<h2><SPAN name="page219"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>CHAPTER XXII</h2>
<p style="text-align: center" class="gutsumm">Tewkesbury.</p>
<p><span class="smcap">The</span> little town of Tewkesbury,
which numbers about 5500 inhabitants, and is one of the most
cheerful and bustling, and withal one of the most picturesque
towns in England, occupies a remarkable situation. Not
remarkable in the scenic way, for a more nearly level stretch of
very often flooded meadow lands you will not see for miles.
The site of Tewkesbury is close upon, but not actually on, the
confluence of England’s greatest river, the broad and
turbid and rather grim Severn, with the Avon. All around,
but in grey and blue distances, are hills: the Cotswolds, the
Bredon Hills, the greater Malverns, and the yet greater, but more
distant Welsh mountains; but the Severn and the Avon flow through
levels that extend considerable distances. When those two
rivers—so different in every respect; in size, in
character, and in the very colour of their waters, the Avon being
clear and bright, and the Severn a sullen, dun-coloured
waterway—unite to flood these low-lying lands the only way
to travel comfortably about the neighbourhood is by boat.
Tewkesbury is at all times particularly old-world and quaint, and
it makes on these occasions an excellent substitute for
Venice. This peculiarity, or rather this contingency, let
us say, perhaps explains the at first sight rather singular fact
that the town should have been built on the Avon, half a mile
from its junction with the Severn, and not upon the larger river
at all. It looks like a wanton disregard <SPAN name="page220"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>of the
advantages that the Severn navigation would bring to the town,
with riverside wharves and quays; but those who selected the site
probably considered the Severn to be too dangerous a river, and
so set their town back half a mile or so from its banks. A
consequence is that the external trade of Tewkesbury has always
been negligible, and to-day, although the text-books tell you of
its industry of making shirt-fronts—“particularly
stiff shirt-fronts”—and the olden one of
flour-milling, which is carried on by Avonside, the scale of
their activities has never become large.</p>
<p>The founding of Tewkesbury is said to have been the work of a
seventh-century religious Saxon named Theoc, who established a
church here; but the Roman station, <i>Etocessa</i>, was here
first, and although the place-name is supposed to derive from
Theoc, by way of “Theocsbyrig,” and the Domesday
version, “Teodechesberie,” too little is known of him
for us to take much interest in it. It is rather
interesting, however, to consider that, the site being among
water-meadows, and that the land at the confluence of Severn and
Wye is called “the Ham,” how very near Tewkesbury was
to being called “Tewkesham.”</p>
<p>The monastery that was thus seated by the two rivers became a
flourishing Benedictine house, and after its full share of the
early adversities of fire and sword, famine and flood, it
resulted in the building of the grand Abbey church, which is
still the greatest architectural glory of the town. The
re-founder of the monastery and builder of this noble and solemn
example of Norman architecture was Robert Fitz Hamon, Earl of
Gloucester, the greatest of the early Lords Marchers of Wales,
and overlord of Glamorgan, who died in 1197, fighting in foreign
wars. He had seen so many post-mortem bequests go wrong and
never reach their intended <SPAN name="page221"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>destination that he determined to
perform his re-founding of monastery and church in his own
lifetime. Both were well advanced when he died, and the
Abbey was finally consecrated in 1223; a remarkable example of
expedition for those times. I do not propose to narrate the
story of the Abbey, which has no such picturesque and fantastic
falsehoods as that of Evesham. The monastery ran its course
and was suppressed with others by Henry the Eighth, and the Abbey
church was saved by the townsfolk, who paid the King the
equivalent of £5000 for the site and fabric. And so
it remains to us to this day, more venerable by lapse of time,
minus its Lady Chapel, and with evidences of the puritan zeal of
rather more than a hundred years later than Henry’s great
reform; but it is yet the veritable building of Fitz
Hamon’s and of the generations that succeeded him.</p>
<p>You cannot see this great Abbey church to advantage from the
town. It is only from the open meadows by the Severn, and
its tributary brooks, where the little town is to be guessed at
by the evidence of a few roofs and chimneys, that its great scale
and solemn majesty are fully apparent. There the great
central Norman tower and the magnificent and unique West Front of
the same period are seen in their proper relation with the
surroundings. The long outline is very like that of St.
Albans, but 237 feet less; St. Albans Abbey being 550 feet long,
and Tewkesbury 313 feet.</p>
<p>The near view of the West Front and its great and
deeply-embayed Norman window, filled not unsuitably with the
Perpendicular tracery of three hundred years later, is no
disillusionment; it is, after the glorious West Front of
Peterborough, one of the most striking compositions of the kind
in England, and the flanking Norman tourelles and spirelets have
by contrast the most delicate appearance.</p>
<p><SPAN name="page222"></SPAN><span class="pagenum">p.
222</span>Entering the building, a massive Norman nave is seen,
singularly like that of Gloucester cathedral, and no doubt
designed by the same hand. The same massive but
disproportionately lofty columns, with dwarfed triforium and
clerestory, proclaim a similar origin. The columns are Fitz
Hamon’s work, and the clerestory above, and the
stone-vaulted roof are the additions of over two centuries later,
when the builders had grown more daring and risked a heavy stone
roof in place of the former flat wooden one. Fitz
Hamon’s transepts also remain and his choir, in its
essentials; although in the same Decorated period which witnessed
the addition of the clerestory and stone vaulting to the nave the
Norman choir was remodelled. To this period belong the
seven windows filled with splendid old stained glass,
representing all good benefactors, from Fitz Hamon onwards,
praying for heavenly grace, but clinging to their ancient
heraldic cognisances of long descent as tenaciously as though the
authority of Garter King-at-Arms and all his fellow-kings and
pursuivants extended to Heaven, and St. Peter was authorised to
admit to the best places only those who could display these
patents of gentility. It is glorious old glass, more than
much damaged and time-worn, but still splendid in design and
colour.</p>
<p>Behind the choir still runs the semi-circular ambulatory, as
on the old Norman plan, but the Lady Chapel has
disappeared. Here too are some of the ancient chapels
formerly clustered about the east end. Here are some
mouldering swords, deeply bitten into by Time’s teeth, from
the battlefield of Tewkesbury. Fitz Hamon’s chantry
is not of his period: it was rebuilt more than three hundred
years later; proof that he, and the health of his immortal part
were kept in mind, and incidentally showing us that not all
gratitude is, as cynics would declare, “a lively sense of
favours to come.”</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><SPAN name="page223"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>
<SPAN href="images/p223.jpg">
<ANTIMG alt="High Street, Tewkesbury" title= "High Street, Tewkesbury" src="images/p223.jpg" /></SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="page224"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>The
so-called “Warwick” chantry, built 1422 by Isabel le
Despencer in memory of her first husband, Richard Beauchamp, Earl
of Abergavenny, is in the last, and most elaborated style of
Gothic architecture and decoration. There are many other
monuments: including the beautiful one of Hugh le Despencer and
his wife Elizabeth. Their splendidly sculptured alabaster
figures lie there with a calm indifference contrasting with his
violent end, for he was executed in 1349, at Hereford. So
often did the great nobles of those centuries suffer from the
headsman’s axe and with such frequency did they die on the
battlefield that it became a matter of pride to declare how
rarely they ended peacefully and of old age, in their beds.
It was almost a slur upon one’s personal character to pass
in this way, when one might in the last resource join some
desperate rebellion and be handsomely slain; or at the very least
of it, be taken and properly beheaded.</p>
<p>These philosophical and historical considerations bring one,
by a natural transition, to the Battle of Tewkesbury, fought in
the meadows to the south of the town on May Day 1471. The
place where the fight raged fiercest was close by the Gloucester
road, in the field still called “Bloody Meadow,”
whose name it is understood the town council, in the interests of
the rising generation, are keenly desirous of seeing changed to
something more respectable.</p>
<p>If you have never been to Tewkesbury, the battle will be a
little unreal to you. You may know perfectly well
“all about the war, and what they killed each other
for,” and you may even be a partisan of either White Rose
or Red, and may throw up your cap for those rival <SPAN name="page225"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>Houses of
York or Lancaster; but if you have never visited the scene where
this great fight raged, it will remain shadowy. But in
Tewkesbury town, whose streets are still astonishingly rich in
old timbered houses that stood on the morning of that great clash
of arms where they do now, it is a vital thing.</p>
<p>It was the last desperate venture of the Lancastrians,
stricken to the ground on many an earlier occasion, but always
hitherto recovering, to try conclusions again, for sake of
right. At Towton, Blore Heath, Hexham, and other places
they had been slaughtered, and such victories as Wakefield, in
which the Yorkists were decimated, were of no permanent
value. Only a month before Tewkesbury they had been
signally defeated at Barnet, and their cause apparently broken;
but here again the party was re-formed. Queen Margaret,
whose devotion and sorrows are among the most pitiful records of
history, had come from France with her son, Prince Edward, the
young hope of the Red Rose. Gathering a force at Exeter,
they advanced towards the midlands, hoping to join hands with
Welsh sympathisers. But the treacherous Severn, coming down
from those Mortimer borderlands where the White Rose had ever
been strongest, proved itself on this occasion the most useful
ally of the Yorkists. It was in flood and prevented that
junction of the two Lancastrian armies whose combined force might
have given them the day and changed the course of the
nation’s story.</p>
<p>The Yorkists, commanded by Edward the Sixth, came up from the
direction of Cheltenham and found their opponents drawn up on the
“plains near Tewkesbury,” as Shakespeare has it, in
the Third Part of <i>Henry the Sixth</i>. The battle was
lost to the Lancastrians partly through their being deceived by a
pretended flight of the troops commanded by Richard, Duke of
Gloucester, <SPAN name="page226"></SPAN><span class="pagenum">p.
226</span>and in a great measure by quarrels among
themselves. Their ranks were broken and the battle was
continued and ended by fighting and heavy slaughter in the
streets of the town. Finally the defeated Lancastrians took
refuge in the Abbey church, from which they would have been
dragged had not the monks in solemn procession prevented
it. Shakespeare adopts Holinshed’s account of the
death of Prince Edward.</p>
<p>Holinshed tells us that proclamation being made that a
life-annuity of £100 should be paid to whoever brought the
Prince, dead or alive, and that, if living, his life should be
spared, Sir Richard Crofts brought him forth, “a fair and
well-proportioned young gentleman, whom, when King Edward had
well-advised, he asked him how he durst so presumptuously enter
his realm with banner displayed, whereupon the prince boldly
answered, saying, ‘To recover my father’s kingdom and
heritage from his grandfather to him, and from him after him to
me lineally descended’; at which words King Edward thrust
him from him, or (as some say) stroke him with his gauntlet, whom
directly George, Duke of Clarence; Richard, Duke of Gloucester;
Thomas Grey, and William, Lord Hastings, that stood by, cruelly
murdered; for the which cruel act the more part of the doers in
their latter days drank the like cup by the righteous justice and
due punishment of God. His body was homely interred in the
church of the monastery of the black monks of
Tewkesbury.”</p>
<p>The thanksgiving of the next day, Sunday, held by the Yorkists
in the Abbey was one of those services in which the victors in a
battle have always adopted the Almighty as a partisan. In
the same time-honoured fashion the King of Prussia, delighting in
the defeats of the French in the war of 1870–71, was in the
habit of exclaiming “Gott mitt uns,” and sending
pious <SPAN name="page227"></SPAN><span class="pagenum">p.
227</span>telegrams to the Queen, caricatured by the humorist of
the time—</p>
<blockquote><p>“Rejoice with me, my dear Augusta,<br/>
We’ve had another awful buster;<br/>
Ten thousand Frenchmen sent below—<br/>
Praise God from whom all blessings flow!”</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center">
<SPAN href="images/p227.jpg">
<ANTIMG alt="The “Bear” Inn and Bridge, Tewkesbury" title= "The “Bear” Inn and Bridge, Tewkesbury" src="images/p227.jpg" /></SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="page228"></SPAN><span class="pagenum"></span>The
thanksgiving was followed next day by a ruthless, cold-blooded
massacre of those who had been hiding in the town. On the
Tuesday the great nobles, leaders in the fight, were executed,
and the Yorkist vengeance was complete.</p>
<p>The nodding old gabled houses of Tewkesbury—many of them
nodding so amazingly that it is surprising they do not
fall—include a number of ancient inns: the
“Wheatsheaf” and the “Bell” prominent
among them. The “Bell,” hard by the Abbey and
the old flour-mills, has a bowling-green and owns associations
with Mrs. Craik’s once-popular story, <i>John Halifax,
Gentleman</i>: which, I believe, was considered eminently a tale
for the young person. “No,” said a bookseller
long since, in my own hearing, to a hesitating prospective
purchaser, “it is not a novel: it is an improving story,
and may be read on Sundays.” I do not know what is
read by the young person nowadays, either on Sundays or
week-days, but I am quite sure it is not <i>John Halifax</i>,
<i>Gentleman</i>, and I am equally sure that the young person
will in these times resent any choice made for him or her, and
read or not read what he or she chooses. But the monument
to Mrs. Craik in the Abbey is inscribed to the author of the
book, and as it is evidently a great source of interest to
visitors, <i>John Halifax</i> is perhaps not quite so out-of-date
as we suppose him to be.</p>
<p>The “Hop Pole” and the “Swan,” in
their present form, belong to a later age; the first being the
house <SPAN name="page229"></SPAN><span class="pagenum">p.
229</span>where Mr. Pickwick and his friends made merry and drank
so astonishingly. But the “Old Black Bear,” as
you leave the town for Worcester, is easily the most picturesque
of all; in itself and in its situation by the rugged old Avon
bridge. The sign was, of course, originally that of the
“Bear and Ragged Staff.”</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />