<p><SPAN name="link2HCH0013" id="link2HCH0013"></SPAN></p>
<h2> CHAPTER XIII </h2>
<p>It was in the spring of 1890 that I learned to speak. The impulse to utter
audible sounds had always been strong within me. I used to make noises,
keeping one hand on my throat while the other hand felt the movements of
my lips. I was pleased with anything that made a noise and liked to feel
the cat purr and the dog bark. I also liked to keep my hand on a singer's
throat, or on a piano when it was being played. Before I lost my sight and
hearing, I was fast learning to talk, but after my illness it was found
that I had ceased to speak because I could not hear. I used to sit in my
mother's lap all day long and keep my hands on her face because it amused
me to feel the motions of her lips; and I moved my lips, too, although I
had forgotten what talking was. My friends say that I laughed and cried
naturally, and for awhile I made many sounds and word-elements, not
because they were a means of communication, but because the need of
exercising my vocal organs was imperative. There was, however, one word
the meaning of which I still remembered, WATER. I pronounced it "wa-wa."
Even this became less and less intelligible until the time when Miss
Sullivan began to teach me. I stopped using it only after I had learned to
spell the word on my fingers.</p>
<p>I had known for a long time that the people about me used a method of
communication different from mine; and even before I knew that a deaf
child could be taught to speak, I was conscious of dissatisfaction with
the means of communication I already possessed. One who is entirely
dependent upon the manual alphabet has always a sense of restraint, of
narrowness. This feeling began to agitate me with a vexing,
forward-reaching sense of a lack that should be filled. My thoughts would
often rise and beat up like birds against the wind, and I persisted in
using my lips and voice. Friends tried to discourage this tendency,
fearing lest it would lead to disappointment. But I persisted, and an
accident soon occurred which resulted in the breaking down of this great
barrier—I heard the story of Ragnhild Kaata.</p>
<p>In 1890 Mrs. Lamson, who had been one of Laura Bridgman's teachers, and
who had just returned from a visit to Norway and Sweden, came to see me,
and told me of Ragnhild Kaata, a deaf and blind girl in Norway who had
actually been taught to speak. Mrs. Lamson had scarcely finished telling
me about this girl's success before I was on fire with eagerness. I
resolved that I, too, would learn to speak. I would not rest satisfied
until my teacher took me, for advice and assistance, to Miss Sarah Fuller,
principal of the Horace Mann School. This lovely, sweet-natured lady
offered to teach me herself, and we began the twenty-sixth of March, 1890.</p>
<p>Miss Fuller's method was this: she passed my hand lightly over her face,
and let me feel the position of her tongue and lips when she made a sound.
I was eager to imitate every motion and in an hour had learned six
elements of speech: M, P, A, S, T, I. Miss Fuller gave me eleven lessons
in all. I shall never forget the surprise and delight I felt when I
uttered my first connected sentence, "It is warm." True, they were broken
and stammering syllables; but they were human speech. My soul, conscious
of new strength, came out of bondage, and was reaching through those
broken symbols of speech to all knowledge and all faith.</p>
<p>No deaf child who has earnestly tried to speak the words which he has
never heard—to come out of the prison of silence, where no tone of
love, no song of bird, no strain of music ever pierces the stillness—can
forget the thrill of surprise, the joy of discovery which came over him
when he uttered his first word. Only such a one can appreciate the
eagerness with which I talked to my toys, to stones, trees, birds and dumb
animals, or the delight I felt when at my call Mildred ran to me or my
dogs obeyed my commands. It is an unspeakable boon to me to be able to
speak in winged words that need no interpretation. As I talked, happy
thoughts fluttered up out of my words that might perhaps have struggled in
vain to escape my fingers.</p>
<p>But it must not be supposed that I could really talk in this short time. I
had learned only the elements of speech. Miss Fuller and Miss Sullivan
could understand me, but most people would not have understood one word in
a hundred. Nor is it true that, after I had learned these elements, I did
the rest of the work myself. But for Miss Sullivan's genius, untiring
perseverance and devotion, I could not have progressed as far as I have
toward natural speech. In the first place, I laboured night and day before
I could be understood even by my most intimate friends; in the second
place, I needed Miss Sullivan's assistance constantly in my efforts to
articulate each sound clearly and to combine all sounds in a thousand
ways. Even now she calls my attention every day to mispronounced words.</p>
<p>All teachers of the deaf know what this means, and only they can at all
appreciate the peculiar difficulties with which I had to contend. In
reading my teacher's lips I was wholly dependent on my fingers: I had to
use the sense of touch in catching the vibrations of the throat, the
movements of the mouth and the expression of the face; and often this
sense was at fault. In such cases I was forced to repeat the words or
sentences, sometimes for hours, until I felt the proper ring in my own
voice. My work was practice, practice, practice. Discouragement and
weariness cast me down frequently; but the next moment the thought that I
should soon be at home and show my loved ones what I had accomplished,
spurred me on, and I eagerly looked forward to their pleasure in my
achievement.</p>
<p>"My little sister will understand me now," was a thought stronger than all
obstacles. I used to repeat ecstatically, "I am not dumb now." I could not
be despondent while I anticipated the delight of talking to my mother and
reading her responses from her lips. It astonished me to find how much
easier it is to talk than to spell with the fingers, and I discarded the
manual alphabet as a medium of communication on my part; but Miss Sullivan
and a few friends still use it in speaking to me, for it is more
convenient and more rapid than lip-reading.</p>
<p>Just here, perhaps, I had better explain our use of the manual alphabet,
which seems to puzzle people who do not know us. One who reads or talks to
me spells with his hand, using the single-hand manual alphabet generally
employed by the deaf. I place my hand on the hand of the speaker so
lightly as not to impede its movements. The position of the hand is as
easy to feel as it is to see. I do not feel each letter any more than you
see each letter separately when you read. Constant practice makes the
fingers very flexible, and some of my friends spell rapidly—about as
fast as an expert writes on a typewriter. The mere spelling is, of course,
no more a conscious act than it is in writing.</p>
<p>When I had made speech my own, I could not wait to go home. At last the
happiest of happy moments arrived. I had made my homeward journey, talking
constantly to Miss Sullivan, not for the sake of talking, but determined
to improve to the last minute. Almost before I knew it, the train stopped
at the Tuscumbia station, and there on the platform stood the whole
family. My eyes fill with tears now as I think how my mother pressed me
close to her, speechless and trembling with delight, taking in every
syllable that I spoke, while little Mildred seized my free hand and kissed
it and danced, and my father expressed his pride and affection in a big
silence. It was as if Isaiah's prophecy had been fulfilled in me, "The
mountains and the hills shall break forth before you into singing, and all
the trees of the field shall clap their hands!"</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />