<SPAN name="CH15"><!-- CH15 --></SPAN>
<h2> CHAPTER XV </h2>
<h3> CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE </h3>
<p>The morning after the hearing saw me setting forth
on my round in more than usually good spirits. The
round itself was but a short one, for my list contained
only a couple of "chronics," and this, perhaps, contributed
to my cheerful outlook on life. But there were
other reasons. The decision of the Court had come as
an unexpected reprieve and the ruin of my friends'
prospects was at least postponed. Then, I had learned
that Thorndyke was back from Bristol and wished me
to look in on him; and, finally, Miss Bellingham had
agreed to spend this very afternoon with me, browsing
round the galleries at the British Museum.</p>
<p>I had disposed of my two patients by a quarter to
eleven, and three minutes later was striding down Mitre
Court, all agog to hear what Thorndyke had to say
with reference to my notes on the inquest. The "oak"
was open when I arrived at his chambers, and a modest
flourish on the little brass knocker of the inner door
was answered by my quondam teacher himself.</p>
<p>"How good of you, Berkeley," he said, shaking
hands genially, "to look me up so early. I am all
alone, just looking through the report of the evidence
in yesterday's proceedings."</p>
<p>He placed an easy chair for me, and, gathering up a
bundle of type-written papers, laid them aside on the
table.</p>
<p>"Were you surprised at the decision?" I asked.</p>
<p>"No," he answered. "Two years is a short period
of absence; but still, it might easily have gone the other
way. I am greatly relieved. The respite gives us
time to carry out our investigations without undue
hurry."</p>
<p>"Did you find my notes of any use?" I asked.</p>
<p>"Heath did. Polton handed them to him, and they
were invaluable to him for his cross-examination. I
haven't seen them yet; in fact, I have only just got
them back from him. Let us go through them together
now."</p>
<p>He opened a drawer, and taking from it my note-book,
seated himself, and began to read through my
notes with grave attention, while I stood and looked
shyly over his shoulder. On the page that contained
my sketches of the Sidcup arm, showing the distribution
of the snails' eggs on the bones, he lingered with a
faint smile that made me turn hot and red.</p>
<p>"Those sketches look rather footy," I said; "but
I had to put something in my note-book."</p>
<p>"You didn't attach any importance, then, to the
facts that they illustrated?"</p>
<p>"No. The egg-patches were there, so I noted the
fact. That's all."</p>
<p>"I congratulate you, Berkeley. There is not one
man in twenty who would have the sense to make a
careful note of what he considers an unimportant or
irrelevant fact; and the investigator who notes only
those things that appear significant is perfectly useless.
He gives himself no material for reconsideration. But
you don't mean that these egg-patches and worm-tubes
appeared to you to have no significance at all?"</p>
<p>"Oh, of course, they show the position in which the
bones were lying."</p>
<p>"Exactly. The arm was lying, fully extended, with
the dorsal side uppermost. There is nothing remarkable
in that. But we also learn from these egg-patches
that the hand had been separated from the arm before
it was thrown into the pond; and there is something
very remarkable in that."</p>
<p>I leaned over his shoulder and gazed at my sketches,
amazed at the rapidity with which he had reconstructed
the limb from my rough drawings of the individual
bones.</p>
<p>"I don't quite see how you arrived at it, though,"
I said.</p>
<p>"Well, look at your drawings. The egg-patches
are on the dorsal surface of the scapula, the humerus,
and the bones of the fore-arm. But here you have
shown six of the bones of the hand: two metacarpals,
the os magnum, and three phalanges; and they all have
egg-patches on the <i>palmar</i> surface. Therefore the
hand was lying palm upwards."</p>
<p>"But the hand may have been pronated."</p>
<p>"If you mean pronated in relation to the arm, that
is impossible, for the position of the egg-patches shows
clearly that the bones of the arm were lying in the
position of supination. Thus the dorsal surface of the
arm and the palmar surface of the hand respectively
were uppermost, which is an anatomical impossibility
so long as the hand is attached to the arm."</p>
<p>"But might not the hand have become detached after
lying in the pond some time?"</p>
<p>"No. It could not have been detached until the
ligaments had decayed, and if it had been separated
after the decay of the soft parts, the bones would have
been thrown into disorder. But the egg-patches are
all on the palmar surface, showing that the bones were
still in their normal relative positions. No, Berkeley,
that hand was thrown into the pond separately from
the arm."</p>
<p>"But why should it have been?" I asked.</p>
<p>"Ah, there is a very pretty little problem for you to
consider. And, meantime, let me tell you that your
expedition has been a brilliant success. You are an
excellent observer. Your only fault is that when you
have noted certain facts you don't seem fully to appreciate
their significance—which is merely a matter of
inexperience. As to the facts that you have collected,
several of them are of prime importance."</p>
<p>"I am glad you are satisfied," said I, "though I
don't see that I have discovered much excepting those
snails' eggs; and they don't seem to have advanced
matters very much."</p>
<p>"A definite fact, Berkeley, is a definite asset. Perhaps
we may presently find a little space in our Chinese
puzzle which this fact of the detached hand will just
drop into. But, tell me, did you find nothing unexpected
or suggestive about those bones—as to their
number and condition, for instance?"</p>
<p>"Well, I thought it a little queer that the scapula
and clavicle should be there. I should have expected
him to cut the arm off at the shoulder-joint."</p>
<p>"Yes," said Thorndyke; "so should I; and so it
has been done in every case of dismemberment that I
am acquainted with. To an ordinary person, the arm
seems to join on to the trunk at the shoulder-joint,
and that is where he would naturally sever it. What
explanation do you suggest of this unusual mode of
severing the arm?"</p>
<p>"Do you think the fellow could have been a
butcher?" I asked, remembering Dr. Summers' remark.
"This is the way a shoulder of mutton is taken
off."</p>
<p>"No," replied Thorndyke. "A butcher includes the
scapula in a shoulder of mutton for a specific purpose,
namely, to take off a given quantity of meat. And
also, as a sheep has no clavicle, it is the easiest way
to detach the limb. But I imagine a butcher would
find himself in difficulties if he attempted to take off
a man's arm in that way. The clavicle would be a new
and perplexing feature. Then, too, a butcher does not
deal very delicately with his subject; if he has to divide
a joint, he just cuts through it and does not trouble
himself to avoid marking the bones. But you note here
that there is not a single scratch or score on any one
of the bones, not even where the finger was removed.
Now, if you have ever prepared bones for a museum,
as I have, you will remember the extreme care that is
necessary in disarticulating joints to avoid disfiguring
the articular ends of the bones with cuts and scratches."</p>
<p>"Then you think that the person who dismembered
this body must have had some anatomical knowledge
and skill?"</p>
<p>"That is what has been suggested. The suggestion
is not mine."</p>
<p>"Then I infer that you don't agree?"</p>
<p>Thorndyke smiled. "I am sorry to be so cryptic,
Berkeley, but you understand that I can't make statements.
Still, I am trying to lead you to make certain
inferences from the facts that are in your possession."</p>
<p>"If I make the right inference, will you tell me?"
I asked.</p>
<p>"It won't be necessary," he answered, with the same
quiet smile. "When you have fitted a puzzle together
you don't need to be told that you have done it."</p>
<p>It was most infernally tantalising. I pondered on the
problem with a scowl of such intense cogitation that
Thorndyke laughed outright.</p>
<p>"It seems to me," I said, at length, "that the identity
of the remains is the primary question and that
is a question of fact. It doesn't seem any use to speculate
about it."</p>
<p>"Exactly. Either these bones are the remains of
John Bellingham or they are not. There will be no
doubt on the subject when all the bones are assembled—if
ever they are. And the settlement of that question
will probably throw light on the further question: Who
deposited them in the places in which they were found?
But to return to your observations: did you gather
nothing from the other bones? From the complete
state of the neck vertebrae, for instance?"</p>
<p>"Well, it did strike me as rather odd that the fellow
should have gone to the trouble of separating the atlas
from the skull. He must have been pretty handy with
the scalpel to have done it as cleanly as he seems to
have done; but I don't see why he should have gone
about the business in the most inconvenient way."</p>
<p>"You notice the uniformity of method. He has
separated the head from the spine, instead of cutting
through the spine lower down, as most persons would
have done: he removed the arms with the entire shoulder-girdle,
instead of simply cutting them off at the
shoulder-joints. Even in the thighs the same peculiarity
appears; for in neither case was the knee-cap
found with the thigh-bone, although it seems to have
been searched for. Now the obvious way to divide the
leg is to cut through the patellar ligament, leaving
the knee-cap attached to the thigh. But in this case,
the knee-cap appears to have been left attached to the
shank. Can you explain why this person should have
adopted this unusual and rather inconvenient method?
Can you suggest a motive for this procedure, or can
you think of any circumstances which might lead a
person to adopt this method by preference?"</p>
<p>"It seems as if he wished, for some reason, to divide
the body into definite anatomical regions."</p>
<p>Thorndyke chuckled. "You are not offering that
suggestion as an explanation, are you? Because it
would require more explaining than the original problem.
And it is not even true. Anatomically speaking,
the knee-cap appertains to the thigh rather than to
the shank. It is a sesamoid bone belonging to the thigh
muscles; yet in this case it has been left attached,
apparently, to the shank. No, Berkeley, that cat won't
jump. Our unknown operator was not preparing a
skeleton as a museum specimen; he was dividing a body
up into convenient-sized portions for the purpose of
conveying them to various ponds. Now what circumstances
might have led him to divide it in this peculiar
manner?"</p>
<p>"I am afraid I have no suggestion to offer. Have
you?"</p>
<p>Thorndyke suddenly lapsed into ambiguity. "I
think," he said, "it is possible to conceive such circumstances,
and so, probably, will you if you think it
over."</p>
<p>"Did you gather anything of importance from the
evidence at the inquest?" I asked.</p>
<p>"It is difficult to say," he replied. "The whole of
my conclusions in this case are based on what is virtually
circumstantial evidence. I have not one single
fact of which I can say that it admits only of a single
interpretation. Still, it must be remembered that even
the most inconclusive facts, if sufficiently multiplied,
yield a highly conclusive total. And my little pile of
evidence is growing, particle by particle; but we mustn't
sit here gossiping at this hour of the day; I have to
consult with Marchmont and you say that you have
an early afternoon engagement. We can walk together
as far as Fleet Street."</p>
<p>A minute or two later we went our respective ways,
Thorndyke towards Lombard Street and I to Fetter
Lane, not unmindful of those coming events that were
casting so agreeable a shadow before them.</p>
<p>There was only one message awaiting me, and when
Adolphus had delivered it (amidst mephitic fumes that
rose from the basement, premonitory of fried plaice), I
pocketed my stethoscope and betook myself to Gunpowder
Alley, the aristocratic abode of my patient,
joyfully threading the now familiar passages of Gough
Square and Wine Office Court, and meditating pleasantly
on the curious literary flavour that pervades these
little-known regions. For the shade of the author of
<i>Rasselas</i> still seems to haunt the scenes of his Titanic
labours and his ponderous but homely and temperate
rejoicings. Every court and alley whispers of books
and of the making of books; forms of type, trundled
noisily on trollies by ink-smeared boys, salute the wayfarer
at odd corners; piles of strawboard, rolls or
bales of paper, drums of printing-ink or roller-composition
stand on the pavement outside dark entries;
basement windows give glimpses into Hadean caverns
tenanted by legions of printer's devils; and the very
air is charged with the hum of press and with odours of
glue and paste and oil. The entire neighbourhood is
given up to the printer and binder; and even my patient
turned out to be a guillotine-knife grinder—a ferocious
and revolutionary calling strangely at variance with
his harmless appearance and meek bearing.</p>
<p>I was in good time at my tryst, despite the hindrances
of fried plaice and invalid guillotinists; but, early as
I was, Miss Bellingham was already waiting in the
garden—she had been filling a bowl with flowers—ready
to sally forth.</p>
<p>"It is quite like old times," she said, as we turned
into Fetter Lane, "to be going to the Museum together.
It brings back the Tell el Amarna tablets and all your
kindness and unselfish labour. I suppose we shall walk
there to-day?"</p>
<p>"Certainly," I replied; "I am not going to
share your society with the common mortals who
ride in omnibuses. That would be sheer, sinful
waste. Besides, it is more companionable to
walk."</p>
<p>"Yes, it is; and the bustle of the streets makes one
more appreciative of the quiet of the Museum. What
are we going to look at when we get there?"</p>
<p>"You must decide that," I replied. "You know
the collection much better than I do."</p>
<p>"Well, now," she mused, "I wonder what you would
like to see; or, in other words, what I should like you
to see. The old English pottery is rather fascinating,
especially the Fulham ware. I rather think I shall take
you to see that."</p>
<p>She reflected awhile, and then, just as we reached
the gate of Staple Inn, she stopped and looked thoughtfully
down the Gray's Inn Road.</p>
<p>"You have taken a great interest in our 'case,' as
Doctor Thorndyke calls it. Would you like to see the
churchyard where Uncle John wished to be buried? It
is a little out of our way, but we are not in a hurry,
are we?"</p>
<p>I, certainly, was not. Any deviation that might
prolong our walk was welcome, and, as to the place—why,
all places were alike to me if only she were by my
side. Besides, the churchyard was really of some interest,
since it was undoubtedly the "exciting cause" of
the obnoxious paragraph two of the disputed will. I
accordingly expressed a desire to make its acquaintance,
and we crossed to the entrance to Gray's Inn Road.</p>
<p>"Do you ever try," she asked, as we turned down
the dingy thoroughfare, "to picture to yourself familiar
places as they looked a couple of hundred years ago?"</p>
<p>"Yes," I answered, "and very difficult I find it.
One has to manufacture the materials for reconstruction,
and then the present aspect of the place will keep
obtruding itself. But some places are easier to reconstitute
than others."</p>
<p>"That is what I find," said she. "Now Holborn,
for example, is quite easy to reconstruct, though I
daresay the imaginary form isn't a bit like the original.
But there are fragments left, like Staple Inn and the
front of Gray's Inn; and then one has seen prints of
the old Middle Row and some of the taverns, so that
one has some material with which to help out one's
imagination. But this road that we are walking in
always baffles me. It looks so old and yet is, for the
most part, so new that I find it impossible to make a
satisfactory picture of its appearance, say, when Sir
Roger de Coverley might have strolled in Gray's Inn
Walks, or farther back, when Francis Bacon had
chambers in the Inn."</p>
<p>"I imagine," said I, "that part of the difficulty is
in the mixed character of the neighbourhood. Here,
on the one side, is old Gray's Inn, not much changed
since Bacon's time—his chambers are still to be seen,
I think, over the gateway; and there, on the Clerkenwell
side, is a dense and rather squalid neighbourhood
which has grown up over a region partly rural and
wholly fugitive in character. Places like Bagnigge
Wells and Hockley in the Hole would not have had
many buildings that were likely to survive; and in the
absence of surviving specimens the imagination hasn't
much to work from."</p>
<p>"I daresay you are right," said she. "Certainly,
the purlieus of old Clerkenwell present a very confused
picture to me; whereas, in the case of an old street
like, say, Great Ormond Street, one has only to sweep
away the modern buildings and replace them with
glorious old houses like the few that remain, dig up the
roadway and pavements and lay down cobble-stones,
plant a few wooden posts, hang up one or two oil-lamps,
and the transformation is complete. And a very delightful
transformation it is."</p>
<p>"Very delightful; which, by the way, is a melancholy
thought. For we ought to be doing better work than
our forefathers; whereas what we actually do is to pull
down the old buildings, clap the doorways, porticoes,
panelling, and mantels in our museums, and then run
up something inexpensive and useful and deadly uninteresting
in their place."</p>
<p>My companion looked at me and laughed softly.
"For a naturally cheerful, and even gay young man,"
said she, "you are most amazingly pessimistic. The
mantle of Jeremiah—if he ever wore one—seems to
have fallen on you, but without in the least impairing
your good spirits excepting in regard to matters architectural."</p>
<p>"I have much to be thankful for," said I. "Am I
not taken to the Museum by a fair lady? And does
she not stay me with mummy cases and comfort me
with crockery?"</p>
<p>"Pottery," she corrected; and then, as we met a
party of grave-looking women emerging from a side-street,
she said: "I suppose those are lady medical
students."</p>
<p>"Yes, on their way to the Royal Free Hospital.
Note the gravity of their demeanour and contrast it
with the levity of the male student."</p>
<p>"I was doing so," she answered, "and wondering
why professional women are usually so much more
serious than men."</p>
<p>"Perhaps," I suggested, "it is a matter of selection.
A peculiar type of woman is attracted to the professions,
whereas every man has to earn his living as a
matter of course."</p>
<p>"Yes, I daresay that is the explanation. This is
our turning."</p>
<p>We passed into Heathcote Street, at the end of
which was an open gate giving entrance to one of those
disused and metamorphosed burial-grounds that are to
be met with in the older districts of London; in which
the dispossessed dead are jostled into corners to make
room for the living. Many of the headstones were
still standing, and others, displaced to make room for
asphalted walks and seats, were ranged around by the
walls, exhibiting inscriptions made meaningless by their
removal. It was a pleasant enough place on this summer
afternoon, contrasted with the dingy street whence
we had come, though its grass was faded and yellow
and the twitter of the birds in the trees mingled with
the hideous Board-school drawl of the children who
played around the seats and the few remaining tombs.</p>
<p>"So this is the last resting-place of the illustrious
house of Bellingham," said I.</p>
<p>"Yes; and we are not the only distinguished people
who repose in this place. The daughter of no less a
person than Richard Cromwell is buried here; the tomb
is still standing—but perhaps you have been here before,
and know it."</p>
<p>"I don't think I have ever been here before; and
yet there is something about the place that seems
familiar." I looked around, cudgelling my brains for
the key to the dimly reminiscent sensations that the
place evoked; until, suddenly, I caught sight of a group
of buildings away to the west, enclosed within a wall
heightened by a wooden trellis.</p>
<p>"Yes, of course!" I exclaimed. "I remember the
place now. I have never been in this part before, but
in that enclosure beyond which opens at the end of
Henrietta Street, there used to be and may be still, for
all I know, a school of anatomy, at which I attended
in my first year; in fact, I did my first dissection
there."</p>
<p>"There was a certain gruesome appropriateness in
the position of the school," remarked Miss Bellingham.
"It would have been really convenient in the days of
the resurrection men. Your material would have been
delivered at your very door. Was it a large school?"</p>
<p>"The attendance varied according to the time of the
year. Sometimes I worked there quite alone. I used
to let myself in with a key and hoist my subject out
of a sort of sepulchral tank by means of a chain tackle.
It was a ghoulish business. You have no idea how
awful the body used to look, to my unaccustomed eyes,
as it rose slowly out of the tank. It was like the resurrection
scenes that you see on some old tombstones,
where the deceased is shown rising out of his coffin
while the skeleton, Death, falls vanquished with his
dart shattered and his crown toppling off.</p>
<p>"I remember, too, that the demonstrator used to
wear a blue apron, which created a sort of impression
of a cannibal butcher's shop. But I am afraid I am
shocking you."</p>
<p>"No, you are not. Every profession has its unpresentable
aspects, which ought not to be seen by out-siders.
Think of a sculptor's studio and of the sculptor
himself when he is modelling a large figure or group
in the clay. He might be a bricklayer or a road-sweeper
if you judge by his appearance. This is the
tomb I was telling you about."</p>
<p>We halted before the plain coffer of stone, weathered
and wasted by age, but yet kept in decent repair by
some pious hands, and read the inscription, setting
forth with modest pride, that here reposed Anna, sixth
daughter of Richard Cromwell, "The Protector." It
was a simple monument and commonplace enough, with
the crude severity of the ascetic age to which it belonged.
But still, it carried the mind back to those
stirring times when the leafy shades of Gray's Inn
Lane must have resounded with the clank of weapons
and the tramp of armed men; when this bald recreation-ground
was a rustic churchyard, standing amidst green
fields and hedgerows, and countrymen leading their
pack-horses into London through the Lane would stop
to look in over the wooden gate.</p>
<p>Miss Bellingham looked at me critically as I stood
thus reflecting, and presently remarked, "I think you
and I have a good many mental habits in common."</p>
<p>I looked up inquiringly, and she continued: "I notice
that an old tombstone seems to set you meditating.
So it does me. When I look at an ancient monument,
and especially an old headstone, I find myself almost
unconsciously retracing the years to the date that is
written on the stone. Why do you think that is? Why
should a monument be so stimulating to the imagination?
And why should a common headstone be more
so than any other?"</p>
<p>"I suppose it is," I answered reflectively, "that a
churchyard monument is a peculiarly personal thing
and appertains in a peculiar way to a particular time.
And the circumstance that it has stood untouched by
the passing years while everything around has changed,
helps the imagination to span the interval. And the
common headstone, the memorial of some dead and
gone farmer or labourer who lived and died in the
village hard by, is still more intimate and suggestive.
The rustic, childish sculpture of the village mason and
the artless doggerel of the village schoolmaster, bring
back the time and place and the conditions of life much
more vividly than the more scholarly inscriptions and
the more artistic enrichments of monuments of greater
pretensions. But where are your own family tombstones?"</p>
<p>"They are over in that farther corner. There is an
intelligent, but inopportune, person apparently copying
the epitaphs. I wish he would go away. I want
to show them to you."</p>
<p>I now noticed, for the first time, an individual engaged,
note-book in hand, in making a careful survey
of a group of old headstones. Evidently he was making
a copy of the inscriptions, for not only was he poring
attentively over the writing on the face of the stone,
but now and again he helped out his vision by running
his fingers over the worn lettering.</p>
<p>"That is my grandfather's tombstone that he is
copying now," said Miss Bellingham; and even as she
spoke, the man turned and directed a searching glance
at us with a pair of keen, spectacled eyes.</p>
<p>Simultaneously we uttered an exclamation of surprise;
for the investigator was Mr. Jellicoe.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />