<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_IV" id="CHAPTER_IV"></SPAN>CHAPTER IV.</h2>
<p>By the aid of the pinion calipers and the old staff, the
diameter of the roller seat and the balance and hair-spring
collet seats may be readily taken, but it is perhaps
better to gauge the holes, as the old staff may not have
been perfect in this respect. A round broach will answer
admirably for this purpose, and the size may be taken
from the broach by means of the calipers. In fitting our
pivots, we can not be too exact; and as yet no instrument
has been placed upon the market for this purpose which
is moderate in price and yet thoroughly reliable. The
majority of watchmakers use what is termed the pivot-gauge,
a neat little instrument which accompanies the
Jacot lathe, and which may be obtained from any material
house. This tool, which is shown in <SPAN href="#f11">Fig. 11</SPAN>, is, however,
open to one objection in the measurement of pivots, and
that is that it may be pressed down at one time with
greater force than at another, and consequently will show
a variation in two measurements of the same pivot.
Some of my readers may think that I am over-particular
on this point, and that the difference in measurement on
two occasions is too trivial to be worthy of attention, but
I do not think that too much care can be bestowed upon
this part of the work, and neglect in this particular is, I<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</SPAN></span>
think, the cause of poor performance in many otherwise
good timepieces. The ordinarily accepted rule among
watchmakers is that a pivot should be made 1/2500 of an
inch smaller than the hole in the jewel to allow for the
proper lubrication. I am acquainted with watchmakers,
and men who are termed good workmen, too, who
invariably allow 1/2500 of an inch side shake, no matter
whether the pivot is 12/2500 or 16/2500 of an inch in diameter.
Now if 1/2500 of an inch is the proper side shake for a
pivot measuring 12/2500 of an inch in diameter, it is certainly
not sufficient for a pivot which is one-third larger.
Of course it is understood that side shakes
do not increase in proportion according
as the pivot increases in size, for if they
did a six-inch shaft would require at this
rate a side shake of 1/2 inch, or 1/4 inch
on each side, which would be ridiculously
out of all proportion, as the 1/64 of an inch
would be ample under any circumstances.
Neither can we arrive at the proper end
shake for a pivot by reducing in proportion from the end
shake allowed on a six-inch shaft, because if we followed
out the same course of reasoning we would arrive at a
point where a pivot measuring 12/2500 of an inch would
require an end shake so infinitely small that it would
require six figures to express the denominator of the
fraction, and the most minute measuring instrument yet
invented would be incapable of recording the measurement.
We must leave sufficient side shake, however, on<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</SPAN></span>
the smallest pivot and jewel for the globules of the oil
to move freely, and experiments have shown conclusively
that 1/2500 of an inch or 1/5000 on each side of the pivot,
is as little space as it is desirable to leave for that purpose,
as the globules of the best chronometer oil will refuse
to enter spaces that are very much more minute. But
to return to our pivot gauge.</p>
<div class="figleft"> <SPAN href="images/il24a.jpg"> <ANTIMG id="f11" src="images/il24a-th.jpg" alt="Fig. 11." /></SPAN> <p class="caption">Fig. 11.</p> </div>
<div class="figright"> <SPAN href="images/il24b.jpg"> <ANTIMG id="f12" src="images/il24b-th.jpg" alt="Fig. 12." /></SPAN> <p class="caption">Fig. 12.</p> </div>
<p>Each division on the gauge represents 1/2500 of an inch,
which is all that we require. The diameter that the pivot
should be, can be ascertained by inserting a round pivot
broach into the jewel and taking the measurement with
the pivot gauge, and then making the necessary deduction
for side shake. Slip the jewel on the broach as far
as it will go, as shown in <SPAN href="#f12">Fig. 12</SPAN>, and then with the pivot
gauge, take the size of the broach, as close up to the
jewel as you can measure, and the taper of the broach
will be about right for the side shake of the pivot. If,
however, you prefer to make the measurement still more
accurate, you can do so by dipping the broach into rouge
before slipping on the jewel and then remove the jewel
and the place which is occupied on the broach can be
plainly discerned and the exact measurement taken and
an allowance of 1/2500 of an inch made for the side shake.
Another method, and one which is particularly applicable
to Swiss watches, where the jewel is burnished into the
cock or plate, is to first slip on to the broach a small flat
piece of cork and as the broach enters the jewel the cork
is forced farther on to the broach, and when the jewel is
removed it marks the place on the broach which its inner<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</SPAN></span>
side occupied, and the measurement can then be taken
with the gauge. If care is used in the selection of a
broach, that it be as nearly perfect in round and taper as
possible, by a little experiment you can soon ascertain just
what part of the length of the broach corresponds to one
degree on the gauge and by a repetition of the experiment
the broach can then be divided accurately, by very
minute rings turned with a fine-pointed graver, into sections,
each representing one degree, or 1/2500 of an inch,
and the measurement will thus be simplified greatly.</p>
<div class="figleft"> <SPAN href="images/il26.jpg"> <ANTIMG id="f13" src="images/il26-th.jpg" alt="Fig. 13." /></SPAN> <p class="caption">Fig. 13.</p> </div>
<p>As before stated, much depends upon the condition of
your gravers and the manner of using them. It is of the
utmost importance that they be kept sharp, and as soon
as they begin to show the slightest sign of losing their
keenness, you should sharpen them. The proper shape
for balance pivots was shown in <SPAN href="#f4">Fig. 4</SPAN>.
Now let us examine into the best positions
for holding the gravers. In <SPAN href="#f13">Fig. 13</SPAN> two
ways of holding the graver are shown, <i>A</i>
representing the right and <i>B</i> representing
the wrong way. If the graver is applied to the work as
shown at <i>A</i>, it will cut a clean shaving, while if applied as
shown at <i>B</i> it will simply scrape the side of the pivot and
ruin the point of the graver without materially forwarding
the work. Again, the holding of the graver as indicated
at <i>A</i> has its advantages, because the force of the cut is
towards the hand holding it, and should it catch from any
cause the jar of the obstruction will be conveyed immediately
to the hand, and it will naturally give and no harm<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</SPAN></span>
will be done. If, on the other hand, the graver should
meet with an obstruction while held in the position indicated
at <i>B</i>, the force of the cut will be in the direction of
the arrow, downward and toward the rest, and the rest
being unlike the hand, or rather being rigid, it cannot
give, and the result is that the work, or graver, or both,
are ruined. In <SPAN href="#f14">Fig. 14</SPAN> two other methods of holding the
graver are shown. The general
roughing out of a staff should
be done with the graver held
about as shown at <i>A</i>, <SPAN href="#f13">Fig. 13</SPAN>; but in finishing, the graver
should be held so that the cut is
made diagonally, as indicated at
<i>A</i>, <SPAN href="#f14">Fig. 14</SPAN>. It is rather dificult
to explain in print just how the
graver should be held, but a little experiment will suffice
to teach the proper position. The best indication that a
graver is doing its work properly, is the fact that the chips
come away in long spiral coils. Aim to see how light a cut
you can make rather than how heavy. Never use force
in removing the material, but depend entirely upon the
keenness of the cutting edges. Never use the point of
the graver, except where you are compelled to, but rather
use the right or left hand cutting edges. By following
out this rule you will find that your work, when left by
the graver, requires little or no finishing up, except at the
pivots.</p>
<div class="figright"> <SPAN href="images/il27.jpg"> <ANTIMG id="f14" src="images/il27-th.jpg" alt="Fig. 14." /></SPAN> <p class="caption">Fig. 14.</p> </div>
<p>At <i>B</i>, <SPAN href="#f14">Fig. 14</SPAN>, is shown the correct manner of
applying the graver when turning a pivot. Hold the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</SPAN></span>
graver nearly on a line with the axis of the lathe and
catching a chip at the extreme end of the pivot with the
back edge of the graver, push slightly forward and at the
same time roll the graver towards you and it will give the
pivot the desired conical form. By keeping the graver
on a line with the length of the pivot, all the force applied
is simply exerted in the direction of the chuck, and
does not tend to spring the pivot, as it would were the
extreme point applied, as in <SPAN href="#f13">Fig. 13</SPAN>. When we come to
such places as the shoulder of the back slope, the seat for
the roller, balance, etc., we must necessarily use the point
of the graver.</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />