<h2><SPAN name="CHAPTER_X" id="CHAPTER_X"></SPAN>CHAPTER X</h2>
<p>In January, 1915, Carl took up his teaching again in real
earnest, commuting to Alamo every night. I would have the boys in
bed and the little supper all ready by the fire; then I would prowl
down the road with my electric torch, to meet him coming home; he
would signal in the distance with his torch, and I with mine. Then
the walk back together, sometimes ankle-deep in mud; then supper,
making the toast over the coals, and an evening absolutely to
ourselves. And never in all our lives did we ask for more joy than
that.</p>
<p>That spring we began building our very own home in Berkeley. The
months in Alamo had made us feel that we could never bear to be in
the centre of things again, nor, for that matter, could we afford a
lot in the centre of things; so we bought high up on the Berkeley
hills, where we could realize as much privacy as was possible, and
yet where our friends could reach us—if they could stand the
climb. The love of a nest we built! We were longer in that house
than anywhere else: two years almost to the day—two years of
such happiness as no other home has ever seen. There, around the
redwood table in the living-room, by the window overlooking the
Golden Gate, we had the suppers that meant much joy to us and I
hope to the friends we gathered around us. There, on the porches
overhanging the very Canyon itself we had our Sunday tea-parties.
(Each time Carl would plead, "I don't have to wear a stiff collar,
do I?" and he knew that I would answer, "You wear anything you
want," which usually meant a blue soft shirt.)</p>
<p>We had a little swimming-tank in back, for the boys.</p>
<p>And then, most wonderful of all, came the day when the June-Bug
was born, the daughter who was to be the very light of her adoring
father's eyes. (Her real name is Alice Lee.) "Mother, there never
really <i>was</i> such a baby, <i>was</i> there?" he would ask ten
times a day. She was not born up on the hill; but in ten days we
were back from the hospital and out day and night through that
glorious July, on some one of the porches overlooking the bay and
the hills. And we added our adored Nurse Balch as a friend of the
family forever.</p>
<p>I always think of Nurse Balch as the person who more than any
other, perhaps, understood to some degree just what happiness
filled our lives day in and day out. No one assumes anything before
a trained nurse—they are around too constantly for that. They
see the misery in homes, they see what joy there is. And Nurse
Balch saw, because she was around practically all the time for six
weeks, that there was nothing but joy every minute of the day in
our home. I do not know how I can make people understand, who are
used to just ordinary happiness, what sort of a life Carl and I
led. It was not just that we got along. It was an active, not a
passive state. There was never a home-coming, say at lunch-time,
that did not seem an event—when our curve of happiness
abruptly rose. Meals were joyous occasions always; perhaps too
scant attention paid to the manners of the young, but much
gurglings, and "Tell some more, daddy," and always detailed
accounts of every little happening during the last few hours of
separation.</p>
<p>Then there was ever the difficulty of good-byes, though it meant
only for a few hours, until supper. And at supper-time he would
come up the front stairs, I waiting for him at the top, perhaps
limping. That was his little joke—we had many little family
jokes. Limping meant that I was to look in every pocket until I
unearthed a bag of peanut candy. Usually he was laden with
bundles—provisions, shoes from the cobbler, a tennis-racket
restrung, and an armful of books. After greetings, always the
question, "How's my June-Bug?" and a family procession upstairs to
peer over a crib at a fat gurgler. And "Mother, there never really
<i>was</i> such a baby, <i>was</i> there?" No, nor such a
father.</p>
<p>It was that first summer back in Berkeley, the year before the
June-Bug was born, when Carl was teaching in Summer School, that we
had our definite enthusiasm over labor-psychology aroused. Will
Ogburn, who was also teaching at Summer School that year, and whose
lectures I attended, introduced us to Hart's "Psychology of
Insanity," several books by Freud, McDougall's "Social Psychology,"
etc. I remember Carl's seminar the following spring—his last
seminar at the University of California. He had started with nine
seminar students three years before; now there were thirty-three.
They were all such a superior picked lot, some seniors, mostly
graduates, that he felt there was no one he could ask to stay out.
I visited it all the term, and I am sure that nowhere else on the
campus could quite such heated and excited discussions have been
heard—Carl simply sitting at the head of the table, directing
here, leading there.</p>
<p>The general subject was Labor-Problems. The students had to read
one book a week—such books as Hart's "Psychology of
Insanity," Keller's "Societal Evolution," Holt's "Freudian Wish,"
McDougall's "Social Psychology,"—two weeks to
that,—Lippmann's "Preface to Politics," Veblen's "Instinct of
Workmanship," Wallas's "Great Society," Thorndike's "Educational
Psychology," Hoxie's "Scientific Management," Ware's "The Worker
and his Country," G.H. Parker's "Biology and Social Problems," and
so forth—and ending, as a concession to the idealists, with
Royce's "Philosophy of Loyalty."</p>
<p>One of the graduate students of the seminar wrote me: "For three
years I sat in his seminar on Labor-Problems, and had we both been
there ten years longer, each season would have found me in his
class. His influence on my intellectual life was by far the most
stimulating and helpful of all the men I have known. . . . But his
spirit and influence will live on in the lives of those who sat at
his feet and learned."</p>
<p>The seminar was too large, really, for intimate discussion, so
after a few weeks several of the boys asked Carl if they could have
a little sub-seminar. It was a very rushed time for him, but he
said that, if they would arrange all the details, he would save
them Tuesday evenings. So every Tuesday night about a dozen boys
climbed our hill to rediscuss the subject of the seminar of that
afternoon—and everything else under the heavens and beyond. I
laid out ham sandwiches, or sausages, or some edible dear to the
male heart, and coffee to be warmed, and about midnight could be
heard the sounds of banqueting from the kitchen. Three students
told me on graduation that those Tuesday nights at our house had
meant more intellectual stimulus than anything that ever came into
their lives.</p>
<p>One of these boys wrote to me after Carl's death:—</p>
<p>"When I heard that Doc had gone, one of the finest and cleanest
men I have ever had the privilege of associating with, I seemed to
have stopped thinking. It didn't seem possible to me, and I can
remember very clearly of thinking what a rotten world this is when
we have to live and lose a man like Doc. I have talked to two men
who were associated with him in somewhat the same manner as I was,
and we simply looked at one another after the first sentences, and
then I guess the thoughts of a man who had made so much of an
impression on our minds drove coherent speech away. . . . I have
had the opportunity since leaving college of experiencing something
real besides college life and I can't remember during all that
period of not having wondered how Dr. Parker would handle this or
that situation. He was simply immense to me at all times, and if
love of a man-to-man kind does exist, then I truthfully can say
that I had that love for him."</p>
<p>Of the letters received from students of those years I should
like to quote a passage here and there.</p>
<p>An aviator in France writes: "There was no man like him in my
college life. Believe me, he has been a figure in all we do over
here,—we who knew him,—and a reason for our doing, too.
His loss is so great to all of us! . . . He was so fine he will
always push us on to finding the truth about things. That was his
great spark, wasn't it?"</p>
<p>From a second lieutenant in France: "I loved Carl. He was far
more to me than just a friend—he was father, brother, and
friend all in one. He influenced, as you know, everything I have
done since I knew him—for it was his enthusiasm which has
been the force which determined the direction of my work. And the
bottom seemed to have fallen out of my whole scheme of things when
the word just came to me."</p>
<p>From one of the young officers at Camp Lewis: "When
E—— told me about Carl's illness last Wednesday, I
resolved to go and see him the coming week-end. I carried out my
resolution, only to find that I could see neither him nor you.
[This was the day before Carl's death.] It was a great
disappointment to me, so I left some flowers and went away. . . . I
simply could not leave Seattle without seeing Carl once more, so I
made up my mind to go out to the undertaker's. The friends I was
with discouraged the idea, but it was too strong within me. There
was a void within me which could only be filled by seeing my friend
once more. I went out there and stood by his side for quite a
while. I recalled the happy days spent with him on the campus. I
thought of his kindliness, his loyalty, his devotion. Carl Parker
shall always occupy a place in the recesses of my memory as a true
example of nobility. It was hard for me to leave, but I felt much
better."</p>
<p>From one of his women students: "Always from the first day when
I knew him he seemed to give me a joy of life and an inspiration to
work which no other person or thing has ever given me. And it is a
joy and an inspiration I shall always keep. I seldom come to a
stumbling-block in my work that I don't stop to wonder what Carl
Parker would do were he solving that problem."</p>
<p>Another letter I have chosen to quote from was written by a
former student now in Paris:—</p>
<p>"We could not do without him. He meant too much to us. . . . I
come now as a young friend to put myself by your side a moment and
to try to share a great sorrow which is mine almost as much as it
is yours. For I am sure that, after you, there were few indeed who
loved Carl as much as I.</p>
<p>"Oh, I am remembering a hundred things!—the first day I
found you both in the little house on Hearst Avenue—the
dinners we used to have ... the times I used to come on Sunday
morning to find you both, and the youngsters—the day just
before I graduated when mother and I had lunch at your house ...
and, finally, that day I left you, and you said, both of you,
'Don't come back without seeing some of the cities of Europe.' I'd
have missed some of the cities to have come back and found you
both.</p>
<p>"Some of him we can't keep. The quaint old gray
twinkle—the quiet, half-impudent, wholly confident poise with
which he defied all comers—that inexhaustible and
incorrigible fund of humor—those we lose. No use to
whine—we lose it; write it off, gulp, go on.</p>
<p>"But other things we keep, none the less. The stimulus and
impetus and inspiration are not lost, and shall not be. No one has
counted the youngsters he has hauled, by the scruff of the neck as
often as not, out of a slough of middle-class mediocrity, and sent
careering off into some welter or current of ideas and conjecture.
Carl didn't know where they would end, and no more do any of the
rest of us. He knew he loathed stagnation. And he stirred things
and stirred people. And the end of the stirring is far from being
yet known or realized."</p>
<p>I like, too, a story one of the Regents told me. He ran into a
student from his home town and asked how his work at the University
was going. The boy looked at him eagerly and said, "Mr.
M——, I've been born again! ["Born again"—those
were his very words.] I entered college thinking of it as a
preparation for making more money when I got out. I've come across
a man named Parker in the faculty and am taking everything he
gives. Now I know I'd be selling out my life to make money the
goal. I know now, too, that whatever money I do make can never be
at the expense of the happiness and welfare of any other human
being."</p>
<hr style="width: 65%;" />
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />