<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0006" id="link2H_4_0006"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> BOOKS, AUTHORS, AND HATS </h2>
<p>ADDRESS AT THE PILGRIMS’ CLUB LUNCHEON, GIVEN IN HONOR OF Mr.<br/>
CLEMENS AT THE SAVOY HOTEL, LONDON, JUNE 25, 1907.<br/>
<br/>
Mr. Birrell, M.P., Chief-Secretary for Ireland, in introducing<br/>
Mr. Clemens said: “We all love Mark Twain, and we are here to<br/>
tell him so. One more point—all the world knows it, and that<br/>
is why it is dangerous to omit it—our guest is a distinguished<br/>
citizen of the Great Republic beyond the seas. In America his<br/>
‘Huckleberry Finn’ and his ‘Tom Sawyer’ are what ‘Robinson<br/>
Crusoe’ and ‘Tom Brown’s School Days’ have been to us. They<br/>
are racy of the soil. They are books to which it is impossible<br/>
to place any period of termination. I will not speak of the<br/>
classics—reminiscences of much evil in our early lives. We do<br/>
not meet here to-day as critics with our appreciations and<br/>
depreciations, our twopenny little prefaces or our forewords.<br/>
I am not going to say what the world a thousand years hence<br/>
will think of Mark Twain. Posterity will take care of itself,<br/>
will read what it wants to read, will forget what it chooses to<br/>
forget, and will pay no attention whatsoever to our critical<br/>
mumblings and jumblings. Let us therefore be content to say to<br/>
our friend and guest that we are here speaking for ourselves<br/>
and for our children, to say what he has been to us. I<br/>
remember in Liverpool, in 1867, first buying the copy, which I<br/>
still preserve, of the celebrated ‘Jumping Frog.’ It had a few<br/>
words of preface which reminded me then that our guest in those<br/>
days was called ‘the wild humorist of the Pacific slope,’ and a<br/>
few lines later down, ‘the moralist of the Main.’ That was<br/>
some forty years ago. Here he is, still the humorist, still<br/>
the moralist. His humor enlivens and enlightens his morality,<br/>
and his morality is all the better for his humor. That is one<br/>
of the reasons why we love him. I am not here to mention any<br/>
book of his—that is a subject of dispute in my family circle,<br/>
which is the best and which is the next best—but I must put in<br/>
a word, lest I should not be true to myself—a terrible thing<br/>
—for his Joan of Arc, a book of chivalry, of nobility, and of<br/>
manly sincerity for which I take this opportunity of thanking<br/>
him. But you can all drink this toast, each one of you with<br/>
his own intention. You can get into it what meaning you like.<br/>
Mark Twain is a man whom English and Americans do well to<br/>
honor. He is the true consolidator of nations. His delightful<br/>
humor is of the kind which dissipates and destroys national<br/>
prejudices. His truth and his honor, his love of truth, and<br/>
his love of honor, overflow all boundaries. He has made the<br/>
world better by his presence. We rejoice to see him here.<br/>
Long may he live to reap the plentiful harvest of hearty,<br/>
honest human affection!”<br/></p>
<p>Pilgrims, I desire first to thank those undergraduates of Oxford. When a
man has grown so old as I am, when he has reached the verge of seventy-two
years, there is nothing that carries him back to the dreamland of his
life, to his boyhood, like recognition of those young hearts up yonder.
And so I thank them out of my heart. I desire to thank the Pilgrims of New
York also for their kind notice and message which they have cabled over
here. Mr. Birrell says he does not know how he got here. But he will be
able to get away all right—he has not drunk anything since he came
here. I am glad to know about those friends of his, Otway and Chatterton—fresh,
new names to me. I am glad of the disposition he has shown to rescue them
from the evils of poverty, and if they are still in London, I hope to have
a talk with them. For a while I thought he was going to tell us the effect
which my book had upon his growing manhood. I thought he was going to tell
us how much that effect amounted to, and whether it really made him what
he now is, but with the discretion born of Parliamentary experience he
dodged that, and we do not know now whether he read the book or not. He
did that very neatly. I could not do it any better myself.</p>
<p>My books have had effects, and very good ones, too, here and there, and
some others not so good. There is no doubt about that. But I remember one
monumental instance of it years and years ago. Professor Norton, of
Harvard, was over here, and when he came back to Boston I went out with
Howells to call on him. Norton was allied in some way by marriage with
Darwin.</p>
<p>Mr. Norton was very gentle in what he had to say, and almost delicate, and
he said: “Mr. Clemens, I have been spending some time with Mr. Darwin in
England, and I should like to tell you something connected with that
visit. You were the object of it, and I myself would have been very proud
of it, but you may not be proud of it. At any rate, I am going to tell you
what it was, and to leave to you to regard it as you please. Mr. Darwin
took me up to his bedroom and pointed out certain things
there-pitcher-plants, and so on, that he was measuring and watching from
day to day—and he said: ‘The chambermaid is permitted to do what she
pleases in this room, but she must never touch those plants and never
touch those books on that table by that candle. With those books I read
myself to sleep every night.’ Those were your own books.” I said: “There
is no question to my mind as to whether I should regard that as a
compliment or not. I do regard it as a very great compliment and a very
high honor that that great mind, laboring for the whole human race, should
rest itself on my books. I am proud that he should read himself to sleep
with them.”</p>
<p>Now, I could not keep that to myself—I was so proud of it. As soon
as I got home to Hartford I called up my oldest friend—and dearest
enemy on occasion—the Rev. Joseph Twichell, my pastor, and I told
him about that, and, of course, he was full of interest and venom. Those
people who get no compliments like that feel like that. He went off. He
did not issue any applause of any kind, and I did not hear of that subject
for some time. But when Mr. Darwin passed away from this life, and some
time after Darwin’s Life and Letters came out, the Rev. Mr. Twichell
procured an early copy of that work and found something in it which he
considered applied to me. He came over to my house—it was snowing,
raining, sleeting, but that did not make any difference to Twichell. He
produced the book, and turned over and over, until he came to a certain
place, when he said: “Here, look at this letter from Mr. Darwin to Sir
Joseph Hooker.” What Mr. Darwin said—I give you the idea and not the
very words—was this: I do not know whether I ought to have devoted
my whole life to these drudgeries in natural history and the other
sciences or not, for while I may have gained in one way I have lost in
another. Once I had a fine perception and appreciation of high literature,
but in me that quality is atrophied. “That was the reason,” said Mr.
Twichell, “he was reading your books.”</p>
<p>Mr. Birrell has touched lightly—very lightly, but in not an
uncomplimentary way—on my position in this world as a moralist. I am
glad to have that recognition, too, because I have suffered since I have
been in this town; in the first place, right away, when I came here, from
a newsman going around with a great red, highly displayed placard in the
place of an apron. He was selling newspapers, and there were two sentences
on that placard which would have been all right if they had been
punctuated; but they ran those two sentences together without a comma or
anything, and that would naturally create a wrong impression, because it
said, “Mark Twain arrives Ascot Cup stolen.” No doubt many a person was
misled by those sentences joined together in that unkind way. I have no
doubt my character has suffered from it. I suppose I ought to defend my
character, but how can I defend it? I can say here and now—and
anybody can see by my face that I am sincere, that I speak the truth—that
I have never seen that Cup. I have not got the Cup—I did not have a
chance to get it. I have always had a good character in that way. I have
hardly ever stolen anything, and if I did steal anything I had discretion
enough to know about the value of it first. I do not steal things that are
likely to get myself into trouble. I do not think any of us do that. I
know we all take things—that is to be expected—but really, I
have never taken anything, certainly in England, that amounts to any great
thing. I do confess that when I was here seven years ago I stole a hat,
but that did not amount to anything. It was not a good hat, and was only a
clergyman’s hat, anyway.</p>
<p>I was at a luncheon party, and Archdeacon Wilberforce was there also. I
dare say he is Archdeacon now—he was a canon then—and he was
serving in the Westminster battery, if that is the proper term—I do
not know, as you mix military and ecclesiastical things together so much.
He left the luncheon table before I did. He began this. I did steal his
hat, but he began by taking mine. I make that interjection because I would
not accuse Archdeacon Wilberforce of stealing my hat—I should not
think of it. I confine that phrase to myself. He merely took my hat. And
with good judgment, too—it was a better hat than his. He came out
before the luncheon was over, and sorted the hats in the hall, and
selected one which suited. It happened to be mine. He went off with it.
When I came out by-and-by there was no hat there which would go on my head
except his, which was left behind. My head was not the customary size just
at that time. I had been receiving a good many very nice and complimentary
attentions, and my head was a couple of sizes larger than usual, and his
hat just suited me. The bumps and corners were all right intellectually.
There were results pleasing to me—possibly so to him. He found out
whose hat it was, and wrote me saying it was pleasant that all the way
home, whenever he met anybody his gravities, his solemnities, his deep
thoughts, his eloquent remarks were all snatched up by the people he met,
and mistaken for brilliant humorisms.</p>
<p>I had another experience. It was not unpleasing. I was received with a
deference which was entirely foreign to my experience by everybody whom I
met, so that before I got home I had a much higher opinion of myself than
I have ever had before or since. And there is in that very connection an
incident which I remember at that old date which is rather melancholy to
me, because it shows how a person can deteriorate in a mere seven years.
It is seven years ago. I have not that hat now. I was going down
Pall-Mall, or some other of your big streets, and I recognized that that
hat needed ironing. I went into a big shop and passed in my hat, and asked
that it might be ironed. They were courteous, very courteous, even
courtly. They brought that hat back to me presently very sleek and nice,
and I asked how much there was to pay. They replied that they did not
charge the clergy anything. I have cherished the delight of that moment
from that day to this. It was the first thing I did the other day to go
and hunt up that shop and hand in my hat to have it ironed. I said when it
came back, “How much to pay?” They said, “Ninepence.” In seven years I
have acquired all that worldliness, and I am sorry to be back where I was
seven years ago.</p>
<p>But now I am chaffing and chaffing and chaffing here, and I hope you will
forgive me for that; but when a man stands on the verge of seventy-two you
know perfectly well that he never reached that place without knowing what
this life is—heart breaking bereavement. And so our reverence is for our
dead. We do not forget them; but our duty is toward the living; and if we
can be cheerful, cheerful in spirit, cheerful in speech and in hope, that
is a benefit to those who are around us.</p>
<p>My own history includes an incident which will always connect me with
England in a pathetic way, for when I arrived here seven years ago with my
wife and my daughter—we had gone around the globe lecturing to raise
money to clear off a debt—my wife and one of my daughters started
across the ocean to bring to England our eldest daughter. She was twenty
four years of age and in the bloom of young womanhood, and we were
unsuspecting. When my wife and daughter—and my wife has passed from
this life since—when they had reached mid Atlantic, a cablegram—one
of those heartbreaking cablegrams which we all in our days have to
experience—was put into my hand. It stated that that daughter of
ours had gone to her long sleep. And so, as I say, I cannot always be
cheerful, and I cannot always be chaffing; I must sometimes lay the cap
and bells aside, and recognize that I am of the human race like the rest,
and must have my cares and griefs. And therefore I noticed what Mr.
Birrell said—I was so glad to hear him say it—something that
was in the nature of these verses here at the top of this:</p>
<p>“He lit our life with shafts of sun<br/>
And vanquished pain.<br/>
Thus two great nations stand as one<br/>
In honoring Twain.”<br/></p>
<p>I am very glad to have those verses. I am very glad and very grateful for
what Mr. Birrell said in that connection. I have received since I have
been here, in this one week, hundreds of letters from all conditions of
people in England—men, women, and children—and there is in
them compliment, praise, and, above all and better than all, there is in
them a note of affection. Praise is well, compliment is well, but
affection—that is the last and final and most precious reward that
any man can win, whether by character or achievement, and I am very
grateful to have that reward. All these letters make me feel that here in
England—as in America—when I stand under the English flag, I
am not a stranger. I am not an alien, but at home.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />