Soho Square.</p>
<p>There he dismissed him, and strolled down Greek Street, till
he came to a place called Bayle’s Court. He passed
under the archway, and found himself in a curious
<i>cul-de-sac</i>, that was apparently occupied by a French
Laundry, as a perfect network of clothes-lines was stretched
across from house to house, and there was a flutter of white
linen in the morning air. He walked right to the end, and
knocked at a little green house. After some delay, during
which every window in the court became a blurred mass of peering
faces, the door was opened by a rather rough-looking foreigner,
who asked him in very bad English what his business was.
Lord Arthur handed him the paper Count Rouvaloff had given
him. When the man saw it he bowed, and invited Lord Arthur
into a very shabby front parlour on the ground floor, and in a
few moments Herr Winckelkopf, as he was called in England,
bustled into the room, with a very wine-stained napkin round his
neck, and a fork in his left hand.</p>
<p>‘Count Rouvaloff has given me an introduction to
you,’ said Lord Arthur, bowing, ‘and I am anxious to
have a short interview with you on a matter of business. My
name is Smith, Mr. Robert Smith, and I want you to supply me with
an explosive clock.’</p>
<p>‘Charmed to meet you, Lord Arthur,’ said the
genial little German, laughing. ‘Don’t look so
alarmed, it is my duty to know everybody, and I remember seeing
you one evening at Lady Windermere’s. I hope her
ladyship is quite well. Do you mind sitting with me while I
finish my breakfast? There is an excellent
<i>pâté</i>, and my friends are kind enough to say
that my Rhine wine is better than any they get at the German
Embassy,’ and before Lord Arthur had got over his surprise
at being recognised, he found himself seated in the back-room,
sipping the most delicious Marcobrünner out of a pale yellow
hock-glass marked with the Imperial monogram, and chatting in the
friendliest manner possible to the famous conspirator.</p>
<p>‘Explosive clocks,’ said Herr Winckelkopf,
‘are not very good things for foreign exportation, as, even
if they succeed in passing the Custom House, the train service is
so irregular, that they usually go off before they have reached
their proper destination. If, however, you want one for
home use, I can supply you with an excellent article, and
guarantee that you will he satisfied with the result. May I
ask for whom it is intended? If it is for the police, or
for any one connected with Scotland Yard, I am afraid I cannot do
anything for you. The English detectives are really our
best friends, and I have always found that by relying on their
stupidity, we can do exactly what we like. I could not
spare one of them.’</p>
<p>‘I assure you,’ said Lord Arthur, ‘that it
has nothing to do with the police at all. In fact, the
clock is intended for the Dean of Chichester.’</p>
<p>‘Dear me! I had no idea that you felt so strongly
about religion, Lord Arthur. Few young men do
nowadays.’</p>
<p>‘I am afraid you overrate me, Herr Winckelkopf,’
said Lord Arthur, blushing. ‘The fact is, I really
know nothing about theology.’</p>
<p>‘It is a purely private matter then?’</p>
<p>‘Purely private.’</p>
<p>Herr Winckelkopf shrugged his shoulders, and left the room,
returning in a few minutes with a round cake of dynamite about
the size of a penny, and a pretty little French clock, surmounted
by an ormolu figure of Liberty trampling on the hydra of
Despotism.</p>
<p>Lord Arthur’s face brightened up when he saw it.
‘That is just what I want,’ he cried, ‘and now
tell me how it goes off.’</p>
<p>‘Ah! there is my secret,’ answered Herr
Winckelkopf, contemplating his invention with a justifiable look
of pride; ‘let me know when you wish it to explode, and I
will set the machine to the moment.’</p>
<p>‘Well, to-day is Tuesday, and if you could send it off
at once—’</p>
<p>‘That is impossible; I have a great deal of important
work on hand for some friends of mine in Moscow. Still, I
might send it off to-morrow.’</p>
<p>‘Oh, it will be quite time enough!’ said Lord
Arthur politely, ‘if it is delivered to-morrow night or
Thursday morning. For the moment of the explosion, say
Friday at noon exactly. The Dean is always at home at that
hour.’</p>
<p>‘Friday, at noon,’ repeated Herr Winckelkopf, and
he made a note to that effect in a large ledger that was lying on
a bureau near the fireplace.</p>
<p>‘And now,’ said Lord Arthur, rising from his seat,
‘pray let me know how much I am in your debt.’</p>
<p>‘It is such a small matter, Lord Arthur, that I do not
care to make any charge. The dynamite comes to seven and
sixpence, the clock will be three pounds ten, and the carriage
about five shillings. I am only too pleased to oblige any
friend of Count Rouvaloff’s.’</p>
<p>‘But your trouble, Herr Winckelkopf?’</p>
<p>‘Oh, that is nothing! It is a pleasure to
me. I do not work for money; I live entirely for my
art.’</p>
<p>Lord Arthur laid down £4, 2s. 6d. on the table, thanked
the little German for his kindness, and, having succeeded in
declining an invitation to meet some Anarchists at a meat-tea on
the following Saturday, left the house and went off to the
Park.</p>
<p>For the next two days he was in a state of the greatest
excitement, and on Friday at twelve o’clock he drove down
to the Buckingham to wait for news. All the afternoon the
stolid hall-porter kept posting up telegrams from various parts
of the country giving the results of horse-races, the verdicts in
divorce suits, the state of the weather, and the like, while the
tape ticked out wearisome details about an all-night sitting in
the House of Commons, and a small panic on the Stock
Exchange. At four o’clock the evening papers came in,
and Lord Arthur disappeared into the library with the <i>Pall
Mall</i>, the <i>St. James’s</i>, the <i>Globe</i>, and the
<i>Echo</i>, to the immense indignation of Colonel Goodchild, who
wanted to read the reports of a speech he had delivered that
morning at the Mansion House, on the subject of South African
Missions, and the advisability of having black Bishops in every
province, and for some reason or other had a strong prejudice
against the <i>Evening News</i>. None of the papers,
however, contained even the slightest allusion to Chichester, and
Lord Arthur felt that the attempt must have failed. It was
a terrible blow to him, and for a time he was quite
unnerved. Herr Winckelkopf, whom he went to see the next
day was full of elaborate apologies, and offered to supply him
with another clock free of charge, or with a case of
nitro-glycerine bombs at cost price. But he had lost all
faith in explosives, and Herr Winckelkopf himself acknowledged
that everything is so adulterated nowadays, that even dynamite
can hardly be got in a pure condition. The little German,
however, while admitting that something must have gone wrong with
the machinery, was not without hope that the clock might still go
off, and instanced the case of a barometer that he had once sent
to the military Governor at Odessa, which, though timed to
explode in ten days, had not done so for something like three
months. It was quite true that when it did go off, it
merely succeeded in blowing a housemaid to atoms, the Governor
having gone out of town six weeks before, but at least it showed
that dynamite, as a destructive force, was, when under the
control of machinery, a powerful, though a somewhat unpunctual
agent. Lord Arthur was a little consoled by this
reflection, but even here he was destined to disappointment, for
two days afterwards, as he was going upstairs, the Duchess called
him into her boudoir, and showed him a letter she had just
received from the Deanery.</p>
<p>‘Jane writes charming letters,’ said the Duchess;
‘you must really read her last. It is quite as good
as the novels Mudie sends us.’</p>
<p>Lord Arthur seized the letter from her hand. It ran as
follows:—</p>
<blockquote><p style="text-align: right"><span class="smcap">The
Deanery</span>, <span class="smcap">Chichester</span>,<br/>
27<i>th</i> <i>May</i>.</p>
<p>My Dearest Aunt,</p>
<p>Thank you so much for the flannel for the Dorcas Society, and
also for the gingham. I quite agree with you that it is
nonsense their wanting to wear pretty things, but everybody is so
Radical and irreligious nowadays, that it is difficult to make
them see that they should not try and dress like the upper
classes. I am sure I don’t know what we are coming
to. As papa has often said in his sermons, we live in an
age of unbelief.</p>
<p>We have had great fun over a clock that an unknown admirer
sent papa last Thursday. It arrived in a wooden box from
London, carriage paid, and papa feels it must have been sent by
some one who had read his remarkable sermon, ‘Is Licence
Liberty?’ for on the top of the clock was a figure of a
woman, with what papa said was the cap of Liberty on her
head. I didn’t think it very becoming myself, but
papa said it was historical, so I suppose it is all right.
Parker unpacked it, and papa put it on the mantelpiece in the
library, and we were all sitting there on Friday morning, when
just as the clock struck twelve, we heard a whirring noise, a
little puff of smoke came from the pedestal of the figure, and
the goddess of Liberty fell off, and broke her nose on the
fender! Maria was quite alarmed, but it looked so
ridiculous, that James and I went off into fits of laughter, and
even papa was amused. When we examined it, we found it was
a sort of alarum clock, and that, if you set it to a particular
hour, and put some gunpowder and a cap under a little hammer, it
went off whenever you wanted. Papa said it must not remain
in the library, as it made a noise, so Reggie carried it away to
the schoolroom, and does nothing but have small explosions all
day long. Do you think Arthur would like one for a wedding
present? I suppose they are quite fashionable in
London. Papa says they should do a great deal of good, as
they show that Liberty can’t last, but must fall
down. Papa says Liberty was invented at the time of the
French Revolution. How awful it seems!</p>
<p>I have now to go to the Dorcas, where I will read them your
most instructive letter. How true, dear aunt, your idea is,
that in their rank of life they should wear what is
unbecoming. I must say it is absurd, their anxiety about
dress, when there are so many more important things in this
world, and in the next. I am so glad your flowered poplin
turned out so well, and that your lace was not torn. I am
wearing my yellow satin, that you so kindly gave me, at the
Bishop’s on Wednesday, and think it will look all
right. Would you have bows or not? Jennings says that
every one wears bows now, and that the underskirt should be
frilled. Reggie has just had another explosion, and papa
has ordered the clock to be sent to the stables. I
don’t think papa likes it so much as he did at first,
though he is very flattered at being sent such a pretty and
ingenious toy. It shows that people read his sermons, and
profit by them.</p>
<p>Papa sends his love, in which James, and Reggie, and Maria all
unite, and, hoping that Uncle Cecil’s gout is better,
believe me, dear aunt, ever your affectionate niece,</p>
<p style="text-align: right"><span class="smcap">jane
percy</span>.</p>
<p><i>PS.</i>—Do tell me about the bows. Jennings
insists they are the fashion.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Lord Arthur looked so serious and unhappy over the letter,
that the Duchess went into fits of laughter.</p>
<p>‘My dear Arthur,’ she cried, ‘I shall never
show you a young lady’s letter again! But what shall
I say about the clock? I think it is a capital invention,
and I should like to have one myself.’</p>
<p>‘I don’t think much of them,’ said Lord
Arthur, with a sad smile, and, after kissing his mother, he left
the room.</p>
<p>When he got upstairs, he flung himself on a sofa, and his eyes
filled with tears. He had done his best to commit this
murder, but on both occasions he had failed, and through no fault
of his own. He had tried to do his duty, but it seemed as
if Destiny herself had turned traitor. He was oppressed
with the sense of the barrenness of good intentions, of the
futility of trying to be fine. Perhaps, it would be better
to break off the marriage altogether. Sybil would suffer,
it is true, but suffering could not really mar a nature so noble
as hers. As for himself, what did it matter? There is
always some war in which a man can die, some cause to which a man
can give his life, and as life had no pleasure for him, so death
had no terror. Let Destiny work out his doom. He
would not stir to help her.</p>
<p>At half-past seven he dressed, and went down to the
club. Surbiton was there with a party of young men, and he
was obliged to dine with them. Their trivial conversation
and idle jests did not interest him, and as soon as coffee was
brought he left them, inventing some engagement in order to get
away. As he was going out of the club, the hall-porter
handed him a letter. It was from Herr Winckelkopf, asking
him to call down the next evening, and look at an explosive
umbrella, that went off as soon as it was opened. It was
the very latest invention, and had just arrived from
Geneva. He tore the letter up into fragments. He had
made up his mind not to try any more experiments. Then he
wandered down to the Thames Embankment, and sat for hours by the
river. The moon peered through a mane of tawny clouds, as
if it were a lion’s eye, and innumerable stars spangled the
hollow vault, like gold dust powdered on a purple dome. Now
and then a barge swung out into the turbid stream, and floated
away with the tide, and the railway signals changed from green to
scarlet as the trains ran shrieking across the bridge.
After some time, twelve o’clock boomed from the tall tower
at Westminster, and at each stroke of the sonorous bell the night
seemed to tremble. Then the railway lights went out, one
solitary lamp left gleaming like a large ruby on a giant mast,
and the roar of the city became fainter.</p>
<p>At two o’clock he got up, and strolled towards
Blackfriars. How unreal everything looked! How like a
strange dream! The houses on the other side of the river
seemed built out of darkness. One would have said that
silver and shadow had fashioned the world anew. The huge
dome of St. Paul’s loomed like a bubble through the dusky
air.</p>
<p>As he approached Cleopatra’s Needle he saw a man leaning
over the parapet, and as he came nearer the man looked up, the
gas-light falling full upon his face.</p>
<p>It was Mr. Podgers, the cheiromantist! No one could
mistake the fat, flabby face, the gold-rimmed spectacles, the
sickly feeble smile, the sensual mouth.</p>
<p>Lord Arthur stopped. A brilliant idea flashed across
him, and he stole softly up behind. In a moment he had
seized Mr. Podgers by the legs, and flung him into the
Thames. There was a coarse oath, a heavy splash, and all
was still. Lord Arthur looked anxiously over, but could see
nothing of the cheiromantist but a tall hat, pirouetting in an
eddy of moonlit water. After a time it also sank, and no
trace of Mr. Podgers was visible. Once he thought that he
caught sight of the bulky misshapen figure striking out for the
staircase by the bridge, and a horrible feeling of failure came
over him, but it turned out to be merely a reflection, and when
the moon shone out from behind a cloud it passed away. At
last he seemed to have realised the decree of destiny. He
heaved a deep sigh of relief, and Sybil’s name came to his
lips.</p>
<p>‘Have you dropped anything, sir?’ said a voice
behind him suddenly.</p>
<p>He turned round, and saw a policeman with a bull’s-eye
lantern.</p>
<p>‘Nothing of importance, sergeant,’ he answered,
smiling, and hailing a passing hansom, he jumped in, and told the
man to drive to Belgrave Square.</p>
<p>For the next few days he alternated between hope and
fear. There were moments when he almost expected Mr.
Podgers to walk into the room, and yet at other times he felt
that Fate could not be so unjust to him. Twice he went to
the cheiromantist’s address in West Moon Street, but he
could not bring himself to ring the bell. He longed for
certainty, and was afraid of it.</p>
<p>Finally it came. He was sitting in the smoking-room of
the club having tea, and listening rather wearily to
Surbiton’s account of the last comic song at the Gaiety,
when the waiter came in with the evening papers. He took up
the <i>St. James’s</i>, and was listlessly turning over its
pages, when this strange heading caught his eye:</p>
<blockquote><p style="text-align: center"><span class="smcap">Suicide of a Cheiromantist</span>.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>He turned pale with excitement, and began to read. The
paragraph ran as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>Yesterday morning, at seven o’clock, the
body of Mr. Septimus R. Podgers, the eminent cheiromantist, was
washed on shore at Greenwich, just in front of the Ship
Hotel. The unfortunate gentleman had been missing for some
days, and considerable anxiety for his safety had been felt in
cheiromantic circles. It is supposed that he committed
suicide under the influence of a temporary mental derangement,
caused by overwork, and a verdict to that effect was returned
this afternoon by the coroner’s jury. Mr. Podgers had
just completed an elaborate treatise on the subject of the Human
Hand, that will shortly be published, when it will no doubt
attract much attention. The deceased was sixty-five years
of age, and does not seem to have left any relations.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Lord Arthur rushed out of the club with the paper still in his
hand, to the immense amazement of the hall-porter, who tried in
vain to stop him, and drove at once to Park Lane. Sybil saw
him from the window, and something told her that he was the
bearer of good news. She ran down to meet him, and, when
she saw his face, she knew that all was well.</p>
<p>‘My dear Sybil,’ cried Lord Arthur, ‘let us
be married to-morrow!’</p>
<p>‘You foolish boy! Why, the cake is not even
ordered!’ said Sybil, laughing through her tears.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER VI</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">When</span> the wedding took place, some
three weeks later, St. Peter’s was crowded with a perfect
mob of smart people. The service was read in the most
impressive manner by the Dean of Chichester, and everybody agreed
that they had never seen a handsomer couple than the bride and
bridegroom. They were more than handsome,
however—they were happy. Never for a single moment
did Lord Arthur regret all that he had suffered for Sybil’s
sake, while she, on her side, gave him the best things a woman
can give to any man—worship, tenderness, and love.
For them romance was not killed by reality. They always
felt young.</p>
<p>Some years afterwards, when two beautiful children had been
born to them, Lady Windermere came down on a visit to Alton
Priory, a lovely old place, that had been the Duke’s
wedding present to his son; and one afternoon as she was sitting
with Lady Arthur under a lime-tree in the garden, watching the
little boy and girl as they played up and down the rose-walk,
like fitful sunbeams, she suddenly took her hostess’s hand
in hers, and said, ‘Are you happy, Sybil?’</p>
<p>‘Dear Lady Windermere, of course I am happy.
Aren’t you?’</p>
<p>‘I have no time to be happy, Sybil. I always like
the last person who is introduced to me; but, as a rule, as soon
as I know people I get tired of them.’</p>
<p>‘Don’t your lions satisfy you, Lady
Windermere?’</p>
<p>‘Oh dear, no! lions are only good for one season.
As soon as their manes are cut, they are the dullest creatures
going. Besides, they behave very badly, if you are really
nice to them. Do you remember that horrid Mr.
Podgers? He was a dreadful impostor. Of course, I
didn’t mind that at all, and even when he wanted to borrow
money I forgave him, but I could not stand his making love to
me. He has really made me hate cheiromancy. I go in
for telepathy now. It is much more amusing.’</p>
<p>‘You mustn’t say anything against cheiromancy
here, Lady Windermere; it is the only subject that Arthur does
not like people to chaff about. I assure you he is quite
serious over it.’</p>
<p>‘You don’t mean to say that he believes in it,
Sybil?’</p>
<p>‘Ask him, Lady Windermere, here he is’; and Lord
Arthur came up the garden with a large bunch of yellow roses in
his hand, and his two children dancing round him.</p>
<p>‘Lord Arthur?’</p>
<p>‘Yes, Lady Windermere.’</p>
<p>‘You don’t mean to say that you believe in
cheiromancy?’</p>
<p>‘Of course I do,’ said the young man, smiling.</p>
<p>‘But why?’</p>
<p>‘Because I owe to it all the happiness of my
life,’ he murmured, throwing himself into a wicker
chair.</p>
<p>‘My dear Lord Arthur, what do you owe to it?’</p>
<p>‘Sybil,’ he answered, handing his wife the roses,
and looking into her violet eyes.</p>
<p>‘What nonsense!’ cried Lady Windermere.
‘I never heard such nonsense in all my life.’</p>
<h2><SPAN name="page65"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>THE CANTERVILLE GHOST<br/> <span class="GutSmall">A HYLO-IDEALISTIC ROMANCE</span></h2>
<h3>CHAPTER I</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">When</span> Mr. Hiram B. Otis, the
American Minister, bought Canterville Chase, every one told him
he was doing a very foolish thing, as there was no doubt at all
that the place was haunted. Indeed, Lord Canterville
himself, who was a man of the most punctilious honour, had felt
it his duty to mention the fact to Mr. Otis when they came to
discuss terms.</p>
<p>‘We have not cared to live in the place
ourselves,’ said Lord Canterville, ‘since my
grandaunt, the Dowager Duchess of Bolton, was frightened into a
fit, from which she never really recovered, by two skeleton hands
being placed on her shoulders as she was dressing for dinner, and
I feel bound to tell you, Mr. Otis, that the ghost has been seen
by several living members of my family, as well as by the rector
of the parish, the Rev. Augustus Dampier, who is a Fellow of
King’s College, Cambridge. After the unfortunate
accident to the Duchess, none of our younger servants would stay
with us, and Lady Canterville often got very little sleep at
night, in consequence of the mysterious noises that came from the
corridor and the library.’</p>
<p>‘My Lord,’ answered the Minister, ‘I will
take the furniture and the ghost at a valuation. I come
from a modern country, where we have everything that money can
buy; and with all our spry young fellows painting the Old World
red, and carrying off your best actresses and prima-donnas, I
reckon that if there were such a thing as a ghost in Europe,
we’d have it at home in a very short time in one of our
public museums, or on the road as a show.’</p>
<p>‘I fear that the ghost exists,’ said Lord
Canterville, smiling, ‘though it may have resisted the
overtures of your enterprising impresarios. It has been
well known for three centuries, since 1584 in fact, and always
makes its appearance before the death of any member of our
family.’</p>
<p>‘Well, so does the family doctor for that matter, Lord
Canterville. But there is no such thing, sir, as a ghost,
and I guess the laws of Nature are not going to be suspended for
the British aristocracy.’</p>
<p>‘You are certainly very natural in America,’
answered Lord Canterville, who did not quite understand Mr.
Otis’s last observation, ‘and if you don’t mind
a ghost in the house, it is all right. Only you must
remember I warned you.’</p>
<p>A few weeks after this, the purchase was completed, and at the
close of the season the Minister and his family went down to
Canterville Chase. Mrs. Otis, who, as Miss Lucretia R.
Tappan, of West 53rd Street, had been a celebrated New York
belle, was now a very handsome, middle-aged woman, with fine
eyes, and a superb profile. Many American ladies on leaving
their native land adopt an appearance of chronic ill-health,
under the impression that it is a form of European refinement,
but Mrs. Otis had never fallen into this error. She had a
magnificent constitution, and a really wonderful amount of animal
spirits. Indeed, in many respects, she was quite English,
and was an excellent example of the fact that we have really
everything in common with America nowadays, except, of course,
language. Her eldest son, christened Washington by his
parents in a moment of patriotism, which he never ceased to
regret, was a fair-haired, rather good-looking young man, who had
qualified himself for American diplomacy by leading the German at
the Newport Casino for three successive seasons, and even in
London was well known as an excellent dancer. Gardenias and
the peerage were his only weaknesses. Otherwise he was
extremely sensible. Miss Virginia E. Otis was a little girl
of fifteen, lithe and lovely as a fawn, and with a fine freedom
in her large blue eyes. She was a wonderful amazon, and had
once raced old Lord Bilton on her pony twice round the park,
winning by a length and a half, just in front of the Achilles
statue, to the huge delight of the young Duke of Cheshire, who
proposed for her on the spot, and was sent back to Eton that very
night by his guardians, in floods of tears. After Virginia
came the twins, who were usually called ‘The Stars and
Stripes,’ as they were always getting swished. They
were delightful boys, and with the exception of the worthy
Minister the only true republicans of the family.</p>
<p>As Canterville Chase is seven miles from Ascot, the nearest
railway station, Mr. Otis had telegraphed for a waggonette to
meet them, and they started on their drive in high spirits.
It was a lovely July evening, and the air was delicate with the
scent of the pine-woods. Now and then they heard a wood
pigeon brooding over its own sweet voice, or saw, deep in the
rustling fern, the burnished breast of the pheasant. Little
squirrels peered at them from the beech-trees as they went by,
and the rabbits scudded away through the brushwood and over the
mossy knolls, with their white tails in the air. As they
entered the avenue of Canterville Chase, however, the sky became
suddenly overcast with clouds, a curious stillness seemed to hold
the atmosphere, a great flight of rooks passed silently over
their heads, and, before they reached the house, some big drops
of rain had fallen.</p>
<p>Standing on the steps to receive them was an old woman, neatly
dressed in black silk, with a white cap and apron. This was
Mrs. Umney, the housekeeper, whom Mrs. Otis, at Lady
Canterville’s earnest request, had consented to keep on in
her former position. She made them each a low curtsey as
they alighted, and said in a quaint, old-fashioned manner,
‘I bid you welcome to Canterville Chase.’
Following her, they passed through the fine Tudor hall into the
library, a long, low room, panelled in black oak, at the end of
which was a large stained-glass window. Here they found tea
laid out for them, and, after taking off their wraps, they sat
down and began to look round, while Mrs. Umney waited on
them.</p>
<p>Suddenly Mrs. Otis caught sight of a dull red stain on the
floor just by the fireplace and, quite unconscious of what it
really signified, said to Mrs. Umney, ‘I am afraid
something has been spilt there.’</p>
<p>‘Yes, madam,’ replied the old housekeeper in a low
voice, ‘blood has been spilt on that spot.’</p>
<p>‘How horrid,’ cried Mrs. Otis; ‘I
don’t at all care for blood-stains in a sitting-room.
It must be removed at once.’</p>
<p>The old woman smiled, and answered in the same low, mysterious
voice, ‘It is the blood of Lady Eleanore de Canterville,
who was murdered on that very spot by her own husband, Sir Simon
de Canterville, in 1575. Sir Simon survived her nine years,
and disappeared suddenly under very mysterious
circumstances. His body has never been discovered, but his
guilty spirit still haunts the Chase. The blood-stain has
been much admired by tourists and others, and cannot be
removed.’</p>
<p>‘That is all nonsense,’ cried Washington Otis;
‘Pinkerton’s Champion Stain Remover and Paragon
Detergent will clean it up in no time,’ and before the
terrified housekeeper could interfere he had fallen upon his
knees, and was rapidly scouring the floor with a small stick of
what looked like a black cosmetic. In a few moments no
trace of the blood-stain could be seen.</p>
<p>‘I knew Pinkerton would do it,’ he exclaimed
triumphantly, as he looked round at his admiring family; but no
sooner had he said these words than a terrible flash of lightning
lit up the sombre room, a fearful peal of thunder made them all
start to their feet, and Mrs. Umney fainted.</p>
<p>‘What a monstrous climate!’ said the American
Minister calmly, as he lit a long cheroot. ‘I guess
the old country is so overpopulated that they have not enough
decent weather for everybody. I have always been of opinion
that emigration is the only thing for England.’</p>
<p>‘My dear Hiram,’ cried Mrs. Otis, ‘what can
we do with a woman who faints?’</p>
<p>‘Charge it to her like breakages,’ answered the
Minister; ‘she won’t faint after that’; and in
a few moments Mrs. Umney certainly came to. There was no
doubt, however, that she was extremely upset, and she sternly
warned Mr. Otis to beware of some trouble coming to the
house.</p>
<p>‘I have seen things with my own eyes, sir,’ she
said, ‘that would make any Christian’s hair stand on
end, and many and many a night I have not closed my eyes in sleep
for the awful things that are done here.’ Mr. Otis,
however, and his wife warmly assured the honest soul that they
were not afraid of ghosts, and, after invoking the blessings of
Providence on her new master and mistress, and making
arrangements for an increase of salary, the old housekeeper
tottered off to her own room.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER II</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">The</span> storm raged fiercely all that
night, but nothing of particular note occurred. The next
morning, however, when they came down to breakfast, they found
the terrible stain of blood once again on the floor.
‘I don’t think it can be the fault of the Paragon
Detergent,’ said Washington, ‘for I have tried it
with everything. It must be the ghost.’ He
accordingly rubbed out the stain a second time, but the second
morning it appeared again. The third morning also it was
there, though the library had been locked up at night by Mr. Otis
himself, and the key carried upstairs. The whole family
were now quite interested; Mr. Otis began to suspect that he had
been too dogmatic in his denial of the existence of ghosts, Mrs.
Otis expressed her intention of joining the Psychical Society,
and Washington prepared a long letter to Messrs. Myers and
Podmore on the subject of the Permanence of Sanguineous Stains
when connected with Crime. That night all doubts about the
objective existence of phantasmata were removed for ever.</p>
<p>The day had been warm and sunny; and, in the cool of the
evening, the whole family went out for a drive. They did
not return home till nine o’clock, when they had a light
supper. The conversation in no way turned upon ghosts, so
there were not even those primary conditions of receptive
expectation which so often precede the presentation of psychical
phenomena. The subjects discussed, as I have since learned
from Mr. Otis, were merely such as form the ordinary conversation
of cultured Americans of the better class, such as the immense
superiority of Miss Fanny Davenport over Sarah Bernhardt as an
actress; the difficulty of obtaining green corn, buckwheat cakes,
and hominy, even in the best English houses; the importance of
Boston in the development of the world-soul; the advantages of
the baggage check system in railway travelling; and the sweetness
of the New York accent as compared to the London drawl. No
mention at all was made of the supernatural, nor was Sir Simon de
Canterville alluded to in any way. At eleven o’clock
the family retired, and by half-past all the lights were
out. Some time after, Mr. Otis was awakened by a curious
noise in the corridor, outside his room. It sounded like
the clank of metal, and seemed to be coming nearer every
moment. He got up at once, struck a match, and looked at
the time. It was exactly one o’clock. He was
quite calm, and felt his pulse, which was not at all
feverish. The strange noise still continued, and with it he
heard distinctly the sound of footsteps. He put on his
slippers, took a small oblong phial out of his dressing-case, and
opened the door. Right in front of him he saw, in the wan
moonlight, an old man of terrible aspect. His eyes were as
red burning coals; long grey hair fell over his shoulders in
matted coils; his garments, which were of antique cut, were
soiled and ragged, and from his wrists and ankles hung heavy
manacles and rusty gyves.</p>
<p>‘My dear sir,’ said Mr. Otis, ‘I really must
insist on your oiling those chains, and have brought you for that
purpose a small bottle of the Tammany Rising Sun
Lubricator. It is said to be completely efficacious upon
one application, and there are several testimonials to that
effect on the wrapper from some of our most eminent native
divines. I shall leave it here for you by the bedroom
candles, and will be happy to supply you with more should you
require it.’ With these words the United States
Minister laid the bottle down on a marble table, and, closing his
door, retired to rest.</p>
<p>For a moment the Canterville ghost stood quite motionless in
natural indignation; then, dashing the bottle violently upon the
polished floor, he fled down the corridor, uttering hollow
groans, and emitting a ghastly green light. Just, however,
as he reached the top of the great oak staircase, a door was
flung open, two little white-robed figures appeared, and a large
pillow whizzed past his head! There was evidently no time
to be lost, so, hastily adopting the Fourth Dimension of Space as
a means of escape, he vanished through the wainscoting, and the
house became quite quiet.</p>
<p>On reaching a small secret chamber in the left wing, he leaned
up against a moonbeam to recover his breath, and began to try and
realise his position. Never, in a brilliant and
uninterrupted career of three hundred years, had he been so
grossly insulted. He thought of the Dowager Duchess, whom
he had frightened into a fit as she stood before the glass in her
lace and diamonds; of the four housemaids, who had gone off into
hysterics when he merely grinned at them through the curtains of
one of the spare bedrooms; of the rector of the parish, whose
candle he had blown out as he was coming late one night from the
library, and who had been under the care of Sir William Gull ever
since, a perfect martyr to nervous disorders; and of old Madame
de Tremouillac, who, having wakened up one morning early and seen
a skeleton seated in an arm-chair by the fire reading her diary,
had been confined to her bed for six weeks with an attack of
brain fever, and, on her recovery, had become reconciled to the
Church, and broken off her connection with that notorious sceptic
Monsieur de Voltaire. He remembered the terrible night when
the wicked Lord Canterville was found choking in his
dressing-room, with the knave of diamonds half-way down his
throat, and confessed, just before he died, that he had cheated
Charles James Fox out of £50,000 at Crockford’s by
means of that very card, and swore that the ghost had made him
swallow it. All his great achievements came back to him
again, from the butler who had shot himself in the pantry because
he had seen a green hand tapping at the window pane, to the
beautiful Lady Stutfield, who was always obliged to wear a black
velvet band round her throat to hide the mark of five fingers
burnt upon her white skin, and who drowned herself at last in the
carp-pond at the end of the King’s Walk. With the
enthusiastic egotism of the true artist he went over his most
celebrated performances, and smiled bitterly to himself as he
recalled to mind his last appearance as ‘Red Ruben, or the
Strangled Babe,’ his <i>début</i> as ‘Gaunt
Gibeon, the Blood-sucker of Bexley Moor,’ and the
<i>furore</i> he had excited one lovely June evening by merely
playing ninepins with his own bones upon the lawn-tennis
ground. And after all this, some wretched modern Americans
were to come and offer him the Rising Sun Lubricator, and throw
pillows at his head! It was quite unbearable.
Besides, no ghosts in history had ever been treated in this
manner. Accordingly, he determined to have vengeance, and
remained till daylight in an attitude of deep thought.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER III</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">The</span> next morning when the Otis
family met at breakfast, they discussed the ghost at some
length. The United States Minister was naturally a little
annoyed to find that his present had not been accepted.
‘I have no wish,’ he said, ‘to do the ghost any
personal injury, and I must say that, considering the length of
time he has been in the house, I don’t think it is at all
polite to throw pillows at him’—a very just remark,
at which, I am sorry to say, the twins burst into shouts of
laughter. ‘Upon the other hand,’ he continued,
‘if he really declines to use the Rising Sun Lubricator, we
shall have to take his chains from him. It would be quite
impossible to sleep, with such a noise going on outside the
bedrooms.’</p>
<p>For the rest of the week, however, they were undisturbed, the
only thing that excited any attention being the continual renewal
of the blood-stain on the library floor. This certainly was
very strange, as the door was always locked at night by Mr. Otis,
and the windows kept closely barred. The chameleon-like
colour, also, of the stain excited a good deal of comment.
Some mornings it was a dull (almost Indian) red, then it would be
vermilion, then a rich purple, and once when they came down for
family prayers, according to the simple rites of the Free
American Reformed Episcopalian Church, they found it a bright
emerald-green. These kaleidoscopic changes naturally amused
the party very much, and bets on the subject were freely made
every evening. The only person who did not enter into the
joke was little Virginia, who, for some unexplained reason, was
always a good deal distressed at the sight of the blood-stain,
and very nearly cried the morning it was emerald-green.</p>
<p>The second appearance of the ghost was on Sunday night.
Shortly after they had gone to bed they were suddenly alarmed by
a fearful crash in the hall. Rushing downstairs, they found
that a large suit of old armour had become detached from its
stand, and had fallen on the stone floor, while, seated in a
high-backed chair, was the Canterville ghost, rubbing his knees
with an expression of acute agony on his face. The twins,
having brought their pea-shooters with them, at once discharged
two pellets on him, with that accuracy of aim which can only be
attained by long and careful practice on a writing-master, while
the United States Minister covered him with his revolver, and
called upon him, in accordance with Californian etiquette, to
hold up his hands! The ghost started up with a wild shriek
of rage, and swept through them like a mist, extinguishing
Washington Otis’s candle as he passed, and so leaving them
all in total darkness. On reaching the top of the staircase
he recovered himself, and determined to give his celebrated peal
of demoniac laughter. This he had on more than one occasion
found extremely useful. It was said to have turned Lord
Raker’s wig grey in a single night, and had certainly made
three of Lady Canterville’s French governesses give warning
before their month was up. He accordingly laughed his most
horrible laugh, till the old vaulted roof rang and rang again,
but hardly had the fearful echo died away when a door opened, and
Mrs. Otis came out in a light blue dressing-gown. ‘I
am afraid you are far from well,’ she said, ‘and have
brought you a bottle of Dr. Dobell’s tincture. If it
is indigestion, you will find it a most excellent
remedy.’ The ghost glared at her in fury, and began
at once to make preparations for turning himself into a large
black dog, an accomplishment for which he was justly renowned,
and to which the family doctor always attributed the permanent
idiocy of Lord Canterville’s uncle, the Hon. Thomas
Horton. The sound of approaching footsteps, however, made
him hesitate in his fell purpose, so he contented himself with
becoming faintly phosphorescent, and vanished with a deep
churchyard groan, just as the twins had come up to him.</p>
<p>On reaching his room he entirely broke down, and became a prey
to the most violent agitation. The vulgarity of the twins,
and the gross materialism of Mrs. Otis, were naturally extremely
annoying, but what really distressed him most was, that he had
been unable to wear the suit of mail. He had hoped that
even modern Americans would be thrilled by the sight of a Spectre
In Armour, if for no more sensible reason, at least out of
respect for their national poet Longfellow, over whose graceful
and attractive poetry he himself had whiled away many a weary
hour when the Cantervilles were up in town. Besides, it was
his own suit. He had worn it with great success at the
Kenilworth tournament, and had been highly complimented on it by
no less a person than the Virgin Queen herself. Yet when he
had put it on, he had been completely overpowered by the weight
of the huge breastplate and steel casque, and had fallen heavily
on the stone pavement, barking both his knees severely, and
bruising the knuckles of his right hand.</p>
<p>For some days after this he was extremely ill, and hardly
stirred out of his room at all, except to keep the blood-stain in
proper repair. However, by taking great care of himself, he
recovered, and resolved to make a third attempt to frighten the
United States Minister and his family. He selected Friday,
the 17th of August, for his appearance, and spent most of that
day in looking over his wardrobe, ultimately deciding in favour
of a large slouched hat with a red feather, a winding-sheet
frilled at the wrists and neck, and a rusty dagger. Towards
evening a violent storm of rain came on, and the wind was so high
that all the windows and doors in the old house shook and
rattled. In fact, it was just such weather as he
loved. His plan of action was this. He was to make
his way quietly to Washington Otis’s room, gibber at him
from the foot of the bed, and stab himself three times in the
throat to the sound of slow music. He bore Washington a
special grudge, being quite aware that it was he who was in the
habit of removing the famous Canterville blood-stain, by means of
Pinkerton’s Paragon Detergent. Having reduced the
reckless and foolhardy youth to a condition of abject terror, he
was then to proceed to the room occupied by the United States
Minister and his wife, and there to place a clammy hand on Mrs.
Otis’s forehead, while he hissed into her trembling
husband’s ear the awful secrets of the charnel-house.
With regard to little Virginia, he had not quite made up his
mind. She had never insulted him in any way, and was pretty
and gentle. A few hollow groans from the wardrobe, he
thought, would be more than sufficient, or, if that failed to
wake her, he might grabble at the counterpane with
palsy-twitching fingers. As for the twins, he was quite
determined to teach them a lesson. The first thing to be
done was, of course, to sit upon their chests, so as to produce
the stifling sensation of nightmare. Then, as their beds
were quite close to each other, to stand between them in the form
of a green, icy-cold corpse, till they became paralysed with
fear, and finally, to throw off the winding-sheet, and crawl
round the room, with white bleached bones and one rolling
eye-ball, in the character of ‘Dumb Daniel, or the
Suicide’s Skeleton,’ a <i>rôle</i> in which he
had on more than one occasion produced a great effect, and which
he considered quite equal to his famous part of ‘Martin the
Maniac, or the Masked Mystery.’</p>
<p>At half-past ten he heard the family going to bed. For
some time he was disturbed by wild shrieks of laughter from the
twins, who, with the light-hearted gaiety of schoolboys, were
evidently amusing themselves before they retired to rest, but at
a quarter past eleven all was still, and, as midnight sounded, he
sallied forth. The owl beat against the window panes, the
raven croaked from the old yew-tree, and the wind wandered
moaning round the house like a lost soul; but the Otis family
slept unconscious of their doom, and high above the rain and
storm he could hear the steady snoring of the Minister for the
United States. He stepped stealthily out of the
wainscoting, with an evil smile on his cruel, wrinkled mouth, and
the moon hid her face in a cloud as he stole past the great oriel
window, where his own arms and those of his murdered wife were
blazoned in azure and gold. On and on he glided, like an
evil shadow, the very darkness seeming to loathe him as he
passed. Once he thought he heard something call, and
stopped; but it was only the baying of a dog from the Red Farm,
and he went on, muttering strange sixteenth-century curses, and
ever and anon brandishing the rusty dagger in the midnight
air. Finally he reached the corner of the passage that led
to luckless Washington’s room. For a moment he paused
there, the wind blowing his long grey locks about his head, and
twisting into grotesque and fantastic folds the nameless horror
of the dead man’s shroud. Then the clock struck the
quarter, and he felt the time was come. He chuckled to
himself, and turned the corner; but no sooner had he done so,
than, with a piteous wail of terror, he fell back, and hid his
blanched face in his long, bony hands. Right in front of
him was standing a horrible spectre, motionless as a carven
image, and monstrous as a madman’s dream! Its head
was bald and burnished; its face round, and fat, and white; and
hideous laughter seemed to have writhed its features into an
eternal grin. From the eyes streamed rays of scarlet light,
the mouth was a wide well of fire, and a hideous garment, like to
his own, swathed with its silent snows the Titan form. On
its breast was a placard with strange writing in antique
characters, some scroll of shame it seemed, some record of wild
sins, some awful calendar of crime, and, with its right hand, it
bore aloft a falchion of gleaming steel.</p>
<p>Never having seen a ghost before, he naturally was terribly
frightened, and, after a second hasty glance at the awful
phantom, he fled back to his room, tripping up in his long
winding-sheet as he sped down the corridor, and finally dropping
the rusty dagger into the Minister’s jack-boots, where it
was found in the morning by the butler. Once in the privacy
of his own apartment, he flung himself down on a small
pallet-bed, and hid his face under the clothes. After a
time, however, the brave old Canterville spirit asserted itself,
and he determined to go and speak to the other ghost as soon as
it was daylight. Accordingly, just as the dawn was touching
the hills with silver, he returned towards the spot where he had
first laid eyes on the grisly phantom, feeling that, after all,
two ghosts were better than one, and that, by the aid of his new
friend, he might safely grapple with the twins. On reaching
the spot, however, a terrible sight met his gaze. Something
had evidently happened to the spectre, for the light had entirely
faded from its hollow eyes, the gleaming falchion had fallen from
its hand, and it was leaning up against the wall in a strained
and uncomfortable attitude. He rushed forward and seized it
in his arms, when, to his horror, the head slipped off and rolled
on the floor, the body assumed a recumbent posture, and he found
himself clasping a white dimity bed-curtain, with a
sweeping-brush, a kitchen cleaver, and a hollow turnip lying at
his feet! Unable to understand this curious transformation,
he clutched the placard with feverish haste, and there, in the
grey morning light, he read these fearful words:—</p>
<blockquote><p style="text-align: center">YE OLDE GHOSTE</p>
<p style="text-align: center">Ye Onlie True and Originale
Spook.<br/>
Beware of Ye Imitationes.<br/>
All others are Counterfeite.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The whole thing flashed across him. He had been tricked,
foiled, and outwitted! The old Canterville look came into
his eyes; he ground his toothless gums together; and, raising his
withered hands high above his head, swore, according to the
picturesque phraseology of the antique school, that when
Chanticleer had sounded twice his merry horn, deeds of blood
would be wrought, and Murder walk abroad with silent feet.</p>
<p>Hardly had he finished this awful oath when, from the
red-tiled roof of a distant homestead, a cock crew. He
laughed a long, low, bitter laugh, and waited. Hour after
hour he waited, but the cock, for some strange reason, did not
crow again. Finally, at half-past seven, the arrival of the
housemaids made him give up his fearful vigil, and he stalked
back to his room, thinking of his vain hope and baffled
purpose. There he consulted several books of ancient
chivalry, of which he was exceedingly fond, and found that, on
every occasion on which his oath had been used, Chanticleer had
always crowed a second time. ‘Perdition seize the
naughty fowl,’ he muttered, ‘I have seen the day
when, with my stout spear, I would have run him through the
gorge, and made him crow for me an ’twere in
death!’ He then retired to a comfortable lead coffin,
and stayed there till evening.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER IV</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">The</span> next day the ghost was very
weak and tired. The terrible excitement of the last four
weeks was beginning to have its effect. His nerves were
completely shattered, and he started at the slightest
noise. For five days he kept his room, and at last made up
his mind to give up the point of the blood-stain on the library
floor. If the Otis family did not want it, they clearly did
not deserve it. They were evidently people on a low,
material plane of existence, and quite incapable of appreciating
the symbolic value of sensuous phenomena. The question of
phantasmic apparitions, and the development of astral bodies, was
of course quite a different matter, and really not under his
control. It was his solemn duty to appear in the corridor
once a week, and to gibber from the large oriel window on the
first and third Wednesday in every month, and he did not see how
he could honourably escape from his obligations. It is
quite true that his life had been very evil, but, upon the other
hand, he was most conscientious in all things connected with the
supernatural. For the next three Saturdays, accordingly, he
traversed the corridor as usual between midnight and three
o’clock, taking every possible precaution against being
either heard or seen. He removed his boots, trod as lightly
as possible on the old worm-eaten boards, wore a large black
velvet cloak, and was careful to use the Rising Sun Lubricator
for oiling his chains. I am bound to acknowledge that it
was with a good deal of difficulty that he brought himself to
adopt this last mode of protection. However, one night,
while the family were at dinner, he slipped into Mr. Otis’s
bedroom and carried off the bottle. He felt a little
humiliated at first, but afterwards was sensible enough to see
that there was a great deal to be said for the invention, and, to
a certain degree, it served his purpose. Still, in spite of
everything, he was not left unmolested. Strings were
continually being stretched across the corridor, over which he
tripped in the dark, and on one occasion, while dressed for the
part of ‘Black Isaac, or the Huntsman of Hogley
Woods,’ he met with a severe fall, through treading on a
butter-slide, which the twins had constructed from the entrance
of the Tapestry Chamber to the top of the oak staircase.
This last insult so enraged him, that he resolved to make one
final effort to assert his dignity and social position, and
determined to visit the insolent young Etonians the next night in
his celebrated character of ‘Reckless Rupert, or the
Headless Earl.’</p>
<p>He had not appeared in this disguise for more than seventy
years; in fact, not since he had so frightened pretty Lady
Barbara Modish by means of it, that she suddenly broke off her
engagement with the present Lord Canterville’s grandfather,
and ran away to Gretna Green with handsome Jack Castleton,
declaring that nothing in the world would induce her to marry
into a family that allowed such a horrible phantom to walk up and
down the terrace at twilight. Poor Jack was afterwards shot
in a duel by Lord Canterville on Wandsworth Common, and Lady
Barbara died of a broken heart at Tunbridge Wells before the year
was out, so, in every way, it had been a great success. It
was, however, an extremely difficult ‘make-up,’ if I
may use such a theatrical expression in connection with one of
the greatest mysteries of the supernatural, or, to employ a more
scientific term, the higher-natural world, and it took him fully
three hours to make his preparations. At last everything
was ready, and he was very pleased with his appearance. The
big leather riding-boots that went with the dress were just a
little too large for him, and he could only find one of the two
horse-pistols, but, on the whole, he was quite satisfied, and at
a quarter past one he glided out of the wainscoting and crept
down the corridor. On reaching the room occupied by the
twins, which I should mention was called the Blue Bed Chamber, on
account of the colour of its hangings, he found the door just
ajar. Wishing to make an effective entrance, he flung it
wide open, when a heavy jug of water fell right down on him,
wetting him to the skin, and just missing his left shoulder by a
couple of inches. At the same moment he heard stifled
shrieks of laughter proceeding from the four-post bed. The
shock to his nervous system was so great that he fled back to his
room as hard as he could go, and the next day he was laid up with
a severe cold. The only thing that at all consoled him in
the whole affair was the fact that he had not brought his head
with him, for, had he done so, the consequences might have been
very serious.</p>
<p>He now gave up all hope of ever frightening this rude American
family, and contented himself, as a rule, with creeping about the
passages in list slippers, with a thick red muffler round his
throat for fear of draughts, and a small arquebuse, in case he
should be attacked by the twins. The final blow he received
occurred on the 19th of September. He had gone downstairs
to the great entrance-hall, feeling sure that there, at any rate,
he would be quite unmolested, and was amusing himself by making
satirical remarks on the large Saroni photographs of the United
States Minister and his wife, which had now taken the place of
the Canterville family pictures. He was simply but neatly
clad in a long shroud, spotted with churchyard mould, had tied up
his jaw with a strip of yellow linen, and carried a small lantern
and a sexton’s spade. In fact, he was dressed for the
character of ‘Jonas the Graveless, or the Corpse-Snatcher
of Chertsey Barn,’ one of his most remarkable
impersonations, and one which the Cantervilles had every reason
to remember, as it was the real origin of their quarrel with
their neighbour, Lord Rufford. It was about a quarter past
two o’clock in the morning, and, as far as he could
ascertain, no one was stirring. As he was strolling towards
the library, however, to see if there were any traces left of the
blood-stain, suddenly there leaped out on him from a dark corner
two figures, who waved their arms wildly above their heads, and
shrieked out ‘BOO!’ in his ear.</p>
<p>Seized with a panic, which, under the circumstances, was only
natural, he rushed for the staircase, but found Washington Otis
waiting for him there with the big garden-syringe; and being thus
hemmed in by his enemies on every side, and driven almost to bay,
he vanished into the great iron stove, which, fortunately for
him, was not lit, and had to make his way home through the flues
and chimneys, arriving at his own room in a terrible state of
dirt, disorder, and despair.</p>
<p>After this he was not seen again on any nocturnal
expedition. The twins lay in wait for him on several
occasions, and strewed the passages with nutshells every night to
the great annoyance of their parents and the servants, but it was
of no avail. It was quite evident that his feelings were so
wounded that he would not appear. Mr. Otis consequently
resumed his great work on the history of the Democratic Party, on
which he had been engaged for some years; Mrs. Otis organised a
wonderful clam-bake, which amazed the whole county; the boys took
to lacrosse, euchre, poker, and other American national games;
and Virginia rode about the lanes on her pony, accompanied by the
young Duke of Cheshire, who had come to spend the last week of
his holidays at Canterville Chase. It was generally assumed
that the ghost had gone away, and, in fact, Mr. Otis wrote a
letter to that effect to Lord Canterville, who, in reply,
expressed his great pleasure at the news, and sent his best
congratulations to the Minister’s worthy wife.</p>
<p>The Otises, however, were deceived, for the ghost was still in
the house, and though now almost an invalid, was by no means
ready to let matters rest, particularly as he heard that among
the guests was the young Duke of Cheshire, whose grand-uncle,
Lord Francis Stilton, had once bet a hundred guineas with Colonel
Carbury that he would play dice with the Canterville ghost, and
was found the next morning lying on the floor of the card-room in
such a helpless paralytic state, that though he lived on to a
great age, he was never able to say anything again but
‘Double Sixes.’ The story was well known at the
time, though, of course, out of respect to the feelings of the
two noble families, every attempt was made to hush it up; and a
full account of all the circumstances connected with it will be
found in the third volume of Lord Tattle’s <i>Recollections
of the Prince Regent and his Friends</i>. The ghost, then,
was naturally very anxious to show that he had not lost his
influence over the Stiltons, with whom, indeed, he was distantly
connected, his own first cousin having been married <i>en
secondes noces</i> to the Sieur de Bulkeley, from whom, as every
one knows, the Dukes of Cheshire are lineally descended.
Accordingly, he made arrangements for appearing to
Virginia’s little lover in his celebrated impersonation of
‘The Vampire Monk, or, the Bloodless Benedictine,’ a
performance so horrible that when old Lady Startup saw it, which
she did on one fatal New Year’s Eve, in the year 1764, she
went off into the most piercing shrieks, which culminated in
violent apoplexy, and died in three days, after disinheriting the
Cantervilles, who were her nearest relations, and leaving all her
money to her London apothecary. At the last moment,
however, his terror of the twins prevented his leaving his room,
and the little Duke slept in peace under the great feathered
canopy in the Royal Bedchamber, and dreamed of Virginia.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER V</h3>
<p>A <span class="smcap">few</span> days after this, Virginia and
her curly-haired cavalier went out riding on Brockley meadows,
where she tore her habit so badly in getting through a hedge,
that, on her return home, she made up her mind to go up by the
back staircase so as not to be seen. As she was running
past the Tapestry Chamber, the door of which happened to be open,
she fancied she saw some one inside, and thinking it was her
mother’s maid, who sometimes used to bring her work there,
looked in to ask her to mend her habit. To her immense
surprise, however, it was the Canterville Ghost himself! He
was sitting by the window, watching the ruined gold of the
yellowing trees fly through the air, and the red leaves dancing
madly down the long avenue. His head was leaning on his
hand, and his whole attitude was one of extreme depression.
Indeed, so forlorn, and so much out of repair did he look, that
little Virginia, whose first idea had been to run away and lock
herself in her room, was filled with pity, and determined to try
and comfort him. So light was her footfall, and so deep his
melancholy, that he was not aware of her presence till she spoke
to him.</p>
<p>‘I am so sorry for you,’ she said, ‘but my
brothers are going back to Eton to-morrow, and then, if you
behave yourself, no one will annoy you.’</p>
<p>‘It is absurd asking me to behave myself,’ he
answered, looking round in astonishment at the pretty little girl
who had ventured to address him, ‘quite absurd. I
must rattle my chains, and groan through keyholes, and walk about
at night, if that is what you mean. It is my only reason
for existing.’</p>
<p>‘It is no reason at all for existing, and you know you
have been very wicked. Mrs. Umney told us, the first day we
arrived here, that you had killed your wife.’</p>
<p>‘Well, I quite admit it,’ said the Ghost
petulantly, ‘but it was a purely family matter, and
concerned no one else.’</p>
<p>‘It is very wrong to kill any one,’ said Virginia,
who at times had a sweet Puritan gravity, caught from some old
New England ancestor.</p>
<p>‘Oh, I hate the cheap severity of abstract ethics!
My wife was very plain, never had my ruffs properly starched, and
knew nothing about cookery. Why, there was a buck I had
shot in Hogley Woods, a magnificent pricket, and do you know how
she had it sent up to table? However, it is no matter now,
for it is all over, and I don’t think it was very nice of
her brothers to starve me to death, though I did kill
her.’</p>
<p>‘Starve you to death? Oh, Mr. Ghost, I mean Sir
Simon, are you hungry? I have a sandwich in my case.
Would you like it?’</p>
<p>‘No, thank you, I never eat anything now; but it is very
kind of you, all the same, and you are much nicer than the rest
of your horrid, rude, vulgar, dishonest family.’</p>
<p>‘Stop!’ cried Virginia, stamping her foot,
‘it is you who are rude, and horrid, and vulgar, and as for
dishonesty, you know you stole the paints out of my box to try
and furbish up that ridiculous blood-stain in the library.
First you took all my reds, including the vermilion, and I
couldn’t do any more sunsets, then you took the
emerald-green and the chrome-yellow, and finally I had nothing
left but indigo and Chinese white, and could only do moonlight
scenes, which are always depressing to look at, and not at all
easy to paint. I never told on you, though I was very much
annoyed, and it was most ridiculous, the whole thing; for who
ever heard of emerald-green blood?’</p>
<p>‘Well, really,’ said the Ghost, rather meekly,
‘what was I to do? It is a very difficult thing to
get real blood nowadays, and, as your brother began it all with
his Paragon Detergent, I certainly saw no reason why I should not
have your paints. As for colour, that is always a matter of
taste: the Cantervilles have blue blood, for instance, the very
bluest in England; but I know you Americans don’t care for
things of this kind.’</p>
<p>‘You know nothing about it, and the best thing you can
do is to emigrate and improve your mind. My father will be
only too happy to give you a free passage, and though there is a
heavy duty on spirits of every kind, there will be no difficulty
about the Custom House, as the officers are all Democrats.
Once in New York, you are sure to be a great success. I
know lots of people there who would give a hundred thousand
dollars to have a grandfather, and much more than that to have a
family Ghost.’</p>
<p>‘I don’t think I should like America.’</p>
<p>‘I suppose because we have no ruins and no
curiosities,’ said Virginia satirically.</p>
<p>‘No ruins! no curiosities!’ answered the Ghost;
‘you have your navy and your manners.’</p>
<p>‘Good evening; I will go and ask papa to get the twins
an extra week’s holiday.’</p>
<p>‘Please don’t go, Miss Virginia,’ he cried;
‘I am so lonely and so unhappy, and I really don’t
know what to do. I want to go to sleep and I
cannot.’</p>
<p>‘That’s quite absurd! You have merely to go
to bed and blow out the candle. It is very difficult
sometimes to keep awake, especially at church, but there is no
difficulty at all about sleeping. Why, even babies know how
to do that, and they are not very clever.’</p>
<p>‘I have not slept for three hundred years,’ he
said sadly, and Virginia’s beautiful blue eyes opened in
wonder; ‘for three hundred years I have not slept, and I am
so tired.’</p>
<p>Virginia grew quite grave, and her little lips trembled like
rose-leaves. She came towards him, and kneeling down at his
side, looked up into his old withered face.</p>
<p>‘Poor, poor Ghost,’ she murmured; ‘have you
no place where you can sleep?’</p>
<p>‘Far away beyond the pine-woods,’ he answered, in
a low dreamy voice, ‘there is a little garden. There
the grass grows long and deep, there are the great white stars of
the hemlock flower, there the nightingale sings all night
long. All night long he sings, and the cold, crystal moon
looks down, and the yew-tree spreads out its giant arms over the
sleepers.’</p>
<p>Virginia’s eyes grew dim with tears, and she hid her
face in her hands.</p>
<p>‘You mean the Garden of Death,’ she whispered.</p>
<p>‘Yes, Death. Death must be so beautiful. To
lie in the soft brown earth, with the grasses waving above
one’s head, and listen to silence. To have no
yesterday, and no to-morrow. To forget time, to forgive
life, to be at peace. You can help me. You can open
for me the portals of Death’s house, for Love is always
with you, and Love is stronger than Death is.’</p>
<p>Virginia trembled, a cold shudder ran through her, and for a
few moments there was silence. She felt as if she was in a
terrible dream.</p>
<p>Then the Ghost spoke again, and his voice sounded like the
sighing of the wind.</p>
<p>‘Have you ever read the old prophecy on the library
window?’</p>
<p>‘Oh, often,’ cried the little girl, looking up;
‘I know it quite well. It is painted in curious black
letters, and it is difficult to read. There are only six
lines:</p>
<blockquote><p>When a golden girl can win<br/>
Prayer from out the lips of sin,<br/>
When the barren almond bears,<br/>
And a little child gives away its tears,<br/>
Then shall all the house be still<br/>
And peace come to Canterville.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But I don’t know what they mean.’</p>
<p>‘They mean,’ he said sadly, ‘that you must
weep for me for my sins, because I have no tears, and pray with
me for my soul, because I have no faith, and then, if you have
always been sweet, and good, and gentle, the Angel of Death will
have mercy on me. You will see fearful shapes in darkness,
and wicked voices will whisper in your ear, but they will not
harm you, for against the purity of a little child the powers of
Hell cannot prevail.’</p>
<p>Virginia made no answer, and the Ghost wrung his hands in wild
despair as he looked down at her bowed golden head.
Suddenly she stood up, very pale, and with a strange light in her
eyes. ‘I am not afraid,’ she said firmly,
‘and I will ask the Angel to have mercy on you.’</p>
<p>He rose from his seat with a faint cry of joy, and taking her
hand bent over it with old-fashioned grace and kissed it.
His fingers were as cold as ice, and his lips burned like fire,
but Virginia did not falter, as he led her across the dusky
room. On the faded green tapestry were broidered little
huntsmen. They blew their tasselled horns and with their
tiny hands waved to her to go back. ‘Go back! little
Virginia,’ they cried, ‘go back!’ but the Ghost
clutched her hand more tightly, and she shut her eyes against
them. Horrible animals with lizard tails, and goggle eyes,
blinked at her from the carven chimney-piece, and murmured
‘Beware! little Virginia, beware! we may never see you
again,’ but the Ghost glided on more swiftly, and Virginia
did not listen. When they reached the end of the room he
stopped, and muttered some words she could not understand.
She opened her eyes, and saw the wall slowly fading away like a
mist, and a great black cavern in front of her. A bitter
cold wind swept round them, and she felt something pulling at her
dress. ‘Quick, quick,’ cried the Ghost,
‘or it will be too late,’ and, in a moment, the
wainscoting had closed behind them, and the Tapestry Chamber was
empty.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER VI</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">About</span> ten minutes later, the bell
rang for tea, and, as Virginia did not come down, Mrs. Otis sent
up one of the footmen to tell her. After a little time he
returned and said that he could not find Miss Virginia
anywhere. As she was in the habit of going out to the
garden every evening to get flowers for the dinner-table, Mrs.
Otis was not at all alarmed at first, but when six o’clock
struck, and Virginia did not appear, she became really agitated,
and sent the boys out to look for her, while she herself and Mr.
Otis searched every room in the house. At half-past six the
boys came back and said that they could find no trace of their
sister anywhere. They were all now in the greatest state of
excitement, and did not know what to do, when Mr. Otis suddenly
remembered that, some few days before, he had given a band of
gypsies permission to camp in the park. He accordingly at
once set off for Blackfell Hollow, where he knew they were,
accompanied by his eldest son and two of the farm-servants.
The little Duke of Cheshire, who was perfectly frantic with
anxiety, begged hard to be allowed to go too, but Mr. Otis would
not allow him, as he was afraid there might be a scuffle.
On arriving at the spot, however, he found that the gypsies had
gone, and it was evident that their departure had been rather
sudden, as the fire was still burning, and some plates were lying
on the grass. Having sent off Washington and the two men to
scour the district, he ran home, and despatched telegrams to all
the police inspectors in the county, telling them to look out for
a little girl who had been kidnapped by tramps or gypsies.
He then ordered his horse to be brought round, and, after
insisting on his wife and the three boys sitting down to dinner,
rode off down the Ascot Road with a groom. He had hardly,
however, gone a couple of miles when he heard somebody galloping
after him, and, looking round, saw the little Duke coming up on
his pony, with his face very flushed and no hat.
‘I’m awfully sorry, Mr. Otis,’ gasped out the
boy, ‘but I can’t eat any dinner as long as Virginia
is lost. Please, don’t be angry with me; if you had
let us be engaged last year, there would never have been all this
trouble. You won’t send me back, will you? I
can’t go! I won’t go!’</p>
<p>The Minister could not help smiling at the handsome young
scapegrace, and was a good deal touched at his devotion to
Virginia, so leaning down from his horse, he patted him kindly on
the shoulders, and said, ‘Well, Cecil, if you won’t
go back I suppose you must come with me, but I must get you a hat
at Ascot.’</p>
<p>‘Oh, bother my hat! I want Virginia!’ cried
the little Duke, laughing, and they galloped on to the railway
station. There Mr. Otis inquired of the station-master if
any one answering the description of Virginia had been seen on
the platform, but could get no news of her. The
station-master, however, wired up and down the line, and assured
him that a strict watch would be kept for her, and, after having
bought a hat for the little Duke from a linen-draper, who was
just putting up his shutters, Mr. Otis rode off to Bexley, a
village about four miles away, which he was told was a well-known
haunt of the gypsies, as there was a large common next to
it. Here they roused up the rural policeman, but could get
no information from him, and, after riding all over the common,
they turned their horses’ heads homewards, and reached the
Chase about eleven o’clock, dead-tired and almost
heart-broken. They found Washington and the twins waiting
for them at the gate-house with lanterns, as the avenue was very
dark. Not the slightest trace of Virginia had been
discovered. The gypsies had been caught on Brockley
meadows, but she was not with them, and they had explained their
sudden departure by saying that they had mistaken the date of
Chorton Fair, and had gone off in a hurry for fear they might be
late. Indeed, they had been quite distressed at hearing of
Virginia’s disappearance, as they were very grateful to Mr.
Otis for having allowed them to camp in his park, and four of
their number had stayed behind to help in the search. The
carp-pond had been dragged, and the whole Chase thoroughly gone
over, but without any result. It was evident that, for that
night at any rate, Virginia was lost to them; and it was in a
state of the deepest depression that Mr. Otis and the boys walked
up to the house, the groom following behind with the two horses
and the pony. In the hall they found a group of frightened
servants, and lying on a sofa in the library was poor Mrs. Otis,
almost out of her mind with terror and anxiety, and having her
forehead bathed with eau-de-cologne by the old housekeeper.
Mr. Otis at once insisted on her having something to eat, and
ordered up supper for the whole party. It was a melancholy
meal, as hardly any one spoke, and even the twins were awestruck
and subdued, as they were very fond of their sister. When
they had finished, Mr. Otis, in spite of the entreaties of the
little Duke, ordered them all to bed, saying that nothing more
could be done that night, and that he would telegraph in the
morning to Scotland Yard for some detectives to be sent down
immediately. Just as they were passing out of the
dining-room, midnight began to boom from the clock tower, and
when the last stroke sounded they heard a crash and a sudden
shrill cry; a dreadful peal of thunder shook the house, a strain
of unearthly music floated through the air, a panel at the top of
the staircase flew back with a loud noise, and out on the
landing, looking very pale and white, with a little casket in her
hand, stepped Virginia. In a moment they had all rushed up
to her. Mrs. Otis clasped her passionately in her arms, the
Duke smothered her with violent kisses, and the twins executed a
wild war-dance round the group.</p>
<p>‘Good heavens! child, where have you been?’ said
Mr. Otis, rather angrily, thinking that she had been playing some
foolish trick on them. ‘Cecil and I have been riding
all over the country looking for you, and your mother has been
frightened to death. You must never play these practical
jokes any more.’</p>
<p>‘Except on the Ghost! except on the Ghost!’
shrieked the twins, as they capered about.</p>
<p>‘My own darling, thank God you are found; you must never
leave my side again,’ murmured Mrs. Otis, as she kissed the
trembling child, and smoothed the tangled gold of her hair.</p>
<p>‘Papa,’ said Virginia quietly, ‘I have been
with the Ghost. He is dead, and you must come and see
him. He had been very wicked, but he was really sorry for
all that he had done, and he gave me this box of beautiful jewels
before he died.’</p>
<p>The whole family gazed at her in mute amazement, but she was
quite grave and serious; and, turning round, she led them through
the opening in the wainscoting down a narrow secret corridor,
Washington following with a lighted candle, which he had caught
up from the table. Finally, they came to a great oak door,
studded with rusty nails. When Virginia touched it, it
swung back on its heavy hinges, and they found themselves in a
little low room, with a vaulted ceiling, and one tiny grated
window. Imbedded in the wall was a huge iron ring, and
chained to it was a gaunt skeleton, that was stretched out at
full length on the stone floor, and seemed to be trying to grasp
with its long fleshless fingers an old-fashioned trencher and
ewer, that were placed just out of its reach. The jug had
evidently been once filled with water, as it was covered inside
with green mould. There was nothing on the trencher but a
pile of dust. Virginia knelt down beside the skeleton, and,
folding her little hands together, began to pray silently, while
the rest of the party looked on in wonder at the terrible tragedy
whose secret was now disclosed to them.</p>
<p>‘Hallo!’ suddenly exclaimed one of the twins, who
had been looking out of the window to try and discover in what
wing of the house the room was situated. ‘Hallo! the
old withered almond-tree has blossomed. I can see the
flowers quite plainly in the moonlight.’</p>
<p>‘God has forgiven him,’ said Virginia gravely, as
she rose to her feet, and a beautiful light seemed to illumine
her face.</p>
<p>‘What an angel you are!’ cried the young Duke, and
he put his arm round her neck and kissed her.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER VII</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">Four</span> days after these curious
incidents a funeral started from Canterville Chase at about
eleven o’clock at night. The hearse was drawn by
eight black horses, each of which carried on its head a great
tuft of nodding ostrich-plumes, and the leaden coffin was covered
by a rich purple pall, on which was embroidered in gold the
Canterville coat-of-arms. By the side of the hearse and the
coaches walked the servants with lighted torches, and the whole
procession was wonderfully impressive. Lord Canterville was
the chief mourner, having come up specially from Wales to attend
the funeral, and sat in the first carriage along with little
Virginia. Then came the United States Minister and his
wife, then Washington and the three boys, and in the last
carriage was Mrs. Umney. It was generally felt that, as she
had been frightened by the ghost for more than fifty years of her
life, she had a right to see the last of him. A deep grave
had been dug in the corner of the churchyard, just under the old
yew-tree, and the service was read in the most impressive manner
by the Rev. Augustus Dampier. When the ceremony was over,
the servants, according to an old custom observed in the
Canterville family, extinguished their torches, and, as the
coffin was being lowered into the grave, Virginia stepped forward
and laid on it a large cross made of white and pink
almond-blossoms. As she did so, the moon came out from
behind a cloud, and flooded with its silent silver the little
churchyard, and from a distant copse a nightingale began to
sing. She thought of the ghost’s description of the
Garden of Death, her eyes became dim with tears, and she hardly
spoke a word during the drive home.</p>
<p>The next morning, before Lord Canterville went up to town, Mr.
Otis had an interview with him on the subject of the jewels the
ghost had given to Virginia. They were perfectly
magnificent, especially a certain ruby necklace with old Venetian
setting, which was really a superb specimen of sixteenth-century
work, and their value was so great that Mr. Otis felt
considerable scruples about allowing his daughter to accept
them.</p>
<p>‘My lord,’ he said, ‘I know that in this
country mortmain is held to apply to trinkets as well as to land,
and it is quite clear to me that these jewels are, or should be,
heirlooms in your family. I must beg you, accordingly, to
take them to London with you, and to regard them simply as a
portion of your property which has been restored to you under
certain strange conditions. As for my daughter, she is
merely a child, and has as yet, I am glad to say, but little
interest in such appurtenances of idle luxury. I am also
informed by Mrs. Otis, who, I may say, is no mean authority upon
Art—having had the privilege of spending several winters in
Boston when she was a girl—that these gems are of great
monetary worth, and if offered for sale would fetch a tall
price. Under these circumstances, Lord Canterville, I feel
sure that you will recognise how impossible it would be for me to
allow them to remain in the possession of any member of my
family; and, indeed, all such vain gauds and toys, however
suitable or necessary to the dignity of the British aristocracy,
would be completely out of place among those who have been
brought up on the severe, and I believe immortal, principles of
republican simplicity. Perhaps I should mention that
Virginia is very anxious that you should allow her to retain the
box as a memento of your unfortunate but misguided
ancestor. As it is extremely old, and consequently a good
deal out of repair, you may perhaps think fit to comply with her
request. For my own part, I confess I am a good deal
surprised to find a child of mine expressing sympathy with
mediævalism in any form, and can only account for it by the
fact that Virginia was born in one of your London suburbs shortly
after Mrs. Otis had returned from a trip to Athens.’</p>
<p>Lord Canterville listened very gravely to the worthy
Minister’s speech, pulling his grey moustache now and then
to hide an involuntary smile, and when Mr. Otis had ended, he
shook him cordially by the hand, and said, ‘My dear sir,
your charming little daughter rendered my unlucky ancestor, Sir
Simon, a very important service, and I and my family are much
indebted to her for her marvellous courage and pluck. The
jewels are clearly hers, and, egad, I believe that if I were
heartless enough to take them from her, the wicked old fellow
would be out of his grave in a fortnight, leading me the devil of
a life. As for their being heirlooms, nothing is an
heirloom that is not so mentioned in a will or legal document,
and the existence of these jewels has been quite unknown. I
assure you I have no more claim on them than your butler, and
when Miss Virginia grows up I daresay she will be pleased to have
pretty things to wear. Besides, you forget, Mr. Otis, that
you took the furniture and the ghost at a valuation, and anything
that belonged to the ghost passed at once into your possession,
as, whatever activity Sir Simon may have shown in the corridor at
night, in point of law he was really dead, and you acquired his
property by purchase.’</p>
<p>Mr. Otis was a good deal distressed at Lord
Canterville’s refusal, and begged him to reconsider his
decision, but the good-natured peer was quite firm, and finally
induced the Minister to allow his daughter to retain the present
the ghost had given her, and when, in the spring of 1890, the
young Duchess of Cheshire was presented at the Queen’s
first drawing-room on the occasion of her marriage, her jewels
were the universal theme of admiration. For Virginia
received the coronet, which is the reward of all good little
American girls, and was married to her boy-lover as soon as he
came of age. They were both so charming, and they loved
each other so much, that every one was delighted at the match,
except the old Marchioness of Dumbleton, who had tried to catch
the Duke for one of her seven unmarried daughters, and had given
no less than three expensive dinner-parties for that purpose,
and, strange to say, Mr. Otis himself. Mr. Otis was
extremely fond of the young Duke personally, but, theoretically,
he objected to titles, and, to use his own words, ‘was not
without apprehension lest, amid the enervating influences of a
pleasure-loving aristocracy, the true principles of republican
simplicity should be forgotten.’ His objections,
however, were completely overruled, and I believe that when he
walked up the aisle of St. George’s, Hanover Square, with
his daughter leaning on his arm, there was not a prouder man in
the whole length and breadth of England.</p>
<p>The Duke and Duchess, after the honeymoon was over, went down
to Canterville Chase, and on the day after their arrival they
walked over in the afternoon to the lonely churchyard by the
pine-woods. There had been a great deal of difficulty at
first about the inscription on Sir Simon’s tombstone, but
finally it had been decided to engrave on it simply the initials
of the old gentleman’s name, and the verse from the library
window. The Duchess had brought with her some lovely roses,
which she strewed upon the grave, and after they had stood by it
for some time they strolled into the ruined chancel of the old
abbey. There the Duchess sat down on a fallen pillar, while
her husband lay at her feet smoking a cigarette and looking up at
her beautiful eyes. Suddenly he threw his cigarette away,
took hold of her hand, and said to her, ‘Virginia, a wife
should have no secrets from her husband.’</p>
<p>‘Dear Cecil! I have no secrets from
you.’</p>
<p>‘Yes, you have,’ he answered, smiling, ‘you
have never told me what happened to you when you were locked up
with the ghost.’</p>
<p>‘I have never told any one, Cecil,’ said Virginia
gravely.</p>
<p>‘I know that, but you might tell me.’</p>
<p>‘Please don’t ask me, Cecil, I cannot tell
you. Poor Sir Simon! I owe him a great deal.
Yes, don’t laugh, Cecil, I really do. He made me see
what Life is, and what Death signifies, and why Love is stronger
than both.’</p>
<p>The Duke rose and kissed his wife lovingly.</p>
<p>‘You can have your secret as long as I have your
heart,’ he murmured.</p>
<p>‘You have always had that, Cecil.’</p>
<p>‘And you will tell our children some day, won’t
you?’</p>
<p>Virginia blushed.</p>
<h2><SPAN name="page121"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>THE SPHINX WITHOUT A SECRET<br/> <span class="GutSmall">AN ETCHING</span></h2>
<p><span class="smcap">One</span> afternoon I was sitting outside
the Café de la Paix, watching the splendour and shabbiness
of Parisian life, and wondering over my vermouth at the strange
panorama of pride and poverty that was passing before me, when I
heard some one call my name. I turned round, and saw Lord
Murchison. We had not met since we had been at college
together, nearly ten years before, so I was delighted to come
across him again, and we shook hands warmly. At Oxford we
had been great friends. I had liked him immensely, he was
so handsome, so high-spirited, and so honourable. We used
to say of him that he would be the best of fellows, if he did not
always speak the truth, but I think we really admired him all the
more for his frankness. I found him a good deal
changed. He looked anxious and puzzled, and seemed to be in
doubt about something. I felt it could not be modern
scepticism, for Murchison was the stoutest of Tories, and
believed in the Pentateuch as firmly as he believed in the House
of Peers; so I concluded that it was a woman, and asked him if he
was married yet.</p>
<p>‘I don’t understand women well enough,’ he
answered.</p>
<p>‘My dear Gerald,’ I said, ‘women are meant
to be loved, not to be understood.’</p>
<p>‘I cannot love where I cannot trust,’ he
replied.</p>
<p>‘I believe you have a mystery in your life,
Gerald,’ I exclaimed; ‘tell me about it.’</p>
<p>‘Let us go for a drive,’ he answered, ‘it is
too crowded here. No, not a yellow carriage, any other
colour—there, that dark green one will do’; and in a
few moments we were trotting down the boulevard in the direction
of the Madeleine.</p>
<p>‘Where shall we go to?’ I said.</p>
<p>‘Oh, anywhere you like!’ he
answered—‘to the restaurant in the Bois; we will dine
there, and you shall tell me all about yourself.’</p>
<p>‘I want to hear about you first,’ I said.
‘Tell me your mystery.’</p>
<p>He took from his pocket a little silver-clasped morocco case,
and handed it to me. I opened it. Inside there was
the photograph of a woman. She was tall and slight, and
strangely picturesque with her large vague eyes and loosened
hair. She looked like a <i>clairvoyante</i>, and was
wrapped in rich furs.</p>
<p>‘What do you think of that face?’ he said;
‘is it truthful?’</p>
<p>I examined it carefully. It seemed to me the face of
some one who had a secret, but whether that secret was good or
evil I could not say. Its beauty was a beauty moulded out
of many mysteries—the beauty, in fact, which is
psychological, not plastic—and the faint smile that just
played across the lips was far too subtle to be really sweet.</p>
<p>‘Well,’ he cried impatiently, ‘what do you
say?’</p>
<p>‘She is the Gioconda in sables,’ I answered.
‘Let me know all about her.’</p>
<p>‘Not now,’ he said; ‘after dinner,’
and began to talk of other things.</p>
<p>When the waiter brought us our coffee and cigarettes I
reminded Gerald of his promise. He rose from his seat,
walked two or three times up and down the room, and, sinking into
an armchair, told me the following story:—</p>
<p>‘One evening,’ he said, ‘I was walking down
Bond Street about five o’clock. There was a terrific
crush of carriages, and the traffic was almost stopped.
Close to the pavement was standing a little yellow brougham,
which, for some reason or other, attracted my attention. As
I passed by there looked out from it the face I showed you this
afternoon. It fascinated me immediately. All that
night I kept thinking of it, and all the next day. I
wandered up and down that wretched Row, peering into every
carriage, and waiting for the yellow brougham; but I could not
find <i>ma belle inconnue</i>, and at last I began to think she
was merely a dream. About a week afterwards I was dining
with Madame de Rastail. Dinner was for eight o’clock;
but at half-past eight we were still waiting in the
drawing-room. Finally the servant threw open the door, and
announced Lady Alroy. It was the woman I had been looking
for. She came in very slowly, looking like a moonbeam in
grey lace, and, to my intense delight, I was asked to take her in
to dinner. After we had sat down, I remarked quite
innocently, “I think I caught sight of you in Bond Street
some time ago, Lady Alroy.” She grew very pale, and
said to me in a low voice, “Pray do not talk so loud; you
may be overheard.” I felt miserable at having made
such a bad beginning, and plunged recklessly into the subject of
the French plays. She spoke very little, always in the same
low musical voice, and seemed as if she was afraid of some one
listening. I fell passionately, stupidly in love, and the
indefinable atmosphere of mystery that surrounded her excited my
most ardent curiosity. When she was going away, which she
did very soon after dinner, I asked her if I might call and see
her. She hesitated for a moment, glanced round to see if
any one was near us, and then said, “Yes; to-morrow at a
quarter to five.” I begged Madame de Rastail to tell
me about her; but all that I could learn was that she was a widow
with a beautiful house in Park Lane, and as some scientific bore
began a dissertation on widows, as exemplifying the survival of
the matrimonially fittest, I left and went home.</p>
<p>‘The next day I arrived at Park Lane punctual to the
moment, but was told by the butler that Lady Alroy had just gone
out. I went down to the club quite unhappy and very much
puzzled, and after long consideration wrote her a letter, asking
if I might be allowed to try my chance some other
afternoon. I had no answer for several days, but at last I
got a little note saying she would be at home on Sunday at four
and with this extraordinary postscript: “Please do not
write to me here again; I will explain when I see
you.” On Sunday she received me, and was perfectly
charming; but when I was going away she begged of me, if I ever
had occasion to write to her again, to address my letter to
“Mrs. Knox, care of Whittaker’s Library, Green
Street.” “There are reasons,” she said,
“why I cannot receive letters in my own house.”</p>
<p>‘All through the season I saw a great deal of her, and
the atmosphere of mystery never left her. Sometimes I
thought that she was in the power of some man, but she looked so
unapproachable, that I could not believe it. It was really
very difficult for me to come to any conclusion, for she was like
one of those strange crystals that one sees in museums, which are
at one moment clear, and at another clouded. At last I
determined to ask her to be my wife: I was sick and tired of the
incessant secrecy that she imposed on all my visits, and on the
few letters I sent her. I wrote to her at the library to
ask her if she could see me the following Monday at six.
She answered yes, and I was in the seventh heaven of
delight. I was infatuated with her: in spite of the
mystery, I thought then—in consequence of it, I see
now. No; it was the woman herself I loved. The
mystery troubled me, maddened me. Why did chance put me in
its track?’</p>
<p>‘You discovered it, then?’ I cried.</p>
<p>‘I fear so,’ he answered. ‘You can
judge for yourself.’</p>
<p>‘When Monday came round I went to lunch with my uncle,
and about four o’clock found myself in the Marylebone
Road. My uncle, you know, lives in Regent’s
Park. I wanted to get to Piccadilly, and took a short cut
through a lot of shabby little streets. Suddenly I saw in
front of me Lady Alroy, deeply veiled and walking very
fast. On coming to the last house in the street, she went
up the steps, took out a latch-key, and let herself in.
“Here is the mystery,” I said to myself; and I
hurried on and examined the house. It seemed a sort of
place for letting lodgings. On the doorstep lay her
handkerchief, which she had dropped. I picked it up and put
it in my pocket. Then I began to consider what I should
do. I came to the conclusion that I had no right to spy on
her, and I drove down to the club. At six I called to see
her. She was lying on a sofa, in a tea-gown of silver
tissue looped up by some strange moonstones that she always
wore. She was looking quite lovely. “I am so
glad to see you,” she said; “I have not been out all
day.” I stared at her in amazement, and pulling the
handkerchief out of my pocket, handed it to her. “You
dropped this in Cumnor Street this afternoon, Lady
Alroy,” I said very calmly. She looked at me in
terror but made no attempt to take the handkerchief.
“What were you doing there?” I asked.
“What right have you to question me?” she
answered. “The right of a man who loves you,” I
replied; “I came here to ask you to be my
wife.” She hid her face in her hands, and burst into
floods of tears. “You must tell me,” I
continued. She stood up, and, looking me straight in the
face, said, “Lord Murchison, there is nothing to tell
you.”—“You went to meet some one,” I
cried; “this is your mystery.” She grew
dreadfully white, and said, “I went to meet no
one.”—“Can’t you tell the truth?” I
exclaimed. “I have told it,” she replied.
I was mad, frantic; I don’t know what I said, but I said
terrible things to her. Finally I rushed out of the
house. She wrote me a letter the next day; I sent it back
unopened, and started for Norway with Alan Colville. After
a month I came back, and the first thing I saw in the <i>Morning
Post</i> was the death of Lady Alroy. She had caught a
chill at the Opera, and had died in five days of congestion of
the lungs. I shut myself up and saw no one. I had
loved her so much, I had loved her so madly. Good God! how
I had loved that woman!’</p>
<p>‘You went to the street, to the house in it?’ I
said.</p>
<p>‘Yes,’ he answered.</p>
<p>‘One day I went to Cumnor Street. I could not help
it; I was tortured with doubt. I knocked at the door, and a
respectable-looking woman opened it to me. I asked her if
she had any rooms to let. “Well, sir,” she
replied, “the drawing-rooms are supposed to be let; but I
have not seen the lady for three months, and as rent is owing on
them, you can have them.”—“Is this the
lady?” I said, showing the photograph.
“That’s her, sure enough,” she exclaimed;
“and when is she coming back, sir?”—“The
lady is dead,” I replied. “Oh sir, I hope
not!” said the woman; “she was my best lodger.
She paid me three guineas a week merely to sit in my
drawing-rooms now and then.” “She met some one
here?” I said; but the woman assured me that it was not so,
that she always came alone, and saw no one. “What on
earth did she do here?” I cried. “She simply
sat in the drawing-room, sir, reading books, and sometimes had
tea,” the woman answered. I did not know what to say,
so I gave her a sovereign and went away. Now, what do you
think it all meant? You don’t believe the woman was
telling the truth?’</p>
<p>‘I do.’</p>
<p>‘Then why did Lady Alroy go there?’</p>
<p>‘My dear Gerald,’ I answered, ‘Lady Alroy
was simply a woman with a mania for mystery. She took these
rooms for the pleasure of going there with her veil down, and
imagining she was a heroine. She had a passion for secrecy,
but she herself was merely a Sphinx without a secret.’</p>
<p>‘Do you really think so?’</p>
<p>‘I am sure of it,’ I replied.</p>
<p>He took out the morocco case, opened it, and looked at the
photograph. ‘I wonder?’ he said at last.</p>
<h2><SPAN name="page133"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>THE MODEL MILLIONAIRE<br/> <span class="GutSmall">A NOTE OF ADMIRATION</span></h2>
<p><span class="smcap">Unless</span> one is wealthy there is no
use in being a charming fellow. Romance is the privilege of
the rich, not the profession of the unemployed. The poor
should be practical and prosaic. It is better to have a
permanent income than to be fascinating. These are the
great truths of modern life which Hughie Erskine never
realised. Poor Hughie! Intellectually, we must admit,
he was not of much importance. He never said a brilliant or
even an ill-natured thing in his life. But then he was
wonderfully good-looking, with his crisp brown hair, his
clear-cut profile, and his grey eyes. He was as popular
with men as he was with women and he had every accomplishment
except that of making money. His father had bequeathed him
his cavalry sword and a <i>History of the Peninsular War</i> in
fifteen volumes. Hughie hung the first over his
looking-glass, put the second on a shelf between <i>Ruff’s
Guide</i> and <i>Bailey’s Magazine</i>, and lived on two
hundred a year that an old aunt allowed him. He had tried
everything. He had gone on the Stock Exchange for six
months; but what was a butterfly to do among bulls and
bears? He had been a tea-merchant for a little longer, but
had soon tired of pekoe and souchong. Then he had tried
selling dry sherry. That did not answer; the sherry was a
little too dry. Ultimately he became nothing, a delightful,
ineffectual young man with a perfect profile and no
profession.</p>
<p>To make matters worse, he was in love. The girl he loved
was Laura Merton, the daughter of a retired Colonel who had lost
his temper and his digestion in India, and had never found either
of them again. Laura adored him, and he was ready to kiss
her shoe-strings. They were the handsomest couple in
London, and had not a penny-piece between them. The Colonel
was very fond of Hughie, but would not hear of any
engagement.</p>
<p>‘Come to me, my boy, when you have got ten thousand
pounds of your own, and we will see about it,’ he used to
say; and Hughie looked very glum in those days, and had to go to
Laura for consolation.</p>
<p>One morning, as he was on his way to Holland Park, where the
Mertons lived, he dropped in to see a great friend of his, Alan
Trevor. Trevor was a painter. Indeed, few people
escape that nowadays. But he was also an artist, and
artists are rather rare. Personally he was a strange rough
fellow, with a freckled face and a red ragged beard.
However, when he took up the brush he was a real master, and his
pictures were eagerly sought after. He had been very much
attracted by Hughie at first, it must be acknowledged, entirely
on account of his personal charm. ‘The only people a
painter should know,’ he used to say, ‘are people who
are <i>bête</i> and beautiful, people who are an artistic
pleasure to look at and an intellectual repose to talk to.
Men who are dandies and women who are darlings rule the world, at
least they should do so.’ However, after he got to
know Hughie better, he liked him quite as much for his bright,
buoyant spirits and his generous, reckless nature, and had given
him the permanent <i>entrée</i> to his studio.</p>
<p>When Hughie came in he found Trevor putting the finishing
touches to a wonderful life-size picture of a beggar-man.
The beggar himself was standing on a raised platform in a corner
of the studio. He was a wizened old man, with a face like
wrinkled parchment, and a most piteous expression. Over his
shoulders was flung a coarse brown cloak, all tears and tatters;
his thick boots were patched and cobbled, and with one hand he
leant on a rough stick, while with the other he held out his
battered hat for alms.</p>
<p>‘What an amazing model!’ whispered Hughie, as he
shook hands with his friend.</p>
<p>‘An amazing model?’ shouted Trevor at the top of
his voice; ‘I should think so! Such beggars as he are
not to be met with every day. A <i>trouvaille</i>, <i>mon
cher</i>; a living Velasquez! My stars! what an etching
Rembrandt would have made of him!’</p>
<p>‘Poor old chap!’ said Hughie, ‘how miserable
he looks! But I suppose, to you painters, his face is his
fortune?’</p>
<p>‘Certainly,’ replied Trevor, ‘you
don’t want a beggar to look happy, do you?’</p>
<p>‘How much does a model get for sitting?’ asked
Hughie, as he found himself a comfortable seat on a divan.</p>
<p>‘A shilling an hour.’</p>
<p>‘And how much do you get for your picture,
Alan?’</p>
<p>‘Oh, for this I get two thousand!’</p>
<p>‘Pounds?’</p>
<p>‘Guineas. Painters, poets, and physicians always
get guineas.’</p>
<p>‘Well, I think the model should have a
percentage,’ cried Hughie, laughing; ‘they work quite
as hard as you do.’</p>
<p>‘Nonsense, nonsense! Why, look at the trouble of
laying on the paint alone, and standing all day long at
one’s easel! It’s all very well, Hughie, for
you to talk, but I assure you that there are moments when Art
almost attains to the dignity of manual labour. But you
mustn’t chatter; I’m very busy. Smoke a
cigarette, and keep quiet.’</p>
<p>After some time the servant came in, and told Trevor that the
framemaker wanted to speak to him.</p>
<p>‘Don’t run away, Hughie,’ he said, as he
went out, ‘I will be back in a moment.’</p>
<p>The old beggar-man took advantage of Trevor’s absence to
rest for a moment on a wooden bench that was behind him. He
looked so forlorn and wretched that Hughie could not help pitying
him, and felt in his pockets to see what money he had. All
he could find was a sovereign and some coppers. ‘Poor
old fellow,’ he thought to himself, ‘he wants it more
than I do, but it means no hansoms for a fortnight’; and he
walked across the studio and slipped the sovereign into the
beggar’s hand.</p>
<p>The old man started, and a faint smile flitted across his
withered lips. ‘Thank you, sir,’ he said,
‘thank you.’</p>
<p>Then Trevor arrived, and Hughie took his leave, blushing a
little at what he had done. He spent the day with Laura,
got a charming scolding for his extravagance, and had to walk
home.</p>
<p>That night he strolled into the Palette Club about eleven
o’clock, and found Trevor sitting by himself in the
smoking-room drinking hock and seltzer.</p>
<p>‘Well, Alan, did you get the picture finished all
right?’ he said, as he lit his cigarette.</p>
<p>‘Finished and framed, my boy!’ answered Trevor;
‘and, by the bye, you have made a conquest. That old
model you saw is quite devoted to you. I had to tell him
all about you—who you are, where you live, what your income
is, what prospects you have—’</p>
<p>‘My dear Alan,’ cried Hughie, ‘I shall
probably find him waiting for me when I go home. But of
course you are only joking. Poor old wretch! I wish I
could do something for him. I think it is dreadful that any
one should be so miserable. I have got heaps of old clothes
at home—do you think he would care for any of them?
Why, his rags were falling to bits.’</p>
<p>‘But he looks splendid in them,’ said
Trevor. ‘I wouldn’t paint him in a frock coat
for anything. What you call rags I call romance. What
seems poverty to you is picturesqueness to me. However,
I’ll tell him of your offer.’</p>
<p>‘Alan,’ said Hughie seriously, ‘you painters
are a heartless lot.’</p>
<p>‘An artist’s heart is his head,’ replied
Trevor; ‘and besides, our business is to realise the world
as we see it, not to reform it as we know it. <i>À
chacun son métier</i>. And now tell me how Laura
is. The old model was quite interested in her.’</p>
<p>‘You don’t mean to say you talked to him about
her?’ said Hughie.</p>
<p>‘Certainly I did. He knows all about the
relentless colonel, the lovely Laura, and the
£10,000.’</p>
<p>‘You told that old beggar all my private affairs?’
cried Hughie, looking very red and angry.</p>
<p>‘My dear boy,’ said Trevor, smiling, ‘that
old beggar, as you call him, is one of the richest men in
Europe. He could buy all London to-morrow without
overdrawing his account. He has a house in every capital,
dines off gold plate, and can prevent Russia going to war when he
chooses.’</p>
<p>‘What on earth do you mean?’ exclaimed Hughie.</p>
<p>‘What I say,’ said Trevor. ‘The old
man you saw to-day in the studio was Baron Hausberg. He is
a great friend of mine, buys all my pictures and that sort of
thing, and gave me a commission a month ago to paint him as a
beggar. <i>Que voulez-vous</i>? <i>La fantaisie
d’un millionnaire</i>! And I must say he made a
magnificent figure in his rags, or perhaps I should say in my
rags; they are an old suit I got in Spain.’</p>
<p>‘Baron Hausberg!’ cried Hughie. ‘Good
heavens! I gave him a sovereign!’ and he sank into an
armchair the picture of dismay.</p>
<p>‘Gave him a sovereign!’ shouted Trevor, and he
burst into a roar of laughter. ‘My dear boy,
you’ll never see it again. <i>Son affaire c’est
l’argent des autres</i>.’</p>
<p>‘I think you might have told me, Alan,’ said
Hughie sulkily, ‘and not have let me make such a fool of
myself.’</p>
<p>‘Well, to begin with, Hughie,’ said Trevor,
‘it never entered my mind that you went about distributing
alms in that reckless way. I can understand your kissing a
pretty model, but your giving a sovereign to an ugly one—by
Jove, no! Besides, the fact is that I really was not at
home to-day to any one; and when you came in I didn’t know
whether Hausberg would like his name mentioned. You know he
wasn’t in full dress.’</p>
<p>‘What a duffer he must think me!’ said Hughie.</p>
<p>‘Not at all. He was in the highest spirits after
you left; kept chuckling to himself and rubbing his old wrinkled
hands together. I couldn’t make out why he was so
interested to know all about you; but I see it all now.
He’ll invest your sovereign for you, Hughie, pay you the
interest every six months, and have a capital story to tell after
dinner.’</p>
<p>‘I am an unlucky devil,’ growled Hughie.
‘The best thing I can do is to go to bed; and, my dear
Alan, you mustn’t tell any one. I shouldn’t
dare show my face in the Row.’</p>
<p>‘Nonsense! It reflects the highest credit on your
philanthropic spirit, Hughie. And don’t run
away. Have another cigarette, and you can talk about Laura
as much as you like.’</p>
<p>However, Hughie wouldn’t stop, but walked home, feeling
very unhappy, and leaving Alan Trevor in fits of laughter.</p>
<p>The next morning, as he was at breakfast, the servant brought
him up a card on which was written, ‘Monsieur Gustave
Naudin, <i>de la part de</i> M. le Baron Hausberg.’
‘I suppose he has come for an apology,’ said Hughie
to himself; and he told the servant to show the visitor up.</p>
<p>An old gentleman with gold spectacles and grey hair came into
the room, and said, in a slight French accent, ‘Have I the
honour of addressing Monsieur Erskine?’</p>
<p>Hughie bowed.</p>
<p>‘I have come from Baron Hausberg,’ he
continued. ‘The Baron—’</p>
<p>‘I beg, sir, that you will offer him my sincerest
apologies,’ stammered Hughie.</p>
<p>‘The Baron,’ said the old gentleman with a smile,
‘has commissioned me to bring you this letter’; and
he extended a sealed envelope.</p>
<p>On the outside was written, ‘A wedding present to Hugh
Erskine and Laura Merton, from an old beggar,’ and inside
was a cheque for £10,000.</p>
<p>When they were married Alan Trevor was the best man, and the
Baron made a speech at the wedding breakfast.</p>
<p>‘Millionaire models,’ remarked Alan, ‘are
rare enough; but, by Jove, model millionaires are rarer
still!’</p>
<h2><SPAN name="page145"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>THE PORTRAIT OF MR. W. H.</h2>
<h3>CHAPTER I</h3>
<p>I <span class="smcap">had</span> been dining with Erskine in
his pretty little house in Birdcage Walk, and we were sitting in
the library over our coffee and cigarettes, when the question of
literary forgeries happened to turn up in conversation. I
cannot at present remember how it was that we struck upon this
somewhat curious topic, as it was at that time, but I know that
we had a long discussion about Macpherson, Ireland, and
Chatterton, and that with regard to the last I insisted that his
so-called forgeries were merely the result of an artistic desire
for perfect representation; that we had no right to quarrel with
an artist for the conditions under which he chooses to present
his work; and that all Art being to a certain degree a mode of
acting, an attempt to realise one’s own personality on some
imaginative plane out of reach of the trammelling accidents and
limitations of real life, to censure an artist for a forgery was
to confuse an ethical with an æsthetical problem.</p>
<p>Erskine, who was a good deal older than I was, and had been
listening to me with the amused deference of a man of forty,
suddenly put his hand upon my shoulder and said to me,
‘What would you say about a young man who had a strange
theory about a certain work of art, believed in his theory, and
committed a forgery in order to prove it?’</p>
<p>‘Ah! that is quite a different matter,’ I
answered.</p>
<p>Erskine remained silent for a few moments, looking at the thin
grey threads of smoke that were rising from his cigarette.
‘Yes,’ he said, after a pause, ‘quite
different.’</p>
<p>There was something in the tone of his voice, a slight touch
of bitterness perhaps, that excited my curiosity.
‘Did you ever know anybody who did that?’ I
cried.</p>
<p>‘Yes,’ he answered, throwing his cigarette into
the fire,—‘a great friend of mine, Cyril
Graham. He was very fascinating, and very foolish, and very
heartless. However, he left me the only legacy I ever
received in my life.’</p>
<p>‘What was that?’ I exclaimed. Erskine rose
from his seat, and going over to a tall inlaid cabinet that stood
between the two windows, unlocked it, and came back to where I
was sitting, holding in his hand a small panel picture set in an
old and somewhat tarnished Elizabethan frame.</p>
<p>It was a full-length portrait of a young man in late
sixteenth-century costume, standing by a table, with his right
hand resting on an open book. He seemed about seventeen
years of age, and was of quite extraordinary personal beauty,
though evidently somewhat effeminate. Indeed, had it not
been for the dress and the closely cropped hair, one would have
said that the face with its dreamy wistful eyes, and its delicate
scarlet lips, was the face of a girl. In manner, and
especially in the treatment of the hands, the picture reminded
one of François Clouet’s later work. The black
velvet doublet with its fantastically gilded points, and the
peacock-blue background against which it showed up so pleasantly,
and from which it gained such luminous value of colour, were
quite in Clouet’s style; and the two masks of Tragedy and
Comedy that hung somewhat formally from the marble pedestal had
that hard severity of touch—so different from the facile
grace of the Italians—which even at the Court of France the
great Flemish master never completely lost, and which in itself
has always been a characteristic of the northern temper.</p>
<p>‘It is a charming thing,’ I cried, ‘but who
is this wonderful young man, whose beauty Art has so happily
preserved for us?’</p>
<p>‘This is the portrait of Mr. W. H.,’ said Erskine,
with a sad smile. It might have been a chance effect of
light, but it seemed to me that his eyes were quite bright with
tears.</p>
<p>‘Mr. W. H.!’ I exclaimed; ‘who was Mr. W.
H.?’</p>
<p>‘Don’t you remember?’ he answered;
‘look at the book on which his hand is resting.’</p>
<p>‘I see there is some writing there, but I cannot make it
out,’ I replied.</p>
<p>‘Take this magnifying-glass and try,’ said
Erskine, with the same sad smile still playing about his
mouth.</p>
<p>I took the glass, and moving the lamp a little nearer, I began
to spell out the crabbed sixteenth-century handwriting.
‘To the onlie begetter of these insuing sonnets.’ . .
. ‘Good heavens!’ I cried, ‘is this
Shakespeare’s Mr. W. H.?’</p>
<p>‘Cyril Graham used to say so,’ muttered
Erskine.</p>
<p>‘But it is not a bit like Lord Pembroke,’ I
answered. ‘I know the Penshurst portraits very
well. I was staying near there a few weeks ago.’</p>
<p>‘Do you really believe then that the sonnets are
addressed to Lord Pembroke?’ he asked.</p>
<p>‘I am sure of it,’ I answered.
‘Pembroke, Shakespeare, and Mrs. Mary Fitton are the three
personages of the Sonnets; there is no doubt at all about
it.’</p>
<p>‘Well, I agree with you,’ said Erskine, ‘but
I did not always think so. I used to believe—well, I
suppose I used to believe in Cyril Graham and his
theory.’</p>
<p>‘And what was that?’ I asked, looking at the
wonderful portrait, which had already begun to have a strange
fascination for me.</p>
<p>‘It is a long story,’ said Erskine, taking the
picture away from me—rather abruptly I thought at the
time—‘a very long story; but if you care to hear it,
I will tell it to you.’</p>
<p>‘I love theories about the Sonnets,’ I cried;
‘but I don’t think I am likely to be converted to any
new idea. The matter has ceased to be a mystery to any
one. Indeed, I wonder that it ever was a
mystery.’</p>
<p>‘As I don’t believe in the theory, I am not likely
to convert you to it,’ said Erskine, laughing; ‘but
it may interest you.’</p>
<p>‘Tell it to me, of course,’ I answered.
‘If it is half as delightful as the picture, I shall be
more than satisfied.’</p>
<p>‘Well,’ said Erskine, lighting a cigarette,
‘I must begin by telling you about Cyril Graham
himself. He and I were at the same house at Eton. I
was a year or two older than he was, but we were immense friends,
and did all our work and all our play together. There was,
of course, a good deal more play than work, but I cannot say that
I am sorry for that. It is always an advantage not to have
received a sound commercial education, and what I learned in the
playing fields at Eton has been quite as useful to me as anything
I was taught at Cambridge. I should tell you that
Cyril’s father and mother were both dead. They had
been drowned in a horrible yachting accident off the Isle of
Wight. His father had been in the diplomatic service, and
had married a daughter, the only daughter, in fact, of old Lord
Crediton, who became Cyril’s guardian after the death of
his parents. I don’t think that Lord Crediton cared
very much for Cyril. He had never really forgiven his
daughter for marrying a man who had not a title. He was an
extraordinary old aristocrat, who swore like a costermonger, and
had the manners of a farmer. I remember seeing him once on
Speech-day. He growled at me, gave me a sovereign, and told
me not to grow up “a damned Radical” like my
father. Cyril had very little affection for him, and was
only too glad to spend most of his holidays with us in
Scotland. They never really got on together at all.
Cyril thought him a bear, and he thought Cyril effeminate.
He was effeminate, I suppose, in some things, though he was a
very good rider and a capital fencer. In fact he got the
foils before he left Eton. But he was very languid in his
manner, and not a little vain of his good looks, and had a strong
objection to football. The two things that really gave him
pleasure were poetry and acting. At Eton he was always
dressing up and reciting Shakespeare, and when we went up to
Trinity he became a member of the A.D.C. his first term. I
remember I was always very jealous of his acting. I was
absurdly devoted to him; I suppose because we were so different
in some things. I was a rather awkward, weakly lad, with
huge feet, and horribly freckled. Freckles run in Scotch
families just as gout does in English families. Cyril used
to say that of the two he preferred the gout; but he always set
an absurdly high value on personal appearance, and once read a
paper before our debating society to prove that it was better to
be good-looking than to be good. He certainly was
wonderfully handsome. People who did not like him,
Philistines and college tutors, and young men reading for the
Church, used to say that he was merely pretty; but there was a
great deal more in his face than mere prettiness. I think
he was the most splendid creature I ever saw, and nothing could
exceed the grace of his movements, the charm of his manner.
He fascinated everybody who was worth fascinating, and a great
many people who were not. He was often wilful and petulant,
and I used to think him dreadfully insincere. It was due, I
think, chiefly to his inordinate desire to please. Poor
Cyril! I told him once that he was contented with very
cheap triumphs, but he only laughed. He was horribly
spoiled. All charming people, I fancy, are spoiled.
It is the secret of their attraction.</p>
<p>‘However, I must tell you about Cyril’s
acting. You know that no actresses are allowed to play at
the A.D.C. At least they were not in my time. I
don’t know how it is now. Well, of course, Cyril was
always cast for the girls’ parts, and when <i>As You Like
It</i> was produced he played Rosalind. It was a marvellous
performance. In fact, Cyril Graham was the only perfect
Rosalind I have ever seen. It would be impossible to
describe to you the beauty, the delicacy, the refinement of the
whole thing. It made an immense sensation, and the horrid
little theatre, as it was then, was crowded every night.
Even when I read the play now I can’t help thinking of
Cyril. It might have been written for him. The next
term he took his degree, and came to London to read for the
diplomatic. But he never did any work. He spent his
days in reading Shakespeare’s Sonnets, and his evenings at
the theatre. He was, of course, wild to go on the
stage. It was all that I and Lord Crediton could do to
prevent him. Perhaps if he had gone on the stage he would
be alive now. It is always a silly thing to give advice,
but to give good advice is absolutely fatal. I hope you
will never fall into that error. If you do, you will be
sorry for it.</p>
<p>‘Well, to come to the real point of the story, one day I
got a letter from Cyril asking me to come round to his rooms that
evening. He had charming chambers in Piccadilly overlooking
the Green Park, and as I used to go to see him every day, I was
rather surprised at his taking the trouble to write. Of
course I went, and when I arrived I found him in a state of great
excitement. He told me that he had at last discovered the
true secret of Shakespeare’s Sonnets; that all the scholars
and critics had been entirely on the wrong tack; and that he was
the first who, working purely by internal evidence, had found out
who Mr. W. H. really was. He was perfectly wild with
delight, and for a long time would not tell me his theory.
Finally, he produced a bundle of notes, took his copy of the
Sonnets off the mantelpiece, and sat down and gave me a long
lecture on the whole subject.</p>
<p>‘He began by pointing out that the young man to whom
Shakespeare addressed these strangely passionate poems must have
been somebody who was a really vital factor in the development of
his dramatic art, and that this could not be said either of Lord
Pembroke or Lord Southampton. Indeed, whoever he was, he
could not have been anybody of high birth, as was shown very
clearly by the 25th Sonnet, in which Shakespeare contrasting
himself with those who are “great princes’
favourites,” says quite frankly—</p>
<blockquote><p>Let those who are in favour with their stars<br/>
Of public honour and proud titles boast,<br/>
Whilst I, whom fortune of such triumph bars,<br/>
Unlook’d for joy in that I honour most.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And ends the sonnet by congratulating himself on the mean
state of him he so adored.</p>
<blockquote><p>Then happy I, that love and am beloved<br/>
Where I may not remove nor be removed.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This sonnet Cyril declared would be quite unintelligible if we
fancied that it was addressed to either the Earl of Pembroke or
the Earl of Southampton, both of whom were men of the highest
position in England and fully entitled to be called “great
princes”; and he in corroboration of his view read me
Sonnets <span class="GutSmall">CXXIV.</span> and <span class="GutSmall">CXXV.</span>, in which Shakespeare tells us that
his love is not “the child of state,” that it
“suffers not in smiling pomp,” but is “builded
far from accident.” I listened with a good deal of
interest, for I don’t think the point had ever been made
before; but what followed was still more curious, and seemed to
me at the time to dispose entirely of Pembroke’s
claim. We know from Meres that the Sonnets had been written
before 1598, and Sonnet <span class="GutSmall">CIV.</span>
informs us that Shakespeare’s friendship for Mr. W. H. had
been already in existence for three years. Now Lord
Pembroke, who was born in 1580, did not come to London till he
was eighteen years of age, that is to say till 1598, and
Shakespeare’s acquaintance with Mr. W. H. must have begun
in 1594, or at the latest in 1595. Shakespeare,
accordingly, could not have known Lord Pembroke till after the
Sonnets had been written.</p>
<p>‘Cyril pointed out also that Pembroke’s father did
not die till 1601; whereas it was evident from the line,</p>
<blockquote><p>You had a father; let your son say so,</p>
</blockquote>
<p>that the father of Mr. W. H. was dead in 1598. Besides,
it was absurd to imagine that any publisher of the time, and the
preface is from the publisher’s hand, would have ventured
to address William Herbert, Earl of Pembroke, as Mr. W. H.; the
case of Lord Buckhurst being spoken of as Mr. Sackville being not
really a parallel instance, as Lord Buckhurst was not a peer, but
merely the younger son of a peer, with a courtesy title, and the
passage in <i>England’s Parnassus</i>, where he is so
spoken of, is not a formal and stately dedication, but simply a
casual allusion. So far for Lord Pembroke, whose supposed
claims Cyril easily demolished while I sat by in wonder.
With Lord Southampton Cyril had even less difficulty.
Southampton became at a very early age the lover of Elizabeth
Vernon, so he needed no entreaties to marry; he was not
beautiful; he did not resemble his mother, as Mr. W. H.
did—</p>
<blockquote><p>Thou art thy mother’s glass, and she in
thee<br/>
Calls back the lovely April of her prime;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>and, above all, his Christian name was Henry, whereas the
punning sonnets (<span class="GutSmall">CXXXV.</span> and <span class="GutSmall">CXLIII.</span>) show that the Christian name of
Shakespeare’s friend was the same as his
own—<i>Will</i>.</p>
<p>‘As for the other suggestions of unfortunate
commentators, that Mr. W. H. is a misprint for Mr. W. S., meaning
Mr. William Shakespeare; that “Mr. W. H. all” should
be read “Mr. W. Hall”; that Mr. W. H. is Mr. William
Hathaway; and that a full stop should be placed after
“wisheth,” making Mr. W. H. the writer and not the
subject of the dedication,—Cyril got rid of them in a very
short time; and it is not worth while to mention his reasons,
though I remember he sent me off into a fit of laughter by
reading to me, I am glad to say not in the original, some
extracts from a German commentator called Barnstorff, who
insisted that Mr. W. H. was no less a person than “Mr.
William Himself.” Nor would he allow for a moment
that the Sonnets are mere satires on the work of Drayton and John
Davies of Hereford. To him, as indeed to me, they were
poems of serious and tragic import, wrung out of the bitterness
of Shakespeare’s heart, and made sweet by the honey of his
lips. Still less would he admit that they were merely a
philosophical allegory, and that in them Shakespeare is
addressing his Ideal Self, or Ideal Manhood, or the Spirit of
Beauty, or the Reason, or the Divine Logos, or the Catholic
Church. He felt, as indeed I think we all must feel, that
the Sonnets are addressed to an individual,—to a particular
young man whose personality for some reason seems to have filled
the soul of Shakespeare with terrible joy and no less terrible
despair.</p>
<p>‘Having in this manner cleared the way as it were, Cyril
asked me to dismiss from my mind any preconceived ideas I might
have formed on the subject, and to give a fair and unbiassed
hearing to his own theory. The problem he pointed out was
this: Who was that young man of Shakespeare’s day who,
without being of noble birth or even of noble nature, was
addressed by him in terms of such passionate adoration that we
can but wonder at the strange worship, and are almost afraid to
turn the key that unlocks the mystery of the poet’s
heart? Who was he whose physical beauty was such that it
became the very corner-stone of Shakespeare’s art; the very
source of Shakespeare’s inspiration; the very incarnation
of Shakespeare’s dreams? To look upon him as simply
the object of certain love-poems is to miss the whole meaning of
the poems: for the art of which Shakespeare talks in the Sonnets
is not the art of the Sonnets themselves, which indeed were to
him but slight and secret things—it is the art of the
dramatist to which he is always alluding; and he to whom
Shakespeare said—</p>
<blockquote><p> Thou art all
my art, and dost advance<br/>
As high as learning my rude ignorance,</p>
</blockquote>
<p>he to whom he promised immortality,</p>
<blockquote><p>Where breath most breathes, even in the mouths of
men,—</p>
</blockquote>
<p>was surely none other than the boy-actor for whom he created
Viola and Imogen, Juliet and Rosalind, Portia and Desdemona, and
Cleopatra herself. This was Cyril Graham’s theory,
evolved as you see purely from the Sonnets themselves, and
depending for its acceptance not so much on demonstrable proof or
formal evidence, but on a kind of spiritual and artistic sense,
by which alone he claimed could the true meaning of the poems be
discerned. I remember his reading to me that fine
sonnet—</p>
<blockquote><p>How can my Muse want subject to invent,<br/>
While thou dost breathe, that pour’st into my verse<br/>
Thine own sweet argument, too excellent<br/>
For every vulgar paper to rehearse?<br/>
O, give thyself the thanks, if aught in me<br/>
Worthy perusal stand against thy sight;<br/>
For who’s so dumb that cannot write to thee,<br/>
When thou thyself dost give invention light?<br/>
Be thou the tenth Muse, ten times more in worth<br/>
Than those old nine which rhymers invocate;<br/>
And he that calls on thee, let him bring forth<br/>
Eternal numbers to outlive long date—</p>
</blockquote>
<p>and pointing out how completely it corroborated his theory;
and indeed he went through all the Sonnets carefully, and showed,
or fancied that he showed, that, according to his new explanation
of their meaning, things that had seemed obscure, or evil, or
exaggerated, became clear and rational, and of high artistic
import, illustrating Shakespeare’s conception of the true
relations between the art of the actor and the art of the
dramatist.</p>
<p>‘It is of course evident that there must have been in
Shakespeare’s company some wonderful boy-actor of great
beauty, to whom he intrusted the presentation of his noble
heroines; for Shakespeare was a practical theatrical manager as
well as an imaginative poet, and Cyril Graham had actually
discovered the boy-actor’s name. He was Will, or, as
he preferred to call him, Willie Hughes. The Christian name
he found of course in the punning sonnets, <span class="GutSmall">CXXXV.</span> and <span class="GutSmall">CXLIII.</span>; the surname was, according to
him, hidden in the seventh line of the 20th Sonnet, where Mr. W.
H. is described as—</p>
<blockquote><p>A man in hew, all <i>Hews</i> in his
controwling.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>‘In the original edition of the Sonnets
“Hews” is printed with a capital letter and in
italics, and this, he claimed, showed clearly that a play on
words was intended, his view receiving a good deal of
corroboration from those sonnets in which curious puns are made
on the words “use” and “usury.” Of
course I was converted at once, and Willie Hughes became to me as
real a person as Shakespeare. The only objection I made to
the theory was that the name of Willie Hughes does not occur in
the list of the actors of Shakespeare’s company as it is
printed in the first folio. Cyril, however, pointed out
that the absence of Willie Hughes’s name from this list
really corroborated the theory, as it was evident from Sonnet
<span class="GutSmall">LXXXVI.</span> that Willie Hughes had
abandoned Shakespeare’s company to play at a rival theatre,
probably in some of Chapman’s plays. It is in
reference to this that in the great sonnet on Chapman,
Shakespeare said to Willie Hughes—</p>
<blockquote><p>But when your countenance fill’d up his
line,<br/>
Then lack’d I matter; that enfeebled mine—</p>
</blockquote>
<p>the expression “when your countenance filled up his
line” referring obviously to the beauty of the young actor
giving life and reality and added charm to Chapman’s verse,
the same idea being also put forward in the 79th
Sonnet—</p>
<blockquote><p>Whilst I alone did call upon thy aid,<br/>
My verse alone had all thy gentle grace;<br/>
But now my gracious numbers are decay’d,<br/>
And my sick Muse doth give another place;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>and in the immediately preceding sonnet, where Shakespeare
says—</p>
<blockquote><p> Every alien
pen has got my <i>use</i><br/>
And under thee their poesy disperse,</p>
</blockquote>
<p>the play upon words (use=Hughes) being of course obvious, and
the phrase “under thee their poesy disperse,” meaning
“by your assistance as an actor bring their plays before
the people.”</p>
<p>‘It was a wonderful evening, and we sat up almost till
dawn reading and re-reading the Sonnets. After some time,
however, I began to see that before the theory could be placed
before the world in a really perfected form, it was necessary to
get some independent evidence about the existence of this young
actor, Willie Hughes. If this could be once established,
there could be no possible doubt about his identity with Mr. W.
H.; but otherwise the theory would fall to the ground. I
put this forward very strongly to Cyril, who was a good deal
annoyed at what he called my Philistine tone of mind, and indeed
was rather bitter upon the subject. However, I made him
promise that in his own interest he would not publish his
discovery till he had put the whole matter beyond the reach of
doubt; and for weeks and weeks we searched the registers of City
churches, the Alleyn MSS. at Dulwich, the Record Office, the
papers of the Lord Chamberlain—everything, in fact, that we
thought might contain some allusion to Willie Hughes. We
discovered nothing, of course, and every day the existence of
Willie Hughes seemed to me to become more problematical.
Cyril was in a dreadful state, and used to go over the whole
question day after day, entreating me to believe; but I saw the
one flaw in the theory, and I refused to be convinced till the
actual existence of Willie Hughes, a boy-actor of Elizabethan
days, had been placed beyond the reach of doubt or cavil.</p>
<p>‘One day Cyril left town to stay with his grandfather, I
thought at the time, but I afterwards heard from Lord Crediton
that this was not the case; and about a fortnight afterwards I
received a telegram from him, handed in at Warwick, asking me to
be sure to come and dine with him that evening at eight
o’clock. When I arrived, he said to me, “The
only apostle who did not deserve proof was St. Thomas, and St.
Thomas was the only apostle who got it.” I asked him
what he meant. He answered that he had not merely been able
to establish the existence in the sixteenth century of a
boy-actor of the name of Willie Hughes, but to prove by the most
conclusive evidence that he was the Mr. W. H. of the
Sonnets. He would not tell me anything more at the time;
but after dinner he solemnly produced the picture I showed you,
and told me that he had discovered it by the merest chance nailed
to the side of an old chest that he had bought at a farmhouse in
Warwickshire. The chest itself, which was a very fine
example of Elizabethan work, he had, of course, brought with him,
and in the centre of the front panel the initials W. H. were
undoubtedly carved. It was this monogram that had attracted
his attention, and he told me that it was not till he had had the
chest in his possession for several days that he had thought of
making any careful examination of the inside. One morning,
however, he saw that one of the sides of the chest was much
thicker than the other, and looking more closely, he discovered
that a framed panel picture was clamped against it. On
taking it out, he found it was the picture that is now lying on
the sofa. It was very dirty, and covered with mould; but he
managed to clean it, and, to his great joy, saw that he had
fallen by mere chance on the one thing for which he had been
looking. Here was an authentic portrait of Mr. W. H., with
his hand resting on the dedicatory page of the Sonnets, and on
the frame itself could be faintly seen the name of the young man
written in black uncial letters on a faded gold ground,
“Master Will. Hews.”</p>
<p>‘Well, what was I to say? It never occurred to me
for a moment that Cyril Graham was playing a trick on me, or that
he was trying to prove his theory by means of a
forgery.’</p>
<p>‘But is it a forgery?’ I asked.</p>
<p>‘Of course it is,’ said Erskine. ‘It
is a very good forgery; but it is a forgery none the less.
I thought at the time that Cyril was rather calm about the whole
matter; but I remember he more than once told me that he himself
required no proof of the kind, and that he thought the theory
complete without it. I laughed at him, and told him that
without it the theory would fall to the ground, and I warmly
congratulated him on the marvellous discovery. We then
arranged that the picture should be etched or facsimiled, and
placed as the frontispiece to Cyril’s edition of the
Sonnets; and for three months we did nothing but go over each
poem line by line, till we had settled every difficulty of text
or meaning. One unlucky day I was in a print-shop in
Holborn, when I saw upon the counter some extremely beautiful
drawings in silver-point. I was so attracted by them that I
bought them; and the proprietor of the place, a man called
Rawlings, told me that they were done by a young painter of the
name of Edward Merton, who was very clever, but as poor as a
church mouse. I went to see Merton some days afterwards,
having got his address from the printseller, and found a pale,
interesting young man, with a rather common-looking
wife—his model, as I subsequently learned. I told him
how much I admired his drawings, at which he seemed very pleased,
and I asked him if he would show me some of his other work.
As we were looking over a portfolio, full of really very lovely
things,—for Merton had a most delicate and delightful
touch,—I suddenly caught sight of a drawing of the picture
of Mr. W. H. There was no doubt whatever about it. It
was almost a <i>facsimile</i>—the only difference being
that the two masks of Tragedy and Comedy were not suspended from
the marble table as they are in the picture, but were lying on
the floor at the young man’s feet. “Where on
earth did you get that?” I said. He grew rather
confused, and said—“Oh, that is nothing. I did
not know it was in this portfolio. It is not a thing of any
value.” “It is what you did for Mr. Cyril
Graham,” exclaimed his wife; “and if this gentleman
wishes to buy it, let him have it.” “For Mr.
Cyril Graham?” I repeated. “Did you paint the
picture of Mr. W. H.?” “I don’t
understand what you mean,” he answered, growing very
red. Well, the whole thing was quite dreadful. The
wife let it all out. I gave her five pounds when I was
going away. I can’t bear to think of it now; but of
course I was furious. I went off at once to Cyril’s
chambers, waited there for three hours before he came in, with
that horrid lie staring me in the face, and told him I had
discovered his forgery. He grew very pale and
said—“I did it purely for your sake. You would
not be convinced in any other way. It does not affect the
truth of the theory.” “The truth of the
theory!” I exclaimed; “the less we talk about that
the better. You never even believed in it yourself.
If you had, you would not have committed a forgery to prove
it.” High words passed between us; we had a fearful
quarrel. I dare say I was unjust. The next morning he
was dead.’</p>
<p>‘Dead!’ I cried,</p>
<p>‘Yes; he shot himself with a revolver. Some of the
blood splashed upon the frame of the picture, just where the name
had been painted. By the time I arrived—his servant
had sent for me at once—the police were already
there. He had left a letter for me, evidently written in
the greatest agitation and distress of mind.’</p>
<p>‘What was in it?’ I asked.</p>
<p>‘Oh, that he believed absolutely in Willie Hughes; that
the forgery of the picture had been done simply as a concession
to me, and did not in the slightest degree invalidate the truth
of the theory; and, that in order to show me how firm and
flawless his faith in the whole thing was, he was going to offer
his life as a sacrifice to the secret of the Sonnets. It
was a foolish, mad letter. I remember he ended by saying
that he intrusted to me the Willie Hughes theory, and that it was
for me to present it to the world, and to unlock the secret of
Shakespeare’s heart.’</p>
<p>‘It is a most tragic story,’ I cried; ‘but
why have you not carried out his wishes?’</p>
<p>Erskine shrugged his shoulders. ‘Because it is a
perfectly unsound theory from beginning to end,’ he
answered.</p>
<p>‘My dear Erskine,’ I said, getting up from my
seat, ‘you are entirely wrong about the whole matter.
It is the only perfect key to Shakespeare’s Sonnets that
has ever been made. It is complete in every detail. I
believe in Willie Hughes.’</p>
<p>‘Don’t say that,’ said Erskine gravely;
‘I believe there is something fatal about the idea, and
intellectually there is nothing to be said for it. I have
gone into the whole matter, and I assure you the theory is
entirely fallacious. It is plausible up to a certain
point. Then it stops. For heaven’s sake, my
dear boy, don’t take up the subject of Willie Hughes.
You will break your heart over it.’</p>
<p>‘Erskine,’ I answered, ‘it is your duty to
give this theory to the world. If you will not do it, I
will. By keeping it back you wrong the memory of Cyril
Graham, the youngest and the most splendid of all the martyrs of
literature. I entreat you to do him justice. He died
for this thing,—don’t let his death be in
vain.’</p>
<p>Erskine looked at me in amazement. ‘You are
carried away by the sentiment of the whole story,’ he
said. ‘You forget that a thing is not necessarily
true because a man dies for it. I was devoted to Cyril
Graham. His death was a horrible blow to me. I did
not recover it for years. I don’t think I have ever
recovered it. But Willie Hughes? There is nothing in
the idea of Willie Hughes. No such person ever
existed. As for bringing the whole thing before the
world—the world thinks that Cyril Graham shot himself by
accident. The only proof of his suicide was contained in
the letter to me, and of this letter the public never heard
anything. To the present day Lord Crediton thinks that the
whole thing was accidental.’</p>
<p>‘Cyril Graham sacrificed his life to a great
Idea,’ I answered; ‘and if you will not tell of his
martyrdom, tell at least of his faith.’</p>
<p>‘His faith,’ said Erskine, ‘was fixed in a
thing that was false, in a thing that was unsound, in a thing
that no Shakespearean scholar would accept for a moment.
The theory would be laughed at. Don’t make a fool of
yourself, and don’t follow a trail that leads
nowhere. You start by assuming the existence of the very
person whose existence is the thing to be proved. Besides,
everybody knows that the Sonnets were addressed to Lord
Pembroke. The matter is settled once for all.’</p>
<p>‘The matter is not settled!’ I exclaimed.
‘I will take up the theory where Cyril Graham left it, and
I will prove to the world that he was right.’</p>
<p>‘Silly boy!’ said Erskine. ‘Go home:
it is after two, and don’t think about Willie Hughes any
more. I am sorry I told you anything about it, and very
sorry indeed that I should have converted you to a thing in which
I don’t believe.’</p>
<p>‘You have given me the key to the greatest mystery of
modern literature,’ I answered; ‘and I shall not rest
till I have made you recognise, till I have made everybody
recognise, that Cyril Graham was the most subtle Shakespearean
critic of our day.’</p>
<p>As I walked home through St. James’s Park the dawn was
just breaking over London. The white swans were lying
asleep on the polished lake, and the gaunt Palace looked purple
against the pale-green sky. I thought of Cyril Graham, and
my eyes filled with tears.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER II</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">It</span> was past twelve o’clock
when I awoke, and the sun was streaming in through the curtains
of my room in long slanting beams of dusty gold. I told my
servant that I would be at home to no one; and after I had had a
cup of chocolate and a <i>petit-pain</i>, I took down from the
book-shelf my copy of Shakespeare’s Sonnets, and began to
go carefully through them. Every poem seemed to me to
corroborate Cyril Graham’s theory. I felt as if I had
my hand upon Shakespeare’s heart, and was counting each
separate throb and pulse of passion. I thought of the
wonderful boy-actor, and saw his face in every line.</p>
<p>Two sonnets, I remember, struck me particularly: they were the
53rd and the 67th. In the first of these, Shakespeare,
complimenting Willie Hughes on the versatility of his acting, on
his wide range of parts, a range extending from Rosalind to
Juliet, and from Beatrice to Ophelia, says to him—</p>
<blockquote><p>What is your substance, whereof are you made,<br/>
That millions of strange shadows on you tend?<br/>
Since every one hath, every one, one shade,<br/>
And you, but one, can every shadow lend—</p>
</blockquote>
<p>lines that would be unintelligible if they were not addressed
to an actor, for the word ‘shadow’ had in
Shakespeare’s day a technical meaning connected with the
stage. ‘The best in this kind are but shadows,’
says Theseus of the actors in the <i>Midsummer Night’s
Dream</i>, and there are many similar allusions in the literature
of the day. These sonnets evidently belonged to the series
in which Shakespeare discusses the nature of the actor’s
art, and of the strange and rare temperament that is essential to
the perfect stage-player. ‘How is it,’ says
Shakespeare to Willie Hughes, ‘that you have so many
personalities?’ and then he goes on to point out that his
beauty is such that it seems to realise every form and phase of
fancy, to embody each dream of the creative imagination—an
idea that is still further expanded in the sonnet that
immediately follows, where, beginning with the fine thought,</p>
<blockquote><p>O, how much more doth beauty beauteous seem<br/>
By that sweet ornament which <i>truth</i> doth give!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Shakespeare invites us to notice how the truth of acting, the
truth of visible presentation on the stage, adds to the wonder of
poetry, giving life to its loveliness, and actual reality to its
ideal form. And yet, in the 67th Sonnet, Shakespeare calls
upon Willie Hughes to abandon the stage with its artificiality,
its false mimic life of painted face and unreal costume, its
immoral influences and suggestions, its remoteness from the true
world of noble action and sincere utterance.</p>
<blockquote><p>Ah, wherefore with infection should he live<br/>
And with his presence grace impiety,<br/>
That sin by him advantage should achieve<br/>
And lace itself with his society?<br/>
Why should false painting imitate his cheek,<br/>
And steal dead seeming of his living hue?<br/>
Why should poor beauty indirectly seek<br/>
Roses of shadow, since his rose is true?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It may seem strange that so great a dramatist as Shakespeare,
who realised his own perfection as an artist and his humanity as
a man on the ideal plane of stage-writing and stage-playing,
should have written in these terms about the theatre; but we must
remember that in Sonnets <span class="GutSmall">CX.</span> and
<span class="GutSmall">CXI.</span> Shakespeare shows us that he
too was wearied of the world of puppets, and full of shame at
having made himself ‘a motley to the view.’ The
111th Sonnet is especially bitter:—</p>
<blockquote><p>O, for my sake do you with Fortune chide,<br/>
The guilty goddess of my harmful deeds,<br/>
That did not better for my life provide<br/>
Than public means which public manners breeds.<br/>
Thence comes it that my name receives a brand,<br/>
And almost thence my nature is subdued<br/>
To what it works in, like the dyer’s hand:<br/>
Pity me then and wish I were renew’d—</p>
</blockquote>
<p>and there are many signs elsewhere of the same feeling, signs
familiar to all real students of Shakespeare.</p>
<p>One point puzzled me immensely as I read the Sonnets, and it
was days before I struck on the true interpretation, which indeed
Cyril Graham himself seems to have missed. I could not
understand how it was that Shakespeare set so high a value on his
young friend marrying. He himself had married young, and
the result had been unhappiness, and it was not likely that he
would have asked Willie Hughes to commit the same error.
The boy-player of Rosalind had nothing to gain from marriage, or
from the passions of real life. The early sonnets, with
their strange entreaties to have children, seemed to me a jarring
note. The explanation of the mystery came on me quite
suddenly, and I found it in the curious dedication. It will
be remembered that the dedication runs as follows:—</p>
<blockquote><p style="text-align: center">TO THE ONLIE BEGETTER
OF<br/>
THESE INSUING SONNETS<br/>
MR. W. H. ALL HAPPINESSE<br/>
AND THAT ETERNITIE<br/>
PROMISED<br/>
BY<br/>
OUR EVER-LIVING POET<br/>
WISHETH<br/>
THE WELL-WISHING<br/>
ADVENTURER IN<br/>
SETTING<br/>
FORTH.</p>
<p style="text-align: right">T. T.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Some scholars have supposed that the word
‘begetter’ in this dedication means simply the
procurer of the Sonnets for Thomas Thorpe the publisher; but this
view is now generally abandoned, and the highest authorities are
quite agreed that it is to be taken in the sense of inspirer, the
metaphor being drawn from the analogy of physical life. Now
I saw that the same metaphor was used by Shakespeare himself all
through the poems, and this set me on the right track.
Finally I made my great discovery. The marriage that
Shakespeare proposes for Willie Hughes is the marriage with his
Muse, an expression which is definitely put forward in the 82nd
Sonnet, where, in the bitterness of his heart at the defection of
the boy-actor for whom he had written his greatest parts, and
whose beauty had indeed suggested them, he opens his complaint by
saying—</p>
<blockquote><p>I grant thou wert not married to my Muse.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The children he begs him to beget are no children of flesh and
blood, but more immortal children of undying fame. The
whole cycle of the early sonnets is simply Shakespeare’s
invitation to Willie Hughes to go upon the stage and become a
player. How barren and profitless a thing, he says, is this
beauty of yours if it be not used:—</p>
<blockquote><p>When forty winters shall besiege thy brow<br/>
And dig deep trenches in thy beauty’s field,<br/>
Thy youth’s proud livery, so gazed on now,<br/>
Will be a tatter’d weed, of small worth held:<br/>
Then being ask’d where all thy beauty lies,<br/>
Where all the treasure of thy lusty days,<br/>
To say, within thine own deep-sunken eyes,<br/>
Were an all-eating shame and thriftless praise.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>You must create something in art: my verse ‘is thine,
and <i>born</i> of thee’; only listen to me, and I will
‘<i>bring forth</i> eternal numbers to outlive long
date,’ and you shall people with forms of your own image
the imaginary world of the stage. These children that you
beget, he continues, will not wither away, as mortal children do,
but you shall live in them and in my plays: do but—</p>
<blockquote><p>Make thee another self, for love of me,<br/>
That beauty still may live in thine or thee.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I collected all the passages that seemed to me to corroborate
this view, and they produced a strong impression on me, and
showed me how complete Cyril Graham’s theory really
was. I also saw that it was quite easy to separate those
lines in which he speaks of the Sonnets themselves from those in
which he speaks of his great dramatic work. This was a
point that had been entirely overlooked by all critics up to
Cyril Graham’s day. And yet it was one of the most
important points in the whole series of poems. To the
Sonnets Shakespeare was more or less indifferent. He did
not wish to rest his fame on them. They were to him his
‘slight Muse,’ as he calls them, and intended, as
Meres tells us, for private circulation only among a few, a very
few, friends. Upon the other hand he was extremely
conscious of the high artistic value of his plays, and shows a
noble self-reliance upon his dramatic genius. When he says
to Willie Hughes:</p>
<blockquote><p>But thy eternal summer shall not fade,<br/>
Nor lose possession of that fair thou owest;<br/>
Nor shall Death brag thou wander’st in his shade,<br/>
When in <i>eternal lines</i> to time thou grow’st:<br/>
So long as men can breathe, or eyes can see,<br/>
So long lives this, and this gives life to thee;—</p>
</blockquote>
<p>the expression ‘eternal lines’ clearly alludes to
one of his plays that he was sending him at the time, just as the
concluding couplet points to his confidence in the probability of
his plays being always acted. In his address to the
Dramatic Muse (Sonnets <span class="GutSmall">C.</span> and <span class="GutSmall">CI.</span>), we find the same feeling.</p>
<blockquote><p>Where art thou, Muse, that thou forget’st so
long<br/>
To speak of that which gives thee all thy might?<br/>
Spend’st thou thy fury on some worthless song,<br/>
Darkening thy power to lend base subjects light?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>he cries, and he then proceeds to reproach the Mistress of
Tragedy and Comedy for her ‘neglect of Truth in Beauty
dyed,’ and says—</p>
<blockquote><p>Because he needs no praise, wilt thou be dumb?<br/>
Excuse not silence so, for ‘t lies in thee<br/>
To make him much outlive a gilded tomb<br/>
And to be praised of ages yet to be.<br/>
Then do thy office, Muse; I teach thee how<br/>
To make him seem long hence as he shows now.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It is, however, perhaps in the 55th Sonnet that Shakespeare
gives to this idea its fullest expression. To imagine that
the ‘powerful rhyme’ of the second line refers to the
sonnet itself, is to mistake Shakespeare’s meaning
entirely. It seemed to me that it was extremely likely,
from the general character of the sonnet, that a particular play
was meant, and that the play was none other but <i>Romeo and
Juliet</i>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Not marble, nor the gilded monuments<br/>
Of princes, shall outlive this powerful rhyme;<br/>
But you shall shine more bright in these contents<br/>
Than unswept stone besmear’d with sluttish time.<br/>
When wasteful wars shall statues overturn,<br/>
And broils root out the work of masonry,<br/>
Nor Mars his sword nor war’s quick fire shall burn<br/>
The living record of your memory.<br/>
‘Gainst death and all-oblivious enmity<br/>
Shall you pace forth; your praise shall still find room<br/>
Even in the eyes of all posterity<br/>
That wear this world out to the ending doom.<br/>
So, till the judgement that yourself arise,<br/>
You live in this, and dwell in lovers’ eyes.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It was also extremely suggestive to note how here as elsewhere
Shakespeare promised Willie Hughes immortality in a form that
appealed to men’s eyes—that is to say, in a
spectacular form, in a play that is to be looked at.</p>
<p>For two weeks I worked hard at the Sonnets, hardly ever going
out, and refusing all invitations. Every day I seemed to be
discovering something new, and Willie Hughes became to me a kind
of spiritual presence, an ever-dominant personality. I
could almost fancy that I saw him standing in the shadow of my
room, so well had Shakespeare drawn him, with his golden hair,
his tender flower-like grace, his dreamy deep-sunken eyes, his
delicate mobile limbs, and his white lily hands. His very
name fascinated me. Willie Hughes! Willie
Hughes! How musically it sounded! Yes; who else but
he could have been the master-mistress of Shakespeare’s
passion, <SPAN name="citation1"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote1" class="citation">[1]</SPAN> the lord of his love to whom he was
bound in vassalage, <SPAN name="citation2"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote2" class="citation">[2]</SPAN> the delicate minion of pleasure, <SPAN name="citation3"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote3" class="citation">[3]</SPAN> the rose of the whole world, <SPAN name="citation4"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote4" class="citation">[4]</SPAN> the herald of the spring <SPAN name="citation5"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote5" class="citation">[5]</SPAN> decked in the proud livery of youth, <SPAN name="citation6"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote6" class="citation">[6]</SPAN> the lovely boy whom it was sweet music
to hear, <SPAN name="citation7"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote7" class="citation">[7]</SPAN> and whose beauty was the very raiment of
Shakespeare’s heart, <SPAN name="citation8"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote8" class="citation">[8]</SPAN> as it was the keystone
of his dramatic power? How bitter now seemed the whole
tragedy of his desertion and his shame!—shame that he made
sweet and lovely <SPAN name="citation9"></SPAN><SPAN href="#footnote9" class="citation">[9]</SPAN> by the mere magic of his personality,
but that was none the less shame. Yet as Shakespeare
forgave him, should not we forgive him also? I did not care
to pry into the mystery of his sin.</p>
<p>His abandonment of Shakespeare’s theatre was a different
matter, and I investigated it at great length. Finally I
came to the conclusion that Cyril Graham had been wrong in
regarding the rival dramatist of the 80th Sonnet as
Chapman. It was obviously Marlowe who was alluded to.
At the time the Sonnets were written, such an expression as
‘the proud full sail of his great verse’ could not
have been used of Chapman’s work, however applicable it
might have been to the style of his later Jacobean plays.
No: Marlowe was clearly the rival dramatist of whom Shakespeare
spoke in such laudatory terms; and that</p>
<blockquote><p> Affable
familiar ghost<br/>
Which nightly gulls him with intelligence,</p>
</blockquote>
<p>was the Mephistopheles of his <i>Doctor Faustus</i>. No
doubt, Marlowe was fascinated by the beauty and grace of the
boy-actor, and lured him away from the Blackfriars Theatre, that
he might play the Gaveston of his <i>Edward II</i>. That
Shakespeare had the legal right to retain Willie Hughes in his
own company is evident from Sonnet <span class="GutSmall">LXXXVII.</span>, where he says:—</p>
<blockquote><p>Farewell! thou art too dear for my possessing,<br/>
And like enough thou know’st thy estimate:<br/>
The <i>charter of thy worth</i> gives thee releasing;<br/>
My <i>bonds</i> in thee are all determinate.<br/>
For how do I hold thee but by thy granting?<br/>
And for that riches where is my deserving?<br/>
The cause of this fair gift in me is wanting,<br/>
<i>And so my patent back again is swerving</i>.<br/>
Thyself thou gayest, thy own worth then not knowing,<br/>
Or me, to whom thou gavest it, else mistaking;<br/>
So thy great gift, upon misprision growing,<br/>
Comes home again, on better judgement making.<br/>
Thus have I had thee, as a dream doth flatter,<br/>
In sleep a king, but waking no such matter.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But him whom he could not hold by love, he would not hold by
force. Willie Hughes became a member of Lord
Pembroke’s company, and, perhaps in the open yard of the
Red Bull Tavern, played the part of King Edward’s delicate
minion. On Marlowe’s death, he seems to have returned
to Shakespeare, who, whatever his fellow-partners may have
thought of the matter, was not slow to forgive the wilfulness and
treachery of the young actor.</p>
<p>How well, too, had Shakespeare drawn the temperament of the
stage-player! Willie Hughes was one of those</p>
<blockquote><p>That do not do the thing they most do show,<br/>
Who, moving others, are themselves as stone.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>He could act love, but could not feel it, could mimic passion
without realising it.</p>
<blockquote><p>In many’s looks the false heart’s
history<br/>
Is writ in moods and frowns and wrinkles strange,</p>
</blockquote>
<p>but with Willie Hughes it was not so.
‘Heaven,’ says Shakespeare, in a sonnet of mad
idolatry—</p>
<blockquote><p> Heaven in thy creation did
decree<br/>
That in thy face sweet love should ever dwell;<br/>
Whate’er thy thoughts or thy heart’s workings be,<br/>
Thy looks should nothing thence but sweetness tell.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In his ‘inconstant mind’ and his ‘false
heart,’ it was easy to recognise the insincerity and
treachery that somehow seem inseparable from the artistic nature,
as in his love of praise that desire for immediate recognition
that characterises all actors. And yet, more fortunate in
this than other actors, Willie Hughes was to know something of
immortality. Inseparably connected with Shakespeare’s
plays, he was to live in them.</p>
<blockquote><p>Your name from hence immortal life shall have,<br/>
Though I, once gone, to all the world must die:<br/>
The earth can yield me but a common grave,<br/>
When you entombed in men’s eyes shall lie.<br/>
Your monument shall be my gentle verse,<br/>
Which eyes not yet created shall o’er-read,<br/>
And tongues to be your being shall rehearse,<br/>
When all the breathers of this world are dead.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>There were endless allusions, also, to Willie Hughes’s
power over his audience—the ‘gazers,’ as
Shakespeare calls them; but perhaps the most perfect description
of his wonderful mastery over dramatic art was in <i>A
Lover’s Complaint</i>, where Shakespeare says of
him:—</p>
<blockquote><p>In him a plenitude of subtle matter,<br/>
Applied to cautels, all strange forms receives,<br/>
Of burning blushes, or of weeping water,<br/>
Or swooning paleness; and he takes and leaves,<br/>
In either’s aptness, as it best deceives,<br/>
To blush at speeches rank, to weep at woes,<br/>
Or to turn white and swoon at tragic shows.</p>
<p style="text-align: center">* * * * *</p>
<p>So on the tip of his subduing tongue,<br/>
All kind of arguments and questions deep,<br/>
All replication prompt and reason strong,<br/>
For his advantage still did wake and sleep,<br/>
To make the weeper laugh, the laugher weep.<br/>
He had the dialect and the different skill,<br/>
Catching all passions in his craft of will.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Once I thought that I had really found Willie Hughes in
Elizabethan literature. In a wonderfully graphic account of
the last days of the great Earl of Essex, his chaplain, Thomas
Knell, tells us that the night before the Earl died, ‘he
called William Hewes, which was his musician, to play upon the
virginals and to sing. “Play,” said he,
“my song, Will Hewes, and I will sing it to
myself.” So he did it most joyfully, not as the
howling swan, which, still looking down, waileth her end, but as
a sweet lark, lifting up his hands and casting up his eyes to his
God, with this mounted the crystal skies, and reached with his
unwearied tongue the top of highest heavens.’ Surely
the boy who played on the virginals to the dying father of
Sidney’s Stella was none other but the Will Hews to whom
Shakespeare dedicated the Sonnets, and who he tells us was
himself sweet ‘music to hear.’ Yet Lord Essex
died in 1576, when Shakespeare himself was but twelve years of
age. It was impossible that his musician could have been
the Mr. W. H. of the Sonnets. Perhaps Shakespeare’s
young friend was the son of the player upon the virginals?
It was at least something to have discovered that Will Hews was
an Elizabethan name. Indeed the name Hews seemed to have
been closely connected with music and the stage. The first
English actress was the lovely Margaret Hews, whom Prince Rupert
so madly loved. What more probable than that between her
and Lord Essex’s musician had come the boy-actor of
Shakespeare’s plays? But the proofs, the
links—where were they? Alas! I could not find
them. It seemed to me that I was always on the brink of
absolute verification, but that I could never really attain to
it.</p>
<p>From Willie Hughes’s life I soon passed to thoughts of
his death. I used to wonder what had been his end.</p>
<p>Perhaps he had been one of those English actors who in 1604
went across sea to Germany and played before the great Duke Henry
Julius of Brunswick, himself a dramatist of no mean order, and at
the Court of that strange Elector of Brandenburg, who was so
enamoured of beauty that he was said to have bought for his
weight in amber the young son of a travelling Greek merchant, and
to have given pageants in honour of his slave all through that
dreadful famine year of 1606–7, when the people died of
hunger in the very streets of the town, and for the space of
seven months there was no rain. We know at any rate that
<i>Romeo and Juliet</i> was brought out at Dresden in 1613, along
with <i>Hamlet</i> and <i>King Lear</i>, and it was surely to
none other than Willie Hughes that in 1615 the death-mask of
Shakespeare was brought by the hand of one of the suite of the
English ambassador, pale token of the passing away of the great
poet who had so dearly loved him. Indeed there would have
been something peculiarly fitting in the idea that the boy-actor,
whose beauty had been so vital an element in the realism and
romance of Shakespeare’s art, should have been the first to
have brought to Germany the seed of the new culture, and was in
his way the precursor of that <i>Aufklärung</i> or
Illumination of the eighteenth century, that splendid movement
which, though begun by Lessing and Herder, and brought to its
full and perfect issue by Goethe, was in no small part helped on
by another actor—Friedrich Schroeder—who awoke the
popular consciousness, and by means of the feigned passions and
mimetic methods of the stage showed the intimate, the vital,
connection between life and literature. If this was
so—and there was certainly no evidence against it—it
was not improbable that Willie Hughes was one of those English
comedians (<i>mimæ quidam ex Britannia</i>, as the old
chronicle calls them), who were slain at Nuremberg in a sudden
uprising of the people, and were secretly buried in a little
vineyard outside the city by some young men ‘who had found
pleasure in their performances, and of whom some had sought to be
instructed in the mysteries of the new art.’
Certainly no more fitting place could there be for him to whom
Shakespeare said, ‘thou art all my art,’ than this
little vineyard outside the city walls. For was it not from
the sorrows of Dionysos that Tragedy sprang? Was not the
light laughter of Comedy, with its careless merriment and quick
replies, first heard on the lips of the Sicilian
vine-dressers? Nay, did not the purple and red stain of the
wine-froth on face and limbs give the first suggestion of the
charm and fascination of disguise—the desire for
self-concealment, the sense of the value of objectivity thus
showing itself in the rude beginnings of the art? At any
rate, wherever he lay—whether in the little vineyard at the
gate of the Gothic town, or in some dim London churchyard amidst
the roar and bustle of our great city—no gorgeous monument
marked his resting-place. His true tomb, as Shakespeare
saw, was the poet’s verse, his true monument the permanence
of the drama. So had it been with others whose beauty had
given a new creative impulse to their age. The ivory body
of the Bithynian slave rots in the green ooze of the Nile, and on
the yellow hills of the Cerameicus is strewn the dust of the
young Athenian; but Antinous lives in sculpture, and Charmides in
philosophy.</p>
<h3>CHAPTER III</h3>
<p><span class="smcap">After</span> three weeks had elapsed, I
determined to make a strong appeal to Erskine to do justice to
the memory of Cyril Graham, and to give to the world his
marvellous interpretation of the Sonnets—the only
interpretation that thoroughly explained the problem. I
have not any copy of my letter, I regret to say, nor have I been
able to lay my hand upon the original; but I remember that I went
over the whole ground, and covered sheets of paper with
passionate reiteration of the arguments and proofs that my study
had suggested to me. It seemed to me that I was not merely
restoring Cyril Graham to his proper place in literary history,
but rescuing the honour of Shakespeare himself from the tedious
memory of a commonplace intrigue. I put into the letter all
my enthusiasm. I put into the letter all my faith.</p>
<p>No sooner, in fact, had I sent it off than a curious reaction
came over me. It seemed to me that I had given away my
capacity for belief in the Willie Hughes theory of the Sonnets,
that something had gone out of me, as it were, and that I was
perfectly indifferent to the whole subject. What was it
that had happened? It is difficult to say. Perhaps,
by finding perfect expression for a passion, I had exhausted the
passion itself. Emotional forces, like the forces of
physical life, have their positive limitations. Perhaps the
mere effort to convert any one to a theory involves some form of
renunciation of the power of credence. Perhaps I was simply
tired of the whole thing, and, my enthusiasm having burnt out, my
reason was left to its own unimpassioned judgment. However
it came about, and I cannot pretend to explain it, there was no
doubt that Willie Hughes suddenly became to me a mere myth, an
idle dream, the boyish fancy of a young man who, like most ardent
spirits, was more anxious to convince others than to be himself
convinced.</p>
<p>As I had said some very unjust and bitter things to Erskine in
my letter, I determined to go and see him at once, and to make my
apologies to him for my behaviour. Accordingly, the next
morning I drove down to Birdcage Walk, and found Erskine sitting
in his library, with the forged picture of Willie Hughes in front
of him.</p>
<p>‘My dear Erskine!’ I cried, ‘I have come to
apologise to you.’</p>
<p>‘To apologise to me?’ he said. ‘What
for?’</p>
<p>‘For my letter,’ I answered.</p>
<p>‘You have nothing to regret in your letter,’ he
said. ‘On the contrary, you have done me the greatest
service in your power. You have shown me that Cyril
Graham’s theory is perfectly sound.’</p>
<p>‘You don’t mean to say that you believe in Willie
Hughes?’ I exclaimed.</p>
<p>‘Why not?’ he rejoined. ‘You have
proved the thing to me. Do you think I cannot estimate the
value of evidence?’</p>
<p>‘But there is no evidence at all,’ I groaned,
sinking into a chair. ‘When I wrote to you I was
under the influence of a perfectly silly enthusiasm. I had
been touched by the story of Cyril Graham’s death,
fascinated by his romantic theory, enthralled by the wonder and
novelty of the whole idea. I see now that the theory is
based on a delusion. The only evidence for the existence of
Willie Hughes is that picture in front of you, and the picture is
a forgery. Don’t be carried away by mere sentiment in
this matter. Whatever romance may have to say about the
Willie Hughes theory, reason is dead against it.’</p>
<p>‘I don’t understand you,’ said Erskine,
looking at me in amazement. ‘Why, you yourself have
convinced me by your letter that Willie Hughes is an absolute
reality. Why have you changed your mind? Or is all
that you have been saying to me merely a joke?’</p>
<p>‘I cannot explain it to you,’ I rejoined,
‘but I see now that there is really nothing to be said in
favour of Cyril Graham’s interpretation. The Sonnets
are addressed to Lord Pembroke. For heaven’s sake
don’t waste your time in a foolish attempt to discover a
young Elizabethan actor who never existed, and to make a phantom
puppet the centre of the great cycle of Shakespeare’s
Sonnets.’</p>
<p>‘I see that you don’t understand the
theory,’ he replied.</p>
<p>‘My dear Erskine,’ I cried, ‘not understand
it! Why, I feel as if I had invented it. Surely my
letter shows you that I not merely went into the whole matter,
but that I contributed proofs of every kind. The one flaw
in the theory is that it presupposes the existence of the person
whose existence is the subject of dispute. If we grant that
there was in Shakespeare’s company a young actor of the
name of Willie Hughes, it is not difficult to make him the object
of the Sonnets. But as we know that there was no actor of
this name in the company of the Globe Theatre, it is idle to
pursue the investigation further.’</p>
<p>‘But that is exactly what we don’t know,’
said Erskine. ‘It is quite true that his name does
not occur in the list given in the first folio; but, as Cyril
pointed out, that is rather a proof in favour of the existence of
Willie Hughes than against it, if we remember his treacherous
desertion of Shakespeare for a rival dramatist.’</p>
<p>We argued the matter over for hours, but nothing that I could
say could make Erskine surrender his faith in Cyril
Graham’s interpretation. He told me that he intended
to devote his life to proving the theory, and that he was
determined to do justice to Cyril Graham’s memory. I
entreated him, laughed at him, begged of him, but it was of no
use. Finally we parted, not exactly in anger, but certainly
with a shadow between us. He thought me shallow, I thought
him foolish. When I called on him again his servant told me
that he had gone to Germany.</p>
<p>Two years afterwards, as I was going into my club, the
hall-porter handed me a letter with a foreign postmark. It
was from Erskine, and written at the Hôtel
d’Angleterre, Cannes. When I had read it I was filled
with horror, though I did not quite believe that he would be so
mad as to carry his resolve into execution. The gist of the
letter was that he had tried in every way to verify the Willie
Hughes theory, and had failed, and that as Cyril Graham had given
his life for this theory, he himself had determined to give his
own life also to the same cause. The concluding words of
the letter were these: ‘I still believe in Willie Hughes;
and by the time you receive this, I shall have died by my own
hand for Willie Hughes’s sake: for his sake, and for the
sake of Cyril Graham, whom I drove to his death by my shallow
scepticism and ignorant lack of faith. The truth was once
revealed to you, and you rejected it. It comes to you now
stained with the blood of two lives,—do not turn away from
it.’</p>
<p>It was a horrible moment. I felt sick with misery, and
yet I could not believe it. To die for one’s
theological beliefs is the worst use a man can make of his life,
but to die for a literary theory! It seemed impossible.</p>
<p>I looked at the date. The letter was a week old.
Some unfortunate chance had prevented my going to the club for
several days, or I might have got it in time to save him.
Perhaps it was not too late. I drove off to my rooms,
packed up my things, and started by the night-mail from Charing
Cross. The journey was intolerable. I thought I would
never arrive. As soon as I did I drove to the Hôtel
l’Angleterre. They told me that Erskine had been
buried two days before in the English cemetery. There was
something horribly grotesque about the whole tragedy. I
said all kinds of wild things, and the people in the hall looked
curiously at me.</p>
<p>Suddenly Lady Erskine, in deep mourning, passed across the
vestibule. When she saw me she came up to me, murmured
something about her poor son, and burst into tears. I led
her into her sitting-room. An elderly gentleman was there
waiting for her. It was the English doctor.</p>
<p>We talked a great deal about Erskine, but I said nothing about
his motive for committing suicide. It was evident that he
had not told his mother anything about the reason that had driven
him to so fatal, so mad an act. Finally Lady Erskine rose
and said, George left you something as a memento. It was a
thing he prized very much. I will get it for you.</p>
<p>As soon as she had left the room I turned to the doctor and
said, ‘What a dreadful shock it must have been to Lady
Erskine! I wonder that she bears it as well as she
does.’</p>
<p>‘Oh, she knew for months past that it was coming,’
he answered.</p>
<p>‘Knew it for months past!’ I cried.
‘But why didn’t she stop him? Why didn’t
she have him watched? He must have been mad.’</p>
<p>The doctor stared at me. ‘I don’t know what you
mean,’ he said.</p>
<p>‘Well,’ I cried, ‘if a mother knows that her
son is going to commit suicide—’</p>
<p>‘Suicide!’ he answered. ‘Poor Erskine
did not commit suicide. He died of consumption. He
came here to die. The moment I saw him I knew that there
was no hope. One lung was almost gone, and the other was
very much affected. Three days before he died he asked me
was there any hope. I told him frankly that there was none,
and that he had only a few days to live. He wrote some
letters, and was quite resigned, retaining his senses to the
last.’</p>
<p>At that moment Lady Erskine entered the room with the fatal
picture of Willie Hughes in her hand. ‘When George
was dying he begged me to give you this,’ she said.
As I took it from her, her tears fell on my hand.</p>
<p>The picture hangs now in my library, where it is very much
admired by my artistic friends. They have decided that it
is not a Clouet, but an Oudry. I have never cared to tell
them its true history. But sometimes, when I look at it, I
think that there is really a great deal to be said for the Willie
Hughes theory of Shakespeare’s Sonnets.</p>
<SPAN name="endofbook"></SPAN>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />