<p><SPAN name="link212HCH0007" id="link212HCH0007"></SPAN></p>
<h2> Chapter XXI: Persecution Of Heresy, State Of The Church.—Part VII. </h2>
<p>The cruel and arbitrary disposition of Constantius, which did not always
require the provocations of guilt and resistance, was justly exasperated
by the tumults of his capital, and the criminal behavior of a faction,
which opposed the authority and religion of their sovereign. The ordinary
punishments of death, exile, and confiscation, were inflicted with partial
vigor; and the Greeks still revere the holy memory of two clerks, a
reader, and a sub-deacon, who were accused of the murder of Hermogenes,
and beheaded at the gates of Constantinople. By an edict of Constantius
against the Catholics which has not been judged worthy of a place in the
Theodosian code, those who refused to communicate with the Arian bishops,
and particularly with Macedonius, were deprived of the immunities of
ecclesiastics, and of the rights of Christians; they were compelled to
relinquish the possession of the churches; and were strictly prohibited
from holding their assemblies within the walls of the city. The execution
of this unjust law, in the provinces of Thrace and Asia Minor, was
committed to the zeal of Macedonius; the civil and military powers were
directed to obey his commands; and the cruelties exercised by this Semi-
Arian tyrant in the support of the Homoiousion, exceeded the commission,
and disgraced the reign, of Constantius. The sacraments of the church were
administered to the reluctant victims, who denied the vocation, and
abhorred the principles, of Macedonius. The rites of baptism were
conferred on women and children, who, for that purpose, had been torn from
the arms of their friends and parents; the mouths of the communicants were
held open by a wooden engine, while the consecrated bread was forced down
their throat; the breasts of tender virgins were either burnt with red-hot
egg-shells, or inhumanly compressed betweens harp and heavy boards. <SPAN href="#link21note-154" name="link21noteref-154" id="link21noteref-154">154</SPAN>
The Novatians of Constantinople and the adjacent country, by their firm
attachment to the Homoousian standard, deserved to be confounded with the
Catholics themselves. Macedonius was informed, that a large district of
Paphlagonia <SPAN href="#link21note-155" name="link21noteref-155" id="link21noteref-155">155</SPAN> was almost entirely inhabited by those
sectaries. He resolved either to convert or to extirpate them; and as he
distrusted, on this occasion, the efficacy of an ecclesiastical mission,
he commanded a body of four thousand legionaries to march against the
rebels, and to reduce the territory of Mantinium under his spiritual
dominion. The Novatian peasants, animated by despair and religious fury,
boldly encountered the invaders of their country; and though many of the
Paphlagonians were slain, the Roman legions were vanquished by an
irregular multitude, armed only with scythes and axes; and, except a few
who escaped by an ignominious flight, four thousand soldiers were left
dead on the field of battle. The successor of Constantius has expressed,
in a concise but lively manner, some of the theological calamities which
afflicted the empire, and more especially the East, in the reign of a
prince who was the slave of his own passions, and of those of his eunuchs:
"Many were imprisoned, and persecuted, and driven into exile. Whole troops
of those who are styled heretics, were massacred, particularly at Cyzicus,
and at Samosata. In Paphlagonia, Bithynia, Galatia, and in many other
provinces, towns and villages were laid waste, and utterly destroyed." <SPAN href="#link21note-156" name="link21noteref-156" id="link21noteref-156">156</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-154" id="link21note-154">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
154 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-154">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Socrates, l. ii. c.
27, 38. Sozomen, l. iv. c. 21. The principal assistants of Macedonius, in
the work of persecution, were the two bishops of Nicomedia and Cyzicus,
who were esteemed for their virtues, and especially for their charity. I
cannot forbear reminding the reader, that the difference between the
Homoousion and Homoiousion, is almost invisible to the nicest theological
eye.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-155" id="link21note-155">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
155 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-155">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ We are ignorant of
the precise situation of Mantinium. In speaking of these four bands of
legionaries, Socrates, Sozomen, and the author of the acts of St. Paul,
use the indefinite terms of, which Nicephorus very properly translates
thousands. Vales. ad Socrat. l. ii. c. 38.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-156" id="link21note-156">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
156 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-156">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Julian. Epist. lii.
p. 436, edit. Spanheim.]</p>
<p>While the flames of the Arian controversy consumed the vitals of the
empire, the African provinces were infested by their peculiar enemies, the
savage fanatics, who, under the name of Circumcellions, formed the
strength and scandal of the Donatist party. <SPAN href="#link21note-157"
name="link21noteref-157" id="link21noteref-157">157</SPAN> The severe
execution of the laws of Constantine had excited a spirit of discontent
and resistance, the strenuous efforts of his son Constans, to restore the
unity of the church, exasperated the sentiments of mutual hatred, which
had first occasioned the separation; and the methods of force and
corruption employed by the two Imperial commissioners, Paul and Macarius,
furnished the schismatics with a specious contrast between the maxims of
the apostles and the conduct of their pretended successors. <SPAN href="#link21note-158" name="link21noteref-158" id="link21noteref-158">158</SPAN>
The peasants who inhabited the villages of Numidia and Mauritania, were a
ferocious race, who had been imperfectly reduced under the authority of
the Roman laws; who were imperfectly converted to the Christian faith; but
who were actuated by a blind and furious enthusiasm in the cause of their
Donatist teachers. They indignantly supported the exile of their bishops,
the demolition of their churches, and the interruption of their secret
assemblies. The violence of the officers of justice, who were usually
sustained by a military guard, was sometimes repelled with equal violence;
and the blood of some popular ecclesiastics, which had been shed in the
quarrel, inflamed their rude followers with an eager desire of revenging
the death of these holy martyrs. By their own cruelty and rashness, the
ministers of persecution sometimes provoked their fate; and the guilt of
an accidental tumult precipitated the criminals into despair and
rebellion. Driven from their native villages, the Donatist peasants
assembled in formidable gangs on the edge of the Getulian desert; and
readily exchanged the habits of labor for a life of idleness and rapine,
which was consecrated by the name of religion, and faintly condemned by
the doctors of the sect. The leaders of the Circumcellions assumed the
title of captains of the saints; their principal weapon, as they were
indifferently provided with swords and spears, was a huge and weighty
club, which they termed an Israelite; and the well-known sound of "Praise
be to God," which they used as their cry of war, diffused consternation
over the unarmed provinces of Africa. At first their depredations were
colored by the plea of necessity; but they soon exceeded the measure of
subsistence, indulged without control their intemperance and avarice,
burnt the villages which they had pillaged, and reigned the licentious
tyrants of the open country. The occupations of husbandry, and the
administration of justice, were interrupted; and as the Circumcellions
pretended to restore the primitive equality of mankind, and to reform the
abuses of civil society, they opened a secure asylum for the slaves and
debtors, who flocked in crowds to their holy standard. When they were not
resisted, they usually contented themselves with plunder, but the
slightest opposition provoked them to acts of violence and murder; and
some Catholic priests, who had imprudently signalized their zeal, were
tortured by the fanatics with the most refined and wanton barbarity. The
spirit of the Circumcellions was not always exerted against their
defenceless enemies; they engaged, and sometimes defeated, the troops of
the province; and in the bloody action of Bagai, they attacked in the open
field, but with unsuccessful valor, an advanced guard of the Imperial
cavalry. The Donatists who were taken in arms, received, and they soon
deserved, the same treatment which might have been shown to the wild
beasts of the desert. The captives died, without a murmur, either by the
sword, the axe, or the fire; and the measures of retaliation were
multiplied in a rapid proportion, which aggravated the horrors of
rebellion, and excluded the hope of mutual forgiveness. In the beginning
of the present century, the example of the Circumcellions has been renewed
in the persecution, the boldness, the crimes, and the enthusiasm of the
Camisards; and if the fanatics of Languedoc surpassed those of Numidia, by
their military achievements, the Africans maintained their fierce
independence with more resolution and perseverance. <SPAN href="#link21note-159" name="link21noteref-159" id="link21noteref-159">159</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-157" id="link21note-157">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
157 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-157">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See Optatus
Milevitanus, (particularly iii. 4,) with the Donatis history, by M. Dupin,
and the original pieces at the end of his edition. The numerous
circumstances which Augustin has mentioned, of the fury of the
Circumcellions against others, and against themselves, have been
laboriously collected by Tillemont, Mem. Eccles. tom. vi. p. 147-165; and
he has often, though without design, exposed injuries which had provoked
those fanatics.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-158" id="link21note-158">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
158 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-158">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ It is amusing enough
to observe the language of opposite parties, when they speak of the same
men and things. Gratus, bishop of Carthage, begins the acclamations of an
orthodox synod, "Gratias Deo omnipotenti et Christu Jesu... qui imperavit
religiosissimo Constanti Imperatori, ut votum gereret unitatis, et
mitteret ministros sancti operis famulos Dei Paulum et Macarium."
Monument. Vet. ad Calcem Optati, p. 313. "Ecce subito," (says the Donatist
author of the Passion of Marculus), "de Constantis regif tyrannica domo..
pollutum Macarianae persecutionis murmur increpuit, et duabus bestiis ad
Africam missis, eodem scilicet Macario et Paulo, execrandum prorsus ac
dirum ecclesiae certamen indictum est; ut populus Christianus ad unionem
cum traditoribus faciendam, nudatis militum gladiis et draconum
praesentibus signis, et tubarum vocibus cogeretur." Monument. p. 304.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-159" id="link21note-159">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
159 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-159">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The Histoire des
Camisards, in 3 vols. 12mo. Villefranche, 1760 may be recommended as
accurate and impartial. It requires some attention to discover the
religion of the author.]</p>
<p>Such disorders are the natural effects of religious tyranny, but the rage
of the Donatists was inflamed by a frenzy of a very extraordinary kind;
and which, if it really prevailed among them in so extravagant a degree,
cannot surely be paralleled in any country or in any age. Many of these
fanatics were possessed with the horror of life, and the desire of
martyrdom; and they deemed it of little moment by what means, or by what
hands, they perished, if their conduct was sanctified by the intention of
devoting themselves to the glory of the true faith, and the hope of
eternal happiness. <SPAN href="#link21note-160" name="link21noteref-160" id="link21noteref-160">160</SPAN> Sometimes they rudely disturbed the
festivals, and profaned the temples of Paganism, with the design of
exciting the most zealous of the idolaters to revenge the insulted honor
of their gods. They sometimes forced their way into the courts of justice,
and compelled the affrighted judge to give orders for their immediate
execution. They frequently stopped travellers on the public highways, and
obliged them to inflict the stroke of martyrdom, by the promise of a
reward, if they consented, and by the threat of instant death, if they
refused to grant so very singular a favor. When they were disappointed of
every other resource, they announced the day on which, in the presence of
their friends and brethren, they should east themselves headlong from some
lofty rock; and many precipices were shown, which had acquired fame by the
number of religious suicides. In the actions of these desperate
enthusiasts, who were admired by one party as the martyrs of God, and
abhorred by the other as the victims of Satan, an impartial philosopher
may discover the influence and the last abuse of that inflexible spirit
which was originally derived from the character and principles of the
Jewish nation.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-160" id="link21note-160">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
160 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-160">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The Donatist suicides
alleged in their justification the example of Razias, which is related in
the 14th chapter of the second book of the Maccabees.]</p>
<p>The simple narrative of the intestine divisions, which distracted the
peace, and dishonored the triumph, of the church, will confirm the remark
of a Pagan historian, and justify the complaint of a venerable bishop. The
experience of Ammianus had convinced him, that the enmity of the
Christians towards each other, surpassed the fury of savage beasts against
man; <SPAN href="#link21note-161" name="link21noteref-161" id="link21noteref-161">161</SPAN> and Gregory Nazianzen most pathetically
laments, that the kingdom of heaven was converted, by discord, into the
image of chaos, of a nocturnal tempest, and of hell itself. <SPAN href="#link21note-162" name="link21noteref-162" id="link21noteref-162">162</SPAN>
The fierce and partial writers of the times, ascribing all virtue to
themselves, and imputing all guilt to their adversaries, have painted the
battle of the angels and daemons. Our calmer reason will reject such pure
and perfect monsters of vice or sanctity, and will impute an equal, or at
least an indiscriminate, measure of good and evil to the hostile
sectaries, who assumed and bestowed the appellations of orthodox and
heretics. They had been educated in the same religion and the same civil
society. Their hopes and fears in the present, or in a future life, were
balanced in the same proportion. On either side, the error might be
innocent, the faith sincere, the practice meritorious or corrupt. Their
passions were excited by similar objects; and they might alternately abuse
the favor of the court, or of the people. The metaphysical opinions of the
Athanasians and the Arians could not influence their moral character; and
they were alike actuated by the intolerant spirit which has been extracted
from the pure and simple maxims of the gospel.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-161" id="link21note-161">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
161 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-161">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Nullus infestas
hominibus bestias, ut sunt sibi ferales plerique Christianorum, expertus.
Ammian. xxii. 5.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-162" id="link21note-162">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
162 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-162">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Gregor, Nazianzen,
Orav. i. p. 33. See Tillemont, tom vi. p. 501, qua to edit.]</p>
<p>A modern writer, who, with a just confidence, has prefixed to his own
history the honorable epithets of political and philosophical, <SPAN href="#link21note-163" name="link21noteref-163" id="link21noteref-163">163</SPAN>
accuses the timid prudence of Montesquieu, for neglecting to enumerate,
among the causes of the decline of the empire, a law of Constantine, by
which the exercise of the Pagan worship was absolutely suppressed, and a
considerable part of his subjects was left destitute of priests, of
temples, and of any public religion. The zeal of the philosophic historian
for the rights of mankind, has induced him to acquiesce in the ambiguous
testimony of those ecclesiastics, who have too lightly ascribed to their
favorite hero the merit of a general persecution. <SPAN href="#link21note-164"
name="link21noteref-164" id="link21noteref-164">164</SPAN> Instead of
alleging this imaginary law, which would have blazed in the front of the
Imperial codes, we may safely appeal to the original epistle, which
Constantine addressed to the followers of the ancient religion; at a time
when he no longer disguised his conversion, nor dreaded the rivals of his
throne. He invites and exhorts, in the most pressing terms, the subjects
of the Roman empire to imitate the example of their master; but he
declares, that those who still refuse to open their eyes to the celestial
light, may freely enjoy their temples and their fancied gods. A report,
that the ceremonies of paganism were suppressed, is formally contradicted
by the emperor himself, who wisely assigns, as the principle of his
moderation, the invincible force of habit, of prejudice, and of
superstition. <SPAN href="#link21note-165" name="link21noteref-165" id="link21noteref-165">165</SPAN> Without violating the sanctity of his
promise, without alarming the fears of the Pagans, the artful monarch
advanced, by slow and cautious steps, to undermine the irregular and
decayed fabric of polytheism. The partial acts of severity which he
occasionally exercised, though they were secretly promoted by a Christian
zeal, were colored by the fairest pretences of justice and the public
good; and while Constantine designed to ruin the foundations, he seemed to
reform the abuses, of the ancient religion. After the example of the
wisest of his predecessors, he condemned, under the most rigorous
penalties, the occult and impious arts of divination; which excited the
vain hopes, and sometimes the criminal attempts, of those who were
discontented with their present condition. An ignominious silence was
imposed on the oracles, which had been publicly convicted of fraud and
falsehood; the effeminate priests of the Nile were abolished; and
Constantine discharged the duties of a Roman censor, when he gave orders
for the demolition of several temples of Phoenicia; in which every mode of
prostitution was devoutly practised in the face of day, and to the honor
of Venus. <SPAN href="#link21note-166" name="link21noteref-166" id="link21noteref-166">166</SPAN> The Imperial city of Constantinople was, in
some measure, raised at the expense, and was adorned with the spoils, of
the opulent temples of Greece and Asia; the sacred property was
confiscated; the statues of gods and heroes were transported, with rude
familiarity, among a people who considered them as objects, not of
adoration, but of curiosity; the gold and silver were restored to
circulation; and the magistrates, the bishops, and the eunuchs, improved
the fortunate occasion of gratifying, at once, their zeal, their avarice,
and their resentment. But these depredations were confined to a small part
of the Roman world; and the provinces had been long since accustomed to
endure the same sacrilegious rapine, from the tyranny of princes and
proconsuls, who could not be suspected of any design to subvert the
established religion. <SPAN href="#link21note-167" name="link21noteref-167" id="link21noteref-167">167</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-163" id="link21note-163">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
163 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-163">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Histoire Politique et
Philosophique des Etablissemens des Europeens dans les deux Indes, tom. i.
p. 9.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-164" id="link21note-164">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
164 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-164">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ According to
Eusebius, (in Vit. Constantin. l. ii. c. 45,) the emperor prohibited, both
in cities and in the country, the abominable acts or parts of idolatry. l
Socrates (l. i. c. 17) and Sozomen (l. ii. c. 4, 5) have represented the
conduct of Constantine with a just regard to truth and history; which has
been neglected by Theodoret (l. v. c. 21) and Orosius, (vii. 28.) Tum
deinde (says the latter) primus Constantinus justo ordine et pio vicem
vertit edicto; siquidem statuit citra ullam hominum caedem, paganorum
templa claudi.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-165" id="link21note-165">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
165 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-165">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See Eusebius in Vit.
Constantin. l. ii. c. 56, 60. In the sermon to the assembly of saints,
which the emperor pronounced when he was mature in years and piety, he
declares to the idolaters (c. xii.) that they are permitted to offer
sacrifices, and to exercise every part of their religious worship.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-166" id="link21note-166">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
166 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-166">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See Eusebius, in Vit.
Constantin. l. iii. c. 54-58, and l. iv. c. 23, 25. These acts of
authority may be compared with the suppression of the Bacchanals, and the
demolition of the temple of Isis, by the magistrates of Pagan Rome.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-167" id="link21note-167">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
167 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-167">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Eusebius (in Vit.
Constan. l. iii. c. 54-58) and Libanius (Orat. pro Templis, p. 9, 10,
edit. Gothofred) both mention the pious sacrilege of Constantine, which
they viewed in very different lights. The latter expressly declares, that
"he made use of the sacred money, but made no alteration in the legal
worship; the temples indeed were impoverished, but the sacred rites were
performed there." Lardner's Jewish and Heathen Testimonies, vol. iv. p.
140.]</p>
<p>The sons of Constantine trod in the footsteps of their father, with more
zeal, and with less discretion. The pretences of rapine and oppression
were insensibly multiplied; <SPAN href="#link21note-168"
name="link21noteref-168" id="link21noteref-168">168</SPAN> every indulgence
was shown to the illegal behavior of the Christians; every doubt was
explained to the disadvantage of Paganism; and the demolition of the
temples was celebrated as one of the auspicious events of the reign of
Constans and Constantius. <SPAN href="#link21note-169"
name="link21noteref-169" id="link21noteref-169">169</SPAN> The name of
Constantius is prefixed to a concise law, which might have superseded the
necessity of any future prohibitions. "It is our pleasure, that in all
places, and in all cities, the temples be immediately shut, and carefully
guarded, that none may have the power of offending. It is likewise our
pleasure, that all our subjects should abstain from sacrifices. If any one
should be guilty of such an act, let him feel the sword of vengeance, and
after his execution, let his property be confiscated to the public use. We
denounce the same penalties against the governors of the provinces, if
they neglect to punish the criminals." <SPAN href="#link21note-170"
name="link21noteref-170" id="link21noteref-170">170</SPAN> But there is the
strongest reason to believe, that this formidable edict was either
composed without being published, or was published without being executed.
The evidence of facts, and the monuments which are still extant of brass
and marble, continue to prove the public exercise of the Pagan worship
during the whole reign of the sons of Constantine. In the East, as well as
in the West, in cities, as well as in the country, a great number of
temples were respected, or at least were spared; and the devout multitude
still enjoyed the luxury of sacrifices, of festivals, and of processions,
by the permission, or by the connivance, of the civil government. About
four years after the supposed date of this bloody edict, Constantius
visited the temples of Rome; and the decency of his behavior is
recommended by a pagan orator as an example worthy of the imitation of
succeeding princes. "That emperor," says Symmachus, "suffered the
privileges of the vestal virgins to remain inviolate; he bestowed the
sacerdotal dignities on the nobles of Rome, granted the customary
allowance to defray the expenses of the public rites and sacrifices; and,
though he had embraced a different religion, he never attempted to deprive
the empire of the sacred worship of antiquity." <SPAN href="#link21note-171"
name="link21noteref-171" id="link21noteref-171">171</SPAN> The senate still
presumed to consecrate, by solemn decrees, the divine memory of their
sovereigns; and Constantine himself was associated, after his death, to
those gods whom he had renounced and insulted during his life. The title,
the ensigns, the prerogatives, of sovereign pontiff, which had been
instituted by Numa, and assumed by Augustus, were accepted, without
hesitation, by seven Christian emperors; who were invested with a more
absolute authority over the religion which they had deserted, than over
that which they professed. <SPAN href="#link21note-172"
name="link21noteref-172" id="link21noteref-172">172</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-168" id="link21note-168">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
168 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-168">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Ammianus (xxii. 4)
speaks of some court eunuchs who were spoliis templorum pasti. Libanius
says (Orat. pro Templ. p. 23) that the emperor often gave away a temple,
like a dog, or a horse, or a slave, or a gold cup; but the devout
philosopher takes care to observe that these sacrilegious favorites very
seldom prospered.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-169" id="link21note-169">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
169 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-169">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See Gothofred. Cod.
Theodos. tom. vi. p. 262. Liban. Orat. Parental c. x. in Fabric. Bibl.
Graec. tom. vii. p. 235.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-170" id="link21note-170">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
170 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-170">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Placuit omnibus locis
atque urbibus universis claudi protinus empla, et accessu vetitis omnibus
licentiam delinquendi perditis abnegari. Volumus etiam cunctos a
sacrificiis abstinere. Quod siquis aliquid forte hujusmodi perpetraverit,
gladio sternatur: facultates etiam perempti fisco decernimus vindicari: et
similiter adfligi rectores provinciarum si facinora vindicare neglexerint.
Cod. Theodos. l. xvi. tit. x. leg. 4. Chronology has discovered some
contradiction in the date of this extravagant law; the only one, perhaps,
by which the negligence of magistrates is punished by death and
confiscation. M. de la Bastie (Mem. de l'Academie, tom. xv. p. 98)
conjectures, with a show of reason, that this was no more than the minutes
of a law, the heads of an intended bill, which were found in Scriniis
Memoriae among the papers of Constantius, and afterwards inserted, as a
worthy model, in the Theodosian Code.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-171" id="link21note-171">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
171 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-171">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Symmach. Epistol. x.
54.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-172" id="link21note-172">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
172 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-172">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The fourth
Dissertation of M. de la Bastie, sur le Souverain Pontificat des Empereurs
Romains, (in the Mem. de l'Acad. tom. xv. p. 75- 144,) is a very learned
and judicious performance, which explains the state, and prove the
toleration, of Paganism from Constantino to Gratian. The assertion of
Zosimus, that Gratian was the first who refused the pontifical robe, is
confirmed beyond a doubt; and the murmurs of bigotry on that subject are
almost silenced.]</p>
<p>The divisions of Christianity suspended the ruin of Paganism; <SPAN href="#link21note-173" name="link21noteref-173" id="link21noteref-173">173</SPAN>
and the holy war against the infidels was less vigorously prosecuted by
princes and bishops, who were more immediately alarmed by the guilt and
danger of domestic rebellion. The extirpation of idolatry <SPAN href="#link21note-174" name="link21noteref-174" id="link21noteref-174">174</SPAN>
might have been justified by the established principles of intolerance:
but the hostile sects, which alternately reigned in the Imperial court
were mutually apprehensive of alienating, and perhaps exasperating, the
minds of a powerful, though declining faction. Every motive of authority
and fashion, of interest and reason, now militated on the side of
Christianity; but two or three generations elapsed, before their
victorious influence was universally felt. The religion which had so long
and so lately been established in the Roman empire was still revered by a
numerous people, less attached indeed to speculative opinion, than to
ancient custom. The honors of the state and army were indifferently
bestowed on all the subjects of Constantine and Constantius; and a
considerable portion of knowledge and wealth and valor was still engaged
in the service of polytheism. The superstition of the senator and of the
peasant, of the poet and the philosopher, was derived from very different
causes, but they met with equal devotion in the temples of the gods. Their
zeal was insensibly provoked by the insulting triumph of a proscribed
sect; and their hopes were revived by the well-grounded confidence, that
the presumptive heir of the empire, a young and valiant hero, who had
delivered Gaul from the arms of the Barbarians, had secretly embraced the
religion of his ancestors.</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-173" id="link21note-173">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
173 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-173">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ As I have freely
anticipated the use of pagans and paganism, I shall now trace the singular
revolutions of those celebrated words. 1. in the Doric dialect, so
familiar to the Italians, signifies a fountain; and the rural
neighborhood, which frequented the same fountain, derived the common
appellation of pagus and pagans. (Festus sub voce, and Servius ad Virgil.
Georgic. ii. 382.) 2. By an easy extension of the word, pagan and rural
became almost synonymous, (Plin. Hist. Natur. xxviii. 5;) and the meaner
rustics acquired that name, which has been corrupted into peasants in the
modern languages of Europe. 3. The amazing increase of the military order
introduced the necessity of a correlative term, (Hume's Essays, vol. i. p.
555;) and all the people who were not enlisted in the service of the
prince were branded with the contemptuous epithets of pagans. (Tacit.
Hist. iii. 24, 43, 77. Juvenal. Satir. 16. Tertullian de Pallio, c. 4.) 4.
The Christians were the soldiers of Christ; their adversaries, who refused
his sacrament, or military oath of baptism might deserve the metaphorical
name of pagans; and this popular reproach was introduced as early as the
reign of Valentinian (A. D. 365) into Imperial laws (Cod. Theodos. l. xvi.
tit. ii. leg. 18) and theological writings. 5. Christianity gradually
filled the cities of the empire: the old religion, in the time of
Prudentius (advers. Symmachum, l. i. ad fin.) and Orosius, (in Praefat.
Hist.,) retired and languished in obscure villages; and the word pagans,
with its new signification, reverted to its primitive origin. 6. Since the
worship of Jupiter and his family has expired, the vacant title of pagans
has been successively applied to all the idolaters and polytheists of the
old and new world. 7. The Latin Christians bestowed it, without scruple,
on their mortal enemies, the Mahometans; and the purest Unitarians were
branded with the unjust reproach of idolatry and paganism. See Gerard
Vossius, Etymologicon Linguae Latinae, in his works, tom. i. p. 420;
Godefroy's Commentary on the Theodosian Code, tom. vi. p. 250; and
Ducange, Mediae et Infimae Latinitat. Glossar.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="link21note-174" id="link21note-174">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
174 (<SPAN href="#link21noteref-174">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ In the pure language
of Ionia and Athens were ancient and familiar words. The former expressed
a likeness, an apparition (Homer. Odys. xi. 601,) a representation, an
image, created either by fancy or art. The latter denoted any sort of
service or slavery. The Jews of Egypt, who translated the Hebrew
Scriptures, restrained the use of these words (Exod. xx. 4, 5) to the
religious worship of an image. The peculiar idiom of the Hellenists, or
Grecian Jews, has been adopted by the sacred and ecclesiastical writers
and the reproach of idolatry has stigmatized that visible and abject mode
of superstition, which some sects of Christianity should not hastily
impute to the polytheists of Greece and Rome.]</p>
<p><br/></p>
<hr />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />