<h2>CHAPTER III</h2>
<p class="center"><small>ROYAL AND HISTORIC POISONERS</small></p>
<p><span class="smcap">Poison</span> appears to have been
employed as a political agent
from a very early period of history,
and numerous stories have
been handed down of royal personages
who used this secret and
deadly method of ridding themselves
of troublesome individuals,
and removing enemies from their
path. They also, at times,
became the victims of jealous
rivals by the same nefarious
means.</p>
<p>One of the earliest traditions
we have of this kind is that of
Phrysa, who poisoned the queen
Statira during the reign of
Artaxerxes II (Mnemon), <small>B.C.</small>
405-359, by cutting her food with
a poisoned knife. The notorious
Nero doubtless resorted to the
use of poison more than once,
as may be inferred from the
story of the death of his brother
Britannicus, who, it is said, was
poisoned by his orders. Britannicus
was dining with his brother
and the Imperial family, and,
as was the custom of the Romans,
hot water was brought round by
slaves to the table, the water
being heated to varied degrees
to suit the taste of the drinker.
According to the story, the cup
of water handed to Britannicus
proved to be too hot, and he
gave it back to the attendant
slave, who added cold water to
it, which addition is supposed
to have contained the poison;
for no sooner had he swallowed
the draught than he fell back gasping
for breath. His mother,
Agrippina, and Octavia, his
sister, who were also at the table,
became terror-stricken, but
Nero, unmoved, calmly remarked
that he often had such fits in his
youth without danger, and the
banquet proceeded. It is thought
probable that the poison given
was prussic acid in some form.</p>
<p>A curious superstition existed
in early times, and is still entertained
by the ignorant, that if
the body rapidly decomposes
after a sudden death it is to be
attributed to the effects of
poison. So when Britannicus
died, it is recorded that the
Romans attempted to conceal
his discoloured face by means of
paint. During the Roman period,
poisoning was reduced to a fine
art, and the skilled or professional
poisoner obtained large<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_27" id="Page_27">27</SPAN></span>
amounts of money for his services.</p>
<p>The Borgias' favourite method
of administering a lethal dose
was by means of a species of
hypodermic injection.</p>
<p>The greatest craft and cunning
used to be exerted in order
to introduce poison into the
system, and there are many old
traditions concerning the subtle
methods employed, although a
number of these are doubtless
more legendary than correct.
Thus Tissot states that John,
King of Castile, owed his death
to wearing a pair of boots which
were supposed to have been impregnated
with poison by a Turk.
Henry VI is said to have
succumbed through wearing
poisoned gloves and Louis
XIV and Pope Clement VII
through the fumes from a poisoned
taper. King John is supposed
to have been poisoned by
matter extracted from a living
toad placed in his wassail bowl,
while Pope Alexander VI is
said also to have fallen a victim
to poison, "after which," according
to the chronicler, "his
body presented a fearful spectacle."</p>
<p>A document drawn up by
Charles, King of Navarre, throws
some light on the systematic
manner in which the poisoning
of obnoxious persons was carried
out in mediæval times. It is in
the form of a commission to one
Wondreton to poison Charles
VI, the Duke of Valois, brother
of the King, and his uncles, the
Dukes of Berri, Burgundy, and
Bourbon. It runs: "Go thou
to Paris; thou canst do great
service if thou wilt. Do what I
tell thee; I will reward thee well.
There is a thing which is called
sublimed arsenic; if a man eat a
bit the size of a pea, he will never
survive. Thou wilt find it in
Pampeluna, Bordeaux, Bayonne,
and in all the good towns thou
wilt pass at the apothecaries'
shops. Take it, and powder it;
and when thou shalt be in the
house of the King, of the Count
de Valois his brother, and the
Dukes of Berri, Burgundy, and
Bourbon, draw near and betake
thyself to the kitchen, to the
larder, to the cellar, or any other
place where thy point can best be
gained, and put the powder in
the soups, meats, or wines;
provided that thou canst do it
secretly. Otherwise do it not."
It is satisfactory to learn that
the miscreant who was intrusted
with this diabolical commission,
was detected in time,
and executed in 1384.</p>
<p>It is related of Charles IX
that, having suspected one of his
cooks of stealing two silver
spoons, he resolved to try the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_28" id="Page_28">28</SPAN></span>
effect of bezoar, which at that
time was highly recommended
as an antidote to poisons. So,
thinking a good opportunity
had arrived for testing its properties,
his Majesty administered
to the unfortunate cook, first,
a large dose of corrosive sublimate,
and then a dose of the
reputed antidote; but the unlucky
man fell a victim to the
experiment, and died in great
agony in seven hours, in spite of
other efforts to save him.</p>
<p>There is an old tradition that
King John also figured as a
poisoner, and got rid of the unfortunate
Maud Fitz-Walter by
means of a poisoned egg. The
story is a romantic one, and is
related by Hepworth Dixon in
"Her Majesty's Tower." "In
the reign of King John, the
White Tower received one of the
first and fairest of a long line of
female victims, in that of Maud
Fitz-Walter, who was known to
the singers of her time as Maud
the Fair. The father of this
beautiful girl was Robert, Lord
Fitz-Walter, of Castle Baynard,
on the Thames, one of John's
most powerful and greatest
barons. Yet the King, during, it
is said, a fit of violence or temper
with the Queen, fell madly in
love with the fair Maud. As
neither the lady herself nor her
powerful sire would listen to his
disgraceful suit, the King is said
to have seized her by force at
Dunmow and brought her to the
Tower. Fitz-Walter raised an
outcry, on which the King sent
troops into Castle Baynard and
his other houses, and when the
baron protested against these
wrongs, his master banished him
from the realm. Fitz-Walter fled
to France with his wife and other
children, leaving poor Maud in
the Tower, where she suffered a
daily insult in the King's unlawful
suit. But she remained
obdurate, and refused his offers.
On her proud and scornful
answer to his overtures being
heard, John carried her up to
the roof and locked her in the
round turret, standing on the
north-east angle of the keep.
Maud's cage was the highest and
chilliest den in the Tower; but
neither cold, solitude, nor hunger
could break her strength, and
at last, in the rage of his disappointed
love, the King sent
one of his minions to her room
with a poisoned egg, of which the
brave girl ate and died."</p>
<p>Bluff King Hal at one period
of his life was apprehensive of
being poisoned, and it was commonly
believed that Anne Boleyn
attempted to dose him. It is
recorded that the King, in an
interview with young Prince
Henry, burst into tears, saying<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_29" id="Page_29">29</SPAN></span>
that he and his sister, the
Princess Mary, might thank God
for having escaped from the
hands of that accursed and
venomous harlot, who had intended
to poison them.</p>
<p>According to the French
Chronicles, "After the death of
Gaultier Giffard, Count Buckingham,
in the early part of the
twelfth century, Agnes his
widow became enamoured with
Robert Duke of Normandy and
attached herself in an illicit
manner to him, shortly after
which time his wife Sibylle died
of poison."</p>
<p>Pope Alexander VI and his
son the Duke Valentinois employed
arsenic to carry out their
fiendish plans, not only on
their enemies, but their friends
also. Thus perished by their
hands the Cardinals of Capua and
Modena; and Alexander himself
by a cup intended for Adrian,
Cardinal of Corneto, who had
invited the pope to a banquet
in the Vineyard of Belvedere,
was destroyed instead of his
host.</p>
<p>Lucretia Borgia, famous in
romance and song for her poisoning
propensities, was a daughter
of Pope Alexander VI, and
sister of Cesare Borgia. She
married Giovanni Sforza, Lord
of Pesaro, in 1493, but being a
woman of haughty disposition
and evil temper, their life was
anything but a happy one; and
after living together for four
years, Alexander dissolved the
marriage, and gave her to
Alphonso II of Naples. Two
years had barely passed before
her second husband was assassinated
by hired ruffians of
Cesare Borgia. So Lucretia took
unto herself a third husband in
the person of Alphonso d'Este,
a son of the Duke of Ferrara.
She led a wild and unhappy life,
and was accused of poisoning,
and almost every form of crime,
although it is stated by several
modern historians that many of
these charges were unfounded.
Although tradition has inflicted
her with a bad character, she
is said to have been a liberal
patroness of art and literature
in her time. She died in 1523.</p>
<p>In 1536 the Dauphin, eldest
son of Francis I, died suddenly,
and suspicion attached to
Sebastian Montecucculi, a Ferrarese,
who held the part of cup-bearer—bribed,
as was supposed
by Catherine of Medicis in order
to secure the crown to her
husband, Henry, Duke of Orleans,
who became Dauphin in
consequence of his elder brother's
death.</p>
<p>The story of the Countess of
Somerset, who was tried with
others for the murder of Sir<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_30" id="Page_30">30</SPAN></span>
Thomas Overbury in the reign
of James I, forms an interesting
episode in the history of romantic
poisoning. Robert, Earl of
Essex, son of Queen Elizabeth's
favourite, and who afterwards
became Commander-in-chief of
the Parliamentary forces,
married, at the age of fourteen,
Frances Howard, a younger
daughter of the Earl of Suffolk, the
bride being just a year younger
than her husband. The match
had been arranged and brought
about through the influence of
relatives, who thought it expedient
that the youthful bridegroom
should be sent off to travel
on the Continent immediately
after the marriage had taken
place, and he remained away for
three or four years. During this
period the countess, who was
brought up at court, developed
into a very beautiful woman,
but seems to have been equally
unprincipled and capricious. On
the return of the earl from his
travels, she shrank from all
advances on his part, and showed
the utmost repugnance to her
husband on all occasions. Their
dispositions were entirely different.
He loved retirement, and
wished to live a quiet country
life, while she, who had been bred
at court, and accustomed to
adulation and intrigue, refused
to leave town. The King about
this time had a number of young
men of distinguished appearance
and good looks attached to the
court, and of these, one Robert
Carr, at length became an exclusive
favourite. Between him
and the self-willed young countess
there sprang up an attachment,
which, at least on her
side, amounted to infatuation.
Her opportunities for meeting
her lover were short and rare,
and in this emergency she
applied to a Mrs. Turner, who
introduced her to Dr. Forman,
a noted astrologer and magician
at that time, and he, by images
made of wax, and other devices
of the black art, undertook
to procure the love of Carr to
the lady. At the same time he
was also to practise against the
earl in the opposite direction.
These measures, however, were
too slow for the wayward countess,
and having gone to the utmost
lengths with her inamorata,
she insisted on a divorce, and a
legal marriage with him.</p>
<p>One of Carr's greatest friends
was Sir Thomas Overbury, a
young courtier and a man of
honour and kindly disposition.
He was much against this intimacy,
and besought his friend to
break it off, assuring him it would
ruin his prospects and reputation
if he married the lady. Carr
unwisely made this known to the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_31" id="Page_31">31</SPAN></span>
countess, who at once regarded
Overbury as a bitter enemy,
and resolved to do what she
could to overthrow him. The
pair plotted together with evident
success, for the unfortunate
Sir Thomas was shortly afterwards
committed to the Tower
by an arbitrary mandate of the
King; next, he was not allowed
to see any visitors; and, finally,
his food was poisoned, and, after
several unsuccessful attempts
on his life, he at last died from
the effects of poison. Cantharides,
nitrate of silver, spiders,
arsenic, and last of all, corrosive
sublimate, are said to have been
administered in turn to this
unfortunate individual. Meanwhile,
the countess obtained a
divorce from her husband on the
ground of impotency, and married
Carr, who was soon after
made Earl of Somerset by
King James.</p>
<p>Two years elapsed before the
murder of Sir Thomas Overbury
was brought to light, when the
inferior criminals, Mrs. Turner
and the others, were convicted
and executed; but the Earl of
Somerset and his countess,
although found guilty with their
accomplices, received the royal
pardon. The happiness of the
earl and countess, however, was
not of long duration, as it is
stated they afterwards became
so alienated from each other,
that they resided for years
under the same roof with the
most careful precautions that
they might not by any chance
come into each other's presence.
The Mrs. Turner implicated in
the crime is said to have been
the first to introduce into England
the yellow starch that was
then applied to ladies' ruffs. Her
last request was, that she should
be hanged in a ruff dyed with
her own yellow starch, which is
said to have been carried out.</p>
<p>According to some historians,
Robert Dudley, Earl of Leicester,
Prime Minister and favourite of
Queen Elizabeth, was a poisoner
of the most diabolical description.</p>
<p>His ambition to marry his
royal mistress, who, shrewd
woman as she was, seems to have
had no insight into his unscrupulous
character, was the cause of
his moving every human obstacle
from his path by insidious
methods. The murder of his
wife Amy Robsart was the first
of a long series of murders,
carried out, doubtless, at his
instigation. He was next suspected
of causing the death of
Lord Sheffield, of whose lady he
was an admirer. The Earl of
Essex is said to have been another
victim. His death is
described in the language of the<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_32" id="Page_32">32</SPAN></span>
time as having been due to "an
extreme flux caused by an Italian
Receit, the maker whereof was
a surgeon that then was newly
come to my Lord from Italy, a
cunning man and sure in operation.
The inventor of this recipe
was known as one Dr. Julio,
who was said to be able to make
a man dye in what manner of
sickness you will." The death of
the Earl of Essex took place when
on his way home from Ireland,
with the object of revenging
himself on the Earl of Leicester
for his domestic wrongs. The
next victim is said to have been
Cardinal Chatillian, who, having
accused the earl of preventing
the marriage of the queen to the
King of France, was journeying
back to Dover, when he was
taken suddenly ill and died in
Canterbury.</p>
<p>Sir Nicholas Throgmorton, a
wealthy city magnate and a tool
of the earl's, whom, 'tis said,
he used to thwart the doings of
the Lord Treasurer, Sir William
Cecil, was another victim. Having
heard that Sir Nicholas was
revealing some of his secrets, he
invited him one night to supper
at his house in London, and at
supper time hurriedly went to
the court, to which he said he
had been called suddenly by her
Majesty. Sir Nicholas proceeded
with the meal in his absence,
and soon after was seized with
a violent vomiting, from which
he never recovered. According
to an old chronicler, "The day
before his death he declared to
a dear friend, all the circumstances
and cause of his complaint,
which he affirmed plainly
to be poison given him in a sallet
at supper, inveighing most
earnestly against the earl's
cruelty and bloody disposition,
and affirming him to be the
wickedest, most perilous and
perfidious man under heaven."</p>
<p>The chronicler continues:
"And for his art of poisoning,
it is such now, and reaching so
far, as he holdeth all his foes in
England and elsewhere, as also
a good many of his friends, in
fear thereof, and if it were
known how many he hath despatched
in that way would be
marvellous to posterity.</p>
<p>"His body physician, one
Dr. Bayly, openly proclaimed
the fact that he knew of poisons
which might be so tempered
that they should kill the party
afterwards at what time it
should be appointed; which argument
belike," says the writer
of <em>Leycester's Commonwealth</em>,
"pleased well his Lordship of
Leicester. The tool who carried
out the murder of the Earl of
Essex is said to have been one
Crompton, Yeoman of the Bottles,<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_33" id="Page_33">33</SPAN></span>
together with Godwick Lloyd."
Leicester was suspected of being
the instigator of many murders
which probably he may have had
nothing to do with, such was the
feeling of dislike against him.
Among others was Lady Lennox,
who died in a mysterious manner
shortly after being visited by the
earl.</p>
<p>He is said to have kept in his
employ several needy but unscrupulous
physicians, ready to
administer the "Italian Comfortive,"
as the <span class="err" title="original: poision">poison</span> was
called, at his bidding. "With
the Earl of Essex, one Mrs.
Alice Drakott, a godly gentlewoman,
is also said to have been
poisoned." This lady happened
to be accompanying the earl on
her way towards her own house,
when after partaking of the same
cup she was also seized with
violent pain and <span class="err" title="original: vomitting">vomiting</span>,
which continued until she died,
a day or two before the earl succumbed.
"When she was dead,"
says the chronicler, "her body
was swollen into a monstrous
bigness and deformity; whereof
the good earl, hearing the day
following, lamented the case
greatly, and said in the presence
of his servants, 'Ah! poor Alice,
the cup was not prepared for
thee, albeit it was thy hard fortune
to taste thereof.'"</p>
<hr class="ruler" />
<hr class="chap" />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_34" id="Page_34">34</SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />