<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0004" id="link2HCH0004"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> CHAPTER 4. MORE ENQUIRIES INTO MASON-BEES. </h2>
<p>This chapter was to have taken the form of a letter addressed to Charles
Darwin, the illustrious naturalist who now lies buried beside Newton in
Westminster Abbey. It was my task to report to him the result of some
experiments which he had suggested to me in the course of our
correspondence: a very pleasant task, for, though facts, as I see them,
disincline me to accept his theories, I have none the less the deepest
veneration for his noble character and his scientific honesty. I was
drafting my letter when the sad news reached me: Darwin was dead; after
searching the mighty question of origins, he was now grappling with the
last and darkest problem of the hereafter. (Darwin died at Down, in Kent,
on the 19th of April 1882.—Translator's Note.) I therefore abandon
the epistolary form, which would be unwarranted in view of that grave at
Westminster. A free and impersonal statement shall set forth what I
intended to relate in a more academic manner.</p>
<p>One thing, above all, had struck the English scientist on reading the
first volume of my "Souvenirs entomologiques", namely, the Mason-bees'
faculty of knowing the way back to their nests after being carried to
great distances from home. What sort of compass do they employ on their
return journeys? What sense guides them? The profound observer thereupon
spoke of an experiment which he had always longed to make with Pigeons and
which he had always neglected making, absorbed as he was by other
interests. This experiment, he thought, I might attempt with my Bees.
Substitute the insect for the bird; and the problem remained the same. I
quote from his letter the passage referring to the trial which he wished
made:</p>
<p>'Allow me to make a suggestion in relation to your wonderful account of
insects finding their way home. I formerly wished to try it with pigeons;
namely, to carry the insects in their paper cornets about a hundred paces
in the opposite direction to that which you intended ultimately to carry
them, but before turning round to return, to put the insects in a circular
box with an axle which could be made to revolve very rapidly first in one
direction and then in another, so as to destroy for a time all sense of
direction in the insects. I have sometimes imagined that animals may feel
in which direction they were at the first start carried.'</p>
<p>This method of experimenting seemed to me very ingeniously conceived.
Before going west, I walk eastwards. In the darkness of their paper bags,
the mere fact that I am moving them gives my prisoners a sense of the
direction in which I am taking them. If nothing happened to disturb this
first impression, the insect would be guided by it in returning. This
would explain the homing of my Mason-bees carried to a distance of two or
three miles amid strange surroundings. But, when the insects have been
sufficiently impressed by their conveyance to the east, there comes the
rapid twirl, first this way round, then that. Bewildered by all these
revolutions first in one direction and then in another, the insect does
not know that I have turned round and remains under its original
impression. I am now taking it to the west, when it believes itself to be
still travelling towards the east. Under the influence of this impression;
the insect is bound to lose its bearings. When set free, it will fly in
the opposite direction to its home, which it will never find again.</p>
<p>This result seemed to me the more probable inasmuch as the statements of
the country-folk around me were all of a nature to confirm my hopes.
Favier (The author's gardener and factotum. Cf. "The Life of the Fly":
chapter 4.—Translator's Note.), the very man for this sort of
information, was the first to put me on the track. He told me that, when
people want to move a Cat from one farm to another at some distance, they
place the animal in a bag which they twirl rapidly at the moment of
starting, thus preventing the animal from returning to the house which it
has quitted. Many others, besides Favier, described the same practice to
me. According to them, this twirling round in a bag was an infallible
expedient: the bewildered Cat never returned. I communicated what I had
learnt to England, I wrote to the sage of Down and told him how the
peasant had anticipated the researches of science. Charles Darwin was
amazed; so was I; and we both of us almost reckoned on a success.</p>
<p>These preliminaries took place in the winter; I had plenty of time to
prepare for the experiment which was to be made in the following May.</p>
<p>'Favier,' I said, one day, to my assistant, 'I shall want some of those
nests. Go and ask our next-door neighbour's leave and climb to the roof of
his shed, with some new tiles and some mortar, which you can fetch from
the builder's. Take a dozen tiles from the roof, those with the biggest
nests on them, and put the new ones in their place.'</p>
<p>Things were done accordingly. My neighbour assented with a good grace to
the exchange of tiles, for he himself is obliged, from time to time, to
demolish the work of the Mason-bee, unless he would risk seeing his roof
fall in sooner or later. I was merely forestalling a repair which became
more urgent every year. That same evening, I was in possession of twelve
magnificent rectangular blocks of nest, each lying on the convex surface
of a tile, that is to say, on the surface looking towards the inside of
the shed. I had the curiosity to weigh the largest: it turned the scale at
thirty-five pounds. Now the roof whence it came was covered with similar
masses, adjoining one another, over a stretch of some seventy tiles.
Reckoning only half the weight, so as to strike an average between the
largest and the smallest lumps, we find the total weight of the Bee's
masonry to amount to three-quarters of a ton. And, even so, people tell me
that they have seen this beaten elsewhere. Leave the Mason-bee to her own
devices, in the spot that suits her; allow the work of many generations to
accumulate; and, one fine day, the roof will break down under the extra
burden. Let the nests grow old; let them fall to pieces when the damp gets
into them; and you will have chunks tumbling on your head big enough to
crack your skull. There you see the work of a very little-known insect.
(The insect is so little known that I made a serious mistake when treating
of it in the first volume of these "Souvenirs." Under my erroneous
denomination of Chalicodoma sicula are really comprised two species, one
building its nests in our dwellings and particularly under the tiles of
outhouses, the other building its nests on the branches of shrubs. The
first species has received various names, which are, in order of priority:
Chalicodoma pyrenaica, LEP. (Megachile); Chalicodoma pyrrhopeza,
GERSTACKER; Chalicodoma rufitarsis, GIRAUD. It is a pity that the name
occupying the first place should lend itself to misconception. I hesitate
to apply the epithet of Pyrenean to an insect which is much less common in
the Pyrenees than in my own district. I shall call it the Chalicodoma, or
Mason-bee, of the Sheds. There is no objection to the use of this name in
a book where the reader prefers lucidity to the tyranny of systematic
entomology. The second species, that which builds its nests on the
branches, is Chalicodoma rufescens, J. PEREZ. For a like reason, I shall
call it the Chalicodoma of the Shrubs. I owe these corrections to the
kindness of Professor Jean Perez, of Bordeaux, who is so well-versed in
the lore of Wasps and Bees.—Author's Note.)</p>
<p>These treasures were insufficient, not in regard to quantity, but in
regard to quality, for the main object which I had in view. They came from
the nearest house, separated from mine by a little field planted with corn
and olive-trees. I had reason to fear that the insects issuing from those
nests might be hereditarily influenced by their ancestors, who had lived
in the shed for many a long year. The Bee, when carried to a distance,
would perhaps come back, guided by the inveterate family habit; she would
find the shed of her lineal predecessors and thence, without difficulty,
reach her nest. As it is the fashion nowadays to assign a prominent part
to these hereditary influences, I must eliminate them from my experiments.
I want strange Bees, brought from afar, whose return to the place of their
birth can in no way assist their return to the nest transplanted to
another site.</p>
<p>Favier took the business in hand. He had discovered on the banks of the
Aygues, at some miles from the village, a deserted hut where the
Mason-bees had established themselves in a numerous colony. He proposed to
take the wheelbarrow, in which to move the blocks of cells; but I
objected: the jolting of the vehicle over the rough paths might jeopardise
the contents of the cells. A basket carried on the shoulder was deemed
safer. Favier took a man to help him and set out. The expedition provided
me with four well-stocked tiles. It was all that the two men were able to
carry between them; and even then I had to stand treat on their arrival:
they were utterly exhausted. Le Vaillant tells us of a nest of Republicans
(Social Weaver-birds.—Translator's Note.) with which he loaded a
wagon drawn by two oxen. My Mason-bee vies with the South-African bird: a
yoke of Oxen would not have been too many to move the whole of that nest
from the banks of the Aygues.</p>
<p>The next thing is to place my tiles. I want to have them under my eyes, in
a position where I can watch them easily and save myself the worries of
earlier days: going up and down ladders, standing for hours at a stretch
on a narrow rung that hurt the soles of my feet and risking sunstroke up
against a scorching wall. Moreover, it is necessary that my guests should
feel almost as much at home with me as where they come from. I must make
life pleasant for them, if I should have them grow attached to the new
dwelling. And I happen to have the very thing for them.</p>
<p>Under the leads of my house is a wide arch, the sides of which get the
sun, while the back remains in the shade. There is something for
everybody: the shade for me, the sunlight for my boarders. We fasten a
stout hook to each tile and hang it on the wall, on a level with our eyes.
Half my nests are on the right, half on the left. The general effect is
rather original. Any one walking in and seeing my show for the first time
begins by taking it for a display of smoked provisions, gammons of some
outlandish bacon curing in the sun. On perceiving his mistake, he falls
into raptures at these new hives of mine. The news spreads through the
village and more than one pokes fun at it. They look upon me as a keeper
of hybrid Bees:</p>
<p>'I wonder what he's going to make out of that!' say they.</p>
<p>My hives are in full swing before the end of April. When the work is at
its height, the swarm becomes a little eddying, buzzing cloud. The arch is
a much-frequented passage: it leads to a store-room for various household
provisions. The members of my family bully me at first for establishing
this dangerous commonwealth within the precincts of our home. They dare
not go to fetch things: they would have to pass through a swarm of Bees;
and then...look out for stings! There is nothing for it but to prove, once
and for all, that the danger does not exist, that mine is a most peaceable
Bee, incapable of stinging so long as she is not startled. I bring my face
close to one of the clay nests, so as almost to touch it, while it is
black with Masons at work; I let my fingers wander through the ranks, I
put a few Bees on my hand, I stand in the thick of the whirling crowd and
never a prick do I receive. I have long known their peaceful character.
Time was when I used to share the common fears, when I hesitated before
venturing into a swarm of Anthophorae or Chalicodomae; nowadays, I have
quite got over those terrors. If you do not tease the insect, the thought
of hurting you will never occur to it. At the worst, a single specimen,
prompted by curiosity rather than anger, will come and hover in front of
your face, examining you with some persistency, but employing a buzz as
her only threat. Let her be: her scrutiny is quite friendly.</p>
<p>After a few demonstrations, my household were reassured: all, old and
young, moved in and out of the arch as though there were nothing unusual
about it. My Bees, far from remaining an object of dread, became an object
of diversion; every one took pleasure in watching the progress of their
ingenious work. I was careful not to divulge the secret to strangers. If
any one, coming on business, passed outside the arch while I was standing
before the hanging nests, some such brief dialogue as the following would
take place:</p>
<p>'So they know you; that's why they don't sting you?'</p>
<p>'They certainly know me.'</p>
<p>'And me?'</p>
<p>'Oh, you; that's another matter!'</p>
<p>Whereupon the intruder would keep at a respectful distance, which was what
I wanted.</p>
<p>It is time that we thought of experimenting. The Mason-bees intended for
the journey must be marked with a sign whereby I may know them. A solution
of gum arabic, thickened with a colouring-powder, red, blue or some other
shade, is the material which I use to mark my travellers. The variety in
hue will save me from confusing the subjects of my different experiments.</p>
<p>When making my former investigations, I used to mark the Bees at the place
where I set them free. For this operation, the insects had to be held in
the fingers one after the other; and I was thus exposed to frequent
stings, which smarted all the more for being constantly repeated. The
consequence was that I was not always quite able to control my fingers and
thumbs, to the great detriment of my travellers; for I could easily warp
their wing-joints and thus weaken their flight. It was worth while
improving the method of operation, both in my own interest and in that of
the insect. I must mark the Bee, carry her to a distance and release her,
without taking her in my fingers, without once touching her. The
experiment was bound to gain by these nice precautions. I will describe
the method which I adopted.</p>
<p>The Bee is so much engrossed in her work when she buries her abdomen in
the cell and rids herself of her load of pollen, or when she is building,
that it is easy, at such times, without alarming her, to mark the upper
side of the thorax with a straw dipped in the coloured glue. The insect is
not disturbed by that slight touch. It flies off; it returns laden with
mortar or pollen. You allow these trips to be repeated until the mark on
the thorax is quite dry, which soon happens in the hot sun necessary to
the Bee's labours. The next thing is to catch her and imprison her in a
paper bag, still without touching her. Nothing could be easier. You place
a small test-tube over the Bee engrossed in her work; the insect, on
leaving, rushes into it and is thence transferred to the paper bag, which
is forthwith closed and placed in the tin box that will serve as a
conveyance for the whole party. When releasing the Bees, all you have to
do is open the bags. The whole performance is thus effected without once
giving that distressing squeeze of the fingers.</p>
<p>Another question remains to be solved before we go further. What
time-limit shall I allow for this census of the Bees that return to the
nest? Let me explain what I mean. The dot which I have made in the middle
of the thorax with a touch of my sticky straw is not very permanent: it
merely adheres to the hairs. At the same time, it would have been no more
lasting if I had held the insect in my fingers. Now the Bee often brushes
her back: she dusts it each time she leaves the galleries; besides, she is
always rubbing her coat against the walls of the cell, which she has to
enter and to leave each time that she brings honey. A Mason-bee, so
smartly dressed at the start, at the end of her work is in rags; her fur
is all worn bare and as tattered as a mechanic's overall.</p>
<p>Furthermore, in bad weather, the Mason-bee of the Walls spends the days
and nights in one of the cells of her dome, suspended head downwards. The
Mason-bee of the Sheds, as long as there are vacant galleries, does very
nearly the same: she takes shelter in the galleries, but with her head at
the entrance. Once those old habitations are in use, however, and the
building of new cells begun, she selects another retreat. In the harmas
(The piece of enclosed waste ground on which the author studies his
insects in their natural state. Cf. "The Life of the Fly": chapter 1.—Translator's
Note.), as I have said elsewhere, are stone heaps, intended for building
the surrounding wall. This is where my Chalicodomae pass the night. Piled
up promiscuously, both sexes together, they sleep in numerous companies,
in crevices between two stones laid closely one on top of the other. Some
of these companies number as many as a couple of hundred. The most common
dormitory is a narrow groove. Here they all huddle, as far forward as
possible, with their backs in the groove. I see some lying flat on their
backs, like people asleep. Should bad weather come on, should the sky
cloud over, should the north-wind whistle, they do not stir out.</p>
<p>With all these things to take into consideration, I cannot expect my dot
on the Bee's thorax to last any length of time. By day, the constant
brushing and the rubbing against the partitions of the galleries soon wipe
it off; at night, things are worse still, in the narrow sleeping-room
where the Mason-bees take refuge by the hundred. After a night spent in
the crevice between two stones, it is not advisable to trust to the mark
made yesterday. Therefore, the counting of the number of Bees that return
to the nest must be taken in hand at once; tomorrow would be too late. And
so, as it would be impossible for me to recognize those of my subjects
whose dots had disappeared during the night, I will take into account only
the Bees that return on the same day.</p>
<p>The question of the rotary machine remains. Darwin advised me to use a
circular box with an axle and a handle. I have nothing of the kind in the
house. It will be simpler and quite as effective to employ the method of
the countryman who tries to lose his Cat by swinging him in a bag. My
insects, each one placed by itself in a paper cornet (A cornet is simply
the old 'sugar-bag,' the funnel-shaped paper bag so common on the
continent and still used occasionally by small grocers and tobacconists in
England.—Translator's Note.) or screw, shall be placed in a tin box;
the screws of paper shall be wedged in so as to avoid collisions during
the rotation; lastly, the box shall be tied to a cord and I will whirl the
whole thing round like a sling. With this contrivance, it will be quite
easy to obtain any rate of speed that I wish, any variety of inverse
movements that I consider likely to make my captives lose their bearings.
I can whirl my sling first in one direction and then in another, turn and
turn about; I can slacken or increase the pace; if I like, I can make it
describe figures of eight, combined with circles; if I spin on my heels at
the same time, I am able to make the process still more complicated by
compelling my sling to trace every known curve. That is what I shall do.</p>
<p>On the 2nd of May 1880, I make a white mark on the thorax of ten
Mason-bees busied with various tasks: some are exploring the slabs of clay
in order to select a site; others are brick-laying; others are garnering
stores. When the mark is dry, I catch them and pack them as I have
described. I first carry them a quarter of a mile in the opposite
direction to the one which I intend to take. A path skirting my house
favours this preliminary manoeuvre; I have every hope of being alone when
the time comes to make play with my sling. There is a way-side cross at
the end; I stop at the foot of the cross. Here I swing my Bees in every
direction. Now, while I am making the box describe inverse circles and
loops, while I am pirouetting on my heels to achieve the various curves,
up comes a woman from the village and stares at me. Oh, how she stares at
me, what a look she gives me! At the foot of the cross! Acting in such a
silly way! People talked about it. It was sheer witchcraft. Had I not dug
up a dead body, only a few days before? Yes, I had been to a prehistoric
burial-place, I had taken from it a pair of venerable, well-developed
tibias, a set of funerary vessels and a few shoulders of horse, placed
there as a viaticum for the great journey. I had done this thing; and
people knew it. And now, to crown all, the man of evil reputation is found
at the foot of a cross indulging in unhallowed antics.</p>
<p>No matter—and it shows no small courage on my part—the
gyrations are duly accomplished in the presence of this unexpected
witness. Then I retrace my steps and walk westward of Serignan. I take the
least-frequented paths, I cut across country so as, if possible, to avoid
a second meeting. It would be the last straw if I were seen opening my
paper bags and letting loose my insects! When half-way, to make my
experiment more decisive still, I repeat the rotation, in as complicated a
fashion as before. I repeat it for the third time at the spot chosen for
the release.</p>
<p>I am at the end of a flint-strewn plain, with here and there a scanty
curtain of almond-trees and holm-oaks. Walking at a good pace, I have
taken thirty minutes to cover the ground in a straight line. The distance
therefore is, roughly, two miles. It is a fine day, under a clear sky,
with a very light breeze blowing from the north. I sit down on the ground,
facing the south, so that the insects may be free to take either the
direction of their nest or the opposite one. I let them loose at a quarter
past two. When the bags are opened, the Bees, for the most part, circle
several times around me and then dart off impetuously in the direction of
Serignan, as far as I can judge. It is not easy to watch them, because
they fly off suddenly, after going two or three times round my body, a
suspicious-looking object which they wish, apparently, to reconnoitre
before starting. A quarter of an hour later, my eldest daughter, Antonia,
who is on the look-out beside the nests, sees the first traveller arrive.
On my return, in the course of the evening, two others come back. Total:
three home on the same day, out of ten scattered abroad.</p>
<p>I resume the experiment next morning. I mark ten Mason-bees with red,
which will enable me to distinguish them from those who returned on the
day before and from those who may still return with the white spot
uneffaced. The same precautions, the same rotations, the same localities
as on the first occasion; only, I make no rotation on the way, confining
myself to swinging my box round on leaving and on arriving. The insects
are released at a quarter past eleven. I preferred the forenoon, as this
was the busiest time at the works. One Bee was seen by Antonia to be back
at the nest by twenty minutes past eleven. Supposing her to be the first
let loose, it took her just five minutes to cover the distance. But there
is nothing to tell me that it is not another, in which case she needed
less. It is the fastest speed that I have succeeded in noting. I myself am
back at twelve and, within a short time, catch three others. I see no more
during the rest of the evening. Total: four home, out of ten.</p>
<p>The 4th of May is a very bright, calm, warm day, weather highly propitious
for my experiments. I take fifty Chalicodomae marked with blue. The
distance to be travelled remains the same. I make the first rotation after
carrying my insects a few hundred steps in the direction opposite to that
which I finally take; in addition, three rotations on the road; a fifth
rotation at the place where they are set free. If they do not lose their
bearings this time, it will not be for lack of twisting and turning. I
begin to open my screws of paper at twenty minutes past nine. It is rather
early, for which reason my Bees, on recovering their liberty, remain for a
moment undecided and lazy; but, after a short sunbath on a stone where I
place them, they take wing. I am sitting on the ground, facing the south,
with Serignan on my left and Piolenc on my right. When the flight is not
too swift to allow me to perceive the direction taken, I see my released
captives disappear to my left. A few, but only a few, go south; two or
three go west, or to right of me. I do not speak of the north, against
which I act as a screen. All told, the great majority take the left, that
is to say, the direction of the nest. The last is released at twenty
minutes to ten. One of the fifty travellers has lost her mark in the paper
bag. I deduct her from the total, leaving forty-nine.</p>
<p>According to Antonia, who watches the home-coming, the earliest arrivals
appeared at twenty-five minutes to ten, say fifteen minutes after the
first was set free. By twelve o'clock mid-day, there are eleven back; and,
by four o'clock in the evening, seventeen. That ends the census. Total:
seventeen, out of forty-nine.</p>
<p>I resolved upon a fourth experiment, on the 14th of May. The weather is
glorious, with a light northerly breeze. I take twenty Mason-bees, marked
in pink, at eight o'clock in the morning. Rotations at the start, after a
preliminary backing in a direction opposite to that which I intend to
take; two rotations on the road; a fourth on arriving. All those whose
flight I am able to follow with my eyes turn to my left, that is to say,
towards Serignan. Yet I had taken care to leave the choice free between
the two opposite directions: in particular, I had sent away my Dog, who
was on my right. To-day, the Bees do not circle round me: some fly away at
once; the others, the greater number, feeling giddy perhaps after the
pitching of the journey and the rolling of the sling, alight on the ground
a few yards away, seem to wait until they are somewhat recovered and then
fly off to the left. I perceived this to be the general flight, whenever I
was able to observe at all. I was back at a quarter to ten. Two Bees with
pink marks were there before me, of whom one was engaged in building, with
her pellet of mortar in her mandibles. By one o'clock in the afternoon
there were seven arrivals; I saw no more during the rest of the day.
Total: seven out of twenty.</p>
<p>Let us be satisfied with this: the experiment has been repeated often
enough, but it does not conclude as Darwin hoped, as I myself hoped,
especially after what I had been told about the Cat. In vain, adopting the
advice given, do I carry my insects first in the opposite direction to the
place at which I intend to release them; in vain, when about to retrace my
steps, do I twirl my sling with every complication in the way of whirls
and twists that I am able to imagine; in vain, thinking to increase the
difficulties, do I repeat the rotation as often as five times over: at the
start, on the road, on arriving; it makes no difference: the Mason-bees
return; and the proportion of returns on the same day fluctuates between
thirty and forty per cent. It goes to my heart to abandon an idea
suggested by so famous a man of science and cherished all the more readily
inasmuch as I thought it likely to provide a final solution. The facts are
there, more eloquent than any number of ingenious views; and the problem
remains as mysterious as ever.</p>
<p>In the following year, 1881, I began experimenting again, but in a
different way. Hitherto, I had worked on the level. To return to the nest,
my lost Bees had only to cross slight obstacles, the hedges and spinneys
of the tilled fields. To-day, I propose to add to the difficulties of
distance those of the ground to be traversed. Discontinuing all my
backing- and whirling-tactics, things which I recognize as useless, I
think of releasing my Chalicodomae in the thick of the Serignan Woods. How
will they escape from that labyrinth, where, in the early days, I needed a
compass to find my way? Moreover, I shall have an assistant with me, a
pair of eyes younger than mine and better-fitted to follow my insects'
first flight. That immediate start in the direction of the nest has
already been repeated very often and is beginning to interest me more than
the return itself. A pharmaceutical student, spending a few days with my
parents, shall be my eyewitness. With him, I shall feel at ease; science
and he are no strangers.</p>
<p>The trip to the woods takes place on the 16th of May. The weather is hot
and hints at a coming storm. There is a perceptible breeze from the south,
but not enough to upset my travellers. Forty Mason-bees are caught. To
shorten the preparations, because of the distance, I do not mark them
while they are on the nests; I shall mark them at the starting-point, as I
release them. It is the old method, prolific of stings; but I prefer it
to-day, in order to save time. It takes me an hour to reach the place. The
distance, therefore, allowing for windings, is about three miles.</p>
<p>The site selected must permit me to recognize the direction of the
insects' first flight. I choose a clearing in the middle of the copses.
All around is a great expanse of dense woods, shutting out the horizon on
every side; on the south, in the direction of the nests, a curtain of
hills rises to a height of some three hundred feet above the spot at which
I stand. The wind is not strong, but it is blowing in the opposite
direction to that which my insects will have to take in order to reach
their home. I turn my back on Serignan, so that, when leaving my fingers,
the Bees, to return to the nest, will be obliged to fly sideways, to right
and left of me; I mark the insects and release them one by one. I begin
operations at twenty minutes past ten.</p>
<p>One half of the Bees seem rather indolent, flutter about for a while, drop
to the ground, appear to recover their spirits and then start off. The
other half show greater decision. Although the insects have to fight
against the soft wind that is blowing from the south, they make straight
for the nest. All go south, after describing a few circles, a few loops,
around us. There is no exception in the case of any of those whose
departure we are able to follow. The fact is noted by myself and my
colleague beyond dispute or doubt. My Mason-bees head for the south as
though some compass told them which way the wind was blowing.</p>
<p>I am back at twelve o'clock. None of the strays is at the nest; but, a few
minutes later, I catch two. At two o'clock, the number has increased to
nine. But now the sky clouds over, the wind freshens and the storm is
approaching. We can no longer rely on any further arrivals. Total: nine
out of forty, or twenty-two per cent.</p>
<p>The proportion is smaller than in the former cases, when it varied between
thirty and forty per cent. Must we attribute this result to the
difficulties to be overcome? Can the Mason-bees have lost their way in the
maze of the forest? It is safer not to give an opinion: other causes
intervened which may have decreased the number of those who returned. I
marked the insects at the starting-place; I handled them; and I am not
prepared to say that they were all in the best of condition on leaving my
stung and smarting fingers. Besides, the sky has become overcast, a storm
is imminent. In the month of May, so variable, so fickle, in my part of
the world, we can hardly ever count on a whole day of fine weather. A
splendid morning is swiftly followed by a fitful afternoon; and my
experiments with Mason-bees have often suffered by these variations. All
things considered, I am inclined to think that the homeward journey across
the forest and the mountain is effected just as readily as across the
corn-fields and the plain.</p>
<p>I have one last resource left whereby to try and put my Bees out of their
latitude. I will first take them to a great distance; then, describing a
wide curve, I will return by another road and release my captives when I
am near enough to the village, say, about two miles. A conveyance is
necessary, this time. My collaborator of the day in the woods offers me
the use of his gig. The two of us set off, with fifteen Mason-bees, along
the road to Orange, until we come to the viaduct. Here, on the right, is
the straight ribbon of the old Roman road, the Via Domitia. We take it,
driving north towards the Uchaux Mountains, the classic home of superb
Turonian fossils. We next turn back towards Serignan, by the Piolenc Road.
A halt is made by the stretch of country known as Font-Claire, the
distance from which to the village is about one mile and five furlongs.
The reader can easily follow my route on the ordnance-survey map; and he
will see that the loop described measures not far short of five miles and
a half.</p>
<p>At the same time, Favier came and joined me at Font-Claire, by the direct
road, the one that runs through Piolenc. He brought with him fifteen
Mason-bees, intended for purposes of comparison with mine. I am therefore
in possession of two sets of insects. Fifteen, marked in pink, have taken
the five-mile bend; fifteen, marked in blue, have come by the straight
road, the shortest road for returning to the nest. The weather is warm,
exceedingly bright and very calm; I could not hope for a better day for my
experiment. The insects are given their freedom at mid-day.</p>
<p>At five o'clock, the arrivals number seven of the pink Mason-bees, whom I
thought that I had bewildered by a long and circuitous drive, and six of
the blue Mason-bees, who came to Font-Claire by the direct route. The two
proportions, forty-six and forty per cent., are almost equal; and the
slight excess in favour of the insects that went the roundabout way is
evidently an accidental result which we need not take into consideration.
The bend described cannot have helped them to find their way home; but it
has also certainly not hampered them.</p>
<p>There is no need of further proof. The intricate movements of a rotation
such as I have described; the obstacle of hills and woods; the pitfalls of
a road which moves on, moves back and returns after making a wide circuit:
none of these is able to disconcert the Chalicodomae or prevent them from
going back to the nest.</p>
<p>I had written to Charles Darwin telling him of my first, negative results,
those obtained by swinging the Bees in a box. He expected a success and
was much surprised at the failure. Had he had time to experiment with his
Pigeons, they would have behaved just like my Bees; the preliminary
twirling would not have affected them. The problem called for another
method; and what he proposed was this:</p>
<p>'To place the insect within an induction coil, so as to disturb any
magnetic or diamagnetic sensibility which it seems just possible that they
may possess.'</p>
<p>To treat an insect as you would a magnetic needle and to subject it to the
current from an induction coil in order to disturb its magnetism or
diamagnetism appeared to me, I must confess, a curious notion, worthy of
an imagination in the last ditch. I have but little confidence in our
physics, when they pretend to explain life; nevertheless, my respect for
the great man would have made me resort to the induction-coils, if I had
possessed the necessary apparatus. But my village boasts no scientific
resources: if I want an electric spark, I am reduced to rubbing a sheet of
paper on my knees. My physics cupboard contains a magnet; and that is
about all. When this penury was realised, another method was suggested,
simpler than the first and more certain in its results, as Darwin himself
considered:</p>
<p>'To make a very thin needle into a magnet; then breaking it into very
short pieces, which would still be magnetic, and fastening one of these
pieces with some cement on the thorax of the insects to be experimented
on. I believe that such a little magnet, from its close proximity to the
nervous system of the insect, would affect it more than would the
terrestrial currents.'</p>
<p>There is still the same idea of turning the insect into a sort of bar
magnet. The terrestrial currents guide it when returning to the nest. It
becomes a living compass which, withdrawn from the action of the earth by
the proximity of a loadstone, loses its sense of direction. With a tiny
magnet fastened on its thorax, parallel with the nervous system and more
powerful than the terrestrial magnetism by reason of its comparative
nearness, the insect will lose its bearings. Naturally, in setting down
these lines, I take shelter behind the mighty reputation of the learned
begetter of the idea. It would not be accepted as serious coming from a
humble person like myself. Obscurity cannot afford these audacious
theories.</p>
<p>The experiment seems easy; it is not beyond the means at my disposal. Let
us attempt it. I magnetise a very fine needle by rubbing it with my bar
magnet; I retain only the slenderest part, the point, some five or six
millimetres long. (.2 to.23 inch.—Translator's Note.) This broken
piece is a perfect magnet: it attracts and repels another magnetised
needle hanging from a thread. I am a little puzzled as to the best way to
fasten it on the insect's thorax. My assistant of the moment, the
pharmaceutical student, requisitions all the adhesives in his laboratory.
The best is a sort of cerecloth which he prepares specially with a very
fine material. It possesses the advantage that it can be softened at the
bowl of one's pipe when the time comes to operate out of doors.</p>
<p>I cut out of this cerecloth a small square the size of the Bee's thorax;
and I insert the magnetised point through a few threads of the material.
All that we now have to do is to soften the gum a little and then dab the
thing at once on the Mason-bee's back, so that the broken needle runs
parallel with the spine. Other engines of the same kind are prepared and
due note taken of their poles, so as to enable me to point the south pole
at the insect's head in some cases and at the opposite end in others.</p>
<p>My assistant and I begin by rehearsing the performance; we must have a
little practice before trying the experiment away from home. Besides, I
want to see how the insect will behave in its magnetic harness. I take a
Mason-bee at work in her cell, which I mark. I carry her to my study, at
the other end of the house. The magnetised outfit is fastened on the
thorax; and the insect is let go. The moment she is free, the Bee drops to
the ground and rolls about, like a mad thing, on the floor of the room.
She resumes her flight, flops down again, turns over on her side, on her
back, knocks against the things in her way, buzzes noisily, flings herself
about desperately and ends by darting through the open window in headlong
flight.</p>
<p>What does it all mean? The magnet appears to have a curious effect on my
patient's system! What a fuss she makes! How terrified she is! The Bee
seemed utterly distraught at losing her bearings under the influence of my
knavish tricks. Let us go to the nests and see what happens. We have not
long to wait: my insect returns, but rid of its magnetic tackle. I
recognize it by the traces of gum that still cling to the hair of the
thorax. It goes back to its cell and resumes its labours.</p>
<p>Always on my guard when searching the unknown, unwilling to draw
conclusions before weighing the arguments for and against, I feel doubt
creeping in upon me with regard to what I have seen. Was it really the
magnetic influence that disturbed my Bee so strangely? When she struggled
and kicked on the floor, fighting wildly with both legs and wings, when
she fled in terror, was she under the sway of the magnet fastened on her
back? Can my appliance have thwarted the guiding influence of the
terrestrial currents on her nervous system? Or was her distress merely the
result of an unwonted harness? This is what remains to be seen and that
without delay.</p>
<p>I construct a new apparatus, but provide it with a short straw in place of
the magnet. The insect carrying it on its back rolls on the ground, kicks
and flings herself about like the first, until the irksome contrivance is
removed, taking with it a part of the fur on the thorax. The straw
produces the same effects as the magnet, in other words, magnetism had
nothing to do with what happened. My invention, in both cases alike, is a
cumbrous tackle of which the Bee tries to rid herself at once by every
possible means. To look to her for normal actions so long as she carries
an apparatus, magnetized or not, upon her back is the same as expecting to
study the natural habits of a Dog after tying a kettle to his tail.</p>
<p>The experiment with the magnet is impracticable. What would it tell us if
the insect consented to it? In my opinion, it would tell us nothing. In
the matter of the homing instinct, a magnet would have no more influence
than a bit of straw.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />