<p><SPAN name="link2H_4_0009" id="link2H_4_0009"></SPAN></p>
<br/>
<h2> GOUVERNEUR MORRIS </h2>
<h3> GOUVERNEUR MORRIS. PARIS. AUGUST 10, 1792. </h3>
<p>Justum et tenacem propositi virum<br/>
Non civium ardor prava jubentium,<br/>
Non vultus instantis tyranni<br/>
Mente quatit solida, neque Auster<br/>
Dux inquieti turbidus Hadriae,<br/>
Nec fulminantis magna manus Jovis:<br/>
Si fractus illabatur orbis,<br/>
Impavidum ferient ruinae.<br/>
—Hor., Lib. III. Carm. III.<br/></p>
<p>The 10th of August, 1792, was one of the most memorable days of the French
Revolution. It was the day on which the French monarchy received its
death-blow, and was accompanied by fighting and bloodshed which filled
Paris with terror. In the morning before daybreak the tocsin had sounded,
and not long after the mob of Paris, headed by the Marseillais, "Six
hundred men not afraid to die," who had been summoned there by Barbaroux,
were marching upon the Tuileries. The king, or rather the queen, had at
last determined to make a stand and to defend the throne. The Swiss Guards
were there at the palace, well posted to protect the inner court; and
there, too, were the National Guards, who were expected to uphold the
government and guard the king. The tide of people poured on through the
streets, gathering strength as they went the Marseillais, the armed bands,
the Sections, and a vast floating mob. The crowd drew nearer and nearer,
but the squadrons of the National Guards, who were to check the advance,
did not stir. It is not apparent, indeed, that they made any resistance,
and the king and his family at eight o'clock lost heart and deserted the
Tuileries, to take refuge with the National Convention. The multitude then
passed into the court of the Carrousel, unchecked by the National Guards,
and were face to face with the Swiss. Deserted by their king, the Swiss
knew not how to act, but still stood their ground. There was some
parleying, and at last the Marseillais fired a cannon. Then the Swiss
fired. They were disciplined troops, and their fire was effective. There
was a heavy slaughter and the mob recoiled, leaving their cannon, which
the Swiss seized. The Revolutionists, however, returned to the charge, and
the fight raged on both sides, the Swiss holding their ground firmly.</p>
<p>Suddenly, from the legislative hall, came an order from the king to the
Swiss to cease firing. It was their death warrant. Paralyzed by the order,
they knew not what to do. The mob poured in, and most of the gallant Swiss
were slaughtered where they stood. Others escaped from the Tuileries only
to meet their death in the street. The palace was sacked and the raging
mob was in possession of the city. No man's life was safe, least of all
those who were known to be friends of the king, who were nobles, or who
had any connection with the court. Some of these people whose lives were
thus in peril at the hands of the bloodstained and furious mob had been
the allies of the United States, and had fought under Washington in the
war for American independence. In their anguish and distress their
thoughts recurred to the country which they had served in its hour of
trial, three thousand miles away. They sought the legation of the United
States and turned to the American minister for protection.</p>
<p>Such an exercise of humanity at that moment was not a duty that any man
craved. In those terrible days in Paris, the representatives of foreign
governments were hardly safer than any one else. Many of the ambassadors
and ministers had already left the country, and others were even then
abandoning their posts, which it seemed impossible to hold at such a time.
But the American minister stood his ground. Gouverneur Morris was not a
man to shrink from what he knew to be his duty. He had been a leading
patriot in our revolution; he had served in the Continental Congress, and
with Robert Morris in the difficult work of the Treasury, when all our
resources seemed to be at their lowest ebb. In 1788 he had gone abroad on
private business, and had been much in Paris, where he had witnessed the
beginning of the French Revolution and had been consulted by men on both
sides. In 1790, by Washington's direction, he had gone to London and had
consulted the ministry there as to whether they would receive an American
minister. Thence he had returned to Paris, and at the beginning Of 1792
Washington appointed him minister of the United States to France.</p>
<p>As an American, Morris's sympathies had run strongly in favor of the
movement to relieve France from the despotism under which she was sinking,
and to give her a better and more liberal government. But, as the
Revolution progressed, he became outraged and disgusted by the methods
employed. He felt a profound contempt for both sides. The inability of
those who were conducting the Revolution to carry out intelligent plans or
maintain order, and the feebleness of the king and his advisers, were
alike odious to the man with American conceptions of ordered liberty. He
was especially revolted by the bloodshed and cruelty, constantly gathering
in strength, which were displayed by the revolutionists, and he had gone
to the very verge of diplomatic propriety in advising the ministers of the
king in regard to the policies to be pursued, and, as he foresaw what was
coming, in urging the king himself to leave France. All his efforts and
all his advice, like those of other intelligent men who kept their heads
during the whirl of the Revolution, were alike vain.</p>
<p>On August 10 the gathering storm broke with full force, and the populace
rose in arms to sweep away the tottering throne. Then it was that these
people, fleeing for their lives, came to the representative of the country
for which many of them had fought, and on both public and private grounds
besought the protection of the American minister. Let me tell what
happened in the words of an eye-witness, an American gentleman who was in
Paris at that time, and who published the following account of his
experiences:</p>
<p>On the ever memorable 10th of August, after viewing the destruction of the
Royal Swiss Guards and the dispersion of the Paris militia by a band of
foreign and native incendiaries, the writer thought it his duty to visit
the Minister, who had not been out of his hotel since the insurrection
began, and, as was to be expected, would be anxious to learn what was
passing without doors. He was surrounded by the old Count d'Estaing, and
about a dozen other persons of distinction, of different sexes, who had,
from their connection with the United States, been his most intimate
acquaintances at Paris, and who had taken refuge with him for protection
from the bloodhounds which, in the forms of men and women, were prowling
in the streets at the time. All was silence here, except that silence was
occasionally interrupted by the crying of the women and children. As I
retired, the Minister took me aside, and observed: "I have no doubt, sir,
but there are persons on the watch who would find fault with my conduct as
Minister in receiving and protecting these people, but I call on you to
witness the declaration which I now make, and that is that they were not
invited to my house, but came of their own accord. Whether my house will
be a protection to them or to me, God only knows, but I will not turn them
out of it, let what will happen to me," to which he added, "you see, sir,
they are all persons to whom our country is more or less indebted, and it
would be inhuman to force them into the hands of the assassins, had they
no such claim upon me."</p>
<p>Nothing can be added to this simple account, and no American can read it
or repeat the words of Mr. Morris without feeling even now, a hundred
years after the event, a glow of pride that such words were uttered at
such a time by the man who represented the United States.</p>
<p>After August 10, when matters in Paris became still worse, Mr. Morris
still stayed at his post. Let me give, in his own words, what he did and
his reasons for it:</p>
<p>The different ambassadors and ministers are all taking their flight, and
if I stay I shall be alone. I mean, however, to stay, unless circumstances
should command me away, because, in the admitted case that my letters of
credence are to the monarchy, and not to the Republic of France, it
becomes a matter of indifference whether I remain in this country or go to
England during the time which may be needful to obtain your orders, or to
produce a settlement of affairs here. Going hence, however, would look
like taking part against the late Revolution, and I am not only
unauthorized in this respect, but I am bound to suppose that if the great
majority of the nation adhere to the new form, the United States will
approve thereof; because, in the first place, we have no right to
prescribe to this country the government they shall adopt, and next,
because the basis of our own Constitution is the indefeasible right of the
people to establish it.</p>
<p>Among those who are leaving Paris is the Venetian ambassador. He was
furnished with passports from the Office of Foreign Affairs, but he was,
nevertheless, stopped at the barrier, was conducted to the Hotel de Ville,
was there questioned for hours, and his carriages examined and searched.
This violation of the rights of ambassadors could not fail, as you may
suppose, to make an impression. It has been broadly hinted to me that the
honor of my country and my own require that I should go away. But I am of
a different opinion, and rather think that those who give such hints are
somewhat influenced by fear. It is true that the position is not without
danger, but I presume that when the President did me the honor of naming
me to this embassy, it was not for my personal pleasure or safety, but to
promote the interests of my country. These, therefore, I shall continue to
pursue to the best of my judgment, and as to consequences, they are in the
hand of God.</p>
<p>He remained there until his successor arrived. When all others fled, he
was faithful, and such conduct should never be forgotten. Mr. Morris not
only risked his life, but he took a heavy responsibility, and laid himself
open to severe attack for having protected defenseless people against the
assaults of the mob. But his courageous humanity is something which should
ever be remembered, and ought always to be characteristic of the men who
represent the United States in foreign countries. When we recall the
French Revolution, it is cheering to think of that fearless figure of the
American minister, standing firm and calm in the midst of those awful
scenes, with sacked palaces, slaughtered soldiers, and a bloodstained mob
about him, regardless of danger to himself, determined to do his duty to
his country, and to those to whom his country was indebted.</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />