<h2><SPAN name="IX" id="IX"></SPAN>IX</h2>
<h3>BRITISH OFFICIAL REPROBATION</h3>
<p><span class="sc">The</span> language of diplomacy is of a restrained and judicial character,
even when dealing with questions that arouse in the lay mind a whole
storm of feeling. But the letter of Sir Edward Grey of October 20, 1915,
addressed to Mr. Page, the United States Ambassador in London, with
studied calmness and marked dignity indicts the German authorities of an
unwarrantable haste in carrying out the sentence that amounts to
political murder. The Foreign Secretary's comments were as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>'Sir E. Grey is confident that the news of the execution of this
noble Englishwoman will be received with horror and disgust, not<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[Pg 90]</SPAN></span>
only in the United States, but throughout the civilized world. Miss
Cavell was not even charged with espionage, and the fact that she
had nursed numbers of wounded German soldiers might have been
regarded as a complete reason in itself for treating her with
leniency.</p>
<p>'The attitude of the German authorities is, if possible, rendered
worse by the discreditable efforts successfully made by the
officials of the German civil administration at Brussels to conceal
the fact that sentence had been passed, and would be carried out
immediately. These efforts were no doubt prompted by the
determination to carry out the sentence before an appeal from the
finding of the court-martial could be made to a higher authority,
and show in the clearest manner that the German authorities
concerned were well aware that the carrying out of the sentence was
not warranted by any consideration.</p>
<p>'Further comment on their proceedings would be superfluous.</p>
<p>'In conclusion, Sir E. Grey would request<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[Pg 91]</SPAN></span> Mr. Page to express to
Mr. Whitlock and the staff of the United States Legation at
Brussels the grateful thanks of His Majesty's Government for their
untiring efforts on Miss Cavell's behalf. He is fully satisfied
that no stone was left unturned to secure for Miss Cavell a fair
trial, and, when sentence had been pronounced, a mitigation
thereof.</p>
<p>'Sir E. Grey realizes that Mr. Whitlock was placed in a very
embarrassing position by the failure of the German authorities to
inform him that the sentence had been passed, and would be carried
out at once. In order, therefore, to forestall any unjust criticism
which might be made in this country, he is publishing Mr.
Whitlock's dispatch to Mr. Page without delay.'</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Sir Edward Grey also wrote to the Spanish Ambassador in London
acknowledging the good services of the Spanish Minister at Brussels, and
concluding thus:</p>
<blockquote><p>'His Majesty's Government much appreciates the efforts made by the
Marquis de<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[Pg 92]</SPAN></span> Villalobar on this occasion, and the sentiments of
humanity and chivalry which animated him, and they would be
grateful if your Excellency would be good enough to so inform the
Spanish Government.'</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In the House of Lords the Earl of Desart asked the Government if they
could give any information with regard to the execution of Miss Edith
Cavell by the German authorities in Belgium. Her offence, he said, of
assisting her own countrymen and the countrymen of our Allies to escape
was one which a belligerent was entitled to protect itself against, and
a sentence of execution might even be passed, but such sentence ought
never to have been carried out by any country. It was rumoured that
other persons against whom similar charges had been made were lying in
peril of their lives, and it might be possible through the action of
neutral countries to prevent a recurrence of one of the greatest
tragedies of the War.</p>
<p>The Marquis of Lansdowne replied:</p>
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[Pg 93]</SPAN></span></p>
<blockquote><p>'I am not surprised, and I am sure no member of the House can be
surprised, that the noble Earl should have called attention to this
most deplorable incident. We have been during the last few months
continually shocked by occurrences each more terrible and moving
than its predecessor; but I doubt whether any incident has moved
public opinion in this country more than the manner in which this
poor lady was, I suppose I may say, executed in cold blood.</p>
<p>'It is no doubt the case that she may by her conduct have rendered
herself liable to punishment, perhaps to severe punishment, for
acts that could be taken to be a violation of the kind of law which
prevails when war is going on. But I have no hesitation in saying
that she might at any rate have expected that measure of mercy
which, I believe, in no civilized country would have been refused
to one who was not only a woman, but a very brave and devoted
woman, and one who had given all her efforts and energies to the
mitigation of the sufferings of others.<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[Pg 94]</SPAN></span></p>
<p>'I am able to tell my noble friend that a full report relating to
the circumstances under which Miss Cavell was executed was
forwarded to the Foreign Office by the United States Ambassador. We
learn from this report that the representatives of the United
States and Spain at Brussels up to the very last moment neglected
no opportunity or effort in order to obtain a commutation of the
death sentence passed on Miss Cavell, or even to obtain at least a
period of suspense before that sentence was carried into effect.
These efforts failed.</p>
<p>'With regard to the second part of my noble friend's question, I am
able to tell him that two French ladies have been condemned to
death on a charge of sheltering British and French fugitive
soldiers. These ladies were to have been executed on Monday last;
but I am glad to be able to add that, as the result of strong
representations made by His Majesty the King of Spain and by the
Pope, the execution of these sentences has been postponed pending
consideration by the German<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[Pg 95]</SPAN></span> Emperor of the reports on both cases.
I will only add that I am convinced there is not a man or woman in
this country who will not join with the noble Earl in the protest
he has made against this terrible occurrence.'</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In the House of Commons Mr. Asquith, the Prime Minister, said:</p>
<blockquote><p>'If there be moments such as come to all of us when we are tempted
to be fainthearted, let us ask ourselves what year in our history
has done more to justify our faith in the manhood and the womanhood
of our people? It has brought us, as we cannot at this moment
forget, the imperishable story of the last hours of Edith Cavell,
facing a terrible ordeal worse than that of the battle-field. She
has taught the bravest man amongst us the supreme lesson of
courage. Yes, and in this United Kingdom and throughout the
Dominions of the Crown there are thousands of such women. A year
ago we did not know it. We have great<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_96" id="Page_96">[Pg 96]</SPAN></span> traditions, but a nation
cannot exist by traditions alone. Thank God, we have living
examples of all the qualities which have built up and sustained our
Empire. Let us be worthy of them, and endure to the end.'</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The Secretary for Foreign Affairs was asked whether, according to
Article 10 of the Hague Convention of 1907 and the guarantee of the
neutrality of Belgium, to which Prussia was a party, the late Miss
Cavell was, according to such law as could be applied to her case,
guilty of any military offence.</p>
<p>Sir E. Grey: 'It seems unnecessary to go into technical legal points to
condemn what has been done in this case. The reprobation of it, which I
believe is widespread in the world, rests upon higher considerations,
which arouse deeper feelings, than mere illegality.'</p>
<p>In another question the Secretary for Foreign Affairs was asked whether
he had taken, or intended to take, any steps to<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[Pg 97]</SPAN></span> convey to the Military
Governor of Brussels that, when opportunity offered, he would be held
personally responsible by His Majesty's Government for the
quasi-judicial assassination of Miss Cavell.</p>
<p>Lord Robert Cecil: 'On May 5 last the Prime Minister assured the House
that due reparation would be exacted from all persons, whatever their
position, who can be shown to have maltreated our prisoners in Germany.
That pledge still holds good, and applies with twofold force in the case
of the savage murder under legal forms of a noble woman. I do not think
that it would serve any good purpose to attempt to convey this resolve
to any particular German official, who, for aught we know at present,
may not be the chief offender.'</p>
<p>The statement of the Prime Minister to which the above reference was
made was as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>'The Government were at least as anxious as anybody else that when
the proper time came due reparation should be exacted<span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[Pg 98]</SPAN></span> from all
persons, whatever their position or their antecedents, who could be
shown to have violated the most elementary principles, and perhaps
the most fundamental, of all the rules and usages of civilized
warfare.'</p>
</blockquote>
<p>If there be any value in the British Government's expressed
determination, then assuredly von Bissing and von der Lancken will be
indicted for the offence that stinks in the nostrils of the whole
world.</p>
<hr />
<p><span class="pagenum"><SPAN name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[Pg 99]</SPAN></span></p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />