<h2><SPAN name="page1"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>CHAPTER I</h2>
<p style="text-align: center" class="gutsumm">The Beginnings of
Stratford-on-Avon.</p>
<p><span class="smcap">Ninety-five</span> miles from the City of
London, in the southern part of Warwickshire, and on the left, or
northern bank of the Avon, stands a famous town. Not a town
famed in ancient history, nor remarkable in warlike story, nor
great in affairs of commerce. It was never a strong place,
with menacing castle or defensive town walls with gates closed at
night. It stood upon a branch road, in a thinly-peopled
forest-district, and in every age the wars and tumults and great
social and political movements which constitute what is called
“history” have passed it by.</p>
<p>Such is, and has been from the beginning, the town of
Stratford-on-Avon, whose very name, although now charged with a
special significance as the birthplace of Shakespeare, takes
little hold upon the imagination when we omit the distinguishing
“on Avon.” For there are other Stratfords to be
found upon the map of England, as necessarily there must be when
we consider the origin of the name, which means merely the ford
where the “street”—generally a paved Roman
road—crossed a river. And as fords of this kind must
<SPAN name="page2"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>have been
very numerous along the ancient roads of this country before
bridges were built, we can only be astonished that there are not
more Stratfords than the five or six that are found in the
gazetteers.</p>
<p>The Roman road that came this way was a vicinal route from the
Watling Street where Birmingham now stands, through
Henley-in-Arden and Alcester, the Roman station of
<i>Alauna</i>. Passing over the ford of the Avon, it went
to London by way of Ettington, Sunrising Hill, and Banbury.
Other Roman roads, the Fosse Way and Ryknield Street, remodelled
on the lines of ancient British track-ways, passed east and west
of Stratford at an equal distance of six miles.</p>
<p>All the surrounding district north of the Avon was woodland,
the great Forest of Arden; and to the south of the river
stretched a more low-lying country as far as the foot of the
Cotswold Hills, much less thickly wooded. In the reign of
Queen Elizabeth, when the Forest of Arden was greatly diminished,
these districts owned two distinctive names: the forest being
called “the Wooland,” and the southward pasture-lands
“the Feldon.”</p>
<p>The travellers who came this way in early Saxon times, and
perhaps even later, came to close grips with the true inwardness
of things. They looked death often in the face as they went
the lonely road. The wild things in the forest menaced
them, floods obscured the fords, lawless men no less fierce than
the animals which roamed the tangled brakes lurked and
slew. “Now am I in Arden,” the wayfarer might
have said, anticipating Touchstone, “the more fool I; when
I was at home I was in a better place; but travellers must be
content.”</p>
<p>No town or village then existed upon the banks of Avon, and
the first mention of Stratford occurs in <span class="GutSmall">A.D.</span> 691, when a monastery situated here
is named. <SPAN name="page3"></SPAN><span class="pagenum">p.
3</span>It was an obscure house, but with extensive and valuable
lands which Bishops of Worcester hungered for and finally
obtained. The site of this monastery was scarcely that of
the existing town of Stratford, but was where the present parish
church stands, in what is known as “Old Stratford,”
which is on the extreme southerly limit of the town. It was
thus situated at some little distance from the ford, which was of
course exactly where the Clopton Bridge now crosses the
river. At that ford there would probably even then have
been a hermit, as there was later, charged with the due guidance
of travellers, and in receipt of offerings, but of him we know
nothing, and next to nothing of the monastery.</p>
<p>The Bishops of Worcester, having thus early obtained a grant
of the monastery and its lands, became lords of the manor and so
remained for centuries, wielding in their spiritual and manorial
functions a very complete authority over the town which gradually
arose here. To resist in any way the Church’s
anointed in matters spiritual or temporal would have been to kick
most foolishly against the pricks, for in his one autocratic
capacity he could blast your worldly prospects, and in the other
he could (or it was confidently believed he could) damn you to
all eternity. Thus it may well be supposed that those Right
Reverend were more feared than loved.</p>
<p>It was an agricultural and cattle-raising community that first
arose here. “Rother Street” still by its name
alludes to the olden passage of the cattle, for
“rother” is the good Anglo-Saxon word
“hroether,” for cattle. The word was known to
Shakespeare, who wrote, “The pasture lards the
rother’s sides.”</p>
<p>In 1216 the then Bishop of Worcester obtained a charter for a
fair, the first of four obtained between that date and
1271. The fairs attracted business, and about <SPAN name="page4"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>1290 the first
market was founded. The town had begun to grow, slowly, it
is true, but substantially. At this period also that Guild
arose which was originally a religious and charitable fraternity,
but eventually developed into surprising issues, founding a
grammar-school and becoming a tradesmen’s society, whence
the incorporation of the town in 1553, and the establishment of a
town council derived. Camden, writing about this time, was
able to describe it as “proper little mercat
towne.”</p>
<p>In that era which witnessed the incorporation of the town of
Stratford-on-Avon and the birth of Shakespeare the population was
some 2000. It is now about 8300; a very moderate increase
in three hundred and fifty years, and much below the average rate
for towns, by which Stratford might now have had a population of
about 16,000.</p>
<p>The incorporation of this little town in the reign of Edward
the Sixth was a great event locally. It included the
restitution to the people of the place of the buildings and the
property of the Guild of Holy Cross which had been confiscated in
1547, when also the inhabitants had been relieved from the yoke
of the Bishops of Worcester, whose manor had been taken away from
them. It is true that the manorial rights had not been
abolished and that the property and its various ancient
privileges had only been transferred to other owners, but it was
something to the good that the Church no longer possessed these
things. These were not arbitrary changes, the whim of this
monarch or that, Henry the Eighth and Edward the Sixth did only
what others in their place would and must have done. They
were certainly sovereigns with convictions of their own, but
their attitude of mind was but the <i>Zeitgeist</i>, the spirit
of the age, and they did not so much originate it as <SPAN name="page5"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>be swayed by
it. Those statesmen who have been held meanly subservient
to them were, after all, men of like convictions. They saw
the old order to be outworn and existing institutions ripe for
change. It was the age of the Renascence. Everywhere
was the new spirit, which was remodelling thought as well as
material things. It was the age, above all things, of the
new learning. These feelings led the advisers of the young
king, Edward the Sixth, to counsel the restitution to the town of
the property of the Guild dissolved only six years earlier, with
the important provision that the grammar-school was to be
re-established and maintained out of its revenues. To this
provision we distinctly owe the dramatist, William Shakespeare,
who was born at the very time when the educational advantages
thus secured to the children of the townsfolk had settled down
into smoothly working order. Education cannot produce a
Shakespeare, it cannot create genius, but it can give genius that
chance in early elementary training without which even the most
adaptive minds lose their direction.</p>
<p>The ancient buildings of the Guild, which after its long
career as a kind of lay brotherhood for what modern people would
style “social service,” had attained an unlooked-for
development as the town authority, thus provided Stratford with
its Grammar School and its first town-hall. In those
timbered rooms the scholars received their education, and for
eighty years, until 1633, when the first hall built especially
for the corporation was opened, the aldermen and councillors met
there. Among them was John Shakespeare.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />