<h2><SPAN name="chap35.2"></SPAN> Chapter XXXV: Invasion By Attila.—Part II. </h2>
<p>When Attila declared his resolution of supporting the cause of his allies,
the Vandals and the Franks, at the same time, and almost in the spirit of
romantic chivalry, the savage monarch professed himself the lover and the
champion of the princess Honoria. The sister of Valentinian was educated
in the palace of Ravenna; and as her marriage might be productive of some
danger to the state, she was raised, by the title of Augusta, <SPAN href="#linknote-35.28" name="linknoteref-35.28" id="linknoteref-35.28">28</SPAN>
above the hopes of the most presumptuous subject. But the fair Honoria had
no sooner attained the sixteenth year of her age, than she detested the
importunate greatness which must forever exclude her from the comforts of
honorable love; in the midst of vain and unsatisfactory pomp, Honoria
sighed, yielded to the impulse of nature, and threw herself into the arms
of her chamberlain Eugenius. Her guilt and shame (such is the absurd
language of imperious man) were soon betrayed by the appearances of
pregnancy; but the disgrace of the royal family was published to the world
by the imprudence of the empress Placidia who dismissed her daughter,
after a strict and shameful confinement, to a remote exile at
Constantinople. The unhappy princess passed twelve or fourteen years in
the irksome society of the sisters of Theodosius, and their chosen
virgins; to whose crown Honoria could no longer aspire, and whose monastic
assiduity of prayer, fasting, and vigils, she reluctantly imitated. Her
impatience of long and hopeless celibacy urged her to embrace a strange
and desperate resolution. The name of Attila was familiar and formidable
at Constantinople; and his frequent embassies entertained a perpetual
intercourse between his camp and the Imperial palace. In the pursuit of
love, or rather of revenge, the daughter of Placidia sacrificed every duty
and every prejudice; and offered to deliver her person into the arms of a
Barbarian, of whose language she was ignorant, whose figure was scarcely
human, and whose religion and manners she abhorred. By the ministry of a
faithful eunuch, she transmitted to Attila a ring, the pledge of her
affection; and earnestly conjured him to claim her as a lawful spouse, to
whom he had been secretly betrothed. These indecent advances were
received, however, with coldness and disdain; and the king of the Huns
continued to multiply the number of his wives, till his love was awakened
by the more forcible passions of ambition and avarice. The invasion of
Gaul was preceded, and justified, by a formal demand of the princess
Honoria, with a just and equal share of the Imperial patrimony. His
predecessors, the ancient Tanjous, had often addressed, in the same
hostile and peremptory manner, the daughters of China; and the pretensions
of Attila were not less offensive to the majesty of Rome. A firm, but
temperate, refusal was communicated to his ambassadors. The right of
female succession, though it might derive a specious argument from the
recent examples of Placidia and Pulcheria, was strenuously denied; and the
indissoluble engagements of Honoria were opposed to the claims of her
Scythian lover. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.29" name="linknoteref-35.29" id="linknoteref-35.29">29</SPAN> On the discovery of her connection with the
king of the Huns, the guilty princess had been sent away, as an object of
horror, from Constantinople to Italy: her life was spared; but the
ceremony of her marriage was performed with some obscure and nominal
husband, before she was immured in a perpetual prison, to bewail those
crimes and misfortunes, which Honoria might have escaped, had she not been
born the daughter of an emperor. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.30"
name="linknoteref-35.30" id="linknoteref-35.30">30</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.28" id="linknote-35.28">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
28 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.28">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ A medal is still
extant, which exhibits the pleasing countenance of Honoria, with the title
of Augusta; and on the reverse, the improper legend of Salus Reipublicoe
round the monogram of Christ. See Ducange, Famil. Byzantin. p. 67, 73.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.29" id="linknote-35.29">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
29 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.29">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ See Priscus, p, 39, 40.
It might be fairly alleged, that if females could succeed to the throne,
Valentinian himself, who had married the daughter and heiress of the
younger Theodosius, would have asserted her right to the Eastern empire.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.30" id="linknote-35.30">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
30 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.30">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The adventures of
Honoria are imperfectly related by Jornandes, de Successione Regn. c. 97,
and de Reb. Get. c. 42, p. 674; and in the Chronicles of Prosper and
Marcellinus; but they cannot be made consistent, or probable, unless we
separate, by an interval of time and place, her intrigue with Eugenius,
and her invitation of Attila.]</p>
<p>A native of Gaul, and a contemporary, the learned and eloquent Sidonius,
who was afterwards bishop of Clermont, had made a promise to one of his
friends, that he would compose a regular history of the war of Attila. If
the modesty of Sidonius had not discouraged him from the prosecution of
this interesting work, <SPAN href="#linknote-35.31" name="linknoteref-35.31" id="linknoteref-35.31">31</SPAN> the historian would have related, with the
simplicity of truth, those memorable events, to which the poet, in vague
and doubtful metaphors, has concisely alluded. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.32"
name="linknoteref-35.32" id="linknoteref-35.32">32</SPAN> The kings and nations
of Germany and Scythia, from the Volga perhaps to the Danube, obeyed the
warlike summons of Attila. From the royal village, in the plains of
Hungary his standard moved towards the West; and after a march of seven or
eight hundred miles, he reached the conflux of the Rhine and the Neckar,
where he was joined by the Franks, who adhered to his ally, the elder of
the sons of Clodion. A troop of light Barbarians, who roamed in quest of
plunder, might choose the winter for the convenience of passing the river
on the ice; but the innumerable cavalry of the Huns required such plenty
of forage and provisions, as could be procured only in a milder season;
the Hercynian forest supplied materials for a bridge of boats; and the
hostile myriads were poured, with resistless violence, into the Belgic
provinces. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.33" name="linknoteref-35.33" id="linknoteref-35.33">33</SPAN> The consternation of Gaul was universal; and
the various fortunes of its cities have been adorned by tradition with
martyrdoms and miracles. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.34" name="linknoteref-35.34" id="linknoteref-35.34">34</SPAN> Troyes was saved by the merits of St. Lupus;
St. Servatius was removed from the world, that he might not behold the
ruin of Tongres; and the prayers of St. Genevieve diverted the march of
Attila from the neighborhood of Paris. But as the greatest part of the
Gallic cities were alike destitute of saints and soldiers, they were
besieged and stormed by the Huns; who practised, in the example of Metz,
<SPAN href="#linknote-35.35" name="linknoteref-35.35" id="linknoteref-35.35">35</SPAN>
their customary maxims of war. They involved, in a promiscuous massacre,
the priests who served at the altar, and the infants, who, in the hour of
danger, had been providently baptized by the bishop; the flourishing city
was delivered to the flames, and a solitary chapel of St. Stephen marked
the place where it formerly stood. From the Rhine and the Moselle, Attila
advanced into the heart of Gaul; crossed the Seine at Auxerre; and, after
a long and laborious march, fixed his camp under the walls of Orleans. He
was desirous of securing his conquests by the possession of an
advantageous post, which commanded the passage of the Loire; and he
depended on the secret invitation of Sangiban, king of the Alani, who had
promised to betray the city, and to revolt from the service of the empire.
But this treacherous conspiracy was detected and disappointed: Orleans had
been strengthened with recent fortifications; and the assaults of the Huns
were vigorously repelled by the faithful valor of the soldiers, or
citizens, who defended the place. The pastoral diligence of Anianus, a
bishop of primitive sanctity and consummate prudence, exhausted every art
of religious policy to support their courage, till the arrival of the
expected succors. After an obstinate siege, the walls were shaken by the
battering rams; the Huns had already occupied the suburbs; and the people,
who were incapable of bearing arms, lay prostrate in prayer. Anianus, who
anxiously counted the days and hours, despatched a trusty messenger to
observe, from the rampart, the face of the distant country. He returned
twice, without any intelligence that could inspire hope or comfort; but,
in his third report, he mentioned a small cloud, which he had faintly
descried at the extremity of the horizon. “It is the aid of God!”
exclaimed the bishop, in a tone of pious confidence; and the whole
multitude repeated after him, “It is the aid of God.” The remote object,
on which every eye was fixed, became each moment larger, and more
distinct; the Roman and Gothic banners were gradually perceived; and a
favorable wind blowing aside the dust, discovered, in deep array, the
impatient squadrons of Ætius and Theodoric, who pressed forwards to the
relief of Orleans.</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.31" id="linknote-35.31">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
31 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.31">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Exegeras mihi, ut
promitterem tibi, Attilæ bellum stylo me posteris intimaturum....
coeperam scribere, sed operis arrepti fasce perspecto, taeduit inchoasse.
Sidon. Apoll. l. viii. epist. 15, p. 235]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.32" id="linknote-35.32">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
32 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.32">return</SPAN>)<br/> [</p>
<p>Subito cum rupta tumultu<br/>
Barbaries totas in te transfuderat Arctos,<br/>
<br/>
Gallia. Pugnacem Rugum comitante Gelono,<br/>
Gepida trux sequitur; Scyrum Burgundio cogit:<br/>
<br/>
Chunus, Bellonotus, Neurus, Basterna, Toringus,<br/>
<br/>
Bructerus, ulvosa vel quem Nicer abluit unda<br/></p>
<p class="foot">
Prorumpit Francus. Cecidit cito secta bipenni Hercynia in lintres, et
Rhenum texuit alno. Et jam terrificis diffuderat Attila turmis In campos
se, Belga, tuos. Panegyr. Avit.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.33" id="linknote-35.33">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
33 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.33">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The most authentic and
circumstantial account of this war is contained in Jornandes, (de Reb.
Geticis, c. 36-41, p. 662-672,) who has sometimes abridged, and sometimes
transcribed, the larger history of Cassiodorus. Jornandes, a quotation
which it would be superfluous to repeat, may be corrected and illustrated
by Gregory of Tours, l. ii. c. 5, 6, 7, and the Chronicles of Idatius,
Isidore, and the two Prospers. All the ancient testimonies are collected
and inserted in the Historians of France; but the reader should be
cautioned against a supposed extract from the Chronicle of Idatius, (among
the fragments of Fredegarius, tom. ii. p. 462,) which often contradicts
the genuine text of the Gallician bishop.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.34" id="linknote-35.34">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
34 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.34">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The ancient legendaries
deserve some regard, as they are obliged to connect their fables with the
real history of their own times. See the lives of St. Lupus, St. Anianus,
the bishops of Metz, Ste. Genevieve, &c., in the Historians of France,
tom. i. p. 644, 645, 649, tom. iii. p. 369.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.35" id="linknote-35.35">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
35 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.35">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The scepticism of the
count de Buat (Hist. des Peuples, tom. vii. p. 539, 540) cannot be
reconciled with any principles of reason or criticism. Is not Gregory of
Tours precise and positive in his account of the destruction of Metz? At
the distance of no more than a hundred years, could he be ignorant, could
the people be ignorant of the fate of a city, the actual residence of his
sovereigns, the kings of Austrasia? The learned count, who seems to have
undertaken the apology of Attila and the Barbarians, appeals to the false
Idatius, parcens Germaniae et Galliae, and forgets that the true Idatius
had explicitly affirmed, plurimae civitates effractoe, among which he
enumerates Metz.]</p>
<p>The facility with which Attila had penetrated into the heart of Gaul, may
be ascribed to his insidious policy, as well as to the terror of his arms.
His public declarations were skilfully mitigated by his private
assurances; he alternately soothed and threatened the Romans and the
Goths; and the courts of Ravenna and Thoulouse, mutually suspicious of
each other’s intentions, beheld, with supine indifference, the approach of
their common enemy. Ætius was the sole guardian of the public safety; but
his wisest measures were embarrassed by a faction, which, since the death
of Placidia, infested the Imperial palace: the youth of Italy trembled at
the sound of the trumpet; and the Barbarians, who, from fear or affection,
were inclined to the cause of Attila, awaited with doubtful and venal
faith, the event of the war. The patrician passed the Alps at the head of
some troops, whose strength and numbers scarcely deserved the name of an
army. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.36" name="linknoteref-35.36" id="linknoteref-35.36">36</SPAN> But on his arrival at Arles, or Lyons, he was
confounded by the intelligence, that the Visigoths, refusing to embrace
the defence of Gaul, had determined to expect, within their own
territories, the formidable invader, whom they professed to despise. The
senator Avitus, who, after the honorable exercise of the Prætorian
praefecture, had retired to his estate in Auvergne, was persuaded to
accept the important embassy, which he executed with ability and success.
He represented to Theodoric, that an ambitious conqueror, who aspired to
the dominion of the earth, could be resisted only by the firm and
unanimous alliance of the powers whom he labored to oppress. The lively
eloquence of Avitus inflamed the Gothic warriors, by the description of
the injuries which their ancestors had suffered from the Huns; whose
implacable fury still pursued them from the Danube to the foot of the
Pyrenees. He strenuously urged, that it was the duty of every Christian to
save, from sacrilegious violation, the churches of God, and the relics of
the saints: that it was the interest of every Barbarian, who had acquired
a settlement in Gaul, to defend the fields and vineyards, which were
cultivated for his use, against the desolation of the Scythian shepherds.
Theodoric yielded to the evidence of truth; adopted the measure at once
the most prudent and the most honorable; and declared, that, as the
faithful ally of Ætius and the Romans, he was ready to expose his life
and kingdom for the common safety of Gaul. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.37"
name="linknoteref-35.37" id="linknoteref-35.37">37</SPAN> The Visigoths, who,
at that time, were in the mature vigor of their fame and power, obeyed
with alacrity the signal of war; prepared their arms and horses, and
assembled under the standard of their aged king, who was resolved, with
his two eldest sons, Torismond and Theodoric, to command in person his
numerous and valiant people. The example of the Goths determined several
tribes or nations, that seemed to fluctuate between the Huns and the
Romans. The indefatigable diligence of the patrician gradually collected
the troops of Gaul and Germany, who had formerly acknowledged themselves
the subjects, or soldiers, of the republic, but who now claimed the
rewards of voluntary service, and the rank of independent allies; the
Læti, the Armoricans, the Breones, the Saxons, the Burgundians, the
Sarmatians, or Alani, the Ripuarians, and the Franks who followed Meroveus
as their lawful prince. Such was the various army, which, under the
conduct of Ætius and Theodoric, advanced, by rapid marches to relieve
Orleans, and to give battle to the innumerable host of Attila. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.38" name="linknoteref-35.38" id="linknoteref-35.38">38</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.36" id="linknote-35.36">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
36 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.36">return</SPAN>)<br/> [</p>
<p>Vix liquerat Alpes<br/>
Ætius, tenue, et rarum sine milite ducens<br/>
Robur, in auxiliis Geticum male credulus agmen<br/>
Incassum propriis praesumens adfore castris.<br/>
—-Panegyr. Avit. 328, &c.]<br/></p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.37" id="linknote-35.37">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
37 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.37">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The policy of Attila,
of Ætius, and of the Visigoths, is imperfectly described in the Panegyric
of Avitus, and the thirty-sixth chapter of Jornandes. The poet and the
historian were both biased by personal or national prejudices. The former
exalts the merit and importance of Avitus; orbis, Avite, salus, &c.!
The latter is anxious to show the Goths in the most favorable light. Yet
their agreement when they are fairly interpreted, is a proof of their
veracity.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.38" id="linknote-35.38">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
38 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.38">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The review of the army
of Ætius is made by Jornandes, c. 36, p. 664, edit. Grot. tom. ii. p. 23,
of the Historians of France, with the notes of the Benedictine editor. The
Loeti were a promiscuous race of Barbarians, born or naturalized in Gaul;
and the Riparii, or Ripuarii, derived their name from their post on the
three rivers, the Rhine, the Meuse, and the Moselle; the Armoricans
possessed the independent cities between the Seine and the Loire. A colony
of Saxons had been planted in the diocese of Bayeux; the Burgundians were
settled in Savoy; and the Breones were a warlike tribe of Rhaetians, to
the east of the Lake of Constance.]</p>
<p>On their approach the king of the Huns immediately raised the siege, and
sounded a retreat to recall the foremost of his troops from the pillage of
a city which they had already entered. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.39"
name="linknoteref-35.39" id="linknoteref-35.39">39</SPAN> The valor of Attila
was always guided by his prudence; and as he foresaw the fatal
consequences of a defeat in the heart of Gaul, he repassed the Seine, and
expected the enemy in the plains of Chalons, whose smooth and level
surface was adapted to the operations of his Scythian cavalry. But in this
tumultuary retreat, the vanguard of the Romans and their allies
continually pressed, and sometimes engaged, the troops whom Attila had
posted in the rear; the hostile columns, in the darkness of the night and
the perplexity of the roads, might encounter each other without design;
and the bloody conflict of the Franks and Gepidae, in which fifteen
thousand <SPAN href="#linknote-35.40" name="linknoteref-35.40" id="linknoteref-35.40">40</SPAN> Barbarians were slain, was a prelude to a
more general and decisive action. The Catalaunian fields <SPAN href="#linknote-35.41" name="linknoteref-35.41" id="linknoteref-35.41">41</SPAN>
spread themselves round Chalons, and extend, according to the vague
measurement of Jornandes, to the length of one hundred and fifty, and the
breadth of one hundred miles, over the whole province, which is entitled
to the appellation of a champaign country. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.42"
name="linknoteref-35.42" id="linknoteref-35.42">42</SPAN> This spacious plain
was distinguished, however, by some inequalities of ground; and the
importance of a height, which commanded the camp of Attila, was understood
and disputed by the two generals. The young and valiant Torismond first
occupied the summit; the Goths rushed with irresistible weight on the
Huns, who labored to ascend from the opposite side: and the possession of
this advantageous post inspired both the troops and their leaders with a
fair assurance of victory. The anxiety of Attila prompted him to consult
his priests and haruspices. It was reported, that, after scrutinizing the
entrails of victims, and scraping their bones, they revealed, in
mysterious language, his own defeat, with the death of his principal
adversary; and that the Barbarians, by accepting the equivalent, expressed
his involuntary esteem for the superior merit of Ætius. But the unusual
despondency, which seemed to prevail among the Huns, engaged Attila to use
the expedient, so familiar to the generals of antiquity, of animating his
troops by a military oration; and his language was that of a king, who had
often fought and conquered at their head. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.43"
name="linknoteref-35.43" id="linknoteref-35.43">43</SPAN> He pressed them to
consider their past glory, their actual danger, and their future hopes.
The same fortune, which opened the deserts and morasses of Scythia to
their unarmed valor, which had laid so many warlike nations prostrate at
their feet, had reserved the joys of this memorable field for the
consummation of their victories. The cautious steps of their enemies,
their strict alliance, and their advantageous posts, he artfully
represented as the effects, not of prudence, but of fear. The Visigoths
alone were the strength and nerves of the opposite army; and the Huns
might securely trample on the degenerate Romans, whose close and compact
order betrayed their apprehensions, and who were equally incapable of
supporting the dangers or the fatigues of a day of battle. The doctrine of
predestination, so favorable to martial virtue, was carefully inculcated by
the king of the Huns; who assured his subjects, that the warriors,
protected by Heaven, were safe and invulnerable amidst the darts of the
enemy; but that the unerring Fates would strike their victims in the bosom
of inglorious peace. “I myself,” continued Attila, “will throw the first
javelin, and the wretch who refuses to imitate the example of his
sovereign, is devoted to inevitable death.” The spirit of the Barbarians
was rekindled by the presence, the voice, and the example of their
intrepid leader; and Attila, yielding to their impatience, immediately
formed his order of battle. At the head of his brave and faithful Huns, he
occupied in person the centre of the line. The nations subject to his
empire, the Rugians, the Heruli, the Thuringians, the Franks, the
Burgundians, were extended on either hand, over the ample space of the
Catalaunian fields; the right wing was commanded by Ardaric, king of the
Gepidae; and the three valiant brothers, who reigned over the Ostrogoths,
were posted on the left to oppose the kindred tribes of the Visigoths. The
disposition of the allies was regulated by a different principle.
Sangiban, the faithless king of the Alani, was placed in the centre, where
his motions might be strictly watched, and that the treachery might be
instantly punished. Ætius assumed the command of the left, and Theodoric
of the right wing; while Torismond still continued to occupy the heights
which appear to have stretched on the flank, and perhaps the rear, of the
Scythian army. The nations from the Volga to the Atlantic were assembled
on the plain of Chalons; but many of these nations had been divided by
faction, or conquest, or emigration; and the appearance of similar arms
and ensigns, which threatened each other, presented the image of a civil
war.</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.39" id="linknote-35.39">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
39 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.39">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Aurelianensis urbis
obsidio, oppugnatio, irruptio, nec direptio, l. v. Sidon. Apollin. l.
viii. Epist. 15, p. 246. The preservation of Orleans might easily be
turned into a miracle, obtained and foretold by the holy bishop.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.40" id="linknote-35.40">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
40 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.40">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The common editions
read xcm but there is some authority of manuscripts (and almost any
authority is sufficient) for the more reasonable number of xvm.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.41" id="linknote-35.41">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
41 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.41">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Chalons, or
Duro-Catalaunum, afterwards Catalauni, had formerly made a part of the
territory of Rheims from whence it is distant only twenty-seven miles. See
Vales, Notit. Gall. p. 136. D’Anville, Notice de l’Ancienne Gaule, p. 212,
279.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.42" id="linknote-35.42">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
42 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.42">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The name of Campania,
or Champagne, is frequently mentioned by Gregory of Tours; and that great
province, of which Rheims was the capital, obeyed the command of a duke.
Vales. Notit. p. 120-123.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.43" id="linknote-35.43">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
43 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.43">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ I am sensible that
these military orations are usually composed by the historian; yet the old
Ostrogoths, who had served under Attila, might repeat his discourse to
Cassiodorus; the ideas, and even the expressions, have an original
Scythian cast; and I doubt, whether an Italian of the sixth century would
have thought of the hujus certaminis gaudia.]</p>
<p>The discipline and tactics of the Greeks and Romans form an interesting
part of their national manners. The attentive study of the military
operations of Xenophon, or Caesar, or Frederic, when they are described by
the same genius which conceived and executed them, may tend to improve (if
such improvement can be wished) the art of destroying the human species.
But the battle of Chalons can only excite our curiosity by the magnitude
of the object; since it was decided by the blind impetuosity of
Barbarians, and has been related by partial writers, whose civil or
ecclesiastical profession secluded them from the knowledge of military
affairs. Cassiolorus, however, had familiarly conversed with many Gothic
warriors, who served in that memorable engagement; “a conflict,” as they
informed him, “fierce, various, obstinate, and bloody; such as could not
be paralleled either in the present or in past ages.” The number of the
slain amounted to one hundred and sixty-two thousand, or, according to
another account, three hundred thousand persons; <SPAN href="#linknote-35.44"
name="linknoteref-35.44" id="linknoteref-35.44">44</SPAN> and these incredible
exaggerations suppose a real and effective loss sufficient to justify the
historian’s remark, that whole generations may be swept away by the
madness of kings, in the space of a single hour. After the mutual and
repeated discharge of missile weapons, in which the archers of Scythia
might signalize their superior dexterity, the cavalry and infantry of the
two armies were furiously mingled in closer combat. The Huns, who fought
under the eyes of their king pierced through the feeble and doubtful
centre of the allies, separated their wings from each other, and wheeling,
with a rapid effort, to the left, directed their whole force against the
Visigoths. As Theodoric rode along the ranks, to animate his troops, he
received a mortal stroke from the javelin of Andages, a noble Ostrogoth,
and immediately fell from his horse. The wounded king was oppressed in the
general disorder, and trampled under the feet of his own cavalry; and this
important death served to explain the ambiguous prophecy of the
haruspices. Attila already exulted in the confidence of victory, when the
valiant Torismond descended from the hills, and verified the remainder of
the prediction. The Visigoths, who had been thrown into confusion by the
flight or defection of the Alani, gradually restored their order of
battle; and the Huns were undoubtedly vanquished, since Attila was
compelled to retreat. He had exposed his person with the rashness of a
private soldier; but the intrepid troops of the centre had pushed forwards
beyond the rest of the line; their attack was faintly supported; their
flanks were unguarded; and the conquerors of Scythia and Germany were
saved by the approach of the night from a total defeat. They retired
within the circle of wagons that fortified their camp; and the dismounted
squadrons prepared themselves for a defence, to which neither their arms,
nor their temper, were adapted. The event was doubtful: but Attila had
secured a last and honorable resource. The saddles and rich furniture of
the cavalry were collected, by his order, into a funeral pile; and the
magnanimous Barbarian had resolved, if his intrenchments should be forced,
to rush headlong into the flames, and to deprive his enemies of the glory
which they might have acquired, by the death or captivity of Attila. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.45" name="linknoteref-35.45" id="linknoteref-35.45">45</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.44" id="linknote-35.44">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
44 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.44">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The expressions of
Jornandes, or rather of Cassiodorus, are extremely strong. Bellum atrox,
multiplex, immane, pertinax, cui simile nulla usquam narrat antiquitas:
ubi talia gesta referuntur, ut nihil esset quod in vita sua conspicere
potuisset egregius, qui hujus miraculi privaretur aspectu. Dubos (Hist.
Critique, tom. i. p. 392, 393) attempts to reconcile the 162,000 of
Jornandes with the 300,000 of Idatius and Isidore, by supposing that the
larger number included the total destruction of the war, the effects of
disease, the slaughter of the unarmed people, &c.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.45" id="linknote-35.45">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
45 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.45">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ The count de Buat,
(Hist. des Peuples, &c., tom. vii. p. 554-573,) still depending on the
false, and again rejecting the true, Idatius, has divided the defeat of
Attila into two great battles; the former near Orleans, the latter in
Champagne: in the one, Theodoric was slain in the other, he was revenged.]</p>
<p>But his enemies had passed the night in equal disorder and anxiety. The
inconsiderate courage of Torismond was tempted to urge the pursuit, till
he unexpectedly found himself, with a few followers, in the midst of the
Scythian wagons. In the confusion of a nocturnal combat, he was thrown
from his horse; and the Gothic prince must have perished like his father,
if his youthful strength, and the intrepid zeal of his companions, had not
rescued him from this dangerous situation. In the same manner, but on the
left of the line, Ætius himself, separated from his allies, ignorant of
their victory, and anxious for their fate, encountered and escaped the
hostile troops that were scattered over the plains of Chalons; and at
length reached the camp of the Goths, which he could only fortify with a
slight rampart of shields, till the dawn of day. The Imperial general was
soon satisfied of the defeat of Attila, who still remained inactive within
his intrenchments; and when he contemplated the bloody scene, he observed,
with secret satisfaction, that the loss had principally fallen on the
Barbarians. The body of Theodoric, pierced with honorable wounds, was
discovered under a heap of the slain: his subjects bewailed the death of
their king and father; but their tears were mingled with songs and
acclamations, and his funeral rites were performed in the face of a
vanquished enemy. The Goths, clashing their arms, elevated on a buckler
his eldest son Torismond, to whom they justly ascribed the glory of their
success; and the new king accepted the obligation of revenge as a sacred
portion of his paternal inheritance. Yet the Goths themselves were
astonished by the fierce and undaunted aspect of their formidable
antagonist; and their historian has compared Attila to a lion encompassed
in his den, and threatening his hunters with redoubled fury. The kings and
nations who might have deserted his standard in the hour of distress, were
made sensible that the displeasure of their monarch was the most imminent
and inevitable danger. All his instruments of martial music incessantly
sounded a loud and animating strain of defiance; and the foremost troops
who advanced to the assault were checked or destroyed by showers of arrows
from every side of the intrenchments. It was determined, in a general
council of war, to besiege the king of the Huns in his camp, to intercept
his provisions, and to reduce him to the alternative of a disgraceful
treaty or an unequal combat. But the impatience of the Barbarians soon
disdained these cautious and dilatory measures; and the mature policy of
Ætius was apprehensive that, after the extirpation of the Huns, the
republic would be oppressed by the pride and power of the Gothic nation.
The patrician exerted the superior ascendant of authority and reason to
calm the passions, which the son of Theodoric considered as a duty;
represented, with seeming affection and real truth, the dangers of absence
and delay and persuaded Torismond to disappoint, by his speedy return, the
ambitious designs of his brothers, who might occupy the throne and
treasures of Thoulouse. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.46" name="linknoteref-35.46" id="linknoteref-35.46">46</SPAN> After the departure of the Goths, and the
separation of the allied army, Attila was surprised at the vast silence
that reigned over the plains of Chalons: the suspicion of some hostile
stratagem detained him several days within the circle of his wagons, and
his retreat beyond the Rhine confessed the last victory which was achieved
in the name of the Western empire. Meroveus and his Franks, observing a
prudent distance, and magnifying the opinion of their strength by the
numerous fires which they kindled every night, continued to follow the
rear of the Huns till they reached the confines of Thuringia. The
Thuringians served in the army of Attila: they traversed, both in their
march and in their return, the territories of the Franks; and it was
perhaps in this war that they exercised the cruelties which, about
fourscore years afterwards, were revenged by the son of Clovis. They
massacred their hostages, as well as their captives: two hundred young
maidens were tortured with exquisite and unrelenting rage; their bodies
were torn asunder by wild horses, or their bones were crushed under the
weight of rolling wagons; and their unburied limbs were abandoned on the
public roads, as a prey to dogs and vultures. Such were those savage
ancestors, whose imaginary virtues have sometimes excited the praise and
envy of civilized ages. <SPAN href="#linknote-35.47" name="linknoteref-35.47" id="linknoteref-35.47">47</SPAN></p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.46" id="linknote-35.46">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
46 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.46">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ Jornandes de Rebus
Geticis, c. 41, p. 671. The policy of Ætius, and the behavior of
Torismond, are extremely natural; and the patrician, according to Gregory
of Tours, (l. ii. c. 7, p. 163,) dismissed the prince of the Franks, by
suggesting to him a similar apprehension. The false Idatius ridiculously
pretends, that Ætius paid a clandestine nocturnal visit to the kings of
the Huns and of the Visigoths; from each of whom he obtained a bribe of
ten thousand pieces of gold, as the price of an undisturbed retreat.]</p>
<p><SPAN name="linknote-35.47" id="linknote-35.47">
<!-- Note --></SPAN></p>
<p class="foot">
47 (<SPAN href="#linknoteref-35.47">return</SPAN>)<br/> [ These cruelties, which
are passionately deplored by Theodoric, the son of Clovis, (Gregory of
Tours, l. iii. c. 10, p. 190,) suit the time and circumstances of the
invasion of Attila. His residence in Thuringia was long attested by
popular tradition; and he is supposed to have assembled a couroultai, or
diet, in the territory of Eisenach. See Mascou, ix. 30, who settles with
nice accuracy the extent of ancient Thuringia, and derives its name from
the Gothic tribe of the Therungi]</p>
<div style="break-after:column;"></div><br />