<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0009" id="link2H_4_0009"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> IX. FREEDOM FOR THE SLAVES </h2>
<p>By no means the least of the evils of slavery was a dread which had
haunted every southern household from the beginning of the government that
the slaves might one day rise in revolt and take sudden vengeance upon
their masters. This vague terror was greatly increased by the outbreak of
the Civil War. It stands to the lasting credit of the negro race that the
wrongs of their long bondage provoked them to no such crime, and that the
war seems not to have suggested, much less started any such attempt.
Indeed, even when urged to violence by white leaders, as the slaves of
Maryland had been in 1859 during John Brown's raid at Harper's Ferry, they
had refused to respond. Nevertheless it was plain from the first that
slavery was to play an important part in the Civil War. Not only were the
people of the South battling for the principle of slavery; their slaves
were a great source of military strength. They were used by the
Confederates in building forts, hauling supplies, and in a hundred ways
that added to the effectiveness of their armies in the field. On the other
hand the very first result of the war was to give adventurous or
discontented slaves a chance to escape into Union camps, where, even
against orders to the contrary, they found protection for the sake of the
help they could give as cooks, servants, or teamsters, the information
they brought about the movements of the enemy, or the great service they
were able to render as guides. Practically therefore, at the very start,
the war created a bond of mutual sympathy between the southern negro and
the Union volunteer; and as fast as Union troops advanced and secession
masters fled, a certain number found freedom in Union camps.</p>
<p>At some points this became a positive embarrassment to Union commanders. A
few days after General Butler took command of the Union troops at Fortress
Monroe in May, 1861, the agent of a rebel master came to insist on the
return of three slaves, demanding them under the fugitive-slave law.
Butler replied that since their master claimed Virginia to be a foreign
country and no longer a part of the United States, he could not at the
same time claim that the fugitive slave law was in force, and that his
slaves would not be given up unless he returned and took the oath of
allegiance to the United States. In reporting this, a newspaper pointed
out that as the breastworks and batteries which had risen so rapidly for
Confederate defense were built by slave labor, negroes were undoubtedly
"contraband of war," like powder and shot, and other military supplies,
and should no more be given back to the rebels than so many cannon or
guns. The idea was so pertinent, and the justice of it so plain that the
name "contraband" sprang at once into use. But while this happy
explanation had more convincing effect on popular thought than a volume of
discussion, it did not solve the whole question. By the end of July
General Butler had on his hands 900 "contrabands," men, women and children
of all ages, and he wrote to inquire what was their real condition. Were
they slaves or free? Could they be considered fugitive slaves when their
masters had run away and left them? How should they be disposed of? It was
a knotty problem, and upon its solution might depend the loyalty or
secession of the border slave States of Maryland, West Virginia, Kentucky
and Missouri, which, up to that time, had not decided whether to remain in
the Union or to cast their fortunes with the South.</p>
<p>In dealing with this perplexing subject. Mr. Lincoln kept in mind one of
his favorite stories: the one on the Methodist Presiding Elder who was
riding about his circuit during the spring freshets. A young and anxious
companion asked how they should ever be able to cross the swollen waters
of Fox River, which they were approaching, and the elder quieted him by
saying that he made it the rule of his life never to cross Fox River until
he came to it. The President, following this rule, did not immediately
decide the question, but left it to be treated at the discretion of each
commander. Under this theory some commanders admitted black people to
their camps, while others refused to receive them. The curt formula of
General Orders: "We are neither negro stealers nor negro catchers," was
easily read to justify either course. Congress greatly advanced the
problem, shortly after the battle of Bull Run, by passing a law which took
away a master's right to his slave, when, with his consent, such slave was
employed in service or labor hostile to the United States.</p>
<p>On the general question of slavery, the President's mind was fully made
up. He felt that he had no right to interfere with slavery where slavery
was lawful, just because he himself did not happen to like it; for he had
sworn to do all in his power to "preserve, protect and defend" the
government and its laws, and slavery was lawful in the southern States.
When freeing the slaves should become necessary in order to preserve the
Government, then it would be his duty to free them; until that time came,
it was equally his duty to let them alone.</p>
<p>Twice during the early part of the war military commanders issued orders
freeing slaves in the districts over which they had control, and twice he
refused to allow these orders to stand. "No commanding general should do
such a thing upon his responsibility, without consulting him," he said;
and he added that whether he, as Commander-in-Chief, had the power to free
slaves, and whether at any time the use of such power should become
necessary, were questions which he reserved to himself. He did not feel
justified in leaving such decisions to commanders in the field. He even
refused at that time to allow Secretary Cameron to make a public
announcement that the government might find it necessary to arm slaves and
employ them as soldiers. He would not cross Fox River until he came to it.
He would not take any measure until he felt it to be absolutely necessary.</p>
<p>Only a few months later he issued his first proclamation of emancipation;
but he did not do so until convinced that he must do this in order to put
down the rebellion. Long ago he had considered and in his own mind adopted
a plan of dealing with the slavery question—the simple, easy plan
which, while a member of Congress, he had proposed for the District of
Columbia—that on condition of the slave-owners voluntarily giving up
their slaves, they should be paid a fair price for them by the Federal
government. Delaware was a slave State, and seemed an excellent place in
which to try this experiment of "compensated emancipation," as it was
called; for there were, all told, only 1798 slaves left in the State.
Without any public announcement of his purpose he offered to the citizens
of Delaware, through their representative in Congress, four hundred
dollars for each of these slaves, the payment to be made, not all at once,
but yearly, during a period of thirty-one years. He believed that if
Delaware could be induced to accept this offer, Maryland might follow her
example, and that afterward other States would allow themselves to be led
along the same easy way. The Delaware House of Representatives voted in
favor of the proposition, but five of the nine members of the Delaware
senate scornfully repelled the "abolition bribe," as they chose to call
it, and the project withered in the bud.</p>
<p>Mr. Lincoln did not stop at this failure, but, on March 6, 1862, sent a
special message to the Senate and House of Representatives recommending
that Congress adopt a joint resolution favoring and practically offering
gradual compensated emancipation to any State that saw fit to accept it;
pointing out at the same time that the Federal government claimed no right
to interfere with slavery within the States, and that if the offer were
accepted it must be done as a matter of free choice.</p>
<p>The Republican journals of the North devoted considerable space to
discussing the President's plan, which, in the main, was favorably
received; but it was thought that it must fail on the score of expense.
The President answered this objection in a private letter to a Senator,
proving that less than one-half day's cost of war would pay for all the
slaves in Delaware at four hundred dollars each, and less than
eighty-seven days' cost of war would pay for all in Delaware, Maryland,
the District of Columbia, Kentucky and Missouri. "Do you doubt," he asked,
that taking such a step "on the part of those States and this District
would shorten the war more than eighty-seven days, and thus be an actual
saving of expense?"</p>
<p>Both houses of Congress favored the resolution, and also passed a bill
immediately freeing the slaves in the District of Columbia on the payment
to their loyal owners of three hundred dollars for each slave. This last
bill was signed by the President and became a law on April 16, 1862. So,
although he had been unable to bring it about when a member of Congress
thirteen years before, it was he, after all, who finally swept away that
scandal of the "negro livery-stable" in the shadow of the dome of the
Capitol.</p>
<p>Congress as well as the President was thus pledged to compensated
emancipation, and if any of the border slave States had shown a
willingness to accept the generosity of the government, their people might
have been spared the loss that overtook all slave-owners on the first of
January, 1863. The President twice called the representatives and senators
of these States to the White House, and urged his plan most eloquently,
but nothing came of it. Meantime, the military situation continued most
discouraging. The advance of the Army of the Potomac upon Richmond became
a retreat; the commanders in the West could not get control of the
Mississippi River; and worst of all, in spite of their cheering assurance
that "We are coming, Father Abraham, three hundred thousand strong," the
people of the country were saddened and filled with the most gloomy
forebodings because of the President's call for so many new troops.</p>
<p>"It had got to be midsummer, 1862," Mr. Lincoln said, in telling an artist
friend the history of his most famous official act. "Things had gone on
from bad to worse, until I felt that we had reached the end of our rope on
the plan of operations we had been pursuing; that we had about played our
last card, and must change our tactics or lose the game. I now determined
upon the adoption of the emancipation policy, and without consultation
with, or the knowledge of the cabinet, I prepared the original draft of
the proclamation, and after much anxious thought, called a cabinet meeting
upon the subject.... I said to the cabinet that I had resolved upon this
step, and had not called them together to ask their advice, but to lay the
subject-matter of a proclamation before them, suggestions as to which
would be in order after they had heard it read."</p>
<p>It was on July 22 that the President read to his cabinet the draft of this
first emancipation proclamation, which, after announcing that at the next
meeting of Congress he would again offer compensated emancipation to such
States as chose to accept it, went on to order as Commander-in-Chief of
the Army and Navy of the United States, that the slaves in all States
which should be in rebellion against the government on January 1, 1863,
should "then, thenceforward and forever be free."</p>
<p>Mr. Lincoln had given a hint of this intended step to Mr. Seward and Mr.
Welles, but to all the other members of the cabinet it came as a complete
surprise. One thought it would cost the Republicans the fall elections.
Another preferred that emancipation should be proclaimed by military
commanders in their several military districts. Secretary Seward, while
approving the measure, suggested that it would better be postponed until
it could be given to the country after a victory, instead of issuing it,
as would be the case then, upon the greatest disasters of the war. "The
wisdom of the view of the Secretary of State struck me with very great
force," Mr. Lincoln's recital continues. "It was an aspect of the case
that, in all my thought upon the subject, I had entirely overlooked. The
result was that I put the draft of the proclamation aside, as you do your
sketch for a picture, waiting for a victory."</p>
<p>The secrets of the administration were well kept, and no hint came to the
public that the President had proposed such a measure to his cabinet. As
there was at the moment little in the way of war news to attract
attention, newspapers and private individuals turned a sharp fire of
criticism upon Mr. Lincoln. For this they seized upon the ever-useful text
of the slavery question. Some of them protested indignantly that the
President was going too fast; others clamored as loudly that he had been
altogether too slow. His decision, as we know, was unalterably taken,
although he was not yet ready to announce it. Therefore, while waiting for
a victory he had to perform the difficult task of restraining the
impatience of both sides. This he did in very positive language. To a man
in Louisiana, who complained that Union feeling was being crushed out by
the army in that State, he wrote:</p>
<p>"I am a patient man, always willing to forgive on the Christian terms of
repentance, and also to give ample time for repentance. Still, I must save
this government if possible. What I cannot do, of course I will not do;
but it may as well be understood, once for all, that I shall not surrender
this game leaving any available card unplayed." Two days later he answered
another Louisiana critic. "What would you do in my position? Would you
drop the war where it is? Or would you prosecute it in future with
elder-stalk squirts charged with rosewater? Would you deal lighter blows
rather than heavier ones? Would you give up the contest leaving any
available means unapplied? I am in no boastful mood. I shall not do more
than I can, and I shall do all I can, to save the government, which is my
sworn duty, as well as my personal inclination. I shall do nothing in
malice. What I deal with is too vast for malicious dealing."</p>
<p>The President could afford to overlook the abuse of hostile newspapers,
but he also had to meet the criticisms of over-zealous Republicans. The
prominent Republican editor, Horace Greeley, printed in his paper, the
"New York Tribune," a long "Open Letter," ostentatiously addressed to Mr.
Lincoln, full of unjust accusations, his general charge being that the
President and many army officers were neglecting their duty through a
kindly feeling for slavery. The open letter which Mr. Lincoln wrote in
reply is remarkable not alone for the skill with which he answered this
attack, but also for its great dignity.</p>
<p>"As to the policy I 'seem to be pursuing,' as you say, I have not meant to
leave anyone in doubt.... My paramount object in this struggle is to save
the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could
save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it; and if I could
save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by
freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that. What I do
about slavery and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to
save the Union, and what I forbear I forbear because I do not believe it
would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe
what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall
believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when
shown to be errors, and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall
appear to be true views. I have here stated my purpose according to my
view of official duty, and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed
personal wish that all men everywhere could be free."</p>
<p>He was waiting for victory, but victory was slow to come. Instead the
Union army suffered another defeat at the second battle of Bull Run on
August 30, 1862. After this the pressure upon him to take some action upon
slavery became stronger than ever. On September 13 he was visited by a
company of ministers from the churches of Chicago, who came expressly to
urge him to free the slaves at once. In the actual condition of things he
could of course neither safely satisfy them nor deny them, and his reply,
while perfectly courteous, had in it a tone of rebuke that showed the
state of irritation and high sensitiveness under which he was living:</p>
<p>"I am approached with the most opposite opinions and advice, and that by
religious men, who are equally certain that they represent the Divine
will.... I hope it will not be irreverent for me to say that if it is
probable that God would reveal his will to others on a point so connected
with my duty, it might be supposed he would reveal it directly to me....
What good would a proclamation of emancipation from me do, especially as
we are now situated? I do not want to issue a document that the whole
world will see must necessarily be inoperative, like the Pope's bull
against the comet." "Do not misunderstand me.... I have not decided
against a proclamation of liberty to the slaves; but hold the matter under
advisement. And I can assure you that the subject is on my mind by day and
night more than any other. Whatever shall appear to be God's will, I will
do."</p>
<p>Four days after this interview the battle of Antietam was fought, and
when, after a few days of uncertainty it was found that it could be
reasonably claimed as a Union victory, the President resolved to carry out
his long-matured purpose. Secretary Chase in his diary recorded very fully
what occurred on that ever-memorable September 22, 1862. After some
playful talk upon other matters, Mr. Lincoln, taking a graver tone, said:</p>
<p>"Gentlemen: I have, as you are aware, thought a great deal about the
relation of this war to slavery, and you all remember that several weeks
ago I read to you an order I had prepared on this subject, which, on
account of objections made by some of you, was not issued. Ever since then
my mind has been much occupied with this subject, and I have thought, all
along, that the time for acting on it might probably come. I think the
time has come now. I wish it was a better time. I wish that we were in a
better condition. The action of the army against the rebels has not been
quite what I should have best liked. But they have been driven out of
Maryland, and Pennsylvania is no longer in danger of invasion. When the
rebel army was at Frederick I determined, as soon as it should be driven
out of Maryland, to issue a proclamation of emancipation, such as I
thought most likely to be useful. I said nothing to anyone, but I made the
promise to myself, and—[hesitating a little]—to my Maker. The
rebel army is now driven out, and I am going to fulfil that promise. I
have got you together to hear what I have written down. I do not wish your
advice about the main matter, for that I have determined for myself. This
I say, without intending anything but respect for any one of you. But I
already know the views of each on this question.... I have considered them
as thoroughly and carefully as I can. What I have written is that which my
reflections have determined me to say. If there is anything in the
expressions I use, or in any minor matter which any one of you thinks had
best be changed, I shall be glad to receive the suggestions. One other
observation I will make. I know very well that many others might, in this
matter as in others, do better than I can; and if I was satisfied that the
public confidence was more fully possessed by any one of them than by me,
and knew of any constitutional way in which he could be put in my place,
he should have it. I would gladly yield it to him. But, though I believe
that I have not so much of the confidence of the people as I had some time
since, I do not know that, all things considered, any other person has
more; and however this may be, there is no way in which I can have any
other man put where I am. I am here; I must do the best I can, and bear
the responsibility of taking the course which I feel I ought to take."</p>
<p>It was in this humble spirit, and with this firm sense of duty that the
great proclamation was given to the world. One hundred days later he
completed the act by issuing the final proclamation of emancipation.</p>
<p>It has been a long-established custom in Washington for the officials of
the government to go on the first day of January to the Executive Mansion
to pay their respects to the President and his wife. The judges of the
courts go at one hour, the foreign diplomats at another, members of
Congress and senators and officers of the Army and Navy at still another.
One by one these various official bodies pass in rapid succession before
the head of the nation, wishing him success and prosperity in the New
Year. The occasion is made gay with music and flowers and bright uniforms,
and has a social as well as an official character. Even in war times such
customs were kept up, and in spite of his load of care, the President was
expected to find time and heart for the greetings and questions and
hand-shakings of this and other state ceremonies. Ordinarily it was not
hard for him. He liked to meet people, and such occasions were a positive
relief from the mental strain of his official work. It is to be
questioned, however, whether, on this day, his mind did not leave the
passing stream of people before him, to dwell on the proclamation he was
so soon to sign.</p>
<p>At about three o'clock in the afternoon, after full three hours of such
greetings and handshakings, when his own hand was so weary it could
scarcely hold a pen, the President and perhaps a dozen friends, went up to
the Executive Office, and there, without any pre-arranged ceremony, he
signed his name to the greatest state paper of the century, which banished
the curse of slavery from our land, and set almost four million people
free.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />